Park Meadows Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 170 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 108.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.09 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by opened and undated food items, staff wearing mask below their nose, and staff handling plates with their bare hands. The facility had a census of 95, with 92 of those residents receiving a meal tray from the kitchen. The findings include: The facility's policy titled, Dietary: Food Service, dated 7/12/2021, revealed .Opened food items . should be stored in a closed container to prevent contamination . Observation in the Kitchen on 5/2/2022 beginning at 10:29 AM, revealed the following: a. a plastic container with cornmeal unlabeled and undated b. a plastic container with flour unlabeled and undated c. a plastic container with sugar unlabeled and undated Observation in the Kitchen on 5/3/2022 beginning at 7:57 AM, revealed the following: a. The Regional Registered Dietician standing in the Kitchen talking with the Surveyor without her mask on. b. The Regional Director of Nutritional Services walking from the back of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-04 · tag F0661 — pattern
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a Discharge Summary with a recapitulation of the resident's stay, the disposition status of the resident at the time of discharge, a post discharge plan of care, and a Physician's Order for discharge for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #98, #100, #251, and #252) reviewed for discharge. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer and Discharge, revised on 11/2021, revealed .Orientation for transfer or discharge must be provided and documented to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility .Other necessary information, including a copy of the resident's discharge summary .to ensure a safe and effective transition of care .Obtain physician's order for transfer or discharge and instructions or precautions for ongoing care .A member of the interdisciplinary team completes relevant sections of the Discharge Summary. The nurse caring for the resident at the time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure investigations, neurological (neuro) checks, and assessments were completed for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #11, #28, and #248) reviewed for falls. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Risk - Fall Prevention, revised on 2/20/2020, revealed .To provide a coordinated system to identify Residents at risk for falls .The fall risk assessment will be completed by a licensed nurse .After a fall . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hepatitis, Heart Disease, and Schizophrenia. Review of the Clinical Note dated 1/11/2022, revealed .CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] discovered resident [Resident #11]on floor. Resident noted to be sitting up on floor next to bed. When asked resident stated she wasn't sure what happened . Review of the annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-04 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #93 and #148) or their families were invited to participate in planning their care. The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Epilepsy, Chronic Kidney Disease, Osteoarthritis, and Cerebral Infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #93 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #93's last Care Plan meeting was held on 4/29/2021. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Osteoarthritis, and Age-related Cognitive Decline. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #148 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated she had moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide information regarding a resident's right to develop an Advance Directive for 4 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #28, #56, #66 and #91) reviewed for Advance Directives. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, .Advance Directives ., revised on 10/18/2021, revealed .Resident will be informed, and written information provided, during the admission process, regarding the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Anxiety, Hypothyroidism, and Cognitive Deficit. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #28's medical record, revealed there was no Advance Directive present and there was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan to reflect the residents' current status for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #11 and #28) reviewed for falls. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Risk- Fall Prevention, revised on 2/20/2020, revealed .An 'At Risk For Fall' care plan may need to be created or updated for Residents .after a fall .quarterly .to address items identified on the fall risk assessment as needed .Scheduling IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] care plan meetings to review the plan of care and include the Resident's risk for falls and current interventions to reduce/eliminate falls . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hepatitis, Heart Disease, and Schizophrenia. Review of the Care Plan dated 1/2/2022, revealed Resident #11 was at risk for falls related to Cerebral Vascular Accident with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assisted with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #8) reviewed for ADLs. The findings include: Review of medical record, revealed Resident #8 was admitted to facility on 10/15/2021 with diagnoses of Respiratory Failure, Heart failure, Depression, Anxiety, Dementia, and Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy. Review of the Care Plan dated 1/28/2022, revealed .Self care deficit .bathing .hygiene .bathing 3 times per week .Assist resident with dressing .Assist with hygiene .Assist with combing/fixing hair . Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive to total assistance from staff for ADLs except supervision for eating, and was totally dependent upon staff for bathing. Review of the ADL Verification Worksheet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Physician Orders for an indwelling urinary catheter for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #15 and #46) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheter, revised on 3/30/2022, revealed .The use of an indwelling urinary catheter will be in accordance with physician orders, which will include the diagnosis or clinical condition making the use of the catheter necessary, size of the catheter, and frequency of change . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Palliative Care, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Review of the Care Plan dated 8/24/2021, revealed Resident #15 was at risk for infection related to indwelling catheter and urinary retention. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 10/12/2021, revealed .Maintain indwelling catheter .Catheter site care .Change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to document meal percentages for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #74) reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary: Weight Monitoring, revised on 11/9/2021, revealed .Documentation: Meal consumption information should be recorded . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Anxiety, Age-related Physical Debility and Cognitive Decline, and Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate. Review of the Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Verification Worksheet dated 3/1/2022- 5/4/2022 revealed the following meal intakes were not documented: a) 3/1/2022 no documentation for breakfast and dinner. b) 3/2/2022 no documentation for breakfast and lunch. c) 3/17/2022 no documentation for breakfast and lunch. d) 4/4/2022 no documentation for breakfast and lunch. e) 4/5/2022 no documentation for lunch and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow the Physician Orders for oxygen flow rate for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #8) reviewed for respiratory services. The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #8 was admitted to facility on 10/15/2021 with diagnoses of Respiratory Failure, Heart failure, Depression, Anxiety, Chronic Pain, and Dementia. Review of the Physician Orders dated 10/16/2021, revealed .Oxygen [O2] at 2L/min [liters per minute] per nasal cannula [tube inserted into the nose with prongs to deliver oxygen] . Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired and he received oxygen therapy. Observation in the Dining Room on 5/2/2022 at 11:32 AM, revealed Resident #8 was receiving oxygen per nasal cannula at 0 L/min. Observations in resident's room on 5/2/2022 at 2:55…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN