Hartsville Convalescent Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.00 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.05 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for wandering behaviors from exiting the building without staff supervision. Resident #1 was a vulnerable, cognitively impaired Resident with a history of wandering behaviors and wore a wander guard on his person and on his wheelchair. On 10/28/2024, an order was written to discontinue the wander guard from Resident #1's wheelchair. The facility discontinued Resident #1's wander guard from his wheelchair and from his person. Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 11/27/2024, 29 days after the wander guard was discontinued from his wheelchair and his person. The facility's failure to ensure a safe, secure environment resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) when Resident #1, eloped from the facility on 11/27/2024, and was found approximately 0.3 miles from the facility at a discount retail store.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by unlabeled and undated food items, failed to maintain 1 of 2 coolers in proper working order to prevent potential cross-contamination to stored food, and failed to keep a temperature log and a thermometer for all personal refrigerators for 4 of 4 (Resident #2, #3, #11, and #42) sampled residents reviewed. The facility had a census of 53. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, dated 10/2017 revealed, .All foods stored in refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date) .Functioning of the refrigeration and food temperatures will be monitored at designated intervals throughout the day by the food and nutrition services manager or designee and documented according to state-specific requirements . Review of the facility policy titled, Maintenance Service,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, hospital record review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident with a notice of the bed hold policy for 5 (Resident #4, Resident #31, Resident #41, Resident #46 and Resident #155) of 5 residents reviewed. The findings included: Review of the undated policy titled Bed Hold Policy revealed When a resident goes to the hospital from Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) or Intermediate Care Facility (ICF), Medicaid/Medicare will not pay to hold the bed in the nursing home. If a resident or resident's representative (RR) wants to hold their bed as Private Pay while they are in the hospital, the Business Office must be notified immediately to decide. The charges for the bed hold will begin the day the resident is transferred to the hospital. If a resident .or their RR, does not make the arrangements as described above, they will be discharged , and all items will be boxed and placed in storage for a limited time .To ensure that the resident and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screen was completed after an identified mental health diagnosis for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #41 and Resident #47) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program, dated 6/2024 revealed, .This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder .or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs .PASARR Level I - initial pre-screening that is completed prior to admission .Negative Level I Screen - permits admission to proceed and ends that PASARR process unless a possible serious mental disorder .arises later .Positive Level I Screen - necessitates a PASARR Level II evaluation prior to admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility fall investigation review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan intervention for 1 of 8 (Resident #39) sampled residents reviewed for falls. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, FALL PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT, dated 10/2023 revealed, .A Fall Prevention and Management Program is used to provide a safe environment for residents. This program is designed to identify residents at risk of falls; define interventions for the prevention of falls and/or decrease the likelihood of injury .Nursing Management is responsible for updating care plan related to fall risk, interventions and/or injury related to falls .Review and update causative factors, interventions, and care plan .Pattern of falls, when identified, should be thoroughly evaluated for underlying causes so that a proactive approach and interventions can be implemented to decrease likelihood of further falls . Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility fall investigation review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an accident for 1 of 8 (Resident #39) sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, FALL PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT, dated 10/2023 revealed, .A Fall Prevention and Management Program is used to provide a safe environment for residents. This program is designed to identify residents at risk of falls; define interventions for the prevention of falls and/or decrease the likelihood of injury .Nursing Management is responsible for updating care plan related to fall risk, interventions and/or injury related to falls .Review and update causative factors, interventions, and care plan .Pattern of falls, when identified, should be thoroughly evaluated for underlying causes so that a proactive approach and interventions can be implemented to decrease likelihood of further falls . Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews the facility failed to provide evaluation and rational for continued use of a PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medication for 1 resident (Resident #47) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 12/2023 revealed, .Residents of the facility who are prescribed a psychotropic medication will be monitored. The resident ' s need for the psychotropic medication will be monitored .Both the medical staff and nursing shall evaluate the effectiveness of PRN orders for psychotropic drugs to manage behavior . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Acquired absence of left leg above knee, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 53 rooms observed. The facility failed to provide clean equipment for 1 of 53 (Resident #155) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Disinfection of Bedpans and Urinals, dated 1/16/2024, revealed .Bedpans and urinals are handled in a manner to prevent the spread of infection through personal equipment .Bedpans and urinals are for single resident use only. [NAME] with the resident's name and discard upon discharge .Store bedpans and urinals in the resident's bedside cabinet or drawer after placing in a plastic bag or as per facility policy . Review of the facility's policy titled, Guidelines for the Administering and Storage of Oxygen, revised 10/2023, revealed .Oxygen is administered for adults through an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility documentation review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner as evidenced by unlabeled, undated and expired food in the walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer and the kitchen dry bin. The Findings include: Facility document review, Untitled, Dated 1/2020, revealed .all food items are monitored for expiration dates and discarded when they expire . Observation and interview on 1/13/2020 at 9:00 AM with the Dietary Manager in the freezer confirmed 4 large bags of creamed corn expired 8/28/18, ½ bag of zucchini unlabeled and undated; 4 bags (2 lb) fried green tomatoes undated; 1 bag french style bread unlabeled and undated and 1 partially used bag of garlic knots unlabeled and undated. Continued interview in the Walk-In Refrigerator confirmed 1 container of chicken salad (5 lb) opened and undated. Observation and interview on 1/14/2020 at 4:45 PM in the kitchen with the Dietary Manager confirmed the following in the dry storage bin: 1 partially used bag of cornmeal expired on 10/25/19; 8 bags of cornmeal (5lb) expired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2020-01-15 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY wBased on medical record review, facility documentation review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly (once every 3 months) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 20 (#2, #5, #7, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14, #17, #20, #21, #74, #76, #124, #126, #224, #225, #230, #231 and #276) of 40 resident Quarterly assessments reviewed. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes, Vascular Dementia With Behavioral Disturbances, Chronic Kidney Disease and Anxiety Disorder. Facility document review revealed Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment was due on 11/7/2019 and was not completed. Medical record review revealed no Quarterly MDS assessment was completed for Resident #2 on 11/7/2019. Medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease and Hypertension. Facility document review revealed Resident #5's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to treat 1 (#229) of 1 resident who required a urinary catheter with dignity related to not covering the resident's catheter drainage bag. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights Policy dated 12/2019, revealed .The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self- determination, and communication with access to persons and services inside and outside the facility . Medical record review revealed Resident #229 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with lower Urinary tract symptoms and Retention of Urine. Medical record review of the 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #229 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #229 required an indwelling catheter. Medical record review of Resident #229's physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,796 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-08-11
• $8,515 — penalty dated 2024-07-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $657K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN