No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Harmonee House

1400 Main St, Amherst, TX 79312 · For profit - Corporation · 35 certified beds · (806) 246-3505 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (806) 246-3505 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1600 S Sunset Ave · (806) 385-5705 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
102 W Waylon Jennings Blvd · (806) 385-4250 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1000 W Waylon Jennings Blvd · (806) 385-0144 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.0%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.7%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.4%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.8%13.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.0%9.6%17.1%check this — see note marked star below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-11)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-01 · tag F0846 — widespread
    Have policies and procedures ensuring the administrator's responsibilities for facility closure are completed successfully.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to submit to the residents of the facility and their legal representatives of such residents or other responsible parties, written notification of an impending closure at least 60 days prior to the date of closure for 16 of 16 resident reviewed for discharge notice. The facility failed provide residents and their representatives a written notice of closure at least 60-days before closure. This failure could place residents at risk of an improper discharge and not having notice to provide them with time to place for a safe discharge. Findings included: Record review of facility closure letter dated September 25, 2025 revealed that the letter indicated that the DON and ADON would be assisting families with a listing of homes in the surrounding area to help make informed decisions and families and residents could meet with the governing board on September 29, 2025. Record review of form 2191, the Nursing Facility Closure Master Resident List, dated 10/20/2025, revealed all 16 residents had been discharged to other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure freezer items were properly stored, labeled, and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure pantry foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated. 3. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated. These failures could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation of the refrigerator on 09/09/24 at 11:12 AM revealed the following: 1. (1) bottle of ketchup, no date. 2. (2) trays of cups, filled with various liquids, covered by a tray, no labels, or dates. Observation of walk-in pantry on 09/09/24 at 11:15 AM revealed the following: 1. (1) box of potatoes, open to the air, no label or date. 2. (1) package of hot dog buns, 2 buns left, no label or date. 3. (5) individual applesauce cups, no dates. 4. (1) loaf of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 5 of 8 anonymous residents observed for 3 of 3 (September 9, 10, and 11 of 2024) days and reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure scheduled activities were taking place. The facility failed to ensure activities met resident's needs/desires. These failures could place residents at risk of boredom and/or a decline in their quality of life. Findings Included: Record review of facility activities calendar dated September 2024 revealed at least 5 activities scheduled each weekday and two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consider the views of a resident group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility for 3 of 8 anonymous residents. The facility failed to address a grievance put forth by the resident council regarding a resident who sang disruptively loud and spit on the floor and on other residents during meals. This failure could lead to residents feeling unheard and unvalued in their place of residence. Findings Included: During a resident council meeting on 09/10/24 at 10:20 AM 3 of 8 attendees complained about a certain resident who sang at the top of her lungs during meals and spit loogies on the floor and occasionally on other residents during meals. The anonymous residents said the singing made it hard to hold conversations during mealtimes and the loogies made them lose their appetites. The residents stated that during lunch yesterday, when state was observing meal pass, the singing, spitting resident was not brought to the dining room to eat.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status and notify the resident and the resident representative, if any, when there is a change in room for 1 (Resident #6) of 12 residents reviewed for notification of change of condition. The facility failed to inform Resident #6's family of his positive COVID test and subsequent change of rooms to an isolation room. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their change in condition communicated to their physician or representative. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #6's admission record dated 09/10/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, acute bronchitis (lining of tube that carries air to and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the care plan is prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that includes to the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s) and if the participation of the resident or their resident representative is determined not practicable for the development of the resident care plan include an explanation in the resident's medical record for 1 (Resident #6) of 12 residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The facility failed to invite Resident #6's family members to his care plan meeting. This failure could lead to a lack of cohesiveness in resident care and/or residents not receiving necessary care. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #6's admission record dated 09/10/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, acute bronchitis (lining of tube that carries air to and from the lungs is inflamed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review; it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on 1 of 1 medication carts, in that:. 3 medications were left loose in the medication cart and 2 residents' insulin vials and box packaging were not marked correctly with date of opening. 1 insulin medication vial in the medication cart drawer one was marked with an open date of 7-16-24 and the box packaging was dated 8-1-24. Insulin was still in use after 55 days from documented vial opening date. 1 insulin medication vial in the medication cart drawer one was open without an opening date marked on the vial or box packaging. The facility's failure to ensure medications were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles could place residents at risk for exposure to medication that is expired or ineffective; resulting in exacerbation of the disease being treated, exposure to contaminated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated and freezer items were properly stored, labeled, and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure dented cans were not in circulation. 3. The facility failed to ensure pantry foods were properly stored, labeled and dated. These failures placed residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: In an observation of the walk-in pantry on 08/06/2023 at 09:45 AM the following was observed: 1-14.05 oz can of cut green beans dated 4/13 dented and stored with cans in circulation. 2-48 oz cans of Chicken of the Sea Tuna dated 4/13 dented and stored with cans in circulation. 1 open bag of brown gravy in its original packaging open to air with no seal-in a plastic clear container with a blue lid; the blue lid was not sealed. In an observation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #2) of 12 residents reviewed for DNR orders. Resident #2 had an Out-of-Hospital DNR order that was not completed as the physician did not date it. This failure could place residents with DNR orders at risk for receiving, or not receiving, life-saving measures that align with their medical preferences. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 08/06/2023 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder(a mental disorder characterized by persistent low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure in normally enjoyable activities), unspecified Dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering and reasoning), and Pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and the right side of the heart). Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #12) of 12 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. Resident #12 received oxygen therapy but her MDS did not have oxygen therapy checked as a service received. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inappropriate care due to inaccurate assessments. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 08/06/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, pulmonary embolism (blood clot that blocks blood flow in a lung artery), high blood pressure, and shortness of breath. Record review of Resident #12's Quarterly MDS, with a completion date of 06/16/23, revealed a BIMS of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Section G of the MDS noted Resident #12 needed limited assistance from one staff member across all ADLs except eating and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 10 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that described the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #12) of 12 residents reviewed for care plan accuracy. Resident #12 had an order for and was receiving oxygen therapy and it was not mentioned in her care plan. Resident #12 had an order for and was receiving hospice care and it was not mentioned in her care plan. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care or treatment needed. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 08/06/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, pulmonary embolism (blood clot that blocks blood flow in a lung artery), high blood pressure, and shortness of breath. Record review of Resident #12's Quarterly MDS, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the person-centered care plan, and residents' goals and preferences for 2 (Resident #9 and Resident #12) of 12 residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1. Resident #9 had a physician's order for continuous oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 lpm and was receiving oxygen at higher concentrations. 2. Resident #12 had a physician's order for PRN oxygen via nasal cannula at 2-3 lpm and was receiving oxygen at higher concentrations. These failures could place residents who receive oxygen at an increased risk for receiving oxygen at the wrong rate which could lead to hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in the blood), pulmonary oxygen toxicity (damage to the lung lining tissues and air sacs), hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood, decreasing the oxygen supply to vital organs), and shortness of breath. Findings Included: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication rooms. Multiple loose pills and expired medication was found in the medication room. The medication refrigerator was not kept at a temperature between 36 to 46 degrees. The facility's failure could place all residents receiving medication that have lost integrity to not receive their therapeutic dose. Findings included: Observation on 08/06/23 at 10:24am revealed the medication refrigerator was unlocked by the LVN, and the lock box was unlocked within the refrigerator. The temperature on the thermometer read 22 degrees. Observation and interview on 08/06/23 at 10:28am revealed multiple pills lose in the bottom medication basket The LVN stated that they must have come out of the packaging, I think those are discontinued. Observed on medication label that medication had a use by date of 08/02/2022 Record review of the temperature log revealed that the temperature has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete, accurate, readily accessible, and systemically organized records for 1 (Resident #6) of 12 residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to accurately document Resident #6's information in the correct resident's chart. This failure could place all residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care through inadequate documentation, possibly resulting in the deterioration in condition, exacerbation of disease process, and increased risk of harm or injury. Finding included: Record Review of Resident #8's paper chart revealed that Resident #6's records have been placed into Resident #8's chart. Interview on 08/07/23 at 10:44 AM with LVN A stated that the orders will come in on the fax in the business office. Business office manager will deliver them to the LVN who enters the information into the computer system and then places them in the paper chart. LVN A stated that the negative outcome would be that the situation would be very confusing and raise a lot of questions. Interview on 08/07/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that facility staff perform hand hygiene appropriately during incontinent care. This failure could place the residents at an increased risk for potentially exposing them to viral infections, secondary infections, tissue breakdown, communicable diseases and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene. Findings included: Observation on 08/07/23 at 11:17 AM revealed incontinent care of Resident #1. CNA C and NA D started incontinent care by letting Resident #1 know that it was time for a brief change. CNA C sanitized hands before donning the first set of gloves, but there was no observation of NA D performing hand hygiene. CNA C started to remove blankets from Resident #1 and started to remove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen when they failed to: A. Ensure foods were stored under sanitary conditions. B. Ensure expired food was discarded. These failures could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk for food-borne illnesses. Findings include: In an observation on 07/11/2022 at 11:18 AM the following issues in the dry storage were observed: 1. 1 unopened Enriched Wheat Sandwich Bread, Best by date 6/21/2022 2. 3 unopened packs of 12 Hot Dog Bun Enriched, Best by date 7/7/2022 3. 1 opened pack of 12 Hot Dog Bun Enriched containing 9 hot dog buns not labeled, Best by dated 7/7/2022 In an observation on 07/11/2022 at 11:22 AM the following issues in the freezer were observed: 1. 1 box Cubed Beef Steak Fritters- Box is opened, bag is open to air. 2. 1 Box Boneless Pork Chop Fritter Box opened, bag is unsealed 3. 5 eggos- not dated, not in box 4. 1 half full container of Rainbow Sherbet- not dated with discard date, no open date In an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed facility coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for two of 13 residents (Resident #20 and Resident #27) reviewed for PASARR. The facility failed to refer Resident #20 and Resident #27 for PASARR Level II assessments after their PASARR listed them as having evidence or an indicator of Mental Illness. This failure could place residents with a positive PASARR evaluation at risk for decreased quality of life, an increased and unnecessary risk of poor self-esteem and poor self-worth. Findings include: Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 02/14/22, revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension. The face sheet also contained a second sheet, dated 06/01/22, with additional current diagnoses of psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet resident's mental and psychosocial needs for one of 13 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for accurate care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #9's Type 2 Diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. This failure could place the resident at risk for not having their person-centered needs met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Type 2 Diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Record review of Resident #9's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score could not be completed resident is rarely/never understood and had a functionality of requiring one-person assistance with most activities. Section C titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for one of 13 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for care plan timing. - The facility failed to update the comprehensive person-centered care plans to address resident's needs after MDS assessments for Resident #9. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed treatment, care, and services that could result in not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Record review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS completed on 04/05/2022 revealed an active diagnoses of Diabetes mellitus checked in section I2900. Record review of Resident #9's facility provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for one of one medication cart reviewed for medication labeling. The only medication cart in the facility contained an insulin pen that did not contain a resident identifying label or open or discard date. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving the wrong insulin or receiving insulin that has expired. Finding include: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type II diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). Record review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS was not able to be conducted due to the resident rarely or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676370. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next