Legacy Park Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 125.8 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-02-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, hospice medical record review, and interview the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from a significant medication error for 1 resident (Resident #7) of 3 sampled hospice respite residents. The facility's failure to prevent a significant medication error resulted in actual HARM for Resident #7. The facility's failure to prevent a significant medication error resulted in actual HARM for Resident #7 when the resident's order for Morphine Sulfate was transcribed incorrectly by nursing staff and Resident #7 was administered the medication on a scheduled basis instead of as needed, according to the physician order. On the fourth day of Resident #7's respite stay in the facility, she was semi-comatose, had constricted pupils, a weak and irregular pulse, slightly labored respirations of 12 with increased oxygen, and was hypotensive (low blood pressure), after she received the incorrect amount of Morphine for 4 days. The findings include:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to dignity when an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was left uncovered and visible to the public for 1 resident (Resident #20) of 27 residents observed for dignity.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 2/2021, revealed, .treat all residents with .dignity .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Colon Cancer, Hypertension, and Dementia.Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #20 scored a 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter.Review of an Order Summary report for Resident #20 dated 7/25/2025, revealed . [indwelling urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual review, facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurate for 1 resident (Resident #116) of 27 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The findings include: Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual Verson 19.1, dated 10/2024, revealed .Health-related Quality of Life .residents covered by Level II PASRR [Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review] process may require certain care and services provided by the nursing home .Steps for Assessment .Code .yes .if PASRR Level II screening determined that the resident has a serious mental illness . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment, revised 8/2018, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure .assessments accurately reflect the resident's status . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #116 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder and Major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (Resident #116) of 27 residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, revised 12/2023, revealed .the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's .mental and psychosocial needs .any specialized services as a result of PASARR [PASRR] [Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review] recommendation, and resident's goals and desired outcomes . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #116 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of a PASRR dated 10/15/2024, revealed Resident #116 had a PASRR Level II Outcome related to a serious mental illness. Review of a significant change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene when serving residents' meal trays for 9 residents (Resident #14, #91, #104. #107, #35, #119, #78, #108, and #87) of 1 of 3 dining areas observed for meal tray distribution. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revised 4/2025, revealed .hand hygiene .most effective measures to prevent the spread of infection .during mealtimes the staff is to use proper hand hygiene .during tray pass .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Dementia, and Hypertension. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #14 revised 2/12/2025, revealed .ADL [Activities of Daily Living] Self Care Performance Deficit r/t [related to] limited mobility, weakness, dementia .assist resident on level needed to complete adls .Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were complete and accurate for 5 residents (Residents #2, #17, #18, #19, and #10) of 19 resident records reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Emptying a Urinary Collection Bag, dated 2001, revealed .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record .The amount of urine emptied from the drainage bag . Review of the facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated 2001, revealed .promptly notifies .his or her attending physician .changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status .Prior to notifying the physician or healthcare provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider, including .information prompted by the Interact SBAR [situation, background, assessment, recommendation] Communication Form . Review of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to Physician Orders for 1 resident (Resident #7) of 3 residents reviewed for hospice respite care. The findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Medication and Treatment Orders, revised April 2019, revealed .Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medication in the state .Orders for medication should include .name and strength of the drug; dosage and frequency of administration; route of administration; clinical condition or symptoms for which the medication is prescribed .therapeutic medication monitoring . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for 5 days of respite care with diagnoses including Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (A rare condition that occurs when too much cerebrospinal fluid builds up in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacist identified an order for Morphine Concentrate was transcribed to Point Click Care (PCC) correctly on 1 resident (Resident #7's) of 3 sampled hospice respite residents ' Medication Administration Record (MAR) for accurate transcription of physician orders. The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, effective 1/08/2024, revealed .A Medication Regimen Review (MRR) is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medication .review includes preventing, identifying, reporting and resolving medication-related problems .medication errors, or other irregularities, and collaborating with other members of the interdisciplinary team . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility document review, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan review, and interview, the facility's QAPI committee failed to ensure an effective QAPI program that identified quality deficiencies, implemented performance improvement activities to address quality concerns, and performed a root cause analysis related to medication errors. The QAPI committee failed recognize, identify, develop and implement corrective systems to ensure appropriate care and safety by all disciplines involved in the medication transcription error. The QAPI committee failed to ensure facility wide education was conducted to ensure understanding of the transcription of hospice admission orders after a significant medication error was identified for 1 resident (Resident #7) related to the resident's Morphine orders. The QAPI committee failed to identify and implement an effective action plan to correct deficiencies when hospice orders were incorrectly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written information to the resident and/or resident representative concerning the right to formulate an advance directive for 22 residents (Resident #103, #156, #34, #5, #69, #45, #14, #102, #356, #67, #31, #47, #73, #99, #96, #8, #65, #3, #22, #12, #21,and #49) of 35 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The findings include: Review of the undated facility document titled, Advanced Directives revealed .On admission the Nurse Liaison inquires if the .resident has any advanced directives. If so, they request a copy and one is placed in the .medical chart .The Social Worker assists .resident .family with obtaining advance directives if requested .Copies are .placed in the .medical chart . Medical record review revealed Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Anxiety Disorder, and Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of an admission Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 residents (Resident #21 and #34) of 35 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the RAI Manual 3.0 dated 10/1/2023 revealed . primary purpose as an assessment instrument is to identify resident care problems that are addressed in an individualized care plan .the assessment [MDS] accurately reflects the resident's status .registered nurse conducts or coordinates each assessment .One of the important functions of the MDS assessment is to generate an updated, accurate picture of the resident's current health status .Active diagnoses are diagnoses that have a direct relationship to the resident's current functional, cognitive, mood or behavior status, medical treatments, nursing monitoring .during the 7-day look-back period . Medical record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$74,633 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $74,633 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-29 for 16 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN