Matlock Place Health & Rehabilitation Center
7100 Matlock Road, Arlington, TX 76002 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 148 certified beds · (817) 466-2511 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $51,496 in federal fines (most recent 2026-07-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.7% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.8% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 34.4% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.8% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.4% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.8% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.4% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.8% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.4% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.00 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.61 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.0%CMS range 31.0–51.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.3–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 78.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.2–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for two of six residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, who had prior behaviors towards others, did not physically abuse Resident #1. On 08/26/25, Resident #2 had her hands around Resident #1's neck and had to be separated by facility staff. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 08/27/25. While the IJ was removed on 08/28/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern with a potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 05/02/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment that describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plan accuracy. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan revised on 08/14/25 for Resident #2, which addressed her physically aggressive behaviors towards others between 08/02/25 to 08/26/25. LVN A and CNA E were able to pull Resident #2's hand away from Resident #1's neck on 08/26/2025. An IJ was identified on 08/27/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:18 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/28/25, the facility remained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had the right to be free from abuse when CNA B transferred her roughly from bed to a geri-chair and then slapped her hand when she attempted to hold onto the bed on 08/31/24. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 08/31/24 and ended on 09/03/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, trauma, and psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 10/31/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/04/24, reflected there was not a BIMS score calculated. Further review reflected a Staff Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. CNA B failed to use a gait-belt to transfer Resident #1 from the bed to a geri-chair on 08/31/24 resulting in rough care during the transfer. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 08/31/24 and ended on 09/03/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk for neglect, harm, pain, and injuries. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 10/31/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/04/24, reflected there was not a BIMS score calculated. Further review reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. On 04/04/24, Resident #1 sustained a right shoulder fracture when CNA B left him unattended in his room while he was sitting in a shower chair. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 04/04/24 and ended on 04/04/24. The facility has corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injuries. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 06/04/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 04/17/24, reflected he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for transfers from chair/bed-to-chair transfer. Resident #1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 2 of 6 residents (Resident#1, and Resident#2) reviewed for accommodation of needs.The facility failed to ensure the call light system was within reach of the Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 06/30/2026. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of being unable to obtain timely assistance form staff. Findings included:1. A record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of: hypertension (elevated blood pressure), neurogenic bladder (a loss of bladder control caused by nerve damage), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (a broad group of brain disorders causing cognitive decline), and muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse of residents are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury to HHSC for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report, within 2 hours, to the SA after Resident #1 alleged sexual abuse to her Mental Health Habilitator on [DATE], who then notified the facility the same day on [DATE]. The facility did not report Resident #1's allegation to law enforcement, nor the SA. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder (brain disorder causing extreme mood swings),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-23 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the status for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #3, #4, and #22) reviewed for accuracy of assessments in that: The facility staff failed to address Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident#5's respiratory treatments on the MDS.These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and treatments. Findings included:1.Record review of Resident #22 face sheet dated 11/23/2025, reflected the resident was an 80- year-old male that was admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with: Vascular Dementia (impaired blood supply to the brain), Acute Respiratory with Hypoxia (inability to maintain blood in the oxygen) and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery. (artery build-up of fat and plaque).Record review of Resident #22's Annual MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 00, indicating he was severely impaired cognitively. Resident #22 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included describing the services to be furnished to attain or maintain measurable objectives to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #10, #22, #3, #4, #5 and #10) reviewed for care plans, in that: Resident #10, #22, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5's care plan did not address the respiratory treatments. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs. Findings included:Resident #10Record Review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 11/23/2025, reflected the resident was a 78 years-old female that was admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with: Alzheimer's Disease (progressive disease that impairs memory) and Acute Respiratory with Hypoxia (inability to maintain blood in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 5 (Residents #10, Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 10 residents reviewed for respiratory care, in that:. Resident #10, Resident #22, Resident #3, and Resident #4's nebulizer mask was not bagged.Resident #4's and Resident #5's NC tubing was not dated.These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate respiratory careFindings: Resident #10 Record Review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 11/23/2025, reflected the resident was a 78 years-old female that was admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with: Alzheimer's Disease (progressive disease that impairs memory) and Acute Respiratory with Hypoxia (inability to maintain blood in the oxygen). Record Review of Resident #10's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 Residents (Resident #1 Resident #2 and Resident #3) observed for infection control. 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA F utilized Enhanced Barrier Precautions, performed hand hygiene during incontinence for Resident #1 and performed hand hygiene prior to leaving Resident #1 room on 11/23/25. 2.The facility failed to ensure CNA E utilized Enhanced Barrier Precautions, performed hand hygiene during incontinence care and mechanical lift transfer to Resident #2 and performed hand hygiene prior to leaving Resident #2's room on 11/23/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA G properly removed her Enhanced barrier equipment and performed hand hygiene prior to leaving Resident #2's room on 11/23/25. 4. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one of six residents (Resident #3) reviewed for pressure ulcers The facility failed to ensure LVN A provided Resident #3 her physician ordered wound care on 11/22/25. This failure could place residents at risk of developing infections or worsening of their wounds.Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/31/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The staff had assessed the resident to severely cognitively impaired. She was dependent on staff with all ADL care and was always incontinent of urine and bowel. She had a feeding tube and received 51 % of her nutrition through a feeding tube. She was coded to be at risk of pressure ulcers. Her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents hazards The Facility failed to ensure CNA F provided a safe two-person transfer and instead lifted Resident #1 under her arms when transferring her from her bed to her wheelchair on 11/23/25. These failures could affect the residents by placing the residents at risk for falls, injuries, and skin tears.Findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/02/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with a BIMS score of 2 which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. She was dependent on all activities of daily living with exception of eating and required the assistance of 2 persons for transfers. She was always incontinent with bladder and bowel. Diagnoses included dementia and multiple sclerosis (chronic disease of the central nervous system) Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (is a medication used: without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for one of five residents (Resident #2) reviewed for unnecessary medications.The facility failed when ADON J did not ensure Resident #2, who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (dementia), was not prescribed an antipsychotic medication, Seroquel, without a diagnosis for the use of the antipsychotic and that was not approved for treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis. The Psych NP said he had ordered the Seroquel for Resident #2's unspecified psychosis which he diagnosed her with after meeting Resident #2 a few times. Resident was administered Seroquel on 08/25/25, 08/26/25, and 08/27/25. This failure could place residents at risk for unintended, harmful events attributed to the use of a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 5 (Residents #85 and #58) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #85's hospice services. 2. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #58's enteral feeding. These failures placed resident at risk of not receiving appropriate care. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #85's admission Record, dated 05/19/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #85's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 05/02/25, reflected she had a BIMS Score of 08, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Her active diagnoses included traumatic brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 3 (Residents #16, #35, and #198) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. 1. On 05/19/25, the facility failed to provide PRN wound care to Resident #16's right buttocks wound. 2. On 05/17/25 and 05/18/25, the facility failed to provide wound care to Resident #35's left foot. 3. On 05/09/25, the facility failed to provide wound care to Resident #198's sacrum wound. These failures placed residents at risk of developing new or worsening pressure ulcers. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #16's admission Record, dated 05/19/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #16's Quarterly MDS Assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means, received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding, for 2 of 4 resident (Residents #16 and #58) reviewed for enteral nutrition. 1. The facility failed to follow physician orders for Resident 16's enteral feeding tube formula when it was not available and required a substitution. 2. The facility failed to follow Resident #58's physician orders for enteral feeding by not allowing Resident to have down time between the hours of 8:00 AM-12:00 PM. These failures could place residents who had gastrostomy tube at risk for weight loss, weight gain or stomach and digestion issues. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #16's admission Record, dated 05/19/25, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #16's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 04/22/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #23 and #33) reviewed for dialysis. 1. The facility failed to ensure dialysis communication forms were completed for Resident #23 after returning from dialysis treatment. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 had an order to complete dialysis treatment. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate monitoring after returning to facility. Findings included: Record review of Resident #23's admission MDS assessment, dated 05/07/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #23 had a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (the final stage of chronic kidney disease where the kidneys can no longer filter waste and fluids from the blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 medication carts (600,700 and 800 Halls cart) and 3 of 3 residents (Residents #68,#91 and #98) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the 600,700 and 800 Halls nurses' medication cart had accurate narcotic counts for Residents #68, #91 and #98. This failure could place residents at risk for medication errors, drug diversion, and delay in medication administration. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #68's comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 05/07/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] . Resident #68 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe) and difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five percent (5%) or greater for 1 of 3 staff (LVN B) which resulted in a 43.9 % medication error rate after 41 opportunities with 18 errors for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #16) reviewed medication administration. LVN B failed to follow the physician orders for flushing Resident #16's gastrostomy tube with 5-10 mL (or prescribed amount) of water between medications, when she administered 13 medications to Resident #16. LVN B also failed to administer all the medications in medicatoin cups leading to 5 cups being left with residual medication. These failures could place residents at risk of physical and chemical incompatibilities leading to an altered therapeutic response and put residents who received medications via gastrostomy tube at risk for gastronomy tube blockage and medication interaction. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/22/25, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed for 1 (the lunch meal on 05/20/25) of 2 meals reviewed for menus. The facility did not serve the correct portions of pureed broccoli and cauliflower, pureed pizza pasta bake, and pureed garlic bread for the lunch meal on 05/20/25. This failure could affect residents in the facility, who eat from the kitchen, by placing them at risk of being hungry or losing weight. Findings included: Observation on 05/20/25 at 11:45 AM of the kitchen revealed the steam table included the prepared pureed foods, including pureed broccoli and cauliflower, pureed garlic bread, and pureed pizza pasta bake. Interview and observation on 05/20/25 at 11:50 AM revealed the DM and [NAME] F were reviewing the recipe for the foods to be served and calling out the scoops required for each of the meal items. [NAME] F said she was using a 3-ounce scoop for the pureed broccoli and cauliflower, a 3-ounce scoop for the pureed pizza pasta bake, and a 2-ounce scoop for the pureed garlic bread. The DM provided [NAME] F with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility provided food that was palatable, for one (the lunch meal on 05/20/25) of three observed meals reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to serve food that had a smooth, pudding like texture during the lunch meal on 05/20/25. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 05/20/25 at 10:30 AM of the kitchen revealed the DM had taken a tray out of the oven that had prepared pizza pasta bake that included ground meat, pasta, and a sauce. The DM added several scoops of the prepared food to the machine to puree the food. The DM pureed the prepared food, but it still had bits of pasta in it and was not smooth or pudding like. A sample tray was requested and tasted on 05/20/25 at 12:55 PM with three surveyors and the DM. The tray that was tasted included pureed pizza pasta bake, pureed garlic bread, and pureed broccoli and cauliflower. The pureed pizza pasta bake…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to have complete records for Resident #36's wound care for April and May 2025 This failure could place residents at risk for incomplete and inaccurately documented medical records that included their progress treatment, services, and interventions. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included heart disease and Alzheimer's disease. The resident had a BIMS of 1, indicating her cognition was severely impaired. The MDS reflected the resident had a chronic disease that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months and was on hospice care. The MDS further reflected the resident had a stage 4 pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #2 and #16) observed for infection control. 1. CNA P and C N A Q failed to perform hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #16. 2. The facility failed to ensure Wound Care Nurse performed hand hygiene and change gloves during the wound care for Residents #2 and #16. This failure could affect the residents, by placing them at risk for worsening conditions and cross contamination. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/12/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of Respiratory Failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own). She had a BIMS score of 02, which indicated her cognition was severely impaired. The MDS reflected the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #73) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #73 had a home-like environment when she was relocated temporarily to another room leaving her without any of her belongings or entertainment. These failures could place residents at risk of an uncomfortable environment, depression and feeling lonely. Findings included: Record review of Resident #73's face sheet dated 05/20/25 reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Record review of Resident #73's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was usually understood and understood others. The MDS indicated a BIMS score of 09 indicating Resident #73 had a moderate cognitive impairment with diagnoses including Depression (persistent feeling of sadness), paralysis or severe weakness on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides received required training which included dementia management training for 1 of 16 (CNA V) staff reviewed for in-service training requirements. The facility failed to ensure CNA V received dementia management training. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by staff who have been insufficiently trained. Findings included: Record review of personnel records provided by the HR Manager revealed CNA V with hire date of 04/17/23 did not have any documented evidence in the facility for annual trainings taken on Residents with Dementia which was consistent with her expected role. During an interview and record review on 05/20/25 at 10:12 AM with Human Resource Specialist revealed she was responsible for new hire orientation. Human Resource Specialist stated that new hires did not have dementia training during orientation with her. Human Resource Specialist stated she did not review job description responsibilities with newly hired staff. Human Resource Specialist stated the DON was over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 7 of 7 rooms (Rooms #605, #607, #608, #703, #704, #801, and #805) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that staff had appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) readily available to wear when entering rooms (Rooms #605, #607, #608, #703, #704, #801, and #805) on droplet precautions to prevent the spread of infection. This failure placed all residents, as well as employees and visitors, at risk of communicable diseases. Findings included: Observation of Hall 600 on 03/01/25 at 11:15 AM revealed Rooms #605 and #608 were on droplet precautions. Both rooms had PPE bins outside of the door, but there were no face shields or goggles available. Observation of Hall 700 on 03/01/25 at 11:18 AM revealed Rooms #703 and #704 were on droplet precautions. Both rooms had PPE bins outside of the door, but there were no face shields or goggles available. Observation of Hall 800…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-08 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's medications were correctly documented on his quarterly and annual MDS assessments. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, printed on 01/08/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by an imbalance of chemicals in the blood), chronic embolism and thrombosis of other specified veins (blood clots), end stage renal disease (a permanent condition where the kidneys can no longer function properly), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition where the lungs are not effectively delivering oxygen to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide Residents #1 and #2 assistance with timely incontinence care on 10/31/24. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased feelings of self-worth, skin breakdown, and infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 10/31/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 10/04/24, reflected there was not a BIMS score calculated. Further review reflected a Staff Assessment for Mental Status was completed which revealed Resident #1 had a memory problem resulting in inattention that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for physician notification of changes. 1. The facility failed to consult with Resident #1's physician and provide all necessary details, when MA A failed to inform LVN A that Resident #1 refused to take her Lactulose medication on Saturday, 10/05/2024 (12:00 PM) and again on Sunday, 10/06/2024 (12:00 PM and 5:00 PM) for a total of 3 doses. 2. The facility failed to follow their policy on medication administration on 10/05/2024 and 10/06/2024 by MA A not immediately detailing any refusals by Resident #1 of her Lactulose medication to LVN A. Resident #1's MAR revealed she missed three doses over a two-day period on Saturday, 10/5/2024 (12:00 PM) and on Sunday, 10/6/2024 (12:00 PM and 5:00 PM). 3. The facility failed to follow their policy on change of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food, subject to spoilage and removed from its original container, was kept sealed, labeled, and dated in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer were properly labeled with the contents after being removed from the original packages and not dated to reflect when the food items were opened. 2. The facility failed to ensure the freezer was maintained in a sanitary manner free from dark substances. This failure could place all residents at risk for food contamination and food borne illness. Findings included: Observation of the freezer and interview on 03/24/24 beginning at 9:00 AM revealed the following: - a grey tub in the bottom of the freezer, - 6 clear plastic bags with frozen chicken parts, undated and unlabeled, - 1 clear bag with breaded patties, undated and unlabeled. At the bottom of the freezer underneath the grey tub and to the left of the tub appeared to be a dark substance that was spilled and frozen. According to [NAME] Q, the spillage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (Residents #21 and #54) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to follow physician orders for weekly weights on Resident #21 resulting in a weight gain. 2. The facility failed to obtained physician orders for Resident #54 use of hinged knee brace. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving the care intended by the physician. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #21's undated admission Record reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, depression, heart disease, and diabetes. Review of Resident #21's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/26/24, revealed a BIMS score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her Functional Status assessment revealed she required minimal assistance with her ADLs. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the system for identifying and reporting infections and communicable diseases for all resident was followed for 1 (Resident #63) of 2 residents reviewed for infection control. The staff failed to notify the physician of Resident #63's urine culture being positive for an infectious agent, resulting in a delay in starting antibiotics and contact isolation. This failure could place residents at risk of being exposed to an infectious agent. Findings included: Review of Resident #63's undated admission Record revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included difficulty swallowing, dementia, muscle weakness and diabetes. Review of Resident #63's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/21/24, revealed a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Review of Resident #63's care plan, dated 01/26/24, indicated she had impaired nutrition, impaired decision making, and she had bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests for 3 (100, 200 and 400 Hall) of 6 Halls, and 1 of 1 conference room reviewed for pests. The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was implemented to prevent the presence of gnats throughout the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observations between 03/24/24 at 9:30 AM through 03/26/24 at 5:00PM revealed 2-3 gnats in the facility Conference room. Observations between 03/24/24 at 10:30 AM through 03/26/24 at 5:00 PM revealed gnats flying in 100, 200, and 400 Hall. Observation and interview on 03/24/24 at 10:44 AM revealed Resident #35 lying in her bed. Resident #35 room was in the 100 Hall. Resident #35 stated she was doing well. She stated her room was cleaned every day; however, she had been having issues with gnats in her room. Observed about 4-5 gnats in Resident #35's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent neglect for one (09/12/23) of one incidents reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to follow their policy to report to the State Survey Agency when Resident #302 tilted in her wheelchair while being transported to an appointment in the facility van. This failure could place the residents in the facility at risk of lacking timely reporting of incidents. Findings included: Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, revised 01/01/23, reflected the following Policy It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures and that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. VII. Reporting/Response 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately but not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency for one of one incidents reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency when Resident #302 tilted in her wheelchair while being transported to an appointment in the facility van. This failure could affect residents by resulting in a delay of identification of abuse or neglect and lack of timely follow-up on recommended interventions to prevent harm, or impairment. Findings included: Review of Resident #302's MDS assessment, dated 08/23/23, reflected the resident was [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 08/16/23. The resident's diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, arthritis, presence of left artificial shoulder joint, and bicipital tendinitis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility admitted a resident with a mental disorder before the State mental health authority had determined he was appropriately placed for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #95) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening. The MDS Coordinator failed to complete the PASARR screening process accurately for Resident #95. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized services. Findings included: Review of Resident #95's undated face sheet revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia (decline in cognitive abilities), severe, with psychotic disturbance (mental health disorders), cognitive communication deficit (communication impairment), and Schizophrenia (general misperception of reality). Review of Resident #95's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/12/24, revealed a BIMS score of 00, indicating the score was not able to be completed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident #54) of 5 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to update Resident #54's care plan to address the use of his hinged knee brace. This failure could result in the resident not receiving appropriate care for his fracture. Findings included: Review of Resident #54's face sheet dated 03/26/24 indicated Resident #54 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #54 had a diagnosis of hyperkalemia (high potassium), end stage renal disease (renal failure), type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified fracture of shaft (middle bone) of left tibia (shinbone), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing and other reduced mobility. Review of Resident #54's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 had a BIMS score of 14 which indicated cognition was intact. MDS Assessment further revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for two (Residents #35 and #83) of eight residents reviewed for facial hair. The facility failed to remove Resident #35 and Resident #83's facial hair. These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #35's face sheet revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of reduce mobility, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), major depressive disorder, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), unsteadiness of feet, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #35's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/04/24, revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS score of 06, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Section GG - Functional Abilities and Goals, Question GG0130. Self-Care revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two (Resident #40 and #302) of six residents reviewed for accidents. 1. The Van Driver failed to properly restrain Resident #302's wheelchair in the facility transportation van to prevent the wheelchair from tipping over on its side on the way to dialysis on 09/12/23. 2. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #40 when she was stuck outside in the courtyard and she was not able to call the facility because their phone lines were down. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury or harm, decline in health, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #302's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 08/16/23. The resident's diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, arthritis, presence of left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for one (Resident #46) of four residents reviewed for feeding tubes. The nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #46's water flushes were correct on the feeding pump per the physician orders. The failure placed residents, who received nutrition via g-tube, at risk for decreased nutritional intake and weight loss complications. Findings included: Review of Resident #46's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), Cerebrovascular Accident (stroke), non-Alzheimer's dementia, hemiplegia (Muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body). The MDS further reflected Resident #46 did not have a BIMS due to having severely impaired cognition and he had a feeding tube. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents in a timely manor for 1 (Resident #77) of 5 residents reviewed for laboratory services in that The facility failed to follow physician orders for routine lab work for Resident #77, resulting in the lab not being performed. This failure could result in missing resident's medical conditions getting worse. Findings included: Review of Resident # 77's undated admission Record revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, diabetes, vitamin deficiency, high cholesterol, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #77's annual MDS assessment, dated 2/02/24, revealed a BIMS score not calculated due to the resident's dementia. Her Functional Status assessment indicated she required substantial assistance with her ADLs. Review of Resident #77's care plan, dated 2/23/24, revealed she had a self-care deficit, limited activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food prepared by methods, which conserved nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for one of one pureed meal observed for nutrition. The Dietary Manager failed to ensure the pureed lunch meal on 03/24/24 was prepared according to the recipe to conserved nutritive value and flavor. The failure could place residents, who were on a pureed diet, at risk for a decrease in nutritive status, loss of appetite, decreased intake and unwanted weight loss. Findings included: Observation on 03/24/24 at 10:55 AM of the Dietary Manager preparing the pureed lunches revealed she put shredded turkey pieces, hot water, and thickener into a blender. She then blended the mixture. The pureed meat appeared to have a pudding consistency. The Dietary Manager then mixed stuffing which included the stuffing, thickener, and hot water. Interview on 03/24/24 at 11:11 AM with the Dietary Manager revealed she was notified by her morning cook that surveyors were in the building, and she was nervous. She stated she came in to assist.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0776 — patternProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner or per the ordering physician's orders for one (Resident #6) of five residents reviewed for radiology services. The facility failed to properly enter a request for an x-ray on 01/27/24 after Resident #6's spouse report swelling at the right hip and that he had pain when he was being changed or repositioned. This failure placed residents at risk of a delay in medical evaluation and treatment, pain, and a decrease in quality of care. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 02/15/24 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #6's diagnosis included aftercare following joint replacement surgery,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0777 — patternProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner or per the ordering physician's orders for one (Resident #6) of five residents reviewed for radiology services. The facility failed to retrieve results of an x-ray order of Resident #6's right hip in a timely manner. This failure placed residents at risk of a delay in medical evaluation and treatment, pain, and a decrease in quality of care. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 02/15/24 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #6's diagnosis included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, other reduced mobility, unspecified dementia, hypertension (high blood pressure), unsteadiness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections of 4 (ADON B, CNA C, Medical Records and Dietary Supervisor) of 6 staff members reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure ADON B, CNA C, Medical Records and Dietary Supervisor donned proper PPE prior to entering the COVID Unit. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections such as COVID-19. Findings included: Review of the facility's line list COVID positive Residents/Staff List revealed Resident #1 and Resident #2 tested positive for COVID on 02/04/24, Resident #3 tested positive for COVID on 02/06/24, Resident #4 tested positive for COVID on 02/07/24 and Resident #5 on 02/13/24. Interview on 02/15/24 at 9:02 AM with the Administrator and DON revealed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure the pressure ulcer on Resident #1's sacrum (a triangular bone in the lower back formed from fused vertebrae and situated between the two hipbones of the pelvis) was covered with a dressing as ordered, and failed to ensure the dressings on both heels and on the right hip were dated. This failure could affect the residents, who received pressure ulcer care, by placing them at risk for contamination of their wounds and causing unnecessary infections and worsening of pressure ulcers. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/29/23 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted into the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-03-26 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing was posted as required each day for three (03/24/24, 03/25/24 and 03/26/34) of three days reviewed for nursing services and postings. The facility failed to update the daily staffing information posting on 03/24/24, 03/25/24 and 03/26/24. This failure could affect residents, their families, and facility visitors by placing them at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census. Findings included: Observation on 03/24/24 at 10:35 AM of the building revealed the daily nursing staff posting was posted on the wall by the entrance with a date of 03/22/24. Observation on 03/25/24 at 10:40 AM of the building revealed the daily nursing staff posting was posted on the wall by the entrance with a date of 03/22/24. Observation on 03/26/24 at 9:45 AM of the building revealed the daily nursing staff posting was posted on the wall by the entrance with a date of 03/22/24. Interview on 03/26/24 at 3:49 PM with the ADON D revealed it was his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$51,496 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $25,490 — penalty dated 2026-07-09
- $8,170 — penalty dated 2025-08-28
- $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-10-31
- $9,009 — penalty dated 2024-06-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARKER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2014 |
| MORGAN, DOMINICIA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/01/2019 |
| BACUS, RANDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2019 |
| TICKNOR ENTERPRISES ARLINGTON LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| TICKNOR, GREGORY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2023 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676141. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.