No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westhills Village Health Care Facility

255 Texas St, Rapid City, SD 57701 · Non profit - Other · 44 certified beds · (605) 342-0255 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (605) 342-0255 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 20241 actual-harm citation$8,788 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • the CMS record shows $8,788 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-08)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3625 5th St · (605) 718-1095 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3615 5th St Ste 109 · (888) 648-0815 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway1.2 mi
2120 Mount Rushmore Rd · (605) 348-5125 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.9%21.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%2.1%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%5.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.1%19.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.4%17.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%96.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.0%25.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.5%24.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.6%78.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.9%19.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.7%12.0%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.181.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.071.751.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 189 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.8%CMS range 54.5–65.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 8.6–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.1–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.13
RN hours/ resident / day
0.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.81
RN hoursweekends
46.2%
Total nursing turnover
22.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 41.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2025-07-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI) review, record review, observation, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (1) was free from a significant medication error when administered the wrong insulin by licensed practical nurse (LPN) D that resulted in the resident's transfer to the emergency room (ER) evaluation and treatment of low blood sugar levels, and a subsequent overnight hospitalization for observation.Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 5/4/25 SD DOH FRI regarding resident 1 revealed:*On 5/4/25 at 7:00 a.m. resident 1 was administered by injection 40 units of lispro (a fast-acting insulin) instead of the physician's ordered 40 units of glargine (a long-acting insulin) by LPN D.*At 7:04 a.m. physician G was notified of the medication error.-Resident 1 to receive an injection of glucagon (a medication used to increase the blood sugar in the body).-To continue encouraging resident 1 to eat and drink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that the current advance directives (a document that expresses a person's health care wishes if they become unable to speak for themselves) for five of five sampled residents (7, 13, 26, 27, and 60) were in the residents' medical records according to the provider's policy.Findings include: 1. Review of resident 7's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation indicating that any advance directive paperwork, which expressed her wishes regarding her code status (specifies the type of emergent treatment a person wishes to receive if their heart or breathing would stop), was completed upon admission. 2. Review of resident 13's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no advance directive or document that indicated her wishes regarding her code status in her medical record. 3. Review of resident 26's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure quality of care for one of one samples resident (27) with hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) who was not provided a pillow under her arm for support as indicated in her care plan by one of one certified nursing assistant (I).Observation and interview on 3/10/26 at 1:08 p.m. in resident 27's room revealed she was seated in her wheelchair watching television. Her call light was lying on the bed to her left and her left hand was resting in her lap. A sign on the wall behind the resident read, Place a pillow under my left arm when I am up in the wheelchair Due to my Stroke. No pillow was positioned under resident 27's left arm. Resident 27 stated she was unsure when the staff had last placed a pillow under her left arm when she was seated in her wheelchair. 2. Observation on 3/11/26 at 1:30 p.m. revealed resident 27 was sitting in her wheelchair the commons area of the facility. Her left arm was positioned down between her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff followed standard infection prevention practices regarding urinary catheter (flexible tubing placed in the bladder to drain urine) care according to the provider's policy for one of one sampled resident (56) with her catheter supplies stores in a container on a shared bathroom floor, and lack of hand hygiene by two of two certified nursing assistants (D and F) observed assisting two of two sampled residents (15 and 19) with eating. Findings include:1. Observation on 3/10/26 at 10:05 a.m. in resident 56's room revealed resident 56 was asleep in her bed and shared a bathroom with her roommate. The bathroom door was open and there was an unlabeled pink plastic container on the floor under the sink. That container held a bottle of liquid with the label distilled vinegar, an empty 60cc (cubic centimeter) syringe, and an unlabeled urinary catheter (flexible tubing placed in the bladder to drain urine) urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI) review, record review, interview, and policy review the provider failed to report to the SD DOH within the required time frame, for one of one sampled resident (1) who was sent to the emergency department, and hospitalized for observation and treatment after being administered the incorrect insulin by licensed practical nurse (LPN) D.Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 5/4/25 SD DOH FRI regarding resident 1 revealed:*On 5/4/25 at 7:00 a.m. resident 1 was administered by injection 40 units of lispro (a fast-acting insulin) instead of the physician's ordered 40 units of glargine (a long-acting insulin) by LPN D.*At 7:04 a.m. physician G was notified of the medication error.-Resident 1 to receive an injection of glucagon (a medication used to increase the blood sugar in the body).-To continue encouraging resident 1 to eat and drink carbohydrates in an attempt to prevent resident 1's blood sugar from becoming too low.-To…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *Proper glove use by one of one cook (Q) during two of two observed meal services. *Proper temperature probe cleaning by one of one cook (Q) during one of one observed meal service. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/19/24 at 11:06 a.m. of cook Q preparing for the noon-time meal service revealed: *He put on clean gloves, removed waffles from a plastic bag then placed them in a toaster. *Wearing the same gloves he: -Organized serving plates, paper products, and utensils for the meal. -Retrieved hot dog buns and hot dogs from two separate plastic bags. -Began cutting one of the hot dogs then turned his attention to the waffles that had popped up from inside of the toaster. --Touched the waffles then lowered them back inside of the toaster for additional toasting time. -Resumed cutting the hot dog. 2. Observation on 11/19/24 at 4:15 p.m. of cook Q temping food for the evening meal service and interview with food services manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the provider failed to ensure communication and resident care were provided in a dignified manner for five of five sampled residents (19, 24, 31, 33, and 35) by one of one certified nursing assistant (CNA) N. Findings included: 1. Observation and interview on 11/19/24 at 9:30 a.m. in resident 33's room revealed: *She sat in her chair with a bedside table beside her. *She had a wheelchair and a hemi-walker (specialty walker to aid soneone with limitation on one side of their body) in her room. *She said an assistant told her she had not been walking enough. -She had a stroke that affected her left side and walked with a hemi-walker. *In the mornings when she would wake up, she would be unsteady and would not be ready to walk right away but CNA N would make her walk to the bathroom and the resident feared falling due to weakness on the left side of her body. *Resident 33 stated CNA N's tone had not been caring towards her. Review of resident 33's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed her 9/7/24 Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. Observation on 11/19/24 at 9:15 a.m. of certified nurse aide (CNA) M assisting resident 40 in her bathroom revealed: *The resident's nasal cannula was pulled out of her nose then dropped to the floor in front of the toilet when she transferred from her wheelchair onto the toilet seat. *After wiping the resident's peri-area with her gloved hands CNA M, without removing her unclean gloves, picked up the nasal cannula from off the floor and handed it to the resident to put back inside her nose. Continued observation and interview with CNA M after resident 40 exited her bathroom revealed: *The resident transferred from her wheelchair to a recliner in her room. She removed the nasal cannula connected to her portable oxygen and hung it over the back of her wheelchair. *CNA M retrieved a second nasal cannula and attached it to the resident's oxygen concentrator. -That cannula was laying underneath a reacher (adaptive grabbing device) and around a wheelchair footrest on the seat of a chair. *Without first cleaning that cannula CNA M handed it to the resident who placed it inside of her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure in-room call lights were accessible for two of two sampled residents (12 and 33). Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 11/19/24 at 9:30 a.m. in resident 33's room revealed: *She sat in her chair with a bedside table beside her. *There was a gray push call light placed on that bedside table that was to her right side. *She stated around three months ago she did not have her call light when she woke up in the morning, she had to holler to get the attention of a certified nursing assistant (CNA), the CNA came in and told her she had to stop hollering, she was upsetting the other residents. *On the morning of 11/19/24 she did not have her call light and she had to holler to get the attention of the morning CNA. *She stated at times the CNAs put the call light on her left side. -She had a stroke that affected her left side, and she could not use her left hand to push the button on the call light. *The call light that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for: *Weight-bearing restrictions for one of one sampled resident (40). *A dressing change for one of one sampled resident (22). Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 11/19/24 at 9:15 a.m. with certified nurse aide (CNA) M in resident 40's bathroom revealed: *The resident entered the bathroom in her wheelchair wearing a left leg immobilizer. *She twisted her upper extremity to the left and used both of her hands to reach towards the wall-mounted grab bar. She pulled herself up to stand holding those grab bars. -She then pivoted her body holding onto the grab bar and sat down on the toilet seat. *After using the toilet she used the same transferring method to return to her wheelchair. *The resident was pushed out of the bathroom in her wheelchair and positioned in front of her recliner. -She bent forward out of the wheelchair seat to grab the armrest of the recliner, pulled her body towards the chair, pivoted, then sat down in the recliner.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the provider failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (15 and 34) were screened for a history of trauma upon their admission to the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview with resident 15 on 11/19/24 at 2:30 p.m. revealed: *She was in her recliner with her feet elevated. *When asked how she was doing she replied, How do you think I'm doing? -She indicated her right arm and shoulder, and her left leg weren't working. She had arthritis and used either a walker or a wheelchair for mobility. *She was living with her family before she came to the facility. She expected to remain there for long-term care. *She became teary-eyed talking about a flood in 1972 that damaged the family-owned business. In the 2000's, her home was destroyed by a wild fire. One of her sons was developmentally disabled. She voiced regret about having not been more active in things like the PTA (Parent-Teacher Association) when her children were school-aged. Review of resident 15's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *Her admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-07-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 05/14/1979
ARCHER, BRADLEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2019
DUHAMEL DUFFY, HELENEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2019
HARLOW, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/28/2015
JACKSON, DOUGLASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/28/2015
KILPATRICK, CHRISTOPHERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2022
KNUDSON, ADAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2024
MOORE, MOLLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2022
MUDGE, DEBORAHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/10/2009
PFEIFLE, CRAIGIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/10/2009
POGANY, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2024
SHIFFERMILLER, KASSIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2024
BIFULCO, LEAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/17/2016
DONOHUE, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/12/2023
BERTSCH, KELSEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2022
DIAMOND, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2015
KNOLL, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/02/2019
PETROTTO, MARYANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/19/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 23%Other / private 77%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$709per resident / day
operating cost
$21,560per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$272per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SD

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the South Dakota Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in South Dakota
$9,444/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,190/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,900/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 435033. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next