No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Southern Tenn Medical Center SNF

629 Hospital Road, Winchester, TN 37398 · For profit - Individual · 46 certified beds · (931) 967-8249 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (931) 967-8249 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
155 Hospital Rd · (931) 962-0672 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1201 Dinah Shore Blvd · (931) 967-2777 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1901 Cowan Hwy · (931) 967-0306 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 1st Ave N · (931) 967-5181 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
108 Memorial Dr · (931) 967-1211

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.4%79.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.6%22.6%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.8%11.2%12.0%worse

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

70.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.64hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.53hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF70.5%CMS range 62.0–76.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.9–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.2–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.21
RN hours/ resident / day
2.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.12
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 11.6 residents a day — about 25% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 41% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.51 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-04)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2022-07-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 3 residents (Resident #4, Resident #11, and Resident #17) were offered the opportunity to formulate an advanced directive upon admission to the facility of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Advanced Directives, revealed .The facility will provide information to the resident/ resident representative on Advanced Directives and will assist the resident/ resident representative in formulating advanced care planning .Upon admission, the resident/ resident representative will be provided with written information concerning the right to .formulate an advanced directive if he or she chooses to do so .Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the Social Services Director or designee will inquire of the resident, his/ her family members and/ or his or her legal representative, about existence of any written advanced Directives .If the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-04 · tag F0582 — widespread
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews the facility failed to provide the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for 3 residents (Resident #3, Resident #5, and Resident #33) of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification.The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Myocardial Infarction [Heart Attack] and Muscle Weakness. Review of a 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 scored a 4 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a Nursing progress note for Resident #3 dated 8/26/2025, revealed .Patient left unit .to be discharged home, transferred out of unit .EMS [Emergency Medical Services] via stretcher . Review of the medical record for Resident #3, revealed no NOMNC or ABN had been provided to the resident or resident representative. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on job description review, facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective administrative leadership and oversight to ensure the required documentation was maintained or obtained related to Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) for 3 residents (Resident #3, Resident #5, and Resident #33), failed to maintain or obtain the required documentation related to Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) for 3 residents (Resident #3, Resident #5, and Resident #33), failed to offer assistance with the formulation of Advanced Directives for 3 residents (Resident #4, Resident #11, and Resident #17), and had not documented staff or residents received education on COVID-19 vaccination for 5 residents (Resident #7, Resident #11, Resident #19, Resident #24, and Resident #32), and had not offered the COVID-19 vaccine to the staff since 2022.The findings include: Review of a Job Description Report for Post Acute/ Skilled Care Administrator dated 10/11/2024, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, job description review, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes review, medical record review, and interview, the facility's leadership and QAPI Committee failed to identify, address and initiate corrective action plans for quality deficiencies to ensure the residents attained or maintained their highest practicable physical, functional, mental, and psychosocial well-being when the residents were not offered the opportunity to formulate advanced directives upon admission, were not provided Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABN) or Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) documentation upon discharge, and had not documented the staff or residents received education on the COVID-19 vaccine for 5 residents (Resident #7, Resident #11, Resident #19, Resident #24, and Resident #32), and had not offered the COVID-19 vaccine to the facility's staff since 2022.The findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee [QAPI], dated 7/19/2025, revealed .The facility will maintain systems and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review , facility policy review, review of current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations and interviews the facility failed to document education was provided to residents and staff regarding COVID-19 vaccination, failed to document offering the COVID vaccine to residents and completing a declination form if the vaccine was declined, and failed to offer staff COVID-19 vaccines affecting all staff and 5 of 5 (Resident #7, #11, #19, #24 and #32) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Plan effective 8/2023, revealed .Referral for assessment, potential testing, immunization .counseling as appropriate of hospital staff, independent practitioners .is providers when there is a risk of occupational exposure, or illness from an infectious disease that may put the population they serve at risk .continued education is provided to all staff .including their responsibilities in preventing the spread of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter [a tube inserted into the bladder that drains urine] for 1 resident (Resident #12) of 4 residents reviewed for the use of an indwelling catheter.The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Foley Catheter, dated 10/2024, revealed .Insertion of .[an indwelling urinary] .catheter should only be used for appropriate indications .Indications should be documented by the physician in the .[indwelling urinary] .catheter order .indications, date of insertion, time of insertion, staff inserting, catheter type, size, and proper technique . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral Region and Urinary Tract Infection. Review of the baseline care plan for Resident #12 dated 8/23/2025, revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-07-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, observation, and interview, the facility failed to properly prevent COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) by failing to implement universal use of eye protection as part of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during resident care interactions in a community with high COVID-19 transmission which had the potential to result in COVID-19 transmission to all 11 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Plan, revised 4/20/2021, showed .following objectives are in place to reduce or eliminate risks .appropriate use of personal protective equipment . Review of the facility's policy titled, Standard Operating Procedure, revised 6/15/2021, showed .Core Principles of COVID-19 Infection Prevention .Appropriate staff use of Personal Protective Equipment . Review of the CDC guidance titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included person-centered interventions for 2 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #15) of 4 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Admissions, Transfers, and Discharges Skilled Care, with an effective date of 2/2022, showed .The facility will develop a person-centered plan of care to address patient needs and services, with input from the Patient/ Representative to ensure the needs and services are provided in accordance with resident choices and with consideration of cultural, ethnic, and spiritual preferences . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Interdisciplinary Care Plan, showed .The result of the MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment will be used to develop, review and revise the resident's comprehensive Plan of Care. The assessment will be conducted or coordinated through participation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 resident (Resident #15) of 3 residents reviewed for insulin administration. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, with an effective date of 8/2021, showed .Medications may be administered to patients upon order of the medical staff or other individuals who have been granted clinical privileges to write such orders . Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Cellulitis, Schizophrenia, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of a physician's order dated 6/8/2022, showed an order for finger stick blood sugar checks daily before breakfast. Review of a physician's order dated 6/10/2022, showed Resident #15 received a Diabetic Consistent Carbohydrate diet. Review of a physician's order dated 6/15/2022, showed .INSULIN GLARGINE [long acting diabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and interview the facility failed to monitor behaviors and side effects for psychotropic medications for 1 resident (#116) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Urinary Tract Infection, Dementia, Congestive Heart Failure, and Depression. Medical record review of Physicians Orders revealed the following: 4/30/19- Trazodone (medication to treat depression) 50 milligrams (mg) po (by mouth) QHS (every night time) 4/30/19- Mirtazepine (medication to treat depression) 15 mg po Q HS Medical record review of the facility Psychoactive Drug Monitoring dated 5/4/19 and 5/5/19, revealed .Does the patient receive Psychoactive Drugs .N [No] . Observation and interview of Resident #116 on 5/6/19 at 12:55 PM, in the residents room revealed the resident was alert and oriented, sitting up in a recliner chair. Interview with the Director of Nursing on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-07-13 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident Assessment Instrument Manual 3.0 (RAI) record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) of 16 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The findings include: Review of the RAI Manual 3.0 dated 10/2019 showed .the comprehensive assessment is considered complete on the date the RN [Registered Nurse] Coordinator indicates completion of the admission assessment .Assuming the resident does not have any significant changes in status or is not discharged from the facility the next assessment schedule is the Quarterly assessment . Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Fracture of Right Femur, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Atrial Fibrillation. Review of Resident #2's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident was discharged from the facility on 1/14/2022. Review of the admission/5-day MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • DSB ACQUISITION LLC — investment firm · 80.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HIGHPOINT HEALTHCARE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2025
ASCENSION HEALTHOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2025
BAPTIST HEALTH CARE AFFILIATES INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2025
HIGHPOINT PARTNER, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2025
HISTORIC LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2014
LEGACY LIFEPOINT HEALTH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/24/2022
LIFEPOINT HOLDINGS 2 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2025
LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2015
SAINT THOMAS HEALTHOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2025
SAINT THOMAS NETWORKOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2025
DAVIS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/24/2019
GROOMS, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2016
HAUGH, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/25/2022
LAWRENCE, CHARLOTTEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/25/2022
MONTE, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2009
POPPELL, MARCUSIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/02/2009
EDWARDS, DANNYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2023
MARTIN, ADAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/22/2022
SELBE, JAMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/26/2025
WOFFORD, JODYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
ZAHARCU, ALEXANDRUIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
LIFEPOINT CORPORATE SERVICES GENERAL PARTNERSHIPOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445222. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next