Ave Maria Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 221 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 133 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 92.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.01 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, wunderground.com, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and an environment free of accident hazards for cognitively impaired residents and residents at risk of elopement for 2 of 5 (Resident #1 and #5) sampled residents reviewed for elopement and accident hazards. On 6/7/2023, Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident, left the facility around lunch time without staff knowledge in her wheelchair, went down the facility drive, down a hill toward the facility dumpster, and was out of the facility at least 15 minutes. A facility staff member found Resident #1 when the staff member was going towards the dumpster, 360 feet from the facility. Resident #5 was a moderately cognitively impaired resident, assessed to be at risk for elopement and wandering, and the wandering placed him at significant risk of a dangerous place. On 1/9/2024 at approximately 5:45 PM, Resident #5 left the facility in their wheelchair through the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and secure environment and failed to ensure fall risk assessments were completed for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #8, #49, #55, and 239) reviewed for accident hazards and falls. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, revised 2/1/2022, revealed .Each resident will be assessed for the risks of falling and will receive care and services in accordance with the level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls .The facility utilizes a standardized risk assessment for determining a resident's fall risk .Complete a fall risk assessment every 90 days and as indicated when the resident's condition changes .When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will .Complete a post-fall assessment . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, and Cerebrovascular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete discharge assessments for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Assessment Frequency/Timeliness, revised on 2/15/2021, revealed .A discharge assessment will be completed within 14 days of the discharge date . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hyperlipidemia, Diabetes, and Mitral Valve Prolapse. Review of the Nurse's Note revealed Resident #1 was discharged home on 1/13/2022. The facility failed to complete a discharge MDS assessment for Resident #1. During an interview on 5/12/2022 at 9:36 AM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed the discharge MDS should have been submitted by 1/27/2022.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed to accurately reflect the residents' status for hospice services and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 2 or 21 sampled residents (Resident #28 and Resident #71) reviewed for Minimum Data Assessments (MDS). The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's, Dementia, Anorexia, and Hypertension. Review of a Physician's Order Sheet revealed, Order date 2/15/2022 .Admit to [Named Hospice Facility] .for terminal dx [diagnoses] of Alzheimer's Disease . Review of the significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #28 was not assessed for receiving hospice services. During an interview on 5/11/2022 at 10:24 AM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #28 began hospice services in February 2022 and should have been coded for receiving hospice services on the significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan to reflect the residents' current status for 2 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #28) reviewed for Care Plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 2/15/2021, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .to meet a resident's medical, nursing .needs that are identified .That comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following .The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Anorexia, and Hypertension. Review of a Physician's Order Sheet revealed, Order date 2/15/2022 .Admit to [Named Hospice Facility] .for terminal dx…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide communication from the dialysis center and failed to provide care and services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #17) reviewed for dialysis. The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Anxiety, Left Below Knee Amputation, End Stage Renal Disease, Sepsis, and Metabolic Encephalopathy. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #17 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for making decisions and received dialysis. The facility was unable to provide a Dialysis Communication Record (dialysis communication) for Resident #17 for the following dates: a. 2/4/2022 b. 2/7/2022 c. 2/9/2022 d. 2/11/2022 e. 2/16/2022 f. 2/25/2022 g. 3/2/2022 h. 4/6/2022 i. 4/18/2022 j. 4/27/2022 k. 5/4/2022 During an interview on 5/11/2022…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect the resident's current status for wounds and the use of a wanderguard 3 of 21 sampled residents (Residents #8, #14, and #44) reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record, showed Resident #8 had diagnoses of Malignant Neoplasm of the Prostate, Parkinson's Disease, Diabetes, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 4, Pressure-Induced Tissue Damage of the Left Heel. Review of the Care Plan dated 10/22/2019 and revised 11/30/2019, showed Resident #8 was assessed as having an unstageable deep tissue injury to the left heel and a Stage 2 pressure ulcer to the right great toe. Review of the December 2019 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed an order dated 10/23/2019 and discontinued on 12/4/2019, for treatment to an Unstageable ulcer of the left heel, and an order dated 11/26/2019 and discontinued 12/26/2019, for a treatment to the right great toe. Review of a Departmental Note…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2020-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to document treatments for pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #91) reviewed with pressure ulcers. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Skin Care, revised 8/13/2013, showed, .To identify and promote the healing process for pressure ulcers and to prevent further skin breakdown .The Treatment Nurse/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's family and physician of any open wounds .and treatment .and will document in the resident's medical record . 2. Review of the medical record showed Resident #91 had diagnoses of Hypertension, Osteoarthritis, Depression, Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarction, and Fractured Shaft Right Tibia and Fibula. Review of the Physician Orders dated 11/6/2019, showed, .Right Heel .Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply SANTYL [sterile enzymatic debriding ointment], and Calcium Alginate [water insoluble substance for treating pressure ulcers],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2019-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, monthly temperature chart review, observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions when refrigerator and freezer temperatures were not documented twice per day in 4 of 9 (Green House (GH) #2, 4, 5 and 8) [NAME] Houses, food was not stored in sealed containers, and open foods were not labeled in 3 of 9 (GH #7, 8 and 9) [NAME] Houses. This had the potential to affect 61 residents that received meals from these [NAME] House kitchens. The findings include: 1. The facility's .Monitoring of Cooler/Freezer Temperature policy dated 6/18, documented, .It is the policy of this facility to maintain temperatures of coolers and freezers at the appropriate temperature to promote food safety. This policy also addresses refrigerated storage .Temperatures will be checked and logged at least twice per day by designated personnel . Review of the FREEZER AND REFRIGERATOR TEMPERATURE CHART logs for GH #2 revealed incomplete daily freezer and refrigerator temperature documentation on 31 of 31 days on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, abuse investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to report an alleged abuse within the required time allotment for 2 of 4 (Resident #135 and #188) residents involved in an abuse allegation. The findings include: The facility's .Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 12/12/18, documented, .Reporting of all alleged violations to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator, the Administrator, state agency, and to all other required agencies .within specified timeframes .b. Not later that 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury . The facility's .Disciplinary Report . dated 12/19/18 documented, .On 12/18/2018 it was reported to GH [Green House] Guide that employee [named Shahbaz #2] was overheard telling elder [named Resident #135], 'Don't you talk to me like that. Shut up.' while providing ADL [activity of daily living] care on Monday 12/17/2018. Later that evening, she was overheard telling elder [named Resident #188], 'Don't come over here and bother me.' These statements were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-03-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, disciplinary report review, staff working schedule review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse for 2 of 4 (Resident #135 and #188) residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: The facility's .Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, dated 12/12/18 documented, .The facility will make efforts to ensure all Elders are protected from physical and psychosocial harm during and after the investigation .Examples include but are not limited to .Responding immediately to protect the alleged victim and integrity of the investigation .Examining the alleged victim for any sign of injury . The facility's .Disciplinary Report . dated 12/19/18, documented, .On 12/18/2018 it was reported to GH [Green House] Guide that employee [named Shahbaz, the certified nursing assistant manager of the [NAME] House home,#2] was overheard telling elder [named Resident #135] Don't you talk to me like that. Shut up. while providing ADL [activity of daily living] care on Monday 12/17/2018. Later that evening, she was overheard telling elder [named…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,921 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $10,039 — penalty dated 2024-03-28
• $17,882 — penalty dated 2024-03-28
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-30 for 94 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN