Lexington Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 81.8 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Timeanddateweather.com review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, secure environment for a vulnerable cognitive impaired resident for 1 of 3 (Resident #60) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The facility's failure to ensure a safe, secure environment resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when on 8/27/2023, Resident #60 exited the facility through an unsecured door, unsupervised. Resident #60 was brought back to the facility by a unknown civilian who stated Resident #60 was found on a busy 4 lane highway, in a self-propelled wheelchair at a [Named Bank] approximately 0.19 of a mile from the facility. The temperature was 91 degrees. Resident #60 was last seen in the facility on 8/27/2023 at approximately 4:20 PM, and was brought back to the facility between approximately 4:36PM and 4:38 PM. The facility was not aware the resident was missing until he was brought back to the facility. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored when a medication was found unattended and unsecured in 1 of 5 (Resident #40) resident occupied rooms observed during medication administration. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, with revision date 11/2020 revealed, .The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner.Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls.The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia, Auditory Hallucinations, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0851 — isolated
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, Quarterly Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) review, facility staffing information review, and interview, the facility failed to submit accurate staffing data for Quarter 4 for PBJ 2025 (July 1, 2025- September 30, 2025) reviewed for staffing data. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Reporting Direct Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal), with a revision date of August 2022, revealed .Complete and accurate direct care staffing information is reported electronically to CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] through the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system in a uniform format specified by CMS.Direct care staffing information includes staff hired directly by the facility, those hired through an agency, and contract employees. Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Quarter 4 of 2025 (July 1, 2025 - September 30, 2025) revealed excessively low weekend staffing. Review of LICENSURE STAFFING REQUIREMENTS for the following dates between July 1, 2025 and September 30, 2025, revealed weekend staffing percentages as follow: a.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain and ensure the prevention and spread of infection during incontinence care, wound care, and medication administration for 3 of 7 (Resident #3, #13, and #92) sampled residents reviewed. The findings included: 1.Review of policy titled, Laundry and Bedding, Soiled, dated September 2022 revealed, .Soiled laundry/bedding shall be handled, transported and processed according to best practices for infection prevention and control. All used laundry is handled as potentially contaminated using standard precautions .Contaminated laundry is bagged or contained at the point of collection (i.e., location where it was used).Leak-resistant containers or bags are used for linens or textiles contaminated with blood or body substances. Review of the facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated 10/2023, revealed .Indications for Hand Hygiene.immediately after glove removal.The use of gloves does not replace hand washing/hand hygiene. 2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide information to the residents regarding their right to refuse medical or surgical treatment or to formulate an advance directive for 11 of 24 (Resident #5, #11, #15, #29, #31, #41, #45, #52, #53, #58 and #60) residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directives, dated September 2022, revealed .Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident , his/her family members and/or his or her legal representatives, about the existence of any written advance directives .The resident or representative is provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so .If the resident or representative indicates that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility staff will offer assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, dish machine log, emergency menu, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, handled, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to recognize the low temperature dishwasher log had low temperatures for the wash cycle and when the emergency menu food items were not in stock. The facility had a census of 68 with 68 of those residents receiving a tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility undated policy titled, Sanitation, revealed .The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner .All kitchens, kitchen areas and dining rooms shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish and protected from .other insects .all counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from cracks and chipped areas . Review of the facility undated policy titled, Dishwasher Use, revealed .Food Service will be trained in all steps of dish machine use by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assess 1 of 1 resident (Resident #5) reviewed for self-administration of medication. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer dated 10/2010, revealed .The purpose of this procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident's airway .Ask the resident to hold the mouthpiece gently between his/her lips .Instruct the resident .Encourage the resident to cough and expectorate .Administer therapy until medication is gone .When the treatment is complete, turn off nebulizer . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Rheumatoid Arthritis, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, and Hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to all appropriate local and state agencies for 1 of 1 (Resident #57) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, dated 9/2022, revealed All reports of resident abuse .are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations .Findings of all investigations are documented and reported .The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: The state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying licensing the facility; the local ombudsman; The resident's representative; Adult protective services .Law enforcement officials, The resident's attending physician, and the facility's medical director .Immediately is defined as .within two hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of sexual abuse for 1 of 1 (Resident #57) sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, dated September 2022, revealed .All reports of resident abuse .are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by the facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported .The administrator initiates investigations .Any employee who has been accused of resident abuse is placed on leave with no resident contact until the investigation is complete .The individual conducting the investigation as a minimum .reviews the documentation and evidence .reviews the resident's medical record to determine the resident's physical and cognitive status at the time of the incident and since the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provided related to showering for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #41 and #45) reviewed for ADLs. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, dated 03/2018, revealed .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . 2. Review of the medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction, Disorders of the Brain, Chronic Obstructive Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, and Heart Failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #41 had a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated Resident #41 was moderately cognitively impaired.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during medication administration when 1 of 3 nurses Registered Nurse (RN) B failed to wear PPE (personal protective equipment) during the administration of medication by way of peg tube and when 1 of 1 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C failed to perform hand hygiene during foley catheter care. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 3/2024, revealed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) are utilized to reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents .Gloves and gown are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activity .EBPs are indicated (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO colonization .Indwelling medical devices include central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,470 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $6,152 — penalty dated 2024-12-23
• $9,318 — penalty dated 2023-10-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN