Magnolia Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 181 beds and averages 81.8 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 99 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards when sharps were found unattended and unsecured in the shared room of 2 of 82 (Residents #30 and #65) sampled residents observed. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Regulated [Biohazard] Medical Waste, dated 6/11/2025, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure that regulated medical waste is managed, handled, stored, and transported as per Federal, State, and local guidance and regulations.Examples of regulated medical waste include.sharp items.Contaminated sharps will be placed in appropriate sharps containers located at the point of use. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Failure, Depression, and Hypertension. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #30 scored a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained daily weights for 1 of 6 (Resident #16) sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 4/9/2025, revealed .obtain and record vital signs.per physician orders. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Adult Failure to Thrive, and Abnormal Weight Loss. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #16 scored a 6 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the Physician's Order dated 1/29/2026, revealed .Weigh patient daily at 0600 [6:00 AM] in the morning. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated January 2026, revealed daily weights were not obtained as ordered by the physician on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was properly stored in 1 of 2 (South Short Hall) medication rooms and in 2 of 82 (Resident #8 and #24) sampled residents' rooms. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, dated 3/31/2025, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premise will be stored.All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms).back -up stock of Schedule III, IV and V medications are stored under double-lock and key. 2. Observation and interview in the Medication Room on the South Short Hall on 4/1/2026 at 8:48 AM, revealed 1 open and 2 unopen vials of Lorazepam (a Schedule IV controlled substance medication used to treat anxiety) 20 mg [milligram]/10 ml [milliliter] in a clear unlocked/unsecured box in the refrigerator. Licensed Practical Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions when unlabeled, undated, and expired food items were found stored, an empty soap dispenser was observed at the hand washing station, the inside of the microwave was splattered with dried food particles, the deep fryer had brown oil with food particles floating in it, there was a black build up on the floor, there was dried food particles on a metal pan, a layer of dust on a shelf of the drying rack, and the warming oven had a build up inside the doors. The facility had a census of 82 and 79 of the residents were served from the Kitchen. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, dated 3/26/2025, revealed .Food will also be stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the prevention and spread of infection during wound care, catheter care, and with Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 2 of 4 (Resident #16 and #24) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control Policy and Procedure, dated 2026, revealed .Require staff to follow hand hygiene practices consistent with accepted standards of practice.CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] recommends specialized training include the following.Principles of standard precautions.hand hygiene.use and care of indwelling urinary.catheters.wound management.The Facility shall develop and implement written policies and procedures for the provision of infection prevention and control.The use and care of urinary catheters.Wound care.Knowledge and skills pertaining to the IPSP's [Infection Prevention and Control Program] standards, policies and procedures are needed by all staff in order to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, policy review, review of Employee Screening logs, employee time sheets and agency invoices, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to maintain the spread of infection were maintained when 14 of 67 staff members (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, Agency LPN #1, #2, #3, and #4, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, and #3, Agency CNA #1, #2, #4, #5 and #6, and Dietary Aide #1) failed to complete screening for the prevention and detection of COVID-19 prior to working on 3 of 3 days (5/28/2022, 5/29/2022 and 6/4/2022) reviewed and when 3 of 4 nurses (Registered Nurse (RN) #1, Agency LPN #5, and #6) failed to perform hand hygiene for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #7, #34, #35, and #375) observed during medication administration. This had the potential to affect the 76 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the CDC document titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-15 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, review of the interdisciplinary Care Plan meeting sign in sheets, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were involved in developing the Care Plan and making decisions about his or her care and failed to include direct care staff in the Interdisciplinary Care Planning for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #20, #35, and #65) reviewed for Care Plan meetings. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 4/2022, revealed .the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident .The IDT may include .Attending Physician .registered nurse who has responsibility for the resident .nurse aide who had responsibility for the resident .member of food and nutrition services .Social Services staff member .Therapy services staff members .resident and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide information regarding a resident's right to formulate an Advanced Directive for 16 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #7, #8, #13, #15, #19, #20, #21, #26, #28, #32, #35, #37, #47, #53, #56, and #65) reviewed for Advanced Directives. The findings include: Review of facility's undated policy titled, Resident Rights and Responsibilities, revealed .all Residents have the right to participate in their health care decisions and to make Advance Directives .and [Named Facility] respects and upholds those rights . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Rheumatoid Arthritis, Alzheimer's Disease, Schizophrenia, and Depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #7 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7's medical record, revealed there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess the nutritional status and to follow the facility's policy for monitoring weights for 6 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #19, #28, #42, #57, #375, #376) reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nutritional Assessment, revised 10/2017, revealed .The dietitian, in conjunction with the nursing staff and healthcare practitioners, will conduct a nutritional assessment for each resident upon admission .and as indicated by a change in condition that places the resident at risk for impaired nutrition .As part of the comprehensive assessment, the nutritional assessment will be a systematic, multidisciplinary process that includes gathering and interpreting data and using that data to help define meaningful interventions for the resident at risk for or with impaired nutrition . Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Management, revised 8/2021, revealed .residents that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 6 of 16 sampled residents (Resident #13, #28, #42, #52, #56, and #376) had alternative food and menu choices. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, .RESIDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES, revealed .Recognize each resident's individuality and provide services in a person-centered manner .promotes .resident's quality of life . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, RESIDENT FOOD PREFERENCES, revealed .Dietary Manager, or designee with regards to obtaining food preferences and conducting an initial visit to the resident .this visit should occur within 72 hours from admission date .important that these preferences .be honored . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Osteoarthritis, Gastroparesis, Nausea, and Morbid Obesity. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #13 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN