Coral Rehabilitation and Nursing of Austin
6909 Burnet Ln, Austin, TX 78757 · Government - Hospital district · 157 certified beds · (512) 452-5719 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0610) — most recent Sep 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568)
- inspectors cited 18 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (88) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $294,614 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-10)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 36.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.8% | 2.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 33.6% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.9% | 13.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.0% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 2.06 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.5–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 70.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 69.2 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 88 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.94 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
88 citations, most serious first. The 28 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for neglect. The facility neglected to follow its process for elopement when they failed to monitor an exit door when the alarm was bypassed by staff during EMS entry/exit. Resident #8 eloped from the facility's Unit 3 vicinity hall 100 door between 7:15 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. on 12/5/25 and was found by law enforcement on a bus on 12/9/25. Resident #8 had severe cognitive impairment, impaired safety awareness, and a history of strokes. An IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) was identified on 12/07/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:45 p.m. While the immediacy was removed on 12/10/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify the resident's representative when there is an accident involving the resident which results in injury and had the potential for requiring physician intervention for 1 (Resident #86) of 5 residents reviewed for falls. The facility failed to notify Resident #86's physician and FM that he had a fall on [DATE]. He was found unresponsive at the facility around 6:30 AM on [DATE] and subsequently passed away.An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 12:23 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 (Resident #86) of 5 residents reviewed for resident neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #86 was free from neglect when nursing staff failed to conduct ongoing neuro checks and monitor for delayed complications after an unwitnessed fall with head injury that occurred on [DATE]; and document in the residents' chart changes in condition, notify the family and physician, and follow facility fall protocol per policy and residents person centered care plan. He was found unresponsive around 6:30 AM on [DATE] and subsequently passed away. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:00 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #86 and Resident #33) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to implement Resident #86's care plan intervention which included follow fall protocol (which consisted of ongoing neuro checks, post fall assessments, and notifying RP and physician) after Resident #86 sustained an unwitnessed fall with a head injury on [DATE]. Resident #86 was found unresponsive around 6:30 AM on [DATE] and subsequently passed away. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 12:23 PM . While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that all nursing staff possess the competencies, and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #86) of 5 residents reviewed. - The facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent to conduct ongoing neuro checks, notify the family, and notify the physician after Resident #86 had an unwitnessed fall and hit his head on [DATE]. He was found unresponsive around 6:30 AM on [DATE] and subsequently passed away.- The facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent to complete a fall risk assessment/ post fall evaluation For Resident #86 following a fall [DATE] (last one documented dated [DATE]).- The facility failed to ensure LVN A had competency on fall risk policies, procedures, conducting assessments, and knowledge of EMR system used. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for incidents. The facility failed to initiate and complete a thorough investigation of Resident #1's injury of unknown origin. Staff observed Resident #1 had discoloration to his buttocks area on 09/10/25. Staff confirmed Resident #1's discoloration was an acute (sudden) femur (thigh) fracture on 09/11/25. An IJ was identified on 09/18/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 7:10 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 09/21/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of untreated medical problems, worsening injuries, mental anguish, and reduced quality of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards and each resident receives adequate supervision for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for incidents. The facility failed to monitor and supervise Resident #1, who was cognitively impaired and a fall risk. Resident #1 complained of pain and had discoloration to his buttocks area on 09/10/25. Resident #1 sustained an acute (sudden) femoral (thigh) fracture and was sent to the hospital for surgery on 09/11/25. An IJ was identified on 09/18/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 7:10 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 09/21/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of untreated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for tracheal care.1. The facility failed to have orders in place to provide care to Resident #1's tracheostomy (a hole in front of the neck and into the windpipe) since he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].2. The facility failed to provide regular tracheostomy care to Resident #1, as the nurses did not feel comfortable, leaving the resident to provide his own tracheostomy care since admission on [DATE]. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and diagnosed with pneumonia. 3. The facility failed to provide trach care and suctioning to Resident #4 according to professional standards of practice. An Immediate Jeopardy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-09-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for pain. The facility failed to: - Order Resident #1's Hydrocodone before it ran out, causing him to be excruciating pain for two days (08/10/25 - 08/12/25), resulting in him being sent to the ER.- Properly document the ordered PRN Hydrocodone administered to Resident #1 as his August 2025 MAR did not match the narc count sheet for his PRN Hydrocodone.- Assess Resident #1 for the effectiveness of his PRN Hydrocodone (as ordered) after it was administered during August 2025. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/12/25 at 4:49 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/13/25 at 6:05 PM, the facility remained at a level of no actual harm at a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment for one of three Residents (Resident #4) reviewed for competent nursing staff.LVN E failed to provide trach care and suctioning to Resident #4 according to professional standards of practice. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 08/28/2025. While the IJ was removed on 09/05/2025, the facility remained at a scope of pattern with a potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This deficient practice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life threatening conditions or clinical complications);- for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed notify Resident #1's NP or RP when he was experiencing a change in condition/decline for an unknown length of time when he stopped getting out of bed, was unable to feed himself, and complained of leg pain during personal care. He was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with possible aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection that occurs when food or liquid is inhaled into the lungs, leading to inflammation and infection), a UTI, and a left femur fracture. This failure resulted in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure staff did not address (and/or document) a change in condition for an unknown length of time when Resident #1 stopped getting out of bed, was unable to feed himself, and complained of leg pain during personal care. He was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with possible aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection that occurs when food or liquid is inhaled into the lungs, leading to inflammation and infection), a UTI, and a left femur fracture. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 05/19/25 at 4:27 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/21/25 4:30 PM, the facility remained at a level of no actual harm at a scope of pattern that is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-10 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders. -The facility failed to ensure behavioral health interventions were implemented for Resident#1, who was admitted with a diagnosis of bi-polar disorder and had a history of being aggressive to residents and staff, after physician orders for psychiatry evaluation and management were received on 02/24/25 and again on 03/08/25. -The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from Resident #1 when Resident #1 scratched Resident #2 with her fingernails during an outburst on 05/03/25 which caused injuries to his thigh. An IJ was identified on 05/08/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures regarding prohibiting and preventing abuse and for one (Resident #11) of twenty residents reviewed for developing and implementing abuse and neglect policies. The facility failed to implement and utilize the following two facility abuse and neglect policies; abuse investigation and reporting policy and abuse prevention and reporting policy when; 1) they did not report an allegation of rape reported to two State of Texas and the facility administrator reported by Resident #11. 2) Immediately notify police of the alleged allegations and take action to protect Resident #11 from possible physical and emotional abuse. By failing to implement these policies, the facility failed to; 3) Identify and assess all possible incidents of abuse and investigate and report all allegations of abuse within timeframes required by federal requirements. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for one of twenty residents (Resident #11) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that The facility had failed to conduct an investigation when there was an allegation of rape from Resident #11. The resident had approximately 3 other allegations of rape that the facility could not provide supporting documentation that those allegations were indeed investigated. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/12/24 at 11:33 AM. While the IJ was removed on 08/13/24 at 5:30 PM, the facility remained at a level of actual no actual harm at a scope of isolated that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure placed residents at risk of undetected abuse, trauma, and/or decline in feelings of safety and well-being or psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #11's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY POST IDR Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for quality of care, in that: The facility failed to provide wound treatments according to physician orders and to assess and obtain treatment orders for new or worsening wounds from 09/01/23 to 10/02/23. Resident #1 and Resident #2's wounds deteriorated during that timeframe. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/20/23 at 4:29 PM. While the IJ was removed on 10/24/23 at 5:20 PM, the facility remained at a level of actual harm at a scope of pattern that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures placed residents at risk of pain, infection, hospitalization, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for pressure injuries, in that: The facility failed to provide wound treatments according to physician orders and to assess and obtain treatment orders for new or worsening wounds from 09/01/23 to 10/02/23. Resident #3's wounds deteriorated during that timeframe. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/20/23 at 4:29 PM. While the IJ was removed on 10/24/23 at 5:20 PM, the facility remained at a level of actual harm at a scope of pattern that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures placed residents at risk of pain, infection, deterioration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 (Resident #15, Resident #51, and Resident #71) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. Resident #71 offered illegal substances to Residents #15 and #51 to smoke in the facility. The facility failed to ensure the resident was assessed upon admission to the facility to determine if she was safe to smoke independently. The resident was found smoking in the building on two separate occasions, smoking outside the building unsupervised on one occasion and after a search of her room, smoking and drug paraphernalia were found. The facility failed to conduct any smoking assessments or provide effective interventions to keep residents safe. An IJ was identified on 06/27/2023. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 6-27-23 at 5:17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide specialized habilitation services and failed to obtain specialized durable medical equipment for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for PASRR (Preadmission Screening Resident Review) services.The facility failed to request a customized wheelchair within 20 business days after the IDT meeting for Resident #1. This failure could put residents at risk of not receiving the needed care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included:Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/03/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Spina Bifida (a neural tube defect that occurs when the fetal spine and spinal cord do not close completely during the first month of pregnancy, This opening can leave the spinal cord and nerves exposed, causing varying degrees of lifelong physical and intellectual disabilities),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent infection for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer in that: The facility failed to obtain order for Resident #2's wound vac (a specialized medical device used to accelerate the healing of large, deep, or difficult-to-heal wounds) when she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 did not have dressing change with the wound vac for four days, from 04/08/2026 to 04/12/2026 until she was transferred to the local hospital for fever of 103. This deficient practice placed Resident at risk for worsening pressure ulcers, decreased quality of care, infection and hospitalization.Findings included:Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 06/03/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 1 of 1 resident council meeting reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to provide a written response to the Resident Council addressing the grievances reported from their meetings for February 2026 and March 2026. These failures could place residents at risk of unresolved grievances, a decreased sense of self-worth, and a decline in quality of life. The findings Included:Record review of Resident Council minutes for February 2026 and March 2026 reflected repeat residents' concerns to include: the importance of staff introducing themselves and call light response times.During an interview on 04/02/2026 at 11:54 AM, Director of Special projects revealed grievances allowed for resident concerns to be addressed. It was important to follow up with grievances and have them resolved. During an interview on 04/03/2026 at 02:12 PM, the Quality Assurance Director said she oversaw grievances. She revealed the Activities Director had not been giving her grievances from resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to allow residents to manage his or her financial affairs for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, #2, and #3 whose funds are managed by the facility had ready access to his or her funds upon request in a timely manner, including non-business days, Saturday, and Sundays. 2. The facility failed to provide balances to Residents #1, #2, and #3 who received Medicaid benefits.3. The facility did not have a trust fund policy. This failure could place residents whose funds were managed by the facility of not receiving funds deposited with the facility and not having their rights and preferences honored. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 01/01/2026, reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE], with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly trust fund statement was provided to 3 of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for personal funds. The facility failed to provide quarterly statements to Residents #1, #2, and #3 who had trust funds with the facility. This failure had the potential to affect residents who had a trust fund account managed by the facility. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 01/01/2026, reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE], with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and generalized anxiety disorder (mental health condition that produces fear, worry and a constant feeling of being overwhelmed). Record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment (type not selected), dated 03/05/2026, reflected resident had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #1 and #3) reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to ensure a grievance was completed for Resident #3 that did not receive their money in a timely manner when they asked to receive their money from their respective trust funds.The facility failed to ensure grievances from Resident Council meetings (to include Resident #1) were given to the Grievance Official (Quality Assurance Director). This failure could place residents at risk for not having their grievances resolved. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record, 01/01/2026, reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE], with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder (persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for RN coverage in March 2026. The facility failed to have the services of an RN on 03/01/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/28/2026, and 03/29/2026. This failure placed the residents at risk for altered physical, mental, and psychological well-being due to decisions that would have required an RN to make in the management of the residents' healthcare needs and in managing and monitoring the direct care staff. The findings included:Record review of the facility's resident roster, dated 04/01/2026, revealed a census of 74 residents. Record review of Raw Punch Report dated 03/01/2024 to 04/01/2024, reflected there was no RN working on 03/01/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/28/2026, and 03/29/2026. During an interview on 04/01/2026 at 05:19PM, HR revealed she was a part of a group to include the staffing coordinator, ADM, and DON that had staffing meetings to ensure there was an RN working 8 hours a day. She was not aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility with more than 120 beds failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis, for 1 of 1 social services staff reviewed for qualifications of Social Worker. The facility failed to employ a full-time social worker from January 2026 to April 2026, the facility was licensed for 157 beds. This failure could place residents at risk of social service and psychosocial needs not being met. The findings included:Record review of the Facility Summary Report, effective 07/31/2016, reflected the facility had a total licensed capacity of 157 beds.Record review of the facility's staff roster, undated, reflected there was no social worker employed at the facility.During an interview on 04/03/2026 at 02:12 PM, the Quality Assurance Director said she believed the social worker left in November 2025 and she had been doing the social services for the residents. She revealed if someone was doing social services and not calling themselves a SW then it met the regulation for a facility having a social worker, as long as they had a degree that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #4) reviewed for care plans. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan was revised to reflect the resident's fall on 1/22/26. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's care plan was revised to reflect the resident's aggression toward another resident on 2/13/26. These failures could place residents at risk of their current needs not being met. