The Heritage At Lowman Rehab And Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 246 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 142 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 129.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain resident safety from harm for 1 of 1 resident. Specifically, while providing incontinent care to Resident (R)1 on 04/01/24, staff walked away from R1, resulting in R1 falling to the floor and suffering a hematoma of the scalp, skin tear and hematoma over the right elbow/forearm, and acute closed fracture of the tibia and fibula. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Falls with a revision date of 04/04/22 revealed, the facility will identify each patient/resident who is at risk for falls and develop and implement a plan of care. Qualified staff will complete a Fall Risk Evaluation to determine if the patient/resident is a fall risk. Fall risk evaluation assists in identifying the appropriate preventative interventions that will be recorded in the resident's medical record/care plan. Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain safe temperatures in 4 of 4 refrigerators in the nourishment rooms on the units. This failure has the potential to cause harm by increasing the risk of foodborne illnesses.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Refrigerators and Freezers with a revised date of December 2022 documented: This facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation, and will observe food expiration guidelines. 1. Acceptable temperature ranges are 35 degrees F to 40 degrees F for refrigerators and less than 0 degrees F for freezers. 2. Monthly tracking sheets for all refrigerators and freezers will be posted to record temperatures. 3. Actions necessary to correct the temperatures will be recorded on the tracking sheet. Review of the December 2025 temperature log for the refrigerator in the Demascus unit nourishment room revealed six of six recorded temperatures were above…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure outdated/expired medications were removed from the medication carts and not stored with other medications in use for residents in 3 of 8 medication carts.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications states: The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner . 3. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner . 8. UNOPENED INSULIN VIALS/PENS SHOULD REMAIN REFRIGERATED UNTIL USE; once in use. an expiration date must be placed on the vials/pens.During an observation on 12/09/25 at 3:30 PM of Medication Cart A on the [NAME] wing revealed the following: Insulin Aspart Injection 100 units/ml (U-100) vial, manufactured by Novo Nordisk with lot #RZFWGOO, open date of 11/04/25, expired on 12/02/25. Promethegan 25 mg suppository, ten count, lot #L5040531 in the top drawer of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)4 was offered showers and/or bed baths daily according to her preferences for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Shower and Bathing, states as the policy statement, The facility will provide residents with assistance for bathing and showering in accordance with their individual care plan, ensuring that personal hygiene needs are met, preferences are honored, and resident rights and safety are maintained. Review of R4's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted R4 on 10/09/19 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pulmonary edema, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, lack of coordination, central corneal ulcer and generalized muscle weakness. Review of R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/04/25 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R4's cognitive ability for decision making was intact.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, the manufacturer's recommendations, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5%, for 2 of 25 opportunities for error. The medication error rate was 8%. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Insulin Pens revealed the Policy Statement reads, Facility staff will follow proper infection control storage, administration, and documentation practices to ensure safe insulin delivery and compliance with regulatory requirements. Under section 3, Prime the Pen documented: 1. Dial 2 units on the dose selector. 2. Hold the pen with the needle pointing upward. 3. Tap the pen gently to move air bubbles to the top. 4. Press the injection button until insulin appears at the tip. If insulin does not appear, repeat priming until a drop is seen. If no insulin appears after 3-4 attempts, discard the pen and notify the nurse/pharmacy.Review of the manufacturer's recommendations for administering insulin using an insulin pen documented: How to Use . 7. Wipe the tip of the pen where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to identify and communicate a change in the breakdown of skin in the perineal area for Resident (R)2 for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for changes in skin condition.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Change in Resident's Condition or Status, with a revision date of 02/2021, revealed, The facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(an):.d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. A 'significant change' of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: a. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions (is not self-limiting).Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure trigger behaviors were identified for the use of an antipsychotic medication for one resident (Resident (R) 40) and failed to ensure psychotropic medications had an end date for three residents (R71, R10, R57). This failure placed the residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: 1. Review of the Face Sheet located in the Admission tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a neurological disease) and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with and assessment reference date (ARD) of 06/26/24 revealed R40 had a Brief Interview for Mental Stats (BIMS) score of zero out of 15 which indicated he was severely cognitively impaired, had no behaviors, and was administered an antipsychotic medication daily during the observation period. Review of R40's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (R)282, R71, and R36) discontinued medications were removed from two of four medication carts. This had the potential for the medications to be diverted or for residents to receive medications with no current physician order. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Labeling and Storage dated 02/23, provided by the facility, revealed . If the facility has discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items . 1.During an observation on 09/04/24 at 10:07 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1, of the A cart, revealed R282 had dronabinol (for nausea) 2.5 mg (milligram) and oxycodone (pain medication) 15 mg in the narcotic drawer of the medication cart. LPN1 confirmed R282's dronabinol 2.5 mg and oxycodone 15 mg were in the medication cart with no current orders in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pneumonia vaccinations were offered and/or provided for three of five residents (Residents (R) 25, R43, and R100) reviewed for immunizations of 30 sample residents. This failure placed the residents at risk for pneumonia. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Vaccination of Residents, dated April 2023, revealed .All residents will be offered vaccines that aid in preventing infectious diseases unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been vaccinated . Review of the undated CDC (Centers for Disease Control) located at www.cdc.gov revealed Complete series: PCV [Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine] 13 at any age & PPSV [Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine] 23 at [AGE] years of age or older and then at five years. Together, with the patient, vaccine providers may choose to administer PCV20 to adults greater than [AGE] years of age who have already received PCV13 or PPSV 23 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 108) of one resident out of a sample of 30 residents was given the opportunity to make choices regarding being able to utilize regular plates and utensils instead of Styrofoam containers and plastic utensils during a COVID-19 outbreak on the unit. This failure placed the resident for a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Self-Determination and Participation, dated February 2021, revealed Our facility respects and promotes the right of each resident to exercise his or her autonomy regarding what the resident considers to be important facets of his or her life . Review of an undated facility's policy titled, Isolation Precautions, dated December 2020, revealed .Dishes, Glasses, Cups, and Eating Utensils .No special precautions are needed for dishes, glasses, cups, or eating utensils .Reusable dishes and utensils are used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 95) reviewed for care planning of 30 sample residents was afforded the right to participate in his care planning process. This failure placed the resident at risk of not being aware of the goals and outcomes of his care. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team, dated September 2013, revealed .Our facility's care planning/interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident .The resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan .Every effort will be made to schedule care plan meetings at the best time of the day for the resident and family . Review of the Face Sheet located in the Admissions tab of the electronic medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,664 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $6,152 — penalty dated 2024-09-04
• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC