Humphreys County Care And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 69.6 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.82 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained for 2 of 2 (Resident #31 and #75) sampled residents reviewed for weight loss. This resulted in actual harm when the facility failed to implement interventions following a significant weight loss for Resident #31 and #75. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring, dated 2/2023, revealed .The facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status.Information gathered from the nutritional assessment.interventions will be identified, implemented, monitored and modified.consistent with the resident's assessed needs.A significant change in weight is defined as.5% [percent] change in weight in 1 month (30 days). Review of the facility policy titled, Nutritional Management, dated 1/20/2024, revealed .The facility provides care and services to each resident to ensure the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-04 · tag F0922 — failed to maintain the building's systems — widespread
  Have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sufficient emergency water supply was available. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Emergency Water Supply, dated 9/17/2024, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to establish procedures to ensure that water remains available for drinking and essential functions when there is a loss of normal water supply.The volume of water needed.Drinking.1 gallon per day times the number of residents and staff.Handwashing.1 gallon per day time the number of staff.Cooking.1 gallon per day times the number of staff.Toilet flushing.2 gallons per day times the number of residents.Miscellaneous.1 gallon per day times the number of residents and staff.The Dietary Manager maintains a 3-day supply of bottled water for drinking and cooking. Observation and interview in the boiler room on 9/4/2025 at 5:30 PM, revealed 4 hot water heaters with a capacity of 116 gallons. Two of the 4 hot water heaters were not in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on job description review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain qualified dietary staff for 76 of 76 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated job description titled, Director of Food Services, revealed .Education.Be a graduate of an accredited course in dietetic training approved by the American Dietetic Association.Experience.Must have, as a minimum five (5) years experience in a supervisory capacity in a hospital, nursing care facility, or other related medical facility. Must have training in cost control, food management, diet therapy .Specific Requirements.Must be registered as a Food Service Director in the state.Must be knowledgeable of food services practices and procedures as well as the laws, regulations, and guidelines governing food services functions in nursing care facilities. 2. During an interview on 9/2/2025 at 8:46 AM, Dietary Aide KK was asked who the Dietary Manager (DM) was. Dietary Aide KK stated .we don't have one.quit about 2 weeks ago. During an interview in the kitchen on 9/2/2025 at 2:45…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain dignity and respect during dining when 1 of 15 (Registered Nurse (RN)) PP staff members failed to use courtesy titles when addressing residents (Resident #69) and when 2 of 15 staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Y and QQ) served meals in the hall to 3 of 3 (Resident #31, #51, and #75) residents observed for dining. Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain dignity and respect during dining when 1 of 15 (Registered Nurse (RN)) PP staff members failed to use courtesy titles when addressing residents (Resident #69) and when 2 of 15 staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Y and QQ) served meals in the hall to 3 of 3 (Resident #31, #51, and #75) residents observed for dining. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Courtesy Titles dated 9/1/2017, revealed .It is the policy of this facility that all personnel are to treat…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written information on how to formulate an Advance Directive for 9 of 24 (Residents #1, #6, #7, #22, #31, #49, # 54, #55, and #83) sampled residents. The findings include: 1.Review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directives, dated 9/1/2017, revealed .Prior to or upon admission of a resident to our facility, the Admissions Director or designee will provide written information.the right to formulate advance directives . 2.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Failure and Hypertension. Review of the annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated that Resident #1 was cognitively intact. The facility was unable to provide documentation that the resident and/or Responsible Party (RP) were provided with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of resident property when staff did not report an allegation of missing money for 1 of 4 (Resident #2) sampled residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property, dated 9/15/2023, revealed .It is the organization's intention to prevent the occurrence of abuse.misappropriation of resident property, and to assure all alleged violations of federal or State laws which involve.misappropriation of resident property are investigated, and reported immediately to the Facility Administrator, the State Agency, and other appropriate State and local agencies in accordance with Federal and State law.The Facility Administrator is responsible for reporting all investigations results to applicable State agencies as required by Federal and State law.Misappropriation of resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to perform a thorough investigation for misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 4 (Resident #2) sampled residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property, dated 9/15/2023, revealed .The organization's policy is that the Facility Administrator, or his or her designee, will conduct a reasonable investigation of each such alleged violation.Investigation Guidelines.The Facility Administrator will investigate all allegations, reports, grievances, and incidents that could potentially constitute.suspicion of crime.the Facility Administrator retains the ultimate responsibility to oversee and complete the investigation, and to draw conclusions regarding the incident.The investigation should include interviews of involved persons.alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 out of 18 (Residents #36 and #61) sample residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 2/5/2025, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident.The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following:.The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's need. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Severe Dementia, Depression, and Anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to update or revise care plans for 2 of 18 (Resident #3 and #5) sampled residents. The findings include: 1.Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 2/5/2025, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident.The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Bipolar, Lower Back Pain, Wedge Compression Fracture of T7 (seventh thoracic vertebra] -T8 [eighth thoracic vertebra), and Wedge Compression Fracture of Lumbar Vertebra. Review of the admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Review of the facilities Incident Checklist dated 8/8/2025, revealed Resident #3 had a fall on 8/8/2025.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards when unsecure sharps and cleaning chemicals were in 5 of 76 (Residents #11, #18, #65, #66, and #83) sampled residents' rooms. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Sharps Disposal, dated 1/1/2024, revealed .The facility shall discard contaminated sharps into designated containers.Whoever uses contaminated sharps will discard them immediately or as soon as feasible into designated containers.Contaminated sharps will be discarded into container that are: Closable, Puncture resistant, Leakproof on sides and bottom, Labeled or color-coded in accordance with our established labeling system. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Personal Belongings, dated 7/2025, revealed .If the facility staff identify items or substances that pose risks to residents' health and safety and are in plain view, they may confiscate them. 2. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, Daily Refrigerator Temperature Monitor log review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored when medications were unsecure in 2 of 76 (Resident #22 and #55) resident rooms, and when 1 of 12 ( 100 Hall Med Cart ) medication storage areas were left unlocked and unattended, and when staff failed to complete temperature logs for 2 of 6 ( 200 hall and 700 hall ) medication refrigerators. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, dated 2/11/2024, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms .All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments .During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart .Refrigerated Products .Charts are kept on each refrigerator and temperature levels…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,013 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-09-04
• $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-10-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN