No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Clarkson Health Care

1015 Mt View Rd, Rapid City, SD 57702 · Non profit - Other · 49 certified beds · (605) 343-5882 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (605) 343-5882 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3810 Jackson Blvd · (605) 343-4050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3200 Canyon Lake Dr Ste 1 · (605) 355-2500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
(605) 791-5947 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4181 Jackson Blvd · (605) 394-4175 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1900 Evergreen Dr · (605) 791-5591

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%21.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.9%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%5.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.5%19.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.5%17.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%96.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%4.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%25.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.4%24.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine73.2%78.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.4%12.0%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.401.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.311.751.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.1%CMS range 59.9–74.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 5.6–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 2.5–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.12
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.67
RN hoursweekends
34.0%
Total nursing turnover
22.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 45.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.30 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

  • Actual harm · G2026-04-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint report, record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to monitor and implement resident-centered pressure ulcer (skin and/or underlying tissue injury due to prolonged pressure) healing and prevention interventions for one of one sampled resident (1) who was identified at risk for developing pressure ulcers and developed an unstageable (wound bed not visible due to covering, such as debris, dead tissue, scabbing, or a non-removable dressing) pressure ulcer to her coccyx (tailbone) area and required surgical debridement, and one of one sampled resident (2) who was admitted to the facility with two stage II (2; open wound or blister with partial-thickness skin loss) pressure ulcers on her left buttocks and developed two additional stage II pressure ulcers to her left buttocks. Findings include:1. Review of the 3/4/26 SD DOH anonymous complaint report revealed that resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (30) observed self-administering a nebulizer (device that converts liquid medication into an inhaled mist) treatment in his room, was assessed for the ability to safely self-administer medications according to the provider's policy.Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 7/23/25 at 8:52 a.m. of a medication pass with licensed practical nurse (LPN) I revealed:*LPN I assembled resident 30's medications taken by mouth, his inhaler, and nebulizer solutions from the Elm/Oak medication cart in the Oak common area.*She brought the medications and supplies to resident 30's room.*Resident 30 was administered his pills and his inhaler.*LPN I put two nebulizer solutions, ipratropium bromide (a medication used to open the airway of people with lung disease), and levalbuterol (a medication for wheezing and shortness of breath) into resident 30's nebulizer administration device, placed the mask on resident 30's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *Medication labels matched the current physician orders for one of one randomly observed resident (28) according to the provider's policy. Findings include: *Medications with shortened expiration dates [medications that, after opening, expire prior to the manufacturer's expiration date] were labeled properly and disposed of after having outdated for one random resident (18) in one of two medication carts, (Maple/Aspen cart) and a provider stock medication in one of one medication room. 1. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 8:21 a.m. with certified medication aide (CMA) N during medication pass revealed:*Resident 28's artificial tears eye drops (medication for dry eyes) medication administration order (MAR) read, Artificial Tears (dextran 70- hypromellose) eye drops (Dextran 70-hypromellose) - 1 drop Opthalmic [related to the eye] Four Times a Day, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observation, interview, and manufacturer's manual review, the provider failed to assess the safety for one of one sampled resident's (10) side rail to be sure it was fastened securely to the bed and for possible risk of entrapment. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 7/22/24 at 2:47 p.m. with resident 10 in his room revealed:*He had a black upside-down U-shaped side rail on the left side of his bed.*It was located about halfway between the foot and the head of his bed.*The D shaped opening at the top of the side rail measured eight inches wide by four and a quarter inch high.*He stated he used the side rail to reposition himself while he was in bed.*He had been educated on how to use the side rail by staff.*He had an electronically adjustable bed. 2. Review of resident 10's electronic medical record revealed:*He was admitted on [DATE].*His 5/8/25 Brief Interview for Mental Score (BIMS) assessment score was 14, which indicated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review the provider failed to ensure food items were appropriately packaged and safely stored away from cleaning chemicals in [one of one kitchen]. Findings include: 1. Observation on 1/30/24 at 8:00 a.m. in the kitchen revealed: a. In the dry food storage room, the following chemicals were stored on a metal rack alongside metal racks of food: *Prominence Heavy Duty Floor Cleaner *Suma Pan-Clean Detergent *Suma Break Up SC, Heavy Duty Foaming Grease Release Cleaner *Medallion Stainless Steel Cleaner *Suma-Diverpak Dish Detergent *Lime-A-Way Lime Scale Remover *Suma Gloss Concentrated Pre-Soak for silver and stainless steel *Suma Cal X Descaler *Dawn Dish Soap *Monogram Glass Cleaner b. Inside the stand-up freezer there was a bag of frozen donuts that was opened and exposed to the air. c. Inside the upright refrigerator/freezer there were unlabeled and undated frozen bags of pizza, hamburger patties, and chicken nuggets that were opened and exposed to the air. Interview on 1/30/23 at 10:00 a.m. with dietary manager (DM) C regarding the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) publication, review of an Association for Professionals in Infection Control (APIC) brief, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were appropriately followed for: *Glove use by one of one certified nurse aide (CNA) (D) during care provided for one of one sampled resident (21). *Cleaning by medication aide (MA) (F) of shared equipment used between two of two (1 and 14 ) observed residents. *Hand hygiene and glove use by one of one CNA G during care provided for two of two sampled residents (16 and 34). *Cleaning by CNA G of shared equipment used by one of one observed resident (34). Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/20/22 at 9:45 a.m. of CNA D and hospitality coordinator E in resident 21's room revealed: *They provided personal care for resident 21 after she had a bowel movement (BM). *CNA D removed the resident's soiled brief and used a wipe to clean the BM off her skin. *Without changing her soiled gloves she: -Placed a clean brief underneath the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2000
ARCHER, BRADLEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2019
DUHAMEL DUFFY, HELENEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2023
HARLOW, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/28/2015
JACKSON, DOUGLASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/28/2015
KILPATRICK, CHRISTOPHERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2022
KNUDSON, ADAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
MOORE, MOLLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2022
MUDGE, DEBORAHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/11/2008
PFEIFLE, CRAIGIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/11/2008
POGANY, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2023
SHIFFERMILLER, KASSIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2023
BIFULCO, LEAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/17/2016
DONOHUE, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/12/2023
BERTSCH, KELSEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/04/2022
DIAMOND, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2011
KNOLL, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
PETROTTO, MARYANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/19/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 32%Medicare 16%Other / private 52%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$400per resident / day
operating cost
$12,155per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$350per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Dakota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in South Dakota
$9,444/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,190/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,900/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 435037. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next