Avir at Arlington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 53.6 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (Residents #1 and #3) of four residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to follow Resident #1's care plan. The resident's wound site was not monitored for signs/symptoms of infection, the effectiveness of treatment, and the physician was not notified for wound changes. The resident was sent out on pass with her family on 12/25/25. The RP took her to the hospital the same night and was told the resident had sepsis due to an infection of the wound. The resident did not recover and passed away on 01/03/26. On 01/09/26 at 3:00PM, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified, and the Administrator was notified. While the Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2026-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for two (Residents #1 and #2) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received the physician ordered treatment for her pressure ulcer. Staff did not consult with the facility physician or wound care nurse practitioner when the wound started deteriorating. The ulcer worsened and the resident required hospitalization on 12/25/25. On 01/08/26 at 5:10PM, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified, and the Administrator was notified. While the Administrator was notified that the IJ was removed on 01/10/26 at 12:15PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for physician notification. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician when there was a significant change in her wound status on 12/22/25. The resident was sent out on pass with her family on 12/25/25. The RP took her to the hospital the same night and was told the resident had sepsis due to an infection of the wound. The resident did not recover and passed away on 01/03/26. On 01/08/26 at 5:10PM, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified, and the Administrator was notified. While the Administrator was notified that the IJ was removed on 01/10/26 at 12:15PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was on duty in the facility for a minimum of eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, for 1 of 5 quarters (Quarter 2 of 2025) reviewed for RN coverage. 1.The facility failed to have 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage for 15 of 31 days in January 2025.2.The facility failed to have 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage for 25 of 28 days in February 2025.3.The facility failed to have 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage for 5 of 31 days in March 2025. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care.Findings included:Record review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report revealed no RN hours for the following dates:01/01/25, 01/05/25, 01/11/25, 01/12/25, 01/18/25, 01/19/25, 01/25/25, 01/26/25, 01/29/25, 01/31/25, 02/02/25, 02/04/25, 02/05/25, 02/06/25, 02/07/25, 02/08/25, 02/09/25, 02/11/25, 02/12/25, 02/13/25, 02/14/25, 02/15/25, 02/16/25, 02/17/25, 02/18/25, 02/19/25, 02/20/25, 02/21/25, 02/22/25, 02/23/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the residents stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, which included charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #26, Resident #62, and Resident #63) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid coverage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26, Resident #62 and Resident #63 were given a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) form when discharged from skilled services at the facility. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26, Resident #62 and Resident #63 were given a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form with information on how to appeal the decision when residents were discharged form skilled services prior to covered days being exhausted.This failure could place residents at risk of not being informed of changes to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed in consultation with the resident's and representative for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #11) reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The facility failed to invite Resident #10 and Resident #11's resident representative to participate in the residents' care plan meetings.The failure could place residents at risk of their care plans not including resident-specific needs.Findings include: Resident #10Record review of Resident #10's face-sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to facility on 05/12/20 and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnosis included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Ketoacidosis without Coma (a serious, acute metabolic complication where the body produces high levels of ketones acid due to insulin deficiency or resistance, without causing loss of consciousness ); Parkinsonism, Unspecified (neurological disorder causing motor symptoms like tremors, stiffness, slow movement,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment to include maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 3 of 17 residents (Resident #14, Resident #2 and Resident #60) reviewed for environmental conditions.1. The facility failed to ensure flooring was replaced in Resident #14's room. 2. The facility failed to ensure the faucet knob was replaced in Resident #2 and #60's bathroom.These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsanitary, unsafe environment and a diminished quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (memory loss and cognitive decline without a specific cause) and cerebral infarction (stroke). Resident #14's BIMS score was 5 indicating sever cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for accident hazards.The facility failed to assess Resident #11 for the ability to self-administer a dietary supplement, Gelatide Dietary Supplement, which was kept in her room at her bedside.This failure could affect residents by placing residents at risk of consuming unsafe medications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's face-sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to facility on 01/04/2026. Her diagnosis included: Unspecified Fracture of Right Femur, Subsequent Encounter for Closed fracture with Routine Healing (healing or recovery phase , receiving routine follow-up care); Essential (Primary) Hypertension (high blood pressure that is multi-factorial with no distinct cause); Trigeminal Neuralgia (a chronic, often debilitating nerve disorder causing sudden, severe electric shock-like facial pain,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident on one of two medication carts (station one) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure the station one nurses' medication cart contained accurate narcotic logs for Resident #21 on 02/25/26.This failure could place residents at risk for medication error, and drug diversion. Findings included: Review of Resident# 21's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 01/29/26, reflected the resident was [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pain. The resident had moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 11.Review of Resident #21's physician's orders dated 2/27/25 reflected an order for Resident #21 to receive one tablet of Acetaminophen-Codeine Tablet 300-30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS Assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for (Residents #3) of four residents reviewed for MDS Assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's MDS Assessment was correct. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care for issues not addressed in the MDS assessment.Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission MDS Assessment, dated 12/23/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His BIMs score was 15. His cognitive skills for daily decision-making were intact. His diagnoses included heart failure, wound infection, paraplegia, malnutrition, and chronic bone infection. The resident had a Stage III pressure ulcer. The MDS did not show that Resident #3 had any other wounds. Record review of Resident #3's Care Plans, not dated, reflected:Resident had an actual impairment to skin integrity related to a non-pressure chronic ulcer to right leg. Facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident#1) out of 4 residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent incidents. The facility failed to provide Resident#1 with adequate supervision when transferring her on 10/09/25. This failure could result in falls, injuries and a decline in quality of life. Findings included:Record review of Resident#1's face sheet, dated 10/16/25 reflected, she was a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], diagnosed with but not limited to: Alzheimer's disease (progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior) and is the with late onset, adult failure to thrive (a condition characterized by significant decline in physical and emotional well-being) , chronic embolism and thrombosis of left popliteal vein (Presence of blood clots located behind the knee) , generalized muscle weakness(Decreased muscle strength across multiple muscle groups),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. Cook G failed to wear a beard guard while prepping food. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods in the refrigerator were properly stored, labeled with the item's contents, and dated with the date in which the food was to be used or discarded. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: Observation of the facility's only kitchen on 11/18/24 at 8:33AM, revealed the following: -Cook G was prepping food, with a beard guard pulled down to his neck (Cook G's beard appeared to be approximately 1/4 in. in length) -a block of Swiss cheese in the refrigerator that had been partially wrapped but was still exposed to air/elements, and which was not dated with the date in which the food was to be used or discarded -a plastic container of green beans in the refrigerator that was covered in plastic wrap, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of residents' personal and medical information for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed for clinical records on Station 3. MA E failed to lock and secure the laptop on medication cart on Station 3. This failure could affect 48 residents by placing them at risk of resident-identifiable information being accessed by the public. Findings included: An observation on 11/20/24 at 3:11 PM revealed a laptop medication cart on the hallway of Station 3 that was unattended, unlocked, and unsecured. HHSC surveyor observed resident information (name, date of birth , photo etc.) on the screen from the laptop on the medication cart that was unlocked, unattended and unsecured. There were not any staff in the hall and a resident was observed walking in the hallway past the medication cart on Station 3. MA E was observed inside a resident ' s room. In an interview on 11/20/24 at 3:19 PM, MA E said she was the only Medication Aide for the facility. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$121,953 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $121,953 — penalty dated 2026-01-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $301K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX