No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Quince Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

6733 Quince Road, Memphis, TN 38119 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 188 certified beds · (901) 755-3860 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0610) — most recent Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)5 immediate-jeopardy citations$71,822 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Jul 2025
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $71,822 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-01)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6116 Quince Rd · (901) 765-4898 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6116 Quince Rd · (901) 765-4898 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6641 Poplar Ave · (901) 737-7898 · Call to confirm hours
Park
May Park0.7 mi
6407 Quince Rd · (901) 636-4200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.6%14.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%6.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.2%13.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.7%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.4%31.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.3%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.6%16.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%79.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.0%22.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.4%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.601.671.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.891.561.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.3%CMS range 26.1–47.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.7%CMS range 8.2–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified72.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 5.3–14.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.44
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
56.7%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 155.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2021-10-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to protect the Residents' right to be free from neglect when they failed to provide necessary care and services to meet the needs of the Residents for 2 of 5 (Resident #3 and #4) sampled residents reviewed for a change in mental status. Resident #3, a vulnerable Resident with severe cognitive impairment, experienced seizure activity on [DATE], and staff failed to perform neurological (neuro) assessments and monitor the Resident after a seizure. On [DATE], Resident #3 experienced a change in condition including vomiting, increased lethargy, changes in speech, gurgling respirations, and subsequently became unresponsive to verbal and tactile stimulation. Resident #3 was hospitalized on [DATE] with diagnosis of an intraparenchymal hemorrhage (a bleed on the brain) and subsequently expired on [DATE]. The facility's failure to perform neuro assessments and monitoring after a seizure on [DATE] and a change in condition on [DATE], resulted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-10-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, video camera footage review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility neglected to supervise a resident with confusion and periods of hallucinations, and at risk for wandering and elopement for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #338) reviewed for wandering and elopement. Resident #338 exited the facility without staff supervision and staff knowledge and was found off the facility property, sitting on a concrete block at the entrance of a housing community, across the street from a lake, approximately 459 feet and 6 inches from the front entrance of the facility, 0.2 miles from a busy intersection and 172 feet from a busy street that had a 45 miles per hour speed limit. Resident #338 was outside the facility without staff supervision and knowledge and off the facility property for approximately 39 minutes. The facility's failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #338. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2021-10-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, facility investigation review, video camera footage review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents of elopement for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #338) reviewed for wandering and exit-seeking behaviors. The facility's failure to thoroughly investigate incidents of elopement resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #338, a resident with episodes of confusion and hallucinations. Resident #338 exited the facility through the front door without staff supervision or knowledge and was found in front of a town house complex entrance, approximately 459 feet and 6 inches away from the facility. Resident #338 was outside the facility unsupervised for approximately 39 minutes. The facility is located on a congested 2 lane street with a lake across the street from the location where Resident #338 was found sitting on a brick landing. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, video camera footage review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident with confusion and periods of hallucinations and failed to place and monitor a Wander Guard (mechanical bracelet device to alert staff of wandering residents that causes the door to alarm when a resident is close to exit door) for function for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #96 and Resident #338) reviewed for wandering behaviors and elopement. Resident #338 exited the facility without staff supervision and knowledge and was found off the facility property, sitting on a concrete block at the entrance into a townhouse community, with a lake across the street. The resident was located approximately 459 feet and 6 inches from the front entrance of the facility, 0.2 of a mile from a busy intersection, and 172 feet from a two-lane busy street that had a 45 miles per hour speed limit. Resident #338 was outside the facility, unsupervised for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2021-10-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, job description review, medical record review, and interview, the facility Administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that protected residents that wandered and exhibited exit seeking behavior from eloping from the facility. Administration failed to provide oversight to monitor and provide a safe resident environment for a confused resident with periods of hallucinations from exiting the facility without staff knowledge or supervision, failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of elopement, failed to ensure policies related to wandering and elopement were followed, and failed to ensure Wander Guards (mechanical bracelet device to alert staff of wandering residents that would cause the door to alarm when a resident is close to an exit door) were available to use on residents with wandering behaviors. The facility's failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #338 exited the front door of the facility and was found on a brick landing of a housing complex that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on job description review and interview, the facility failed to have a Register Dietitian (RD) or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for 153 of 153 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: 1. Review of the job description titled Registered Dietitian, dated 3/4/2026, revealed .Job Summary.Coordinates nutritional care of residents by completing nutritional assessments, developing and implementing care plans and documenting dietary information about residents. Provides guidance and collaborates with the Dietary Manager in the provision of food and nutrition services.Nutritional Care Responsibilities.Ensures physicians orders are followed making recommendations for changes needed.Completes nutritional assessments, MDS [Minimum Data Set], CAA [Care Area Assessment] and care plans.Provides routine and change of condition progress notes in the residents' medical record .determines the effectiveness of nutritional care plan; documents outcome in the progress notes and adjusts care plans as needed .Reviews weight records routinely and communicates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure timely notice regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage for 1of 3 (Resident #76) sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), revealed .It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage.A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), Form CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid] -10123, shall be issued to the resident/representative when Medicare Part A covered service (s) are ending, no matter if the resident is leaving the facility or remaining in the facility. This informs the resident on how to request an appeal or expedited determination from their Quality Improvement Organization (QIO).the notice shall be provided within forty-eight hours of the last anticipated covered day. Review of the medical record reveal Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Director of Nursing (DON) job description review, Registered Dietitian (RD) job description review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assess for and ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 4 ( #173) sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated 10/5/2025, revealed .The interdisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for our residents .Significant unplanned and undesired weight changes will be based on the following criteria [where percentage of body weight loss = (usual weight-actual weight) / (usual weight) x 100] .1 month- 5% [percent] weight change is significant; greater than 5% is severe .3 months- 7.5% weight change is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe .6 months- 10% weight change is significant; greater than 10% is severe.Weights will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, job description review, orientation checklists, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to detect changes in a resident's condition, perform neurological assessments, and monitor a resident after a change in condition for 1 of 5 (Residents #3) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Neurological Evaluations, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to perform a neuro [neurological] vital sign evaluation when indicated by resident condition.Perform neurological checks.and document on the Neurological Evaluation Flow Sheet.Determine state of consciousness.Check all three spheres (person, place , time) and observe speech pattern.Take temperature, pulse, respirations and blood pressure.Check pupil reaction. Darken room. Open eyelid with your fingertips. Turn on flashlight and observe size and reaction of pupil. Repeat for the other eye. Determine motor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 9 of 22 staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4, #5, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, and #11) provided care for a resident in a manner that maintained or enhanced the resident's dignity when the staff did not knock on resident doors prior to entering the room, called residents feeders, and did not address the resident by a courtesy title for 13 of 133 residents (Resident #8, #9, #17, #20, #37, #40, #43, #49, #64, #112, #122, #341 and #342) observed during dining. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, RESIDENT BILL OF RIGHTS, revised on 11/2017, revealed .Each resident has a right to a dignified existence .communication .in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life . Dining observation in the resident's room on 10/17/2021 at 12:45 PM, revealed LPN #4 entered Resident #37's room without knocking or requesting permission to enter the resident's room. Dining observation in in the residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services when oxygen tubing was not dated and/or changed weekly for 5 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #62, #63, #101, #123, and #190) reviewed for oxygen therapy. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Oxygen [O2] Therapy, revealed, .Humidifier if needed .change tubing weekly .Date tube when changed (weekly) . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Fracture of Neck of Right Femur, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cerebral Infarction, and Hypertensive Heart Disease. Review of the Physician Order dated 9/8/2021, revealed .Oxygen @ [at] 2L [liter]/min [per minute] bnc [bi-nasal cannula]. Titrate [measure and adjust to the needs of the resident] to keep O2 [oxygen] sat [saturation] >/= [greater than or equal to] 92% [percent] . Observation in the resident's room during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored appropriately when undated, open medications and expired medications were observed in 1 of 11 medication storage areas (West Hall Medication Room) and when 1 of 5 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2) left medications unattended for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident # 343) observed during medication pass. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, dated 11/2010, revealed .Medication supply must be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications .All drugs, treatments, and biologicals must be stored securely . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Administration - General Guidelines, revealed .During routine administration of medications .No medications are left unattended . Observation of the [NAME] Hall Medication Room on 10/17/2021 at 12:40 PM, revealed a locked refrigerator containing: 1 open, undated, multidose vial of tuberculin 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-21 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to document the total number of actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care on every shift on the staffing postings and failed to have staffing postings completed and available for 24 of 76 days of staffing postings (12/2/2019, 12/3/2019, 12/4/2019, 12/5/2019, 12/6/2019, 12/7/2019, 12/8/2019, 12/9/2019, 12/12/2019, 12/14/2019, 12/15/2019, 12/25/2019, 1/7/2020, 1/8/2020, 2/1/2020, 2/2/2020, 2/3/2020, 2/4/2020, 2/10/2020, 2/11/2020, 2/12/2020, 2/13/2020, 2/14/2020, and 2/17/2020) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the staffing postings between 12/1/19 and 2/18/2020, showed the facility did not document actual Registered Nurse hours worked on 12/2/2019, 12/3/2019, 12/4/2019, 12/6/2019, 12/7/2019, 12/8/2019, 12/25/2019, 1/7/2020, 1/8/2020, 2/3/2020, 2/4/2020, 2/11/2020, 2/12/2020, 2/13/2020, 2/14/2020, and 2/17/2020. Review of the staffing postings between 12/1/2019 and 2/18/2020, showed the facility did not document actual Licensed Practical Nurse and Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychotropic medications were appropriately monitored for side effects and behaviors for 5 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #27, #100, #104, #111, and #283) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, SUBJECT: Behavior Management and Psycho-pharmological Medication Monitoring Protocol, dated 3/2018, showed that medication side effects and resident behaviors should be monitored for residents receiving antipsychotic, anti-depressant, sedative/hypnotic, or anti-anxiety (psychotropic) medications. 1. Review of the medical record showed, Resident #27 had a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes Mellitus, End Stage Renal Disease and Dependent on Renal Dialysis, Insomnia, and Psychosis. Review of the Physician Orders dated 1/16/2020, showed, .SERTRALINE HCL [Hydrochloride] [an antidepressant] 100 MG [milligrams] .TWO .TABLETS .BY MOUTH EVERY EVENING . Review of the December 2019, January 2020, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were followed in 2 of 3 isolation rooms (Resident #107 and #163) and failed to maintain infection control practices when 2 of 6 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #3 and #4) failed to perform proper hand hygiene, failed to clean a stethoscope, and failed to protect the feeding tube tip from being contaminated for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #45 and #88) reviewed during medication administration observations. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, .CONTACT PRECAUTIONS, dated 9/2019, showed that a door sign that reads Contact Precautions or Visitors Must See Nurse Before Entering must be on the door, a cart must be placed outside the room that contains a covered supply of personal protective equipment such as gowns, gloves, masks, and plastic bags, and personal protective equipment should be worn prior to entering the room. 1. Review of the medical record showed, Resident #107 had diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-21 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, medical record review, and interview, the facility to complete and transmit an MDS assessment within 14 days of the completion date for 1 of 38 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for Resident Assessment and transmission. The finding include: Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual v (version) 1.16 October 1, 2018 page 664, showed, .Assessment Transmission .MDS assessments must be submitted within 14 days of the MDS Completion Date . Review of the medical record, showed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hypothyroidism, Diabetes Mellitus, Osteoarthritis and Malignant Neoplasm of Bladder. Review of the annual MDS assessment, showed the assessment had an Assessment Reference Date of 1/10/2020 and a completion date of 1/24/2020. The annual assessment should have been transmitted by 2/7/2020, but had not been transmitted. During an interview conducted on 2/20/2020 at 6:55 PM, MDS Coordinator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess residents for bladder and bowel continence, activities of daily living, cognition, and the use of antipsychotics for 4 of 38 sampled residents (Resident #10, #62, #87, and #104) reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record, showed Resident #10 had diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Dysphasia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypothyroidism. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed Resident #10 was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident #10 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the Care Plan dated 11/25/2019, showed, .[Named Resident #10] is incontinent of bowel and bladder r/t [related to] impaired mobility and cognitive deficit . During an interview conducted on 2/20/2020 at 2:13 PM, MDS Coordinator #2 confirmed the MDS dated [DATE] was coded incorrectly for bladder and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #71 and #135) reviewed for falls. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record, showed Resident #71 had diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Coronary Artery Disease, and Diabetes. Review of the Care Plan revised 1/15/2020, showed, .Problem .has the potential for falls and fall related injuries r/t [related to] poor safety awareness .Approaches .1/15/20 [2020] .dycem [cushion that prevents sliding] to w/c [wheelchair] . Observation in the resident's room on 2/20/2020 at 3:50 PM, showed there was no dycem in Resident #71's wheelchair. During an interview conducted on 2/20/2020 at 3:50 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed there was no dycem in Resident #71's wheelchair. 2. Review of the medical record, showed Resident #71 had diagnoses of Diabetes, Dementia, and Legal Blindness. Review of the Care Plan revised 12/14/2019, showed, .Problem .is at risk for falls .Approaches…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #103) reviewed for the use of an indwelling urinary catheters. The findings include: Review of the medical record, showed Resident #103 had diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure, Hemiplegia, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Review of the February 2020 Physician Orders, showed, .MAINTAIN PATENCY AND PLACEMENT OF #18FR [FRENCH] / 10CC [CUBIC CENTIMETERS] BULB INDWELLING FOLEY CATHETER EVERY SHIFT .FOLEY CATHETER CARE WITH SOAP AND WATER EVERY SHIFT . Review of the February 2020 Medication Administration Record (MAR), showed no documentation to maintain placement and patency of an indwelling urinary catheter from 2/9/2020 through 2/20/2020 for the 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM shift and no documentation on 2/12/2020, 2/13/2020, 2/14/2020, 2/16/2020, 2/17/2020, and 2/19/2020 for the 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift. Review of the February 2020 MAR, showed no documentation for catheter care for an indwelling urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$71,822 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $71,822 — penalty dated 2025-07-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 6%Other / private 19%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$321per resident / day
operating cost
$9,758per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$282per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445197. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next