Wellpark Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 243 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 158 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 30.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-05-01 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to electronically submit an accurate Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) (staffing information for all employees in the nursing home based on payroll data submitted on a quarterly schedule) timely to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for 1 (first quarter) 1 quarter reviewed for fiscal year 2026.Findings included: The facility's PBJ Staffing Data Report for the first quarter (October 1 through December 31) fiscal year 2026 indicated the facility failed to submit the PBJ report for the quarter. The CMS Submission Report PBJ Final File Validation Report, dated 02/14/2026 at 1:16 AM, regarding the first quarter of fiscal year 2026, indicated one file was processed and was rejected due to an employee's identification not matching an identification in the PBJ system. The report revealed, If a match cannot be found, the PBJ submission file will be rejected. During an interview on 04/30/2026 at 12:21 PM, the Executive Director (ED) stated the facility's PBJ report was submitted by a contracted service center.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility document and policy review, the facility failed to protect residents' personal information for 2 (halls 100 and 400) of 4 halls. Findings included: A facility policy titled, HIPAA Compliance Policy and Procedure, last reviewed in 01/2026, indicated, All staff, volunteers, and vendors must not disclose any medical information about a resident, either, verbally, written, or electronically. An observation on 04/28/2026 at 4:32 AM revealed a phlebotomist approached the nurses' station, opened a laboratory binder, and obtained a piece of paper. The phlebotomist left the laboratory binder open on top of the nurses' station when he walked away to start to obtain the venipunctures (blood draws). The document titled, iPowerDoc Daily Log, dated 04/28/2026 to 04/28/2026, remained visible in the open binder on top of the nurses' station and revealed resident names, room numbers, and laboratory tests to be completed. An observation on 04/28/2026 at 4:36 AM, revealed a clipboard placed in the upright position on the ledge of the nurses' station that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the use of an anticoagulant for 1 (Resident #59) of 2 residents reviewed for care plan concerns. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, reviewed in 01/2026, indicated, It is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The IDT will also develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident, within 48 hours of admission, that includes minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident and instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional standards of quality care. A Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #59 on 08/06/2025. A 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was in place for a non-invasive mechanical CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) ventilator for 1 (Resident #66) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Physician Orders, reviewed in 01/2026, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to accurately implement orders in addition to medication orders (treatment, procedures) only upon the order of a person duly licensed and authorized to do so in accordance with the resident's plan of care. A Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #66 to the facility on [DATE]. A 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/21/2025, revealed Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Obstructive sleep apnea was included as an active diagnosis on the resident's MDS. Resident #66's LN [Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the correct resident's name was used in a comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident #59) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Documentation and Charting, dated 01/2026, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to provide, and 5. Assistant in the development of a Plan of Care for each resident. A Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #59 on 08/06/2025. A 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/12/2025, revealed Resident #59 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #59 had an active diagnosis of a hip fracture. Resident #59's Care Plan Report included a focus area, initiated 08/07/2025, that indicated the resident had a potential for alteration in diversional activities related to a preference to initiate activities of choice independently. Interventions directed staff to: invite and encourage group…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned the recommended personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing incontinence care for 1 (Resident #8) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 failed to don a gown when providing incontinence care to Resident #8, who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Findings included: A facility policy titled, Process: Enhanced Barrier Precautions, reviewed 01/2026, indicated, Staff will follow CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] guidelines for PPE use. Facility signage, produced by the CDC and titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions indicated, Providers and staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing Bathing/Showering Transferring Changing Linens Providing Hygiene Changing briefs or assisting with toileting Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy Wound care: any skin opening requiring a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to dignity was protected for 1 resident (Resident #11) of 30 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, revised 2/2021, revealed .Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem .Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times .Staff protect confidential information. Examples include the following .Signs indicating the resident's clinical status or care needs are not openly posted in the resident's room unless specifically requested by the resident or family member. Discreet posting of important clinical information for safety reasons is permissible (e.g., taped to the inside of the door) . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, and interview the facility failed to protect 1 resident (Resident #84) of 16 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Plan, dated 11/2/2023, revealed .The facility has a zero-tolerance policy for abuse .The resident shall not be subjected to .misappropriation of property .'Misappropriation of Resident Property' means the deliberate misplacement .wrongful, temporary .permanent, use of a resident's belongings .money without the resident's consent .A thorough investigation of the history of all potential employees shall be completed prior to making an offer of employment . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Right Femur Fracture and Macular Degeneration. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #84 scored a 15 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy reivew, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 residents (Resident #22) for falls and for 1 resident (Resident #31) for discharge location of 11 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The findings include: Review of the faiclity's policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, dated 11/2019, revealed .Any person completeing a portion of the .MDS .must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment .The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation (look-back) period for that assessment . Review of the RAI Version 3.0 Manual dated 10/2024, revealed .documents the location to which the resident is being discharged at the time of discharge .Review the medical record including the discharge plan .discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan timely for pressure ulcers for 1 resident (Resident #11) of 2 residents reviewed for wounds of 4 residents sampled. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Skin and Wound Monitoring and Management, revised on 12/2023, revealed .Facility nursing staff will identify and document in the resident's clinical records, the condition and pressure injury risk factors .implementation of a plan of care will begin at admission with the initial care plan and be completed throughout assessment process for developing a comprehensive plan of care . Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, revised on 12/2023, revealed .The facility IDT [interdisciplinary team] will develop and implement a comprehensive-person centered .care plan for each resident within seven (7) days of completion of the Resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) and will include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN