Community Care Of Rutherford

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 92.8 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention for a fall for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #44), which resulted in actual harm (blunt trauma to head with 3 staples needed for closure of a laceration). The facility also failed to implement a care plan for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #76) reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 9/20/2016, revealed, .Plans of Care are developed by the interdisciplinary team, to coordinate and communicate care approaches and goals for the resident related to clinical diagnosis or identified concerns .The facility develops a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental/psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment .[named facility] staff will refer to the goals and interventions when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident which resulted in actual harm (blunt trauma to head with 3 staples needed for closure of a laceration) for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #44). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigation and Reporting, revised 4/2006 revealed .All accidents or incidents involving residents .occurring on our premises must be investigated .the Nurse Supervisor .Charge Nurse shall .if necessary, transfer the injured person to the emergency room [ER] .hospital . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Accident/Incident Reporting, revised 3/7/2022, revealed .Purpose .All incidents are to be reported timely and appropriate interventions implemented .Resident incident reports are to be implemented at the time of the incident .investigation form to be completed immediately .incident reports will be reviewed by Interdisciplinary Team [IDT] within 24-72…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility record review, interview, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of money and medications for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #97) of 4 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property (Resident #6 and Resident #97)Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse Policy for [Facility Name], dated 06/02/2025, indicated, Abuse: the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse will not be tolerated by anyone, including staff, patients, consultants, volunteers, family members or legal guardians, friends, nor visitors. Types: verbal, sexual, physical, mental, neglect, misappropriation of property, involuntary seclusion, injuries of unknown source. The attached document titled, Training on Abuse indicated, Misappropriation of patient property - the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a patient's belongings or money without the patients [sic]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to immediately implement protective measures following an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse and complete a timely and thorough investigation for 1 (Residents #94) of 6 residents sampled for abuse. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse Policy for [Facility Name], dated 06/02/2025, indicated, Abuse: the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse will not be tolerated by anyone, including staff, patients, consultants, volunteers, family members or legal guardians, friends, nor visitors. 1. Any employee having direct or indirect knowledge of allegations of possible abuse, must report the event immediately. This facility will not retaliate against any resident, employee, or family member making good faith reports. The identity of the person reporting the allegation of abuse, [sic] will only be disclosed on a need to know basis. 2. When abuse is reported or observed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #3) of 7 sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the policy titled [Named Facility's] Incidents and Accidents Policy dated 1/17/24 (1/17/2024) revealed .It is the policy of this facility to report, investigate, and review any accidents or incidents that occur or allegedly occur, on facility property and may involve or allegedly involve a resident .The following incidents/accidents require an incident/accident report but are not limited to .Medication or treatment errors .The nurse will contact the resident's practitioner to inform them of the incident/accident, report any injuries or other findings, and obtain orders .The resident's family or representative will be notified .documentation should include the date, time, nature of the incident, location, initial findings, immediate interventions, notifications and orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 95 of 98 (3 of the 98 residents required enteral feedings) residents were treated in a dignified manner during the lunch meal on 5/9/2022. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 2016, revealed, .The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbances, Blindness, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed she had severely impaired vision and required extensive assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and total dependence for eating. Observation in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident identifiable information was kept confidential for 2 of 32 sampled residents (Resident #3 and #34) reviewed. The facility also failed to maintain patient confidentiality related to 1 of 5 computer screens open with resident health information visualized with no staff attendance. The findings include: Review of facility policy titled, HIPAA (Health Information Portability and Accountability Act), dated 7/15/2020, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to apply sanctions against employees who fail to comply with all policies and procedures regarding the protection of personal identifiable health information of our residents .This information from any source and in any form, including, but not limited to paper records, oral communications, audio/digital recordings, and electric display of information is strictly confidential . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation, and interview, the facilty failed to update/revise the care plan for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #63) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Revision Upon Status Change revised 5/11/2022 revealed .The care plan will be updated with the new and modified interventions . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #63 had a fall prior to the assessment. Review of the fall investigations revealed Resident #63 had falls on 4/3/2021, 9/5/2021, and 2/14/2022. Review of the current care plan revealed no revised fall interventions for 4/3/2021, 9/5/2021, and 2/14/2022. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #24). The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) revised 5/1/2020 revealed .A resident who is unable to to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease and Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #24 required extensive assistance of one staff member for personal hygiene. Review of the current Care Plan dated 12/8/2021,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to keep water in reach for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #11) observed. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia, Parkinson's, and Dysphagia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the current care plan dated 1/5/2022 revealed .Nutritional risk r/t [related to]: dx [diagnosis] dementia, history of GERD [Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease], COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease], Parkinson's, hx [history] breast CA [cancer], DM [diabetes mellitus], Constipation, dysphagia .Interventions: Offer fluids throughout the day . Observation in Resident #11's room on 5/9/2022 at 11:07 AM, revealed Resident #11 was in bed and her water pitcher and covered glass…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #44) was monitored for the side effect of Tardive Dyskinesia (a condition affecting the nervous system, often caused by long-term use of some psychiatric drugs. Symptoms include repetitive muscle movements in the face, neck, arms and legs) related to the use of antipsychotic medication. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy dated 5/1/2020, with an addendum added on 5/11/2020, titled, Use of Antipsychotic Drugs, revealed, .It is the facility's policy that each resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs, including unnecessary antipsychotic drugs .AIMS [Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale] Assessment done every 6 months to monitor for abnormal involuntary movements for residents taking Antipsychotic medications .AIMS are completed by Psyche or MDS [Minimum Data Set] Coordinator . Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed she was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored for 2 of 57 residents (Resident #10 and #51). The facility also failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and discarded properly in 2 of 5 medication carts. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, dated [DATE], revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observations of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart . Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medication Requiring Refrigeration, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN