Legacy Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 26.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 50.9 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, homelike environment for 4 residents (Residents #4, #6, #32, and #36) of 24 residents observed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised 2/2021, revealed .Residents are provided with a safe, clean .and homelike environment .The facility staff and management maximizes .the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting .The characteristics include .clean, sanitary and orderly environment . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Congestive Heart Failure, and Acute Kidney Disease. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 scored a 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to refer 2 residents (Residents #4 and #25), after the residents were diagnosed with a serious mental disorder, to the state-designated authority for a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation and determination of 10 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes, Congestive Heart Failure, and Depression. The diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder, Insomnia, and Anxiety Disorder were added on 7/9/2024. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 scored a 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of a PASARR for Resident #4 submitted on 12/12/2023, revealed diagnoses .depression-mild or situational . The PASARR outcome was .Negative, No Level II Required . Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan related to smoking for 1 resident (Resident #39) of 14 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 12/2006, revealed .develops and implements .person-centered care plan for each resident .identifying problem areas .developing interventions .targeted .to the resident . Review of the facility's policy titled, Smoking Policy - Residents, revised 7/2017, revealed .any smoking privileges .concerns .shall be noted on the care plan . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to facility on 8/14/2024 with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Diabetes, and Nicotine Dependence. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #39 scored a 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for 1 Resident (Resident #34) of 14 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, dated 9/2013, revealed .Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, and Diabetes. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #34 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and received dialysis services. Medical record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident #34 dated 3/26/2025, revealed .observe shunt site by palpating for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Physician's Order was obtained for oxygen therapy for 2 residents (Residents #4 and #255) of 6 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised 10/ 2010, revealed .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration .Preparation .Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Acute Kidney Disease. Review of a facility document titled Report Sheet [report given to facility nurse from hospital nurse] for Resident #4 dated 1/27/2025, revealed .O2 [oxygen] 2 L/M [liters/minute] . Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 scored a 14 on the Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, review of kitchen equipment cleaning documentation, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and failed to ensure dietary staff wore protective hair coverings during food preparation in the kitchen, which had the potential to affect 53 of 53 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitation, revised 10/2008, revealed .food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner .equipment should be kept clean .all equipment .shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils .using the manual or mechanical means necessary .for fixed equipment .removable components will be scraped to remove food particle accumulation .Food Services Manager will be responsible for scheduling staff for regular cleaning of kitchen .areas . Review of the facility's policy titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised 12/2017, revealed .Food and nutrition services employees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the outside dumpster area was maintained in a sanitary and orderly condition. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal, revised 10/2017, revealed .outside dumpsters .will be kept .free of surrounding litter .storage areas will be kept clean at all times .shall not constitute a nuisance . During an observation of the outside dumpster area on 6/23/2025 at 10:08 AM, with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed the area behind dumpster A and B had 2 broken light fixtures, 2 broken chairs, 1 broken office chair, 1 walker, 1 broken window air conditioner, and mop bucket on the ground. During an interview on 6/23/2025 at 10:11 AM, the DM stated the 2 broken light fixtures, 2 broken chairs, 1 broken office chair, 1 walker, 1 broken window air conditioner, and mop bucket on the ground were not disposed of properly and was unsure how long those items had been there. The DM confirmed the dumpster area had not been maintained in a sanitary condition.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment by failing to clean and store soiled items in a multi-resident bathroom for 1 Resident (Resident #4) of 10 residents observed. The findings include: Review of the facility's police titled, Cleaning and Disinfecting Non-Critical Resident-Care Items, revised 6/2011, revealed .Rinse bedpan or urinal with cool water to remove feces and urine .Rinse with hot running water .Return bedpan or urinal to resident's bedside cabinet . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Acute Kidney Disease. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 scored a 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an observation on 6/23/2025 at 11:37 AM, Resident #4's bathroom revealed 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report dated 10/1/2023-12/31/2023, daily nursing staff posting sheets, time clock punches, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the minimum requirement of 8 hours per day of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 20 days reviewed on the PBJ report and 12 days reviewed on 1/1/2024-4/10/2024 (not a PBJ report). The findings include: Review of the facility's PBJ dated 10/1/2023-12/31/2023 showed the following dates with no RN coverage: 10/7/2023 (Saturday), 10/14/2023 (Saturday), 10/15/2023 (Sunday), 10/29/2023 (Sunday), 11/4/2023 (Saturday), 11/5/2023 (Sunday), 11/12/2023 (Sunday), 11/18/2023 (Saturday), 11/26/2023 (Sunday), 12/2/2023 Saturday), 12/10/2023 (Sunday), 12/24/2023 (Sunday), and 12/31/2023 (Sunday). Review of the facility's daily staffing posting sheets, and time clock punches showed: 10/1/2023 (Sunday): 1.25 hours of RN coverage 10/21/2023 (Saturday): 3.02 hours of RN coverage 10/28/2023 (Saturday): 5.25 hours of RN coverage 11/11/2023 (Saturday): 2.83 hours of RN coverage 11/23/2023 (Monday): 1.48 hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-10 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation and interview the facility failed to post accurate staffing information to reflect daily staffing levels. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised 7/2016, showed .Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents During an observation on 4/8/2024 at 7:40 AM, of the daily nurse staffing showed the staffing information posted was the staff scheduled for 4/5/2024 and had not been updated to reflect the current staff in the facility on 4/8/2024. During an interview on 4/10/2024 at 2:035 PM, the Director of Nursing stated the Unit 1 Charge Nurse was responsible for posting the daily staffing sheet.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN