Waverly Hills Post Acute
895 Powers Blvd, Waverly, TN 37185 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (931) 296-7552 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.3% | 14.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 6.1% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.6% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 89.8% | 13.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.4% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 53.0% | 31.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.6% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.1% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 32.3% | 16.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.7% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 26.9% | 79.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.2% | 22.6% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.6%CMS range 45.7–77.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 5.7–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 24.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 4.2–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 63.3 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, Emergency Medical Services, Police Department Incident Narrative, and interview, the facility failed to ensure safety interventions were implemented and failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards for 1 of 3 (Resident #4) sampled resident reviewed for accidents, resulting in significant injury and death to Resident #4 . On 1/9/2026, Resident #4, who was moderately cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with transfers, was found unresponsive by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A and lying supine (lying on back with face upward) on the floor with the bed control cord stretched across her body and neck area and pinned under her back near her left shoulder. Resident #4's head and torso were partially under the bed, with the bed resting on the Resident's head and chest. The facility's failure to ensure care plan safety interventions to keep the bed in low position were followed, resulted in immediate jeopardy when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, fall investigation review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and secure environment for 6 of 8 residents (Resident #11, #14, #18, #52, #163, and #215) reviewed for falls and accidents. The facility failed to ensure processes were implemented to provide supervision and assistance to ensure the residents' environment was free of accident hazards. The facility failed to conduct appropriate fall investigations to identify all contributing factors (root causes) including the disabling of the courtyard door alarm on the 400 hall and failed to implement appropriate interventions to ensure resident safety. On [DATE] Resident #11, a vulnerable resident with memory impairment and abnormalities of gait and mobility, exited the building unsupervised and without staff knowledge after a staff member disabled the courtyard door alarm on the 400 hall. At approximately 11:15 AM, a staff member was looking out the window of a resident's room and saw…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards when unsecured sharps were observed in resident's room for 1 of 57 (Resident #37) residents reviewed for accidents. Observations during survey revealed no wandering residents on Resident #37's hall. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Sharps Disposal, with a revised date of January 2012, revealed .The facility shall discard contaminated sharps into designated container . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Delusional Disorders, Dementia, and Cognitive Communication Deficient. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated Resident #37 had moderately impaired cognition and required supervision and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to follow Physician's Orders and provide care and services regarding oxygen therapy for 3 of 6 (Resident #57, #257, and #308) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated 10/2024, revealed .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration .Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure .Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident . 2. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Pneumonia, and Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, Quarterly Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) review, and interview, the facility failed to submit accurate staffing data for 1 of 4 (Quarter 2, January 1-March 31, 2025) quarters reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Reporting Direct Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal), with a revision date of August 2022, revealed .Complete and accurate direct care staffing information is reported electronically to CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] through the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system in a uniform format specified by CMS .Direct care staffing information includes staff hired directly by the facility, those hired through an agency, and contract employees . Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Quarter 2 of 2025 (January 1- March 31) revealed one star staffing rating and excessively low weekend staffing. During an interview on 6/18/2205 at 10:54 AM, the Administrator stated, .None of the agency staff hours rolled into the system .The agency staff has to be manually put it into the system. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, review of the facility's Infection Control Program documents, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to follow Infection Control practices when they failed to track pathogens in the Monthly Surveillance Report, when facility staff left a contaminated ice scoop in the ice chest for 1 of 2 (300 and 400 hall) nourishment rooms and when the facility failed to use enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 3 (Resident #8) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship- Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, dated 12/2016, revealed .Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility -wide antibiotic stewardship .All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions related to unlabeled, undated, food items, expired foods, and dirty metal carts, food containers, food carts, floors, and nourishment refrigerators. The finding include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary: Food Storage, dated 7/31/2023, revealed .Food shall be stored in accordance with professional standards for food service .staple items such as flour, sugar, and cornmeal should be stored in clean, closed containers .All stored items should have an expiration date or a purchase/delivery date .Open Date .ready- to-eat .food .shall be clearly marked at the time the original container is opened . Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary: Cleaning, dated 7/31/2023, revealed .Adequate cleaning and sanitizing shall minimize the risk of food born illnesses . 2. Observation in the kitchen on 7/15/2024 at 8:48 AM, revealed: A 4-tier metal cart with food particles and a dried dark brown substance on the cart. On the top shelf…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 6 of 60 (Resident #6, #21, #22, #35, #36, and #45) resident shared bathrooms observed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 11/20/2023, revealed, .All reusable items and equipment requiring .cleaning .or disinfection shall be cleaned in accordance with our current procedures governing the cleaning and disinfection of soiled or contaminated equipment .The reusable equipment shall be decontaminated using a germicidal detergent prior to storing for reuse . Review of the facility's undated cleaning list titled, ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING INFECTION CONTROL COMPLIANCE LOG, revealed, .ITEM TO BE CLEANED .HOYERS .FREQUENCY .AFTER USE .METHOD OF CLEANIG .DISINFECTANT WIPES .RESPONSIBLE .CNA'S . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain or enhance residents' dignity and respect during dining when 3 of 12 (Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) A, B, C), failed to knock and/or announce self when entering resident rooms and failed to use courtesy titles when addressing residents during dining. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity Policy, dated 11/20/2023 revealed, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality .All staff members are involved in providing care and services to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights . 2. Observation during dining on the 300 hall on 7/15/24 at 11:44 AM, revealed, CNA A removed a tray from the meal cart, knocked and entered Resident #2's room and stated, I got…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to follow Physician Order for 2 of 5 (Resident #23 and #213) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's titled, [Named Pharmacy] Delivery Services, dated 11/2021, revealed .Night delivery is provided to each facility on a pre-set schedule .This delivery consists of medications .the Charge Nurse should compare the medication label and the pharmacy label to the physician order .to identify discrepancies .delivered medications match the orders . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 8/4/2023, revealed Medications shall be administered by licensed medical or nursing personnel acting within the scope of their practice and per the Physician's Signed Order. While administering medications the nurse shall observe the 8 Rights of Medication Administration .Right Dose .Right Time .Review the EMAR [Electronic Medication Administration Record] to identify the medication to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation and interview the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for a resident with dialysis, failed to assess and monitor dialysis sites for thrill, bruit, and infection, and failed to follow/implement individualized care plan for 1 of 1 (Resident #263) sampled residents for dialysis. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy Dialysis dated 10/9/2023, revealed .Residents who have End Stage Renal Disease [ESRD] and receive dialysis shall be provided care consistent with professional standards of practice, the physicians/practitioner's orders, and in accordance with the resident goals and preferences .Vascular Access [is] a connection made between an artery and a vein to provide good blood flow for dialysis. Bruit [is] a constant rumbling sound such as swishing or whoosh sound heard via stethoscope placed on the access .Thrill [is] a steady vibration or rumbling sensation felt at the AV [Arteriovenous] graft/fistula site .Medical conditions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured when 1 of 3 staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) A) left the medication cart unlocked, unattended, and out of sight for 1 of 7 (100 Hall medication cart) medication storage areas and when medications were left unsecured and unattended, at the bedside, in Resident #41's and Resident #52's room. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration: Medication, Controlled and Biological Storage, Night/Emergency Box and Backup Pharmacy, dated 9/5/2023, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises shall be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacture's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security .All drugs and biologicals shall be stored in locked compartments […
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 11 citations
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Assignment Sheets, Nursing Home Licensing Checklist, facility time punches, the facility working schedule, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Daily Assignment Sheets were completed for 18 of 18 (1/2/2023, 1/9/2023, 1/13/2023, 2/10/2023, 2/14/2023, 2/15/2023, 3/4/2023, 3/5/2023, 3/14/2023, 3/21/2025, 3/25/2023, 3/31/2023, 4/2/2023, 4/8/2023, 4/14/2023, 5/11/2023, 7/1/2023, and 7/29/2023) days and sufficient staff were scheduled for 2 of 218 (3/23/2023 and 4/2/2023) days reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff, dated 10/24/2022, revealed .The facility shall supply services by sufficient numbers of each of the following personnel types on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans .licensed nurses .other nursing personnel, including but not limited to nurse aides .To meet the needs of patients or residents with dementia, at a minimum, the organization plans nurse staffing (RN [Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured when 1 of 5 staff member (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #3)) left the medications unattended, when 2 of 5 staff members (LPN #4 and #LPN #7 ) left the medication cart and treatment cart unlocked and unattended, and when 2 of 7 medication storage areas (Station 2 Medication Room, and Station 2 medication Cart) had expired medications, open undated medications, had externals and internals stored together, and a medication was left at a resident's bedside. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration: Medication, Controlled and Biological Storage . dated 9/20/2022, revealed .Eternal Products: Disinfectants and drugs for external use are stored separately from internal and injectable medications .Internal Products: Medications to be administered by mouth are stored separately from other formulation .Opening Medications: whenever a seal of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices that prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when 2 of 5 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #3, and #4) failed to clean reusable equipment before and after use, and when 1 of 3 staff Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA #7) failed to wear proper Personal Protective Equipment when entering the room of a resident positive for Covid-19. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 10/24/2022, revealed .Equipment Protocol. All reusable items and requiring special cleaning or disinfection shall be cleaned in accordance with our current procedures governing the cleaning and disinfection of soiled or contaminated equipment .Reusable items potentially contaminated .The reusable equipment shall be decontaminated using a germicidal detergent prior to storing for reuse . Review of the facility's policy titled, Covid-19 Prevention, Response, and Reporting, dated 3/5/2020 and revised 5/12/2023, revealed .To provide guidance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, Facility Assessment, employee training records, and interviews, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective behavioral health training program for all staff (direct care staff, indirect care staff, contract staff and volunteers, as appropriate to their roles). The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy's titled, Behavioral Health Services dated 10/24/2022, revealed .To ensure that residents receive necessary behavioral health services .It is the policy of this facility that all residents receive care and services to assist him or her to reach and maintain the highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning .The facility shall consider .residents with mental disorders, psychosocial disorders, or substance use disorders .with a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder .Facility staff shall receive education to ensure appropriate competencies and skills sets for meeting the behavioral health needs of residents .Education shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assess 1 of 5 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for self-administration of medication. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medication, dated 1/1/2023, revealed To provide guidance on self-administration of medication by the resident .A resident who desires to self-administer medication may be permitted to do so if the resident is assessed, using the Assessment for Self-Administration of Medication tool and deemed competent to self-administer medications safely as determined by the interdisciplinary team .If the resident is deemed competent to self-administer medications, per the Assessment of Self Administration, the physician must authorize self-administration by giving an order . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Encephalopathy, Osteoarthritis, Cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective housekeeping to maintain a sanitary environment for 1 of 32 (Resident #213) resident bathrooms observed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Housekeeping-Cleaning and Disinfecting, with a revision date of 5/15/2023 revealed, .Surfaces that are frequently touched . require more frequent cleaning. Specific areas include .bathrooms .Clean the entire toilet .rim . Observations in Resident #213's bathroom on 8/7/2023 at 11:13 AM and on 8/8/2023 at 7:45 AM, revealed the resident's bathroom had urine in toilet, a dark brown ring around the liquid inside the toilet, the toilet seat was raised and a dark brown round spot that was approximately dime-nickel size was on the left side of the bowl. Observations on 8/8/2023 at 10:50 AM, 12:14 PM, and 5:12 PM, revealed Resident #213's bathroom had a dark brown ring around the liquid inside the toilet, the toilet seat was raised, a dark brown round spot that was approximately dime-nickel size was on the left side of the bowl, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, facility investigations and interview, the facility failed to report the results of abuse allegation investigation outcomes within 5 working days of the alleged violation for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #11, #48, and #51) sampled for abuse allegation investigations. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy Abuse Prohibition Plan revision date of 10/24/22 showed .Notification of law enforcement and/or the State Agency .within the appropriate time frames .REPORTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ELDER JUSTICE ACT .Each covered individual .shall report, or cause a report to be made, to the State Agency and one or more law enforcement entities .The local Police Department is the law enforcement entity for the political subdivision of this facility .The Administrator shall report results of all investigations to the State Agency, within (5 ) five working days of the allegation 2. Medical record review for Resident #11 documented an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for a urinary catheter and failed to ensure appropriate diagnoses for the indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #214) sampled residents reviewed with urinary catheters. The findings include: Review of the facility's titled policy Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity Policy, dated 10/24/2022, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life .Maintain resident privacy . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #214 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Femur Fracture, Atrial Fibrillation, Pulmonary Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Diabetes. Review of the Care Plan dated 8/2/2023, revealed At risk for infection R/T [related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of medical records for 2 of 5 (Resident #32 and #113) residents observed during medication administration. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Patient Confidentiality, dated 1/2023, revealed This facility honors the resident's right to secure and confidential personal and medical records. This includes the right to confidentiality of all information contained in a resident's records, regardless of the form of storage or location of the record .'Confidentiality' is defined a safeguarding the content of information including written, video, audio, or other computer stored information from unauthorized disclosure without the consent of the resident and/or representative . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Encephalopathy, Osteoarthritis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, facility data, and interview, the facility's QUALITY ASSURANCE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (QAPI) program failed to identify issues, take appropriate actions, ensure appropriate interventions, and monitor effectiveness for falls related to 71 resident falls in the last 120 days. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled QUALITY ASSURANCE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN, dated January 2023, revealed The Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan is designed to establish and maintain an organized facility-wide program that is data-driven and utilizes a proactive approach to improving the quality of life and services throughout the facility. This is a living document that will continue to be refined and revisited. It is written in accordance with the facility's mission, vision, and values. Objectives of the QAPI plan include .Establish a facility-wide process to identify opportunities for improvement through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and Resident safety .Address gaps in systems of processes. Ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #33 and #47) were vaccinated for Pneumonia. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pneumococcal Immunization, revised 10/21/2022, revealed, . Each resident shall be assessed for pneumococcal vaccination upon admission .each resident or the resident's representative shall receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization .the resident/representative retains the right to refuse .shall state the reason for refusal and sign a declination statement .the resident's medical record shall include documentation that indicates .was provide education regarding the benefits and potential side effects .received or did not receive due to medical contraindication or refusal . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation and Dementia. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445251. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.