Avir At Athens

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 77.6 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). LVN E and CNA D witnessed CNA C abusing Resident #1. CNA C hit Resident #1 and was allowed to remain in the facility for over three hours with access to Resident #1 and other Residents. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (past non-compliance). The IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) began on 4/19/24 and ended 4/19/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. The facility failures could have caused residents serious physical injury. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory), and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated she was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 5. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the alleagtion involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State law for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1.) LVN E and CNA D did not immediately report abuse to the Administrator after they witnessed CNA C abusing Resident #1. CNA C hit Resident #1 and was allowed to remain in the facility for over three hours with access to Resident #1 and other Residents. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (past non-compliance). The IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) began on 4/19/24 and ended 4/19/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could have caused continued abuse to Resident #1 and possibly other residents. Findings included: Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #2). CNA A failed to ensure two staff members provided a Hoyer lift transfer. A family member assisted with the transfer, the Hoyer lift sling strap was not attached properly, and Resident #2 fell out of the Hoyer lift. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (past non-compliance). The IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) began on 3/3/24 and ended 3/3/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could have caused serious injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Some of her diagnoses were muscle weakness, obesity, and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a BIMs score of 13 indicating she was cognitively intact.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-10-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen was free from unnecessary medication for 1 of 5 (Resident #74) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74 did not receive a medication she was allergic to (ibuprofen) ordered for a swollen right hand on 5/22/23. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74 was not given medications she was allergic to as ordered (ibuprofen 400 mg by mouth 4 times a day for 14 days). Resident #1 received ibuprofen from 05/22/23 to 07/23/23 (63 days). 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74's ibuprofen was discontinued after Resident #1 returned from the hospital from an upper GI bleed. Resident #1 received scheduled ibuprofen on 07/26/23 through 07/27/23 (4 doses). An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 10/20/23. While the IJ was removed on 10/21/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate threat due to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from physical abuse when CNA B slapped Resident #1's arm during patient care on 5/10/26.This failure could place residents at risk for physical abuse, mental abuse, emotional abuse, and harm.Findings included:Record review of an undated Face sheet printed on 5/30/26 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance (a clinical presentation where a person experiences progressive decline in cognitive functions (like memory, thinking, or language) that interferes with daily life, but without accompanying psychiatric or behavioral symptoms such as aggression, severe agitation, or delusions), chronic kidney disease (the progressive loss of kidney function over time, impairing the organ's ability to filter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to the Administrator of the facility for 1 of 8 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure CNA C and LVN D immediately reported an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse on 5/10/26 when CNA B slapped Resident #1's arm to the facility Administrator This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, abuse, and/or neglect.Findings included: Record review of an undated Face sheet printed on 5/30/26 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance (a clinical presentation where a person experiences progressive decline in cognitive functions (like memory, thinking, or language) that interferes with daily life, but without accompanying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the representative immediately of a significant change in condition and transfer to the hospital for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for notification requirements. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's representative on (1/21/2026) when there was a change in the resident's condition requiring the resident to be sent to the local hospital. This failure could place residents at risk of not having family members or representatives notified of changes in condition and allowing them to participate in care decisions. Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female born 11/26/1954 and admitted on [DATE]. According to a face sheet dated 3/10/2026, she had a diagnosis including cerebral infarction due to embolism of left middle cerebral, type 2 diabetes mellitus, primary hypertension, congestive heart, failure chronic kidney disease stage 3, aphasia (nonfluent slow speech with difficulty producing language) following cerebrovascular disease. According to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #87's medications Clonazepam (a benzodiazepine medication that produces a calming effect, reducing anxiety) and Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (an opioid medication that relieves pain) were available for 6 consecutive days following admission. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of and exacerbation of underlying medical conditions, avoidable discomfort, and a decline in physical or psychosocial well-being. A record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #87 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnoses of encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction, leading to altered mental states and various neurological symptoms), hypothyroidism (a condition in which the thyroid gland does not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were complete and accurately documented for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #53, #59, #73) reviewed for medical records accuracy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's physician's orders included an order for oxygen use. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59's physician's orders included an order for a foley catheter. The facility failed to ensure resident #73's physician's orders included orders for diet and dialysis treatments. These failures could place residents at risk for errors in care and treatment. Findings included: 1.Record review of a face sheet dated 02/18/2026 indicated Resident #53 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had diagnoses which included tracheostomy status (opening in the neck into the windpipe to facilitate breathing, traumatic hemorrhage of the cerebrum (the rupture of blood vessels…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #87 had a completed baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of decline in physical or functional well-being, of not receiving necessary care or services, and of having personalized plans developed/implemented to address their needs. The findings included: A record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #87 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnoses of encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction, leading to altered mental states and various neurological symptoms), hypothyroidism (a condition in which the thyroid gland does not produce enough hormones),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments were completed for 6 of 9 residents (Residents #1, #2, #17, #50, #60, and #65) reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #17, #50, #60, and #65's MDS assessment was accurately coded for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest level of well-being. Findings included: 1.A review of Resident #1's face sheet for December 2024 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia and depressive disorder. A review of Resident #1's PASRR Level 1 screening done 11/07/2022 indicated she was positive for MI/ID/DD. A review of Resident #1's PASRR Evaluation done 11/08/2022 indicated she was negative for ID and negative for DD. The resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status in either life threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for change in condition. LVN B failed to notify the physician when she did not administer Resident #54's scheduled insulin dose due to low blood sugar level. This failure could place residents at risk for non-therapeutic effects of the medication and decline in health status. Findings included: A record review of Resident #54's face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had multiple diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following a stroke, gastrostomy status (refers to the presence of a surgical opening into the stomach that allows for nutritional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3(Resident #22) reviewed for pharmacy services. MA C failed to administer a correct dose of a scheduled medication, lactulose solution (to treat constipation and liver disease) to Resident #22 as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic response of prescribed medications which could result in diminished health and well-being. Findings included: A record review of Resident #22's face sheet indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had diagnoses which included stroke, slow transit constipation (condition where the large intestine moves waste too slowly, leading to constipation and other issues), and chronic hepatic failure (liver is permanently damaged and can no longer function properly).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-25 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level 1(PASRR 1) Screening for 3 of 12 residents reviewed for PASRR (Residents #12, 23, and #45). The facility failed to ensure Residents #12, #23, and #45 had accurate PASRR Level 1 Screenings indicating diagnoses of mental illness. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed assessments (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: Resident #12 Record review of Resident 12's PASRR Level 1 Screening completed on 03/27/2023 indicated in section C0100 this resident did not have evidence of having a mental illness. Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #12 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder. Record review of the Comprehensive (admission) MDS assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$243,325 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $8,400 — penalty dated 2024-11-26
• $8,400 — penalty dated 2024-11-26
• $12,844 — penalty dated 2024-11-26
• $213,681 — penalty dated 2023-10-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX