Stoneridge Health Care, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 48% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 27.0 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to monitor water temperatures to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards when hot water temperatures ranging from 131 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 134 degrees F were found in 6 of 17 (Resident #4, #7, #14, #15, #20, #23, #26, #27, and #30) occupied resident bathrooms, with no documentation of temperatures being monitored from 11/26/2025 though 3/15/2026. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Accident and Hazard Prevention Policy, dated 1/1/2026, revealed .A systematic process shall be in place to identify, evaluate, and correct environmental hazards on an ongoing basis . 2. Review of the undated Maintenance Director's job description revealed .Ensures the facility remains in compliance with all federal, state and local regulations .Ensures .monitors compliance .Maintains a safe .environment free of objects/situations that could cause harm .to residents, families, visitors, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured when medications were found unsecured and unattended in 2 of 17 (Resident #2 and #25) resident occupied rooms reviewed and when a treatment cart was left unsecured and unattended. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage Policy, dated 11/2026, revealed .Purpose.To ensure medications are stored safely and securely in accordance with CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) regulations for long-term care facilities.All medications will be stored in a safe, secure, and properly maintained environment to protect residents and maintain medication integrity.All medications must be stored in locked medication carts, medication rooms, or medication refrigerators when not in use.Medication rooms, carts, and refrigerators must remain locked when not directly in use.Controlled Substances must be secured in a double-locked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews, the facility failed to refund 4 Residents (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #8) of 6 residents reviewed, for refunds of resident trust accounts within 30 days of discharge. The facility failed to monitor resident trust fund balances, so no resident goes over the $2000.00 balance limit for 1 (Resident #4) out of 6 discharged residents reviewed for trust fund balances. The findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Resident Trust Fund Refund Accounts Receivable, dated 9/2017, 10/2020, revealed, .The Facility must ensure accurate and timely, refunds within individual state regulations .Resident Trust Fund Refunds are usually issued due to either the resident was discharged .and return is not anticipated, or due to the resident expired. The facility must refund the Resident Trust Fund money of discharged or deceased residents according to the time frames and procedures of the individual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, facility's Grievance Log review, facility email review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the policy to document and investigate a grievance for 1 resident (Resident #6) of 6 residents reviewed for grievances. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled COMPLAINT MANAGEMENT: OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT, dated 9/1/2017, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to document and investigate all concerns and complaints .The resident, their representatives, advocates, or interested family members may file a concern or complaint .All reported complaints/concerns will be responded to orally and in writing no longer than 5 working days after being reported .The responsibility for investigating concerns and complaints is assigned to the Social Services department at the facility .Upon receipt of a concern/complaint, the Social Services Director will begin by sending a letter to the person who has reported the complaint or concern…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 (Resident #11 and Resident #13) of 22 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Personal history of Traumatic Brain Injury, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Essential (primary) Hypertension, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Medical record review revealed Resident #11 had an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. Further medical record review revealed no Quarterly MDS assessment was completed in November 2023. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, Encephalopathy, unspecified, Nontoxic Multinodular Goiter, and Neurosyphilis, unspecified. Medial record review revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-04-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, test tray temperatures, and interview, the facility failed to serve palatable food at a safe and appetizing temperature during the lunch meal on 4/11/2022. The findings include: Observation in the dining room on 4/11/2022 at 12:37 PM, revealed 2 dining carts arrived in the dining room with 25 trays total (including a test tray). The last resident's meal was delivered at 12:52 PM. Observation in the hall on 4/11/2022 at 12:52 PM, revealed temperatures taken of the test tray by [NAME] #1 as follows: Ham-pureed 80 degrees F (Fahrenheit); Ham-chopped: 100 degrees F; Ham slice-whole: 80 degrees F; mixed vegetables: 110 degrees F; mixed vegetables-pureed: 60 degrees F; pineapple casserole: 85 degrees F; and pineapple casserole pureed: 75 degrees F. During an interview in the hall on 4/11/2022 at 12:56 PM, [NAME] #1 confirmed the food temperatures were not appropriate. She stated, That food should be hotter than that.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-04-13 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Frequency of Meals, dated September 1, 2017, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility that each resident shall receive at least three (3) meals daily, as well as an evening or bedtime snack .At least three (3) meals or their equivalent are served daily, at regular times, with not more than a fourteen (14) hour span between the evening meal and breakfast . Review of the undated facility documentation titled, Meal Times, revealed 14.5 hours between the evening meal at 5:00 PM and the breakfast meal at 7:30 AM. Review of the facility documentation titled, Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated from March 2021 thru March 2022, revealed there was no meeting to extend the mealtimes greater than the regulated 14-hour span…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility's dietary department failed to maintain dietary equipment in a sanitary manner and failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions when a male dietary employee with facial hair was observed working in the kitchen without wearing a hair net or beard net and a Certified Nurse Aide entered the kitchen without wearing a hairnet. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Personnel Standards, Dietary, revised 1/1/2005, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility that dietary personnel shall follow sanitary standards .Hair nets, covering all of the hair, must be worn at all times while on duty . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage, dated September 1, 2017, revealed, .it is the policy of this facility that food storage areas shall be maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner .food storage areas shall be clean at all times . Observation in the dietary department on 4/11/2022 at 7:41 AM revealed the Dietary Manager was working in the kitchen without a hair net or beard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for 14 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #12, #13, #14, #18, #19, #21, #23, #24, #25, #29, #31, #132, #183, and #184) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Admitting the Resident, dated [DATE], revealed, .An individualized Comprehensive Care Plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident .4. The resident's Comprehensive Care Plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the resident's comprehensive assessment (MDS [Minimum Data Set]) . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Convulsions, Dementia, and Acute Kidney Failure. Review of the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form dated [DATE], revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #14 and #132) who required an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights Under Federal Law, revised January 2014, revealed, .The resident has a right to a dignified existence . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 required an indwelling catheter. Review of the current Physician's Orders, for Resident #14, revealed orders for an indwelling urinary catheter and catheter care. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #132 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder. Review of the admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $150K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN