Graceland Rehabilitation And Nursing Care Center
1250 Farrow Road, Memphis, TN 38116 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 240 certified beds · (901) 332-7290 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 8 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $342,603 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-13)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.3% | 14.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 6.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.6% | 13.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.1% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.5% | 31.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.8% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.0% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.4% | 16.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.3% | 1.7% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 6.3% | 79.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.6% | 22.6% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.98 | 1.67 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.67 | 1.56 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 52% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.8%CMS range 30.4–58.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.8–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 26.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 5.0–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 168.2 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 72 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, hospital record review, medical transport services record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from accident hazards for 2 of 5 (Resident #415 and #515) sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure a vulnerable, non-verbal, cognitively impaired resident who required 2-person assistance with bed mobility and care, remained free from accident hazards as evidenced by failure to provide the required amount of assistance for safe repositioning and/or transfer, resulting in a significant injury and hospitalization for Resident #415. On 3/7/2025 at approximately 11:20 AM, Resident #415, a cognitively impaired Resident who was totally dependent on staff for mobility and required 2-person assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) was receiving care from Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A and CNA B. CNA A and CNA B repositioned Resident #415 in the bed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, daily staffing records, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sufficient number of licensed staff was available to provide care and services to all residents based on physician orders when there was no nurse to provide readmission assessments and services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) readmitted to the Crown Ventilation Unit on 4/4/2024 and failed to administer significant and other medications for 20 of 21 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #22, #23, and #24 ) sampled residents reviewed on the Crown Unit. The facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff at all times to meet the residents ' needs safely and promote each resident's well-being when there were not a licensed nurse on the Crown Unit on 13 of 90 days (1/1/2024, 1/2/2024, 1/3/2024, 1/6/2024, 1/22/2024, 1/27/2024, and 1/28/2024 on the 11:00 to 7:00 AM shift, 1/6/2023 on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 25 of 26 sample residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #22, #23, #24, #35, #36, #38, #40, and #41) reviewed for medication administration. The facility's failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) when the residents' medications were not administered as prescribed for December 2023, January 2024, February 2024, March 2024, and April 2024, and had the likelihood to cause serious adverse outcomes. Immediate Jeopardy is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, or impairment, or death of a resident. The Chief Operating Officer, Administrator, and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for of F760 on 4/23/2024 at 11:34 PM, in the Conference Room. The facility was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on job description review, record review, medical record review, and interview, the facility Administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that provided oversight of the care being provided to residents, and ensure staff were sufficient in numbers and competent in their duties to provide care and services per physician orders and to meet the individualized needs of all residents. The facility Administration failed to have a system in place to ensure sufficient licensed nursing staff were available and with the knowledge and skills necessary to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when medications were not administered as ordered by the physician for 25 of 26 sample residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #22, #23, #24, #35, #36, #38, #40 and #41) reviewed who required medications and treatments. The medications not administered as ordered by the physician included anti-diabetics, anticoagulants,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on job description review, facility document review, medical record review, and interview, the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI /QA) committee failed to ensure a QAPI program that identified, implemented actions, and monitored serious issues affecting facility staffing, quality of care, prescribed care and services, and residents' rights for 20 of 21 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #22, #23 and #24 ) sampled residents reviewed for prescribed medications, treatments, care and services during January 2024, February 2024, March 2024 and April 2024. (Resident #4) failed to receive appropriate monitoring after a fall on 3/29/2024 and underwent an emergency craniotomy (a type of brain surgery where a surgeon removes part of your skull to access your brain) on 3/30/2024. Residents #5 and #6) reviewed for the implementation of basic life support were not immediately provided Basic Life Support (BLS)/Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) CPR. The facility failed to provide hair care in a manner that promoted a sense…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, user instruction manual review, job description review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when multi-use blood glucometers were not cleaned and disinfected after/between resident testing to prevent cross-contamination of bloodborne pathogens for 5 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #9, #10, #11, #12, and #13) reviewed for blood glucose monitoring, when 1 of 3 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A) failed to use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing care to Residents #9, #10, #11, #12, #17, and #18, and when staff failed to ensure reusable equipment was cleaned and disinfected when 2 of 2 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) N and CNA M) were observed during transferring Resident #4 with a mechanical lift. The facility's failure to ensure nursing staff properly disinfected the multi-use blood glucose meter that was used for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, job descriptions, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision and monitoring for 1 of 5 (Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for unwitnessed falls, failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from neglect when the facility failed to provide necessary goods and services and failed to treat residents in a manner that promoted a sense of self-worth, dignity and individuality for 11 of 11 sampled residents (Resident #7, #20, #28, #30, #37, #42, #44, #45, #46, #47 and #48) reviewed for daily hair care, and failed to ensure residents' vital signs were monitored [DATE], February 2024, [DATE] and [DATE], for 20 of 21 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #22, #23, and #24 ) sampled residents reviewed on the Crown Unit, a unit with residents that are dependent on ventilators and high acuity care requirements. Resident #4 experienced unwitnessed falls on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, review of the American Heart Association Provider Manual, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to initiate and provide Basic Life Support (BLS)/Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR - perform measures to assist the person with breathing and to stimulate a heart rate) for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #5 and #6) reviewed in accordance with the professional standards of care related to basic life support for healthcare providers. Resident #5 who resided on the ventilation unit called the Crown Unit was found unresponsive and not breathing by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B on [DATE] at 2:45 AM and was a full code (to receive CPR). Resident #6 who resided on the [NAME] Unit was found unresponsive on [DATE] at 3:50 AM by CNA H and was a full code. The facility failed to immediately initiate CPR according to the professional standard of practice for a healthcare provider and in accordance with the facility policy. The facility's failure to immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, medical review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders to administer Tylenol (a medication used for moderate pain) for 1 of 6 (Resident #14) reviewed for quality of care. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 2012, revealed .Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame .Medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses including Osteoarthrosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Transient Ischemic Attack, and Pain. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 had a BMS score of 3, which indicated she was cognitively impaired with no behaviors identified and required physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to prevent accidents/hazards, provide education and monitoring for 1 of 5 (Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for falls, and failed to ensure a safe environment for 1 of 3 (Resident #3) residents sampled for elopement. The facility's failure to provide appropriate transfer with a mechanical lift resulted in actual harm when Resident #4 sustained a fall which resulted in a laceration to the forehead and required sutures. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Assessing Falls and Their Causes, dated 2018, revealed .The purposes of this procedure are to provide guidelines for assisting a resident after a fall and to assist staff in identifying causes of the fall .Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident .Residents must be assessed upon admission and regularly afterward for potential risk of falls. Relevant risk factors must be addressed promptly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, handled, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions, when stainless steel tables and metal storage racks were found with rust on the legs and black buildup around the base, the ice machine contained a dark brown, rust colored substance on the metal inside flap, food stored in the reach in cooler was unlabeled and undated, food items left on top of stainless steel tables was unattended and uncovered, dust was observed on top of a reach in cooler and around the edges of the ceiling vents, and when a substance with the appearance of rust was found around the edges of the ceiling vent and metal grates, when 9 stainless steel trays with food were found in the reach in cooler unlabeled and undated, the can opener contained thick black gummy buildup around the blade, when food items were found on top of a stainless steel table opened and undated, when dry ingredient storage bins that contained sugar and flour were unlabeled and undated with the lids soiled with thick yellow sticky debris,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed when 2 of 2 staff members (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) DD and Housekeeping CC) failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions and failed to properly perform hand hygiene after exiting Transmission-Based Precautions resident rooms. The facility failed to limit interactions with other residents when 1 of 4 (Resident #74) sampled residents reviewed for contact precautions was allowed to interact outside of his room with other residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated April 2010, revealed .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections .All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors .Employees must wash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent for administration of psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #13 and #52) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 7/2022, revealed .Residents will not receive medication that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition .A psychotropic medication is any mediation that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior .Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications .Anti-psychotics .Anti-depressants .Anti-anxiety medications .Residents, families and/or the representative are involved in the medication management process .Residents who have not used psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given these medications unless the medication is determined to be necessary to treat a specific condition that is diagnosed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide education and written information to resident and/or family representative to formulate an Advance Directive for 27 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #4, #22, #28, #29, #30, #37, #39, #42, #48, #66, #69, #75, #87, #91, #100, #102, #112, #119, #125, #129, #137, #139, #143, #146, #151, #265, and #465) reviewed for Advance Directives. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directives, dated 2001, revealed .The resident has the right to formulate an advance directive .Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family and/or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives .The resident or representative is provided with written information concerning the right .to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 (Resident #52) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications were limited to 14 days duration. The facility failed to obtain a physician's assessment or document rationale for continued use of the medication. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 7/2022, revealed .Residents will not receive medication that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition .A psychotropic medication is any mediation that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior .Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications .Anti-psychotics .Anti-depressants .Anti-anxiety medications .Psychotropic medication management includes .indications for use .dose .duration .adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences .preventing, identifying and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility policy review, medical record review, Incident Reporting System (IRS), and interview the facility failed to report sufficient information to describe the results of all investigations to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 2 (Resident #515) sampled residents reviewed for an injury of unknown origin. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigations, dated 4/2010, revealed .Policy Statement .All reports of resident abuse, neglect and injuries of unknown source shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management .Should an incident .of unknown source be reported, the Administrator .will appoint a member of management to investigate the alleged incident .The Administrator will provide a written report of the results of all .investigations and appropriate action taken to the state survey and certification agency .within five (5) working days of the reported incident . Review of the facility policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative or family member of the intent to discharge for 1 of 3 (Resident #316) sampled residents reviewed for discharge. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer or Discharge ., dated 8/2018, revealed .Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, our facility will implement the following procedures .Notify the representative (sponsor) or family member . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #316 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Pulmonary Embolism, Myocardial Infarction, and Acute Kidney Failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated Resident #316 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the Nurse's Note dated 8/2/2023, revealed Resident discharged to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and obtain lab work for 2 of 5 (Resident #4 and #100) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Laboratory Services and Reporting, dated 11/24/2024, revealed .The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state la .The facility is responsible for the timeliness of the service . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Diabetes, Urinary Tract Infection, and Colostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, which indicated Resident #4 was severely cognitively impaired and received hypoglycemic medications. Review of the Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured when medications were found unsecured and unattended in 1 of 78 (Resident #83) resident occupied rooms. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated 4/2007, revealed .The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Diabetes, Alzheimer's Disease, Depression, and Hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated Resident #83 was severely cognitively impaired. During a random observation in the Resident's room on 5/5/2025 at 10:36 AM and at 11:22 AM, an unsecure and unattended medication cup with 8 pills was observed on the Resident's dresser.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs for bathing when the water was not at the minimum temperature for hot water for 5 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #2, #7, #8, #9 and #10) reviewed for resident rights. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Resident Rights revealed, .Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to .self-determination . Review of the Rules of the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission dated July 2022, revealed .Water distribution systems shall be arranged to provide hot water at each hot water outlet at all times. Hot water at shower, bathing and hand washing facilities shall be between 105° [degrees] F [Fahrenheit] and 115°F . Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated October 8, 2024, revealed . MAINTENACE [MAINTENANCE] .WATER STILL NOT GETTING HOT . Review of .QAPI [Quality Assurance Process…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 13 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review and interview, the facility failed to follow the resident ' s comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for fall prevention and care plans. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 7/10/2024, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident ' s needs as identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to monitor the resident ' s progress .Qualified staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan will be notified of their roles and responsibilities for carrying out the interventions, initially and when changes are made . Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, dated 7/10/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual review, medical record review, weekly skin evaluations review, facility document review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately document skin assessments for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) residents with wounds reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Prevention of Pressure Injuries, with revision date of 4/2020, revealed .The purpose of this procedure is to provide information regarding identification of pressure injury risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors .Risk Assessment .Assess the resident on admission (within eight hours) for existing pressure injury risk factors. Repeat the risk assessment weekly and upon any changes in condition .Use a standardized pressure injury screening tool to determine and document risk factors .Supplement the use of a risk assessment tool with assessment of additional risk factors .Conduct a comprehensive skin assessment upon (or soon after) admission,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, Pharmacy Services agreement, review of facility medication reconciliation documents, observation, and interview, the facility failed to have a system of records of receipt and disposition of all narcotic medications in sufficient detail to ensure accurate narcotic drug reconciliation for 5 of 9 (Resident #7, #15, #35, #36, #41) sampled residents reviewed with orders for controlled narcotics and 5 of 5 medication storage carts reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability revised 2019, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure .The Controlled Drug Record (or other specified form) serves the dual purpose of recording both narcotic disposition and patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, job descriptions, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing administered nutritional support and services in January 2024, February 2024, March 2024 and April 2024 for 20 of 21 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #17, #18, #20, #22, #23, and #24 ) sampled residents reviewed on the Crown Unit, a unit with residents that are dependent on ventilators and high acuity care requirements. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Right, dated 2016, revealed .Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all resident in this facility .equal access to quality of care . Review of the facility undated policy titled, NOTICE OF RESIDENT RIGHTS, revealed .This facility will protect and promote the rights of each resident .To reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of individuals needs and preferences .To have appropriate assessment and management plan . Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #29) reviewed for self-administration of medications. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Self-Administration of Medications revealed, .Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so .The resident can follow directions and tell time to know when to take the medication .The resident comprehends the medication's purpose, proper dosage, timing, signs of side effects and when to report the staff .has the physical capabilities to open bottles, remove medications from a container .If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, Nursing Home Notice of Involuntary Transfer or Discharge document review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the 30 day discharge notice initiated by the facility, included physician documentation for the specific needs the facility could not meet, the facility's efforts made to meet those needs, and the specific services the receiving facility will provide to meet those needs that could not be provided by the facility for 1 of 1 (Resident #2) sampled residents for facility initiated discharge. The findings include: 1.Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge Notice dated December 2016, revealed .Our facility shall provide a resident and/or the resident's representative (sponsor) with a thirty (30)-day written notice of an impending transfer or discharge .The resident and/or representative (sponsor) will be notified in writing of the following information: a. The reason for the transfer of discharge; b. The effective date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement Comprehensive Care Plans for 2 of 18 sample resident (Resident #4 and #9) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Hypertension and Rhabdomyolysis. Review of the significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Metal Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated he was cognitively impaired with no behaviors identified and required physical help for most activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 5/30/2024, revealed .is at risk for falls due to unsteady gait, impaired balance .had a fall on 5/29/2024 .Assess for fall risk on admission, quarterly and as needed .Encourage and assist as needed to wear proper nonslip footwear .Inservice staff on proper transfer techniques and proper usage of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to have physician orders and failed to provide pressure ulcer/injury treatments for 1 of 2 (Resident #9) sampled residents determined to have pressure injuries. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Provision of Physician Ordered Services for Graceland Rehab and Nursing dated 2019 and reviewed/revised 6/2024, revealed .The purpose of this policy is to provide a reliable process for the proper and consistent provision of physician ordered services according to professional standards of quality. Definition: Professional Standards of Quality means that care and services are provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice .Qualified nursing personnel will submit timely requests for physician ordered services (laboratory, radiology, consultations) to the appropriate entity . Review of the facility's policy titled Verbal Orders Graceland Rehab and Nursing Center dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, facility document review, medical record review, and interview revealed the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3) for elopement and 1 of 6 sample resident (Resident #14) reviewed for falls. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Documentation in Medical Record (Named Facility), dated 6/2024, revealed .Each resident's medical records contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate, and timely documentation .Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team members shall document all assessments, observations, and services provided in the resident's medical record in accordance with state law and facility policy .Principles of documentation include, but are not limited to .Documentation shall be factual, objective, and resident centered .False information shall not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, 3 of 8 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, #2 and #6) nurses failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection during wound care and medication administration observations, and the facility failed to identify 1 of 1 (Resident #43) isolation room. The findings include: 1. The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy revised April 2010 documented, .Employees must wash their hands for at least fifteen (15) seconds using antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial soap and water under the following conditions .After removing gloves . The facility's Isolation-Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions policy revised March 2019 documented, .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .When a resident is placed on transmissin-based precautions, appropriate notification is placed on the room entrance door so visitors and staff are aware of the need for precaution . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #66 and was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity and respect when 6 of 25 (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1, #2, #4, and #5) staff members failed to knock and request permission to enter a resident's room, and 1 of 1 (CNA #3) failed to provide privacy and dignity while assisting a resident during toileting. The finding include: 1. The facility's undated Resident Rights policy documented, .The resident has a right to a dignified existence .The resident has the right to personal privacy and confidentiality . 2. Observations outside room [ROOM NUMBER] on 7/8/19 beginning at 12:11 PM, revealed CNA #1 entered residents' rooms #703, #700, and #701 and delivered a meal tray without knocking and requesting permission to enter. Observations outside room [ROOM NUMBER] on 7/8/19 at 12:22 PM, revealed LPN #5 entered a resident's room [ROOM NUMBER] and delivered a meal tray without knocking and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement a splint device for 2 of 6 (Resident #125 and #130) sampled residents reviewed with limited range of motion. The findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #125 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure, Osteoarthritis, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, and Epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #125 had functional limitations in range of motion with impairment in all extremities. The July 2019 physician order documented, .L [left] elbow and hand splint to be applied in a.m. [morning] 4-6 hours as tolerated . There was no documentation of the application of splints in Resident #125's medical record. Observations on Resident #125's room on 7/8/19 at 11:30 AM, 7/9/19 at 8:36 AM and 12:26 PM, 7/10/19 at 8:17 AM, 10:20 AM, and 11:59 AM, revealed Resident #125 was not wearing hand or elbow splints. 2. Medical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured in 1 of 14 (400 Hall Medication Cart #2) medication storage areas. The findings include: 1. The facility's Security of Medication Cart policy revised March 2019 documented, .The medication cart shall be secured during medication passes .The nurse must secure the medication cart during the medication pass .The medication cart should be parked in the doorway of the resident's room during the medication pass .The cart must be locked before the nurse enters the resident's room .Medication carts must be locked at all times when out of the nurses's view . 2. Observations in the 400 Hall on 7/9/19 at 11:25 AM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 entered Resident #46's room to perform a blood glucose level and left the 400 Hall Medication Cart #2 unlocked, out of sight, and unattended. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 7/10/19 at 10:45 AM, in the DON office, the DON was asked what she expected staff to do when the medication cart was not in use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$342,603 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $39,293 — penalty dated 2025-05-13
- $303,310 — penalty dated 2024-05-01
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-31 for 145 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LICHTSCHEIN, RAPHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2017 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445331. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.