Five Counties Nursing Home
405 6th Avenue West, Lemmon, SD 57638 · Non profit - Corporation · 38 certified beds · (605) 374-3871 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $20,703 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-12)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.6% | 21.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.7% | 5.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.3% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.8% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.7% | 5.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.4% | 19.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.2% | 17.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 96.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 25.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.3% | 24.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.76 | 1.52 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.33 | 1.75 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 6.3–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 34.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to implement pressure ulcer prevention interventions for one of one sampled resident (1) identified at risk for pressure ulcers who developed a pressure ulcer to her spinal area. Findings include: 1. Observation on 4/7/25 at 2:48 p.m. of resident 1 in her room revealed: *She was lying on her back in her bed. *She was very thin in appearance. *There were Prevalon boots (cushioned boots used to decrease heel pressure) on the floor next to her closet. *There was a cushion in the seat of her wheelchair. 2. Review of resident 1's electronic medical record revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her 1/21/25 Brief Interview of Mental Status assessment score was 10, which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. *Her 1/18/25 Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk assessment indicated she was At Risk for the development of a pressure ulcer. *Her physician orders indicated: -On 5/22/24 to use pressure relieving mattress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (1) was free from a significant medication error that involved a controlled medication (medications with risk for abuse and addiction) that she did not have orders to receive. She required an emergency room (ER) evaluation and treatment related to a change in her condition. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 3/25/25 SD DOH FRI regarding resident 1 revealed: *Staff found resident 1 unresponsive, shaking, with a weak pulse and a blood pressure of 81/47. -She was transported to the ER by ambulance. *A drug screen was performed at the ER. -The drug screen indicated resident 1 had a benzodiazepine (sedative) medication in her system. -Resident 1 was not on a prescribed benzodiazepine medication. *Resident 1 was returned to the facility via ambulance on 3/25/25 at 4:00 p.m. *The provider did not identify when or how…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to follow standard food safety practices regarding: *Hand hygiene (handwashing or the use of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer) and glove use by two of two cooks (J and K) who did not wash their hands as required and wore soiled gloves to handle ready-to-eat foods, one of one restorative therapy (RT) (D) who did not wash her hands between feeding a resident and eating her own meal, and one of one certified nursing assistant (CNA)/certified medication aide (CMA) (E) who did not remove her soiled gloves before handling food items during two of two meal services. *The disposal of garbage away from a portable food serving station during one of two observed meal services. Findings include:1. Observation and interview on 5/5/26 with cook J from 12:15 p.m. through 12:45 p.m. during the mid-day meal service in the dining room revealed cook J washed his hands, used his clean, wet hands to turn the unclean faucet handles off, and dried his hands with a clean paper towel. He then put his unclean hands into a pair of clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure a homelike environment and staff assistance was provided in one of one dining room during two of two observed mealtimes.Findings include:1. Observation on 5/5/26 from 12:02 p.m. through 12:55 p.m. of restorative therapy (RT) D in the dining room revealed that she sat between residents 15 and 23 for the meal service, and they both required assistance to eat their meals. Resident 23's eyes were closed for most of the meal service, but she would open them when spoken to by RT D. Resident 23 was given one sip of juice from RT D, and they did not converse with one another at the table. 2. Observation on 5/6/26 from 9:15 a.m. through 9:43 a.m. of certified nursing assistant (CNA) G in the dining room revealed that she sat between residents 23 and 30 at a dining room table. Two other unidentified residents sat at that same table. The four residents did not converse with one another, but resident 30 responded to the staff who passed by the table and spoke to her. Resident 23's eyes were closed. Breakfast was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure a self-administration of medication assessment was completed for one of one sampled resident (10) who was allowed to keep her bedtime medications in a cup on her nightstand without supervision. Findings include: 1. Review of resident 10's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated her cognition was intact. Resident 10 had a 11/14/25 medication self-administration safety screen to self-administer saline nasal mist (non-medicated mix of salt and water designed to moisturize and flush out irritants in the nasal passages) and Refresh eyedrops (artificial tears used to treat dry, burning, or irritated eyes). The staff's instructions on the safety screen were to complete this assessment prior to the resident initiating self-administration of medication and with any medication order changes, change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the safety of one of one sampled resident (31) who was left outside of his room unsupervised by one of one certified nurse aide (CNA) (M) after his room was cleaned and the floor was wet, which placed the resident at risk for falling and sustaining an injury.Findings include:1.Observation on 5/5/26 at 12:55 p.m. revealed CNA M walked beside resident 31 and used physical and verbal cues to guide the resident towards his room. The resident wore a pair of Crocs (lightweight, slip-on foam clogs) on his feet. There was a Caution Wet Floor sign placed on the floor at the entrance of the resident's room. The room floor was visibly wet. CNA M instructed resident 31 to wait before he entered his room because the floor was still wet from having been mopped. CNA M then walked away from the resident. 2. Interview on 5/5/26 at 1:00 p.m. with environmental services L revealed she had recently cleaned resident 31's room, which included mopping the room floor. She placed the caution sign in front of his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, interview, and observation, the provider failed to ensure the safety of one of one cognitively impaired sampled resident (3), identified as being at risk for elopement, who eloped (left the facility without staff knowledge) and was outside of the building for an unknown amount of time after she entered the doorlock's key pad code and exited the building. Failure to adequately supervise and monitor the resident's location and to provide environmental controls (doorlock keypad code unknown to the resident) may have contributed to her elopement and placed the resident at risk for an accident and/or injury while she was out of the building and unsupervised. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 4/12/25 SD DOH FRI revealed: *On 4/12/25 at 11:00 a.m. resident 3 exited the building through the [NAME] wing doors. -She stated she had entered the door code to unlock it and left as she was looking for her son. -The door locked behind her. *She went to the front door of the building and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure medications were securely stored and inaccessible to unauthorized individuals including: *Two of two unauthorized individuals (administrator A and maintenance director M) who had access to one of one medication room where controlled medications (medications at risk for abuse and addiction) were stored in an unsecured manner. *One of one certified nursing assistant (CNA)/certified medication aide (CMA) N who had not securely stored the keys to one of two medication cart and a drawer where controlled medications were stored for two of two observations. Findings include: 1. Observation on 4/7/25 at 2:40 p.m. of the medication carts near the nurse's station revealed: *The keys to open one of the two medication carts were stored on an open shelf on the side of the medication cart beside the water cups. -Those were accessible to visitors and unauthorized individuals. *There was no staff member present within sight of the medication carts. Interview on 4/7/25 at 2:43 p.m. with CNA/CMA N revealed: *She had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the provider's South Dakota Department of Health Facility Reported Incident (SD DOH FRI), observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed and reported to the SD DOH regarding a facial bruise of unknown origin for one of one sampled resident (1). Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 3/25/25 SD DOH FRI regarding resident 1 revealed: *On 3/25/25 at 10:30 a.m. in the activity room resident 1 was found unresponsive, shaking, with a weak pulse and a blood pressure of 81/47. -She was transported to the emergency room by ambulance. *The emergency department performed a drug screen. -The drug screen indicated resident 1 had a benzodiazepine medication in her system. -Resident 1 was not on a prescribed benzodiazepine medication. *The SD DOH FRI did not indicate resident 1 had any injuries or bruises. Observation on 4/9/25 at 8:45 a.m. of resident 1 at the breakfast table revealed: *She was seated in a wheelchair. *A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the provider's South Dakota Department of Health Facility Reported Incident (SD DOH FRI), record review, observation, and interview, the provider failed to follow professional standards to ensure a resident's physician ordered: *Fluid restriction was implemented effectively and accurately documented for one of one sampled resident (1). *Basic metabolic panel (BMP) laboratory (lab) test (a common blood test that measures levels of key electrolytes including sodium, glucose, and kidney function indicators) was not completed for one of one sampled resident (1) who had been diagnosed with a low sodium level (hyponatremia). Findings include: 1. Review of resident 1's electronic medical record revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her 1/21/25 Brief Interview of Mental Status assessment score was 10, which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. *Her diagnoses included: hypertension (high blood pressure), hypo-osmolality (a condition where bodily fluids have a lower-than-normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) record review, employee timecard review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure licensed nursing coverage for 24 hours a day for three federal fiscal quarters (Quarter 2, 1/1/24 through 3/31/24; Quarter 3, 4/1/24 through 6/30/24; and Quarter 4, 7/1/24 through 9/30/24). Findings include: 1. Interview on 3/9/25 at 2:08 p.m. with business office manager C during the entrance conference revealed the provider did not have any licensed nurse staffing waivers. 2. Interview on 3/9/25 at 3:42 p.m. with resident 5 revealed she had been told by staff members on multiple occasions they were short of nurses. 3. Review of the PBJ records submitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) revealed the provider submitted the following for licensed nursing coverage not being covered 24 hours per day for: *Quarter 2, 2024 for 34 days. *Quarter 3, 2024 for 11 days. *Quarter 4, 2024 for 30 days. 4. Review of the provider's employee timecards revealed: *For Quarter 2, 2024; 24-hour licensed nursing coverage was unable to be verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) reports, interview, staff timecard review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *A registered nurse (RN) had been scheduled for eight consecutive hours of coverage for four days in quarter two (January 1 through March 31) of fiscal year 2024. *There was a full-time director of nursing (DON) for 16 randomly selected weeks between July and December 2024. 1. Interview on 3/9/35 at 2:08 p.m. with business office manager (BOM) C during the entrance conference revealed: *The provider did not have any nurse staffing waivers. *She stated the DON worked 36 hours per week. *The DON was paid hourly. 2. Review of the RN staff timecards for fiscal year 2024 revealed: *The DON timecard for 2/3/24 was not produced by the provider to verify hours worked. *RN coverage for eight consecutive hours could not be verified for 1/13/24, 1/14/24, and 2/17/24. 3. Interview on 3/11/25 at 6:00 p.m. with administrator A revealed: *The Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse was scheduled from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday during quarter two of fiscal year…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the provider failed to post the required daily nurse staffing information in a prominent location that was readily accessible to residents and visitors and to include the actual hours worked of nursing staff. Findings include: 1. Observation 3/12/25 at 8:00 a.m. of the posted nurse staffing information revealed: *It was posted on a board near the nurse's station. *It would not be readable to a resident or visitor in a wheelchair at the height it was posted. *There were three categories of staff listed on the sheet: RN (registered nurse), LPN (licensed practical nurse), and CNA (certified nursing assistant). *Under the LPN and CNA category the number of those staff scheduled for the day was listed by shift. *There were no numbers listed under the RN category. *There were no documented actual hours worked on the form for the nursing staff. 2. Interview on 3/12/25 at 8:54 a.m. with director of nursing (DON) B about posting the daily staffing revealed: *CNA/certified medication aide (CMA) K was responsible for developing the schedule.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the provider failed to follow their policies for controlled medications (medications with risk for abuse, addiction, and potential theft) to ensure accurate and complete documentation for those medications related to their receipt, counts, administration details including the dates given and the resident names, and destruction process. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/10/25 at 2:07 p.m. of the North wing medication cart revealed: *There was a three-ring binder labeled North Narcotic Binder on top of the medication cart that contained: -A March 2025 CONTROLLED DRUG COUNT RECORD. --That form had two columns for nurse initials labeled NURSE ON and NURSE OFF and rows numbered 1 through 31 which indicated days of the month. --There were no nurse initials for two nurses on 3/1/25 and 3/2/25 and only one nurse on 3/4/25. -Multiple forms labeled CONTROLLED DRUG RECORD Individual Patient's Narcotic Record. --Those forms included areas for the resident's name, medication name and strength, directions for administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to follow standard food safety practices to ensure: *The mechanical dishwashers, refrigerator, and freezer temperatures were monitored and logged according to their policy. *Single-use food containers were not used to store leftover food. *Clean dishes were not stored on frayed cloth towels. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/9/25 at 1:59 p.m. in the kitchen revealed the posted dishwasher temperature log for March 2025 was not completed for 3/4/25 through 3/7/25 and 3/9/25. *The dishwasher temperature logs for January, February, and March 2025 had no temperatures documented on 36 of 67 days. *The freezer temperature logs for February and March 2025 had no temperatures documented on 15 of 36 days for two of two freezers. *The walk-in cooler temperature logs for February and March 2025 had no documented temperatures on 8 of 36 days. *The satellite kitchen refrigerator/freezer temperature logs for February and March 2025 had no temperatures documented on 7 of 31 days. Interview on 3/11/25 at 4:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, policy review, and job description review, the provider failed to ensure the facility was operated and administered by administrator A, director of nursing (DON) B, and assistant director of nursing (ADON) G, in a manner that ensured quality of life and overall well-being for all 39 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy reviews throughout the survey on 3/9/25 from 1:00 p.m. through 6:00 p.m., 3/10/25 from 7:30 a.m. through 6:15 p.m., 3/11/25 from 7:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m., and 3/12/25 from 7:30 a.m. through 5:30 p.m., revealed administrator A, DON B, and ADON G, had not ensured the management, safety, quality of life, and overall well-being of all the residents who lived in the facility. Those were evidenced by: *A widespread system breakdown to ensure services provided: -Met professional standards as it pertained to: --Medication administration and storage. --Addressing and notifying the physician of the significant weight loss for one resident (36). --Identifying and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy reviews, the governing body failed to ensure the facility was operated in a manner that ensured the safe management and overall well-being for all 39 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. During the survey on 3/9/25 from 1:00 p.m. through 6:00 p.m., 3/10/25 from 7:30 a.m. through 6:15 p.m., 3/11/25 from 7:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m., and 3/12/25 from 7:30 a.m. through 5:30 p.m., it was identified that the provider had not operated in a manner to ensure residents received quality care. Administrator A had not been assisted with her duties to ensure she was able to effectively provide guidance to staff to be able to provide quality care. Those were evidenced by: *A widespread system breakdown to ensure services provided: -Met professional standards as it pertained to: --Medication administration and storage. --Addressing and notifying the physician of the significant weight loss for one resident (36). --Identifying and addressing low blood sugars for one diabetic resident (5). -Met the requirements for sufficient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and Arbitration Agreement review, the provider failed to ensure seven of thirteen sampled residents (13, 21, 23, 24, 25, 36, and 142) and three of three recently admitted residents (38, 39, and 142) who had entered into an Arbitration Agreement upon admission to the facility: *Were not required to sign a binding arbitration agreement as a condition of admission to receive care at the facility. *Were explained the arbitration agreement in a form and manner including a language that the resident or his/her representative understood. *Were explicitly granted the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar day of signing it. Findings include: 1. Record review on 3/10/25 at 1:00 p.m. of the Resident List Report printed at 12:10 p.m. that day by administrator A revealed: *The report listed forty residents which included thirty-nine residents in the facility and one resident who was hospitalized . *A handwritten note by administrator A that indicated All residents have a signed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0848 — widespreadProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and Arbitration Agreement review, the provider failed to ensure the provider's Arbitration Agreement: *Included the arbitration organization's name and how to contact that organization. *Provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties. *Provided for a location that was convenient for both parties for an arbitration dispute. Findings include: 1. Interview and record review of the provider's one-page arbitration agreement on 3/10/25 at 5:43 p.m. with administrator A revealed that the agreement had not included: *The arbitration organization's name and how to contact that organization. *For the provision of the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties. *For the provision of a location that was convenient for both parties for an arbitration dispute. *Administrator A agreed with those findings above. Interview on 3/11/25 at 1:10 p.m. with administrator A regarding the arbitration agreement revealed: *The provider had no policy regarding arbitration agreements. *She agreed the arbitration agreement was poorly written.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) record review, employee timecard review, and interview, the provider failed to submit PBJ data accurately for three of three federal fiscal quarters reviewed Quarter 2, 2024 (January 1 through March 31, 2024); Quarter 3, 2024 (April 1 through June 30, 2024)2024); and Quarter 4, 2024 (July 1 through September 30, 2024). Findings include: 1. Review of the PBJ records submitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) revealed the provider submitted the following for licensed nursing coverage not being covered 24 hours per day for: *Quarter 2, 2024 for 34 days. *Quarter 3, 2024 for 11 days. *Quarter 4, 2024 for 30 days. 2. Review of the PBJ records submitted to CMS revealed the provider submitted the following for RN (registered nurse) coverage for 8 consecutive hours per day for: *Quarter 2, 2024 for 16 days. *Quarter 4, 2024 for 4 days. 3. Review of the provider's employee timecards revealed: *Quarter 2, 2024; 24-hour licensed nursing coverage was verified for 13 of the 34 days that were triggered for no 24-hour licensed nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) plan policy review, the provider failed to ensure they had identified and corrected quality deficiencies when they occurred throughout the facility and that performance improvement projects (PIP) had been thoroughly identified, implemented, or monitored regarding nurse staffing, siderails, medication administration and storage, baseline care plans, and arbitration agreements. Findings include: 1. Interview on 3/12/25 at 11:29 a.m. with administrator A regarding the QAPI program and committee revealed: *She was the QAPI coordinator for the provider and stated each department manager conducted their own audit, discussed that audit with the QAPI committee, and implemented any plan needed for correction. *The provider's QAPI committee was comprised of: -All the department managers. -Administrator A. -Director of nursing (DON) B. -The following committee members attended on a quarterly basis: --The medical director. --The executive director. --The consultant dietitian (by phone). *The QAPI committee was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to ensure the proper Medicare Notices were completed accurately for: *Two of two sampled residents (10 and 33) who had remained in the facility following their discharge from Medicare part A skilled services. *One of one sampled resident (41) who had discharged to home following their discharge from Medicare part A skilled services. Findings include: 1. Review of resident 10's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She had a 3/4/25 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 14, which indicated she was cognitively intact. *Her last covered day of Medicare Part A skilled services was 10/30/24. *The section of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) form Beginning on with a blank for the date that her Medicare coverage ended was missing and appeared to have been whited out. *The signature box contained a handwritten note, Phone: [name of family member]/[signature of director of nursing (DON) P]. -There was no documentation of the time of that notification. -There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure two of two sampled resident (9 and 21) privacy had been maintained related to audio or video monitoring devices. The provider had not followed their policy for video monitoring related to: *Ensuring a cognitively intact resident had consented and been aware of the monitoring device in his room. *Staff training and awareness with the devices including which residents had them, when to turn off or block the device to ensure the residents' privacy, the process for consents by the residents and staff, and ensuring a sign was posted to notify others of the video monitoring device. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/9/25 at 2:36 p.m. of resident 9's room revealed there was a white ball-shaped device on a stand on the dresser with a camera lens that faced resident 9's bed. Observation on 3/10/25 at 1:47 p.m. of resident 9's room revealed: *The above observed device was no longer present. *There was no signage present at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Observation and interview on 3/10/25 at 8:51 a.m. of resident 142 revealed she: *Was seated in a wheelchair by the bathing room. *Stated she was recently admitted for occupational therapy and physical therapy. *Planned to return to her home within the next 30 days. Review of resident 142's EMR revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her 3/4/25 BIMS assessment score was a 14, which indicated her cognition was intact. *Her diagnoses included: muscle weakness, Erythema Intertrigo (redness, inflammation, and irritation in the skin folds), lumbar radiculopathy (compressed or irritated nerves in the back that may cause pain and other symptoms), and retention of urine. *Her 3/4/25 baseline care plan included focus areas of: -She did not have a POA (financial and care). -She had the potential of a psychosocial well-being problem related to her major life adjustment of having admitted to the facility and losing her independence. -To ensure on or before admission, and throughout stay, I am reviewed for appropriateness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to follow professional standards of practice related to: *Physician notification of and implementation of appropriate interventions for one of one sampled resident's (36) significant weight loss as directed in their policy. *Identification and implementation of interventions for one of one sampled resident (5) with low blood sugars. *Holding the administration of insulin for one of one sampled resident (5) with low blood sugars without a physician's order. Findings include: 1.Observation on 3/9/25 at 3:39 p.m. of resident 36 in the hallway revealed she had significant swelling to her ankles. Review of resident 36's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her 3/5/25 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score was 1, which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. *Her diagnoses included disorder of electrolyte and fluid balance, heart failure, dehydration, and dementia. *A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to assess two of two (24 and 36) sampled residents for their need for trauma-informed care. 1. Observation and interview on 3/9/25 at 3:10 p.m. with resident 24 revealed: *Her room had piles of clothing, books, and papers. *She believed someone had taken some of her belongings. *She believed her daughters had been molested by her husband. Review of resident 24's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her 1/27/25 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score was 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. *Her diagnoses included anxiety and major depressive disorder. -A copy of resident 24's trauma-informed care assessment was requested from the provider on 3/11/25 at 4:10 p.m. but was not provided for review by the end of the survey. Review of resident 24's 3/10/25 care plan revealed: *She had a focus area of, behavior problem r/t [related to] Depression and Anxiety Disorders.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure residents who used bed rails/assist bars had: *A signed consent for their use for two of twelve sampled residents (23 and 25). *The medical symptoms for use documented on the Side Rail Assessments for five of twelve sampled residents (6, 9,13, 21, and 36). *Received education on the risks of use versus benefits of use of side rails/assist bars for one of twelve sampled residents (9). *Other attempted interventions documented on the Side Rail Assessment for one of twelve sampled residents (23). Findings include: 1. Review of resident 23's 2/23/25 Side Rail Assessment revealed the area that was to indicate if a consent form had been signed was left blank. 2. Review of resident 25's 1/25/25 Side Rail Assessment revealed the area that was to indicate if a consent form had been signed was left blank. 3. Review of resident 6's 1/12/25 Side Rail Assessment revealed the area that was to have her medical condition/symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to: *Ensure medications were labeled properly for four of four random residents (3, 5, 20, and 32) related to having the pharmacy label remain with the medication and to follow the manufacturers' instructions for use-by dates. *Ensure proper labeling and storage of medication for one of one resident (29) with a medicated ointment stored unsecured in her room. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/10/25 at 2:32 p.m. of the medication storage room with certified medication aide (CMA) Z revealed: *There were three insulin pens on the top of the treatment cart. -The pens were labeled for residents 3, 5, and 20. *All three insulin pens had the pharmacy label attached to the removable cap. *All three insulin pens were insulin aspart (a fast-acting insulin) and were not labeled with a date to have indicated when the pen was removed from the refrigerator for its first use or when they should have been used by. 2. Interview on 3/10/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to assess side rails on 13 of 13 sampled residents' beds (2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 13, 16, 21, 23, 24, 25, 36, and 142) routinely as a part of a safety and preventative maintenance program to ensure those side rails were in good working order and safe from possible resident entrapment or injury. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/9/25 at 2:31 p.m. of resident 36 revealed she had two quarter-length side rails in the up position at the head of her bed. 2. Observation on 3/9/25 at 2:32 p.m. of resident 24 revealed she had two quarter-length side rails in the up position at the head of her bed. 3. Observation on 3/9/25 at 2:36 p.m. of resident 9 revealed he had two quarter-length side rails in the up position at the head of his bed. 4. Observation on 3/9/25 at 3:42 p.m. of resident 5 revealed she had two quarter-length side rails in the up position at the head of her bed. 5. Observations on 3/9/25 between 3:48 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. and on 3/10/24 between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed regarding an allegation of abuse for one of one sampled resident (5). Findings include: 1.Review of a 12/25/24 grievance form completed by registered nurse (RN) Q regarding resident 5 revealed: *The nature of the grievance was Resident reports CNA [certified nursing assistant] R used unnecessary force and maleficence [harmful] while giving cares in changing her brief and providing peri-care during repositioning/turning. *The incident was documented attached to the grievance as happening between 7:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on 12/25/24. *RN Q's documentation attached to the grievance stated, Upon entering [the] resident's room she was visibly upset, looking to me and stating, 'I don't know what else to do. I know I can trust you to make this right.' She then reported the following: - CNA R was in resident 5's room completing morning cares and resident 5 was lying on her right side holding onto the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure documentation related to a gradual dose reduction (GDR) had occurred to support the rationale for not completing a GDR for one of one sampled resident (5) who received psychotropic medications (any medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors). Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 3/9/25 at 3:42 p.m. of resident 5 in her room while she was in bed revealed she had slow slurred speech. 2. Review of resident 5's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her 12/26/24 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score was 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. *Her diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that includes symptoms of both schizophrenia and mood disorder), depression, and anxiety. *She had a physician order to receive mental health services. *She had multiple psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of SD DOH complaint report submitted on 1/15/25 at 4:53 p.m. revealed: *The complainant wished to remain anonymous. *The complainant reported concerns with the accuracy of resident assessments and timeliness of the documentation of resident assessments at the facility. 3. A review of resident 2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *Her diagnoses included secondary hypertension (high blood pressure from an underlying medical condition), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anemia, peripheral vascular disease (progressive circulation disorder caused by narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), and essential hypertension (the most common type of high blood pressure). *Previous vital signs were documented instead of having checked and documented her current vital signs each day. From 10/4/24 to 11/12/24, her: - Blood pressure was checked on 33 out of 41 days. - Pulse was checked on 24 out of 41 days. - Temperature was checked on 25 out of 41 days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provided failed to ensure the following: *Post-fall monitoring was completed and documented in a timely manner for one of one sampled resident (26) who had fallen. *A physician's order was followed and suprapubic catheter cleaning and care at the insertion site was completed and documented for one of one sampled resident (11). *The use of a chair alarm was monitored and documented for one of one sampled resident (14 ) who required a chair alarm. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/4/23 at 3:25 p.m. of resident 26 revealed she: *Was asleep on her bed. -Had multiple staples on the crown of her head. Interview on 12/5/23 at 10:00 a.m. with resident 26 revealed she: *Turned wrong and had fallen when she was returning to her bed from the bathroom a few weeks ago. *Was taken to the emergency room (ER) after the fall and required staples to close a cut on the top of her head that occurred as a result of that fall. Review of resident 26's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the provider failed to have an acknowledged and signed code status that was easily accessible for three of three sampled residents (186, 32, and 33). Findings include: 1. Review of resident 186's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *He was admitted on [DATE]. *There was no code status documented for the resident on the demographic section at the top of the EMR screen. *There was no physician's order located for a code status. Review of resident 186's care plan revealed: *He had signed an Advanced Directive that was in his EMR. *There was no documentation of his code status. Review of the provider's list of resident code status located at the nurse's station revealed that resident 186 was not on that list. Review of resident 186's paper chart revealed: *There was no indication of his code status on the outside of the paper chart binder. *The advanced directive/code status was not quickly accessible for staff in an emergency situation to find the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, job description review, and policy review, the provider failed to follow a process to thoroughly assess, implement, monitor, and revise interventions for one of one sampled resident (26) who was at nutritional risk. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/4/23 at 12:30 p.m. of resident 26 in the dining room revealed: *She fed herself the noon meal without observed chewing or swallowing difficulties. *The texture of her food was the consistency of a regular diet. Review of resident 26's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *Registered dietician (RD) E's 5/25/23 initial dietary assessment indicated the resident was eating 100% of her meals, her weight was 141 lbs, and her nutritional status was normal. -There were no additional RD assessments or progress notes completed since that initial assessment. *Dietary manager (DM) D completed two progress notes (PN) between 5/17/23 and 12/5/23. -Her 8/17/23 PN: The resident's weight was down 5% over the last 30 days but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the bed hold notice was given upon the transfer on three separate dates for one of one sampled resident (10) to the hospital. Findings include: 1. Review of resident 10's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *On 3/30/23, he had been transferred to the hospital when staff was unable to keep his oxygen saturation levels above 90% on eight liters of oxygen. *On 4/6/23, he was transferred to the hospital at the request of his family representative when he had lost consciousness while transferring using a mechanical stand lift. *On 11/19/23, he was transferred to the hospital for intravenous (IV) antibiotics to treat cellulitis in his left leg. The bed hold forms were requested on 12/5/23 at 3:15 p.m. for the above three hospital transfers and the facility was not able to produce that documentation. Interview on 12/06/23 at 9:49 a.m. with interim director of nursing B revealed: *Her expectation would have been that all residents who were transferred out of the facility to an acute care provider would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Consultant Pharmacist Review reports for 2023, record review, and interview, the provider failed to ensure a physician's order included a specific duration of time for an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for one of one sampled resident (1) who received a PRN psychotropic medication. Findings include: 1. Review of resident 1's electronic medical record (EMR) and paper chart revealed: *Consultant Pharmacist Review 2023 monthly notes completed by pharmacist H regarding his review of the resident's medical record for identification of medication irregularities. *His September 2023 review note was dated 9/30/23: -MD [medical doctor] - Serax (a psychotropic medication) DR [dose reduction] request - now taking prn for insomnia (as of 10/31/23) - no need to send. *His October 2023 note was dated 10/31/23: -No recommendations. *A Fax Communication to Provider form dated 10/31/23: Resident was out of oxazepam [Serax] over the weekend. She reports that she did 'well without it' and is requesting it be changed to PRN. Resident noted to be well and in good spirits…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$20,703 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $20,703 — penalty dated 2025-03-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| STROSCHEIN, CHAD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/19/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 2 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in SD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Dakota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 435090. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.