The Health Center At Standifer Place

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 444 beds and averages 382.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 resident (Resident #142) of 42 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy, dated 12/2023, revealed .comprehensive care plan .includes .services that are to be furnished .maintain the resident's highest practicable .well-being .individualized interventions .care plans are updated as needed .Review of the facility's policy titled, Side Rail Assessment, dated 11/2018, revealed .side rail(s) are used to assist with resident safety, positioning .update care plan as needed .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #142 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dysphagia, Hypertension, and Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition.Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #142 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility Respiratory Therapy Manual review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to properly date and store a nasal cannula for 1 resident (Resident #220) of 7 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy and failed to properly date an inline suction catheter (closed suction system designed to remove secretions in patients with artificial airways) for 1 resident (Resident #147) of 11 residents sampled with inline suction catheters.The findings include: Review of the facility's undated Respiratory Therapy Manual revealed .Change Out of Respiratory Disposables.applies to OXYGEN .VENTILATORS.SUCTION.Nasal Cannulas.Inline suction catheters.are to be changed weekly. Medical record review revealed Resident #147 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, Tracheostomy Status (surgically created opening into the windpipe to provide an alternative airway for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly contained in 1 of 3 dumpsters (dumpster B) and failed to ensure the outside dumpster area was maintained in a sanitary and orderly condition. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Garbage/Refuse Disposal, dated 5/2023, revealed .All garbage, refuse .shall be disposed of in a sanitary manner .The area around dumpsters shall be free of waste products, including paper trash .but not limited to .gloves .to prevent harborage and feeding of pests .During an observation of the outside dumpster area on 7/22/2025 at 10:43 AM, with the Dietary Manager, revealed 3 dumpsters for waste disposal. Observation of the ground surrounding the dumpster area revealed cardboard, multiple gloves, and multiple plastic eating utensils. Further observation revealed 1 dumpster (dumpster B) had no drain plug intact resulting in the dumpster contents being left open to the elements and potential to attract pests.During an interview on 7/22/2025 at 10:45 AM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure biohazard waste was contained properly for 1 resident (Resident #3) of 6 residents observed on transmission based precautions, failed to ensure a sanitary environment for 1 resident (Resident #95) of 4 residents observed, and failed to offer hand hygiene assistance prior to meals to 5 residents (Residents #244, #199, #268, #359, and #350) on 1 of 4 hallways observed for meal tray distribution.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing and Hand Hygiene, dated 10/2024 revealed .staff will encourage residents to complete hand hygiene .before eating .Medical record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Tracheostomy (surgical opening the trachea that provides airway for breathing) and Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO) and was in Contact Precautions and Droplet Precautions.During an observation on 7/21/2025 at 3:08 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 Physical Therapy Gym's mat platform tables were maintained in good repair. The findings include:During an observation on 7/23/2025 at 11:20 AM, in the facility's Physical Therapy Gym, revealed 2 mat platform tables had multiple large rips and tears which exposed the foam padding.During an interview on 7/23/2025 at 11:25 AM, the facility's Director of Therapy, confirmed, .the rips and tears have been there a while and I see what you are saying, they could be a problem, and we do need them covered or replaced .

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to submit a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II evaluation for 1 resident (Resident #193) of 6 residents reviewed for PASRR Level II evaluation. The findings include: Review of the facility policy PASRR Policy, undated, showed .Individuals who have or are suspected to have MI [Mental Illness] or ID/DD [Intellectual Disability/Mental Retardation] or related conditions have a level II PASRR review .when individuals with MI or ID/DD have a significant change in physical or mental condition, a new level II PASRR completed .all new orders .are reviewed no less frequently than weekly .an updated PASRR will be completed and submitted .to determine if the resident requires specialized services . Resident #193 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Depression, Anxiety, Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Hypertension. A diagnosis of Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the medical record review and interviews the facility failed to provide restorative nursing care for 1 resident (Resident #91) of 10 residents reviewed. The findings include: Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery, Open Wound of Lower Back and Pelvis, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty Walking, Adult Failure to Thrive, Pressure Ulcer, Stage 4, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident #91 had moderate cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance of 2 staff persons with bed mobility, extensive assistance of 1 staff person with dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The resident required set up assistance with meals and could eat independently. Resident #91 received 170 minutes of occupational therapy services and 134 minutes of physical therapy services. Review of the Physician Order dated 4/11/2022 showed .Restorative ROM .B LE as tolerated .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to address the Pharmacist's recommendations for 1 resident (Resident #114) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Resident #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Encounter for Palliative Care (Hospice), and Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance. Review of the Clinical Pharmacist Review dated 3/10/2022 showed .Haloperidol [a medication to treat mental disorders] .Seroquel [a medication to treat mental disorders] XR [extended release] 50 mg [milligrams] .Valium [an anxiety medication] 5 mg .Please review for possible trial gradual dose reduction if patient is ineligible, document reason . Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident #114 had moderate impaired cognition. Review of the 7 day look back showed the resident received antipsychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 1 resident (Resident #540) of 4 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions which had the potential to result in transmission of COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus). The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAM/PLAN, showed .will maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections .Transmission-based Precautions are used additionally with Standard Precautions when caring for those residents who are known or suspected to be infected or colonized with pathogens that can be transmitted by contact or by droplets .A medical staff order is needed for the application and removal of transmission-based…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-07-31 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to refer 1 resident (#90) identified with a possible serious mental disorder to the state-designated authority for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) of 6 residents reviewed for PASARR of 37 sampled residents. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes, End Stage Renal Disease, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Medical record review of a PASARR Level I assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no diagnosis of mental illness. Medical record review of a Psychiatric Evaluation dated 3/11/19 revealed .Worsening depression .she reports the increase of Wellbutrin [medication to treat depression] did not help .she does admit to a history of mood swings and thinks she may have bipolar [a psychiatric disorder] .Diagnosis .Bipolar 1 Disorder . Interview with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator on 7/30/19 at 1:39…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN