Gallaway Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 90.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, email correspondence review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for 3 of 14 (Resident #6, Resident #1, and Resident #12) sampled residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Resident #6, a vulnerable, cognitively impaired, totally dependent resident who required enteral feeding (method of delivering nutrition directly into the gastrointestinal tract) for nutrition was reviewed for neglect. On 3/20/2025, the nurse documented Resident #6 had a tear on the side of the feeding port of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube which caused leakage of the feeding onto the bed. Resident #6 did not receive a new PEG tube until 4/7/2025, 19 days after the tear was found, which allowed for leakage of the enteral nutrition for 19 days. Resident #6's weight was 137 pounds (lbs.) on 3/14/2025 and decreased to 117 lbs. on 4/3/2025. Resident #6 sustained a severe weight loss of 14.59 percent (%) in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on personnel file review, facility document review and interview, Administration failed to ensure that nursing services were provided by qualified personnel when the facility hired an imposter nurse (Imposter Nurse A) to function as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) using another LPN's (LPN C) Tennessee license. The findings include: Review of Imposter Nurse A's personnel file revealed a letter from a Tennessee Criminal History Record Request for Imposter Nurse A's first and last name revealed, .NO TENNESSEE CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD HAS BEEN FOUND FOR THE PERSON LISTED BELOW. There was no national background check found in the personnel file. Review of the I-9 form (Employment Eligibility Verification) used to verify the identity and legal authorization of individuals hired for employment in the United States dated 04/11/2023, revealed Imposter Nurse A's legal first and last name, along with a birth certificate and a valid Driver's license from another state. The last name used on the I-9 form was the same as the Driver's license. Review of a license verification form revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 (Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1.Review of the undated facility policy titled, KARDEX revealed, .the KARDEX is a vital section that outlines each resident's individualized daily care plan. It provides detailed instructions on various aspects of care, including the resident's daily activities.includes information on the resident's mobility.specific safety needs.and transfer methods.It notes whether the resident can ambulate independently. Review of the facility policy titled, F 656, F 657, F 658 Comprehensive Care Plans, with an effective date of 3/2025 revealed, .An individualized comprehensive person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental cultural and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, policy review, review of Employee Screening logs and employee time sheets, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to maintain the spread of infection were maintained when 14 of 47 staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, #3, and #4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, #2, and #3, Housekeeper #1, #2, and #3 and Dietary Aide #1, #2, #3 and #4) failed to complete screening for the prevention and detection of COVID-19 prior to working on 2 of 2 days (5/25/2022 and 5/28/2022) reviewed and when 1 of 4 nurses (LPN #7) failed to properly clean and store enteral feeding syringes after use for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #65 and #75) observed. This had the potential to affect the 90 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the CDC document titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 2/2/2022, revealed .Recommended routine infection prevention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician and patient representative for an allegation of abuse for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #11) reviewed for abuse and the facility failed to notify patient representatives of changes in pressure ulcer status for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #36 and Resident #388) reviewed for pressure ulcers/injuries. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Reporting of Abuse Allegations, revised 11/2017, revealed .All suspected violations and all substantiated incidents of abuse .Should a suspected violation or substantiated incident of mistreatment, neglect, injuries of an unknown source, or abuse (including resident to resident abuse .) be reported, the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, will promptly notify the following persons (verbally or written) of such incident .The State Licensing/recertification agency .The resident's Attending Physician .The facility Medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate an incident of resident-to-resident abuse for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #11 and #32) reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigations, revised 11/2017, revealed .Reports of resident abuse .shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management .The individual conducting the investigation will, as a minimum .Review the completed documented forms .Interview any witnesses to the incident .Interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident .Interview the resident's roommate .Witness reports will be obtained in writing . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Dementia, and Psychotic Disorder Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive Care Plan for Dementia for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #10 and #62) reviewed. The findings include: The facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Comprehensive, revised 11/2017, revealed .And individualized comprehensive person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Atrial Fibrillation, Dysphagia, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 had Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of the Care Plan dated 2/28/2022, revealed there was no comprehensive Care Plan for Dementia. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-09 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, the disposition status of the resident at the time of discharge, and a post discharge plan of care for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #388) reviewed for discharge. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Summary and Plan, revealed .When a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharged plan will be developed .The discharge summary will include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at this facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge .The recapitulation will include .diagnoses, Course of illness, treatment or therapy, Pertinent lab, radiology and consultation results, reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post discharge medications .a final summary paragraph . Review of the medical record, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7) followed policies and procedures for the administration of medication through a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #65) observed and the facility failed to ensure Physician Orders for lab were followed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #9) reviewed for lab services. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medication Through an Enteral Tube, revised 2/2018, revealed .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications through an enteral tube .Dilute powdered, crushed, or split (capsule) medications at the bedside . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, Schizophrenia, Gastrostomy, and Depression. Review of the Physician's Orders dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2019-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Service Agreement review, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective housekeeping services and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment as evidenced by missing ceiling tiles, missing grout in tiles, brown debris and brownish and black build-up on the floors and in corners of rooms, unpainted, exposed plaster, brownish build-up on window ledges, blinds, and air conditioners, air conditioners with missing pieces, discolored grout in bathrooms, worn linoleum floors exposing subflooring, gray areas on ceiling tiles, unclean, broken and rust colered resident equipment, unclean exhaust fans, brown substance and stains in sinks and on commodes, holes in walls, loose and broken tiles and base boards, bulging and crumbling dry wall, odors, gouged and scratched walls, peeling paint; corroded faucets, missing covers on lights, an improperly hanging door, and mismatched floor tiles in 44 of 57 (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2019-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by a dirty bowl stacked in clean bowls, chipped plates, a dirty ice machine, a mound of ice in the walk-in freezer, a dirty freezer floor, staff allowing dirty dishes to come in contact with clean dishes, wet nesting of dishes [stacking of wet items, such as pans and dishes], staff touched clean dishes with dirty gloves, and staff stored personal food in a resident nutrition refrigerator. The facility had a census of 93 with 91 of those residents receiving a meal tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. The facility's Sanitization policy revised 2017, documented, .The food service area shall be maintained in a clean sanitary manner .Utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning .Plastic-ware, china and glassware that cannot be sanitized or are hazardous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$78,741 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $78,741 — penalty dated 2025-08-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $484K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN