Perry County Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 85.5 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.482 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.15 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, review of the American Heart Association Provider Manual, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to initiate and provide Basic Life Support (BLS)/Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #84) reviewed in accordance with the professional standards of care related to basic life support for healthcare providers. Resident #84 was found lying on the bed unresponsive, not breathing, and was a full code [if a person's heart stopped beating and /or they stopped breathing, all resuscitation procedures will be provided to keep them alive]. The facility failed to immediately initiate CPR according to the professional standard of practice. The facility's failure to immediately provide basic life support for Resident #84 resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility list of resident tobacco users, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a smoking assessment for residents who use tobacco with each quarterly or comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to ensure safe smoking for 4 of 5 (Resident # 16, #25, #37, and #65) residents sampled for smoking assessments. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Smoking, dated 10/24/2022, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe and healthy environment for residents, visitors, and employees, including safety as related to smoking.All residents will be asked about tobacco use during the admission process, and during each quarterly or comprehensive MDS assessment process.Residents who smoke will be further assessed, using the Resident Safe Smoking Assessment, to determine whether or not supervision is required for smoking, or if resident is safe to smoke at all.A safe smoking assessment will be completed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored under sanitary conditions. In the kitchen, the vent hood was observed soiled, and 3 of 3 (West Hall, North Hall, and East Hall) nutrition refrigerators contained dead pests, opened, undated, unlabeled, and expired food items, and no thermometer. The findings include: 1. Observation in the kitchen on 12/9/2024 at 8:49 AM, revealed the following: a. a vent hood over the kitchen stove with dust and grease buildup. 2. Observation in the [NAME] hall nourishment refrigerator on 12/10/24 at 3:52 PM, revealed the following: a. dead gnats (tiny black pests) on the bottom of the refrigerator. b. 1 opened, undated bottle of ketchup. c. 1 opened, undated and unlabeled bottle ranch dressing. d. 1 undated and unlabeled red bowl with unidentified food item. e. 1 undated and unlabeled breakfast sandwich. f. 1 undated and unlabeled frozen dinner. g. 1 undated and unlabeled divided plate with food items. h. 1 expired Jell-O cup (gelatin cup) dated 9/30/2024. i. 1 opened, undated, unlabeled, expired pack of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when 1 of 1 (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C) staff members was observed administering perineal care without the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), when 1 of 1 (CNA B) staff members walked down the hall adorned in PPE, and when 1 of 1 (Wound Nurse) staff members failed to use hand hygiene during wound care. The findings include: 1. The facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, dated 11/12/2024, revealed .Staff involved in direct resident contact will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors .Hand hygiene is a general term that applies to either handwashing or the use of an antiseptic hand rub, also known as alcohol-based hand rub .The use of gloves does not replace hand washing. Wash hands after removing gloves . 2. Review of the medical record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0572 — isolated
  Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, review of meeting minutes, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were reviewed during resident council meeting for 5 of 10 residents (Resident #10, #36, #38, #41, and #50) in attendance during resident council meeting. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 9/2024, revealed The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anemia, Anxiety and Kidney Failure. Review of the MDS dated quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated Resident #10 was cognitively intact. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident abuse for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #18 and #32) reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 1/20/2023, revealed .Each resident has the right to be free from abuse .Response and Reporting of Abuse .When abuse .is suspected .Contact the State Agency and the local Ombudsman office to report the alleged abuse .The Administrator should follow up with the government agencies .to confirm the report was received, and to report the results of the investigation when final . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alcoholic Cirrhosis, Depression, and Paranoid Schizophrenia. Review of the Care Plan dated 9/19/2023, revealed .potential for behavior problem r/t [related to] paranoid schizophrenia, hepatic encephalopathy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of resident to resident abuse for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #18 and #32) reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 1/20/2023, revealed When suspicions of abuse .or reports of abuse .an investigation is immediately warranted .Components of an investigation may include .if the residents response is incongruent .interview the resident's family .gather how .the resident would react to the incident .Obtain witness statements, according to appropriate policies. All statements should be signed and dated .all alleged violations involving abuse .are reported immediately, but not more that 2 hours after the allegation is made .to the administrator of the facility and to other official (including the State Survey Agency) .Have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated . 2. Review of the medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Center's for Medicare Services (CMS) Pressure Ulcer/Injury Coding Stages, policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff failed to correctly identify and stage a pressure ulcer and failed to notify patient representative for changes for 1 of 3 (Resident #53) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: 1. The CMS undated pocket guide for Pressure Ulcer / Injury Coding Stages, revealed .Stage 3 .Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon, or muscle is not exposed. Slough (dead tissue on the surface of the wound bed that prevents healing) may be present but does not obscure (prevent) the depth (deepness of the wound) of tissue loss .Pressure ulcer known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar . Unstageable pressure ulcers due to slough and/or eschar .Percentage of slough in a wound refers to the proportion of the wound bed that is covered by dead tissue [slough] .while the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards when sharps and hazardous personal items were found in 2 of 54 (Resident #19 and #56) resident occupied rooms and when in 1 of 3 (East Hall Shower Room) Shower Rooms was found unsecured and unattended with sharps and hazardous items. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care and Storage of Personal Care Items, dated 12/2024, revealed It is the policy of the facility to properly stored resident personal care items such as deodorant, shampoo, mouthwash, safety razors, fingernail clippers in a safe area to ensure safety .Resident mouthwash should be stored in a closed cabinet inside the resident room .Shampoo and bathing chemical should always be stored in a closed cabinet .If razors are used, discard in the sharps container or store in a locked cabinet . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for residents with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (tube inserted into the stomach to administer medications, supplements and liquid food) when staff failed to ensure the enteral feedings and the flush solutions were properly labeled for 2 of 2 (Resident #51 and #59) sampled residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Dementia, Dysphagia, and Anorexia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score but documented that her cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. Resident #51 was dependent on staff for all care and was coded for a Feeding Tube. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE], revealed no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was assessed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for the use of oxygen and failed to ensure oxygen concentrators were clean for 2 of 2 (Resident #29 and #40) sampled residents reviewed for oxygen use. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy Oxygen Administration dated 10/14/2024, revealed .Oxygen therapy is the administration of oxygen at concentrations greater than that in ambient air .with the intent of treating or preventing the symptoms and manifestations of hypoxia .Hypoxia means decreased perfusion of oxygen to the tissues .Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician .Staff shall document the initial ongoing assessment of the resident's condition warranting oxygen and the response to oxygen therapy .Cleaning and care of equipment shall be in accordance with facility's policies for such equipment . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN