Ware Memorial Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 87.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.99 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and once developed, failed to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing for one (Resident #1) of nine residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to: A. Ensure Resident #1 who was admitted to the facility without a pressure ulcer did not develop an unstageable pressure ulcer with eschar (a layer of dead skin tissue that forms over a wound) on her coccyx within two weeks of admission. B. Failed to notify the wound care nurse of the ulcer. C. Failed to accurately document Resident #1's skin conditions which caused delayed care for the ulcer. D. Failed to document descriptions of the pressure ulcer which put the resident at risk of worsening pressure ulcer due to not accurately documenting Resident #1's skin conditions.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remained as free from accident hazards as was possible; and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accident hazards for one resident (Resident #1) of 7 residents observed for accident hazards. -CNA A transferred Resident #1 in an unsafe manner resulting in a small skin tear and a large bruise to her left lower leg. This failure could affect all the residents at the facility by placing them at risk for accidents that lead to injuries such as bruising, skin tears, fractures, subdural hematomas, and feeling of isolation. Findings include: Record review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include senile degeneration of the brain (a decreased in the ability to think, concentrate, or remember), heart failure (a condition in which the heart dose not pump blood as well as it should), dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration.The facility failed to ensure LVN A stayed with Resident #1 until the medications she gave him were taken on the morning of 04/16/26.This failure could place residents at risk of harm due to not receiving necessary medications or receiving medications at the wrong time as well as taking medication that does not belong to them.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 04/16/26 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), depression (a mood disorder that causes a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for 4 (Resident #1, #2, #28, and #40) of 24 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. -The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #1, #2, and #40 for the use of restraints on their MDS assessments. -The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #28 for the use of CPAP therapy on his MDS assessment. This failure to accurately assess a resident could place residents at risk for inaccurate and incomplete MDS assessment which could result in residents not receiving correct care and services. Findings include: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet printed 02/10/26 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart dose not pump blood as well as it should), atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 (Resident #46 and Resident #79) of 24 residents reviewed for medication administration.1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A stayed with Resident #46 until her medications were swallowed on the morning of [DATE].2. The facility failed to ensure LVN B stayed with Resident #79 until her medications were swallowed on the morning of [DATE].3. The facility failed to ensure the Southeast Hall medication cart did not contain expired eyedrops.4. The facility failed to ensure the Southwest Hall medication cart did not contain expired insulin.These failures could place residents at risk of harm due to not receiving necessary medications or receiving medications at the wrong time as well as taking medication that does not belong to them or is no longer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 2 kitchens when they failed to: Ensure kitchen staff used proper hand washing and sanitation procedures when handling food. Ensure kitchen staff and other employees wore hair restraints and beard coverings while in the kitchen. This failure could cause decreased meal satisfaction and decreased meal consumption due to using unsanitary practices in the facility's kitchen and could affect all residents in the facility that receive meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: In an observation and interview of the kitchen food prep activities on 2/10/26 at 8:50 am, [NAME] I was observed in the kitchen with his beard cover under his chin and not covering his moustache. He stated he had been aware it should have been covering the moustache and just forgot to pull the face covering up over his moustache. He stated food borne illness would be a consequence of not having the proper covering. In an observation of the kitchen prep area on 2/10/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 1 (Resident #55) of 25 residents reviewed for advanced directives.Resident #55's DNR form lacked a dated notarial acknowledgment and therefore was not fully executed.This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medical treatment inconsistent with their or their legal representative's expressed wishes.Findings included:Record review of Resident #55's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified atrial fibrillation(irregular heart rhythm), drug induce subacute dyskinesia(movement disorder related to side effects of medications), peripheral vascular disease (narrowed arteries/reduce blood flow to limbs) and hypertension(high blood pressure). Resident #55 was identified as a DNR in the Advance Directive section.Record review of Resident #55's quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 (the 1-Northwest Hall medication cart) of 10 medication storage areas reviewed for medication storage. -The 1-Northwest Hall medication cart has loose medication pills. The facility's failure could result in a resident receiving medications that would be ineffective for their treatment resulting in exacerbation of the resident's condition and disease processes.Findings included: During an observation on 02/11/2026 at 08:44 AM of the 1-Northwest medication cart with LVN E present. Noted two loose pills identified by the LVN E as Levothyroxine and Atorvastatin. During an interview on 02/11/2026 at 1:24 PM LVN E reported loose medication in a medication cart can result in a resident missing a dose of medication, they could run out of the medication early and the insurance might not refill it. This could affect the residents if they do not receive the dose of medication they need. During an interview on 02/11/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #11) of 4 residents observed for infection control. -LVN E did not perform hand hygiene properly while performing wound care for Resident #11. This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents by exposing them to care that could lead to the spread of infections, tissue breakdown, and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene. Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's admission record dated 02/12/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to included Parkinson's (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movements to include tremors), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interfere with daily functioning), Osteoarthritis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 7 out of 8 resident snack refrigerators located in the residents dining rooms, reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure refrigerators were free of expired foods, non-food items and staff items. 3. The facility failed to ensure cleanliness was maintained in the refrigerators. These failures could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen, and stored food in the resident refrigerators were at risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: North Side First Floor In an observation and interview on 12/3/24 at 8:25 am of the initial tour of the lower-level resident dining room on the North side called the North First Floor Dining there were 2 refrigerators in the dining room. The refrigerators were stainless steel and had freezers on the bottom portion of the refrigerator. There were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be informed in advance if the risks and benefits of proposed care, or treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to chose the alternative or options he or she prefers for 5 of 19 residents (Resident #13, #15, #47, #70, and #75) and 5 residents interviewed during an anonymous interview reviewed for self-determination. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13, #15, #47, #70, and #75 and 5 anonymous residents received requested bedrails for 10 days or more after requested by the resident or family. This failure could cause residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected leading to feeling of anxiety, anger, isolation, and deterioration in general health conditions. Findings include: Resident #13 Record review of Resident #13's clinical record revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the residents stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, which included charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #31, Resident #82, and Resident #240) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid coverage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31, Resident #82, and Resident #240 were given a NOMNC (a notice that indicates when care is set to end from a home health agency, skilled nursing facility, comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, or hospice) with information on how to appeal the decision when residents were discharged from skilled services prior to covered days being exhausted. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31, Resident #82, and Resident #240 were given a SNF ABN (document that informs a Medicare beneficiary that Medicare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$81,894 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $81,894 — penalty dated 2025-02-24
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-25 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in TX