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 3/11/26, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes (condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy) , Crohn's Disease (a chronic inflammatory bowel disease), Asthma (condition in which airways…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to extend to the resident representative the right to make decisions on behalf of the resident for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for resident representative rights. Resident #8 eloped from the facility on 12/5/25 between the period 7:15 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. and the Guardian was not contacted immediately. This failure could lead to the facility making decisions without the resident's right to designate a surrogate or representative to make treatment or transfer decisions for the resident; and could deny the resident through the resident representative their wishes and preferences. The findings include: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 12/06/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and eloped on 12/5/25 and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #8 diagnoses included: encephalopathy (primary)-stroke, cerebral infarction (stroke), (admitting diagnosis), HTN, lack of coordination, cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 60 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed, in that: There was no physician order for the use of the continuous positive airway pressure machine for Resident #1. This failure could result in inadequate care due to incomplete and inaccurate medical records. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/4/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung condition that makes breathing hard due to inflamed, narrowed airways), bipolar disorder (a disorder causing extreme mood shifts), and generalized anxiety disorder (a mental health condition marked by excessive, uncontrollable worry about various everyday things). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was implemented so the facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to keep an effective pest control program to ensure the residents' rooms including bathrooms, halls, and recreation room (where resident activities are held) were free of roaches, flies, spiders, and water bugs. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life and poor sanitary environment.Findings included: Review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 09/10/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, bacteremia (bacteria in the blood), thrombocytopenia (low platelet count), and hepatic encephalopathy (brain disfunction caused by liver disfunction). Review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating cognition intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #17, and Resident #70) of 5 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure the MDS dated [DATE] was updated to reflect an active pressure wound for Resident #1. The facility failed to ensure the MDS dated [DATE] was updated to reflect an active pressure wound for Resident #17.The facility failed to ensure the MDS dated [DATE] was updated to reflect an active pressure wound for Resident #70. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate assessments and not receiving appropriate care according to their status.Findings include: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/11/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 3, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #9, Resident #18, and Resident #44) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living's. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 and Resident #44's fingernails were trimmed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's facial hair was shaved. This failure was evident and could place residents at risk of not receiving care services, diminished quality of life, and decreased self-esteem.Findings included:Record review of Resident #9's Face Sheet dated 09/11/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental health condition that is marked by a mix of symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, and mood disorder symptoms), Bipolar (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 (Medication storage room- Hall 100, Medication storage room-Hall 200) of 2 Medication storage rooms and 1 (Nurses' med cart - Hall 100) of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure :1. The medications stored in the hall 100 and hall 200 medication storage rooms were not expired .2. The content in a medication bottle in the hall 200 medication storage room was the medication labelled on the bottle.3. No mobile phone was stored in the hall 100 nurses' medication cart.4. Food items were not stored in the medication refrigerator in the hall 100 medication storage room. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for adverse effects and not receiving the therapeutic effects of the medication or treatment.The findings included:During an observation of the facility's medication storage room in the Hall 200 on 09/09/2025 at 8:50am it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1. The facility failed to dispose of open stored perishable food products. 2. The facility failed to properly label and date food products in one of two freezers. 3. The facility failed to properly label and date food products in two of two kitchen pantries. 4. The facility failed to properly label and date food products throughout one of one kitchen. These failures could place residents who were served from the kitchen at risk for consuming contaminated food and developing foodborne illnesses.Findings include:Observation on 09/09/2025 at 10:20 AM during a walk-through of the facility kitchen revealed three large industrial facility refrigerators, two large industrial facility freezers, and two kitchen pantries. Observation revealed there was an open bag of undated and not labeled frozen dinner roll found in one of two freezers. Observation revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 (Resident #18) of 8 residents reviewed for sanitary rooms. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's floor was not sticky on 09/09/25 at 12:14 PM and 3:30 PM. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life and poor sanitary environment. Findings included:Review of Resident #18's admission Record, dated 09/09/25, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, vascular dementia, and depressive disorders. Review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 14, which indicated she was cognitively intact. During an observation of Resident #18's room on 09/09/25 at 12:14 PM, she was not in her room. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 (Resident #33) of 5 residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to perform a new PASRR level 1 assessment on Resident #33 for the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed services and support.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated 09/10/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, diabetes mellitus, presence of cardiac pacemaker, hypertension, anxiety disorder and bipolar disorder (onset date: 01/13/23). Record review of Resident #33's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's baseline Care Plan to include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #55) whose records were reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 has a baseline care plan for the Jackson Pratt drain (a medical device used to remove excess fluid from a surgical site or wound, preventing swelling and promoting healing) and skin care at the incision site, since his admission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving required care.Findings included: Record review of Resident #55's face sheet dated 09/11/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included encephalopathy (disturbance in brain function), acute pancreatitis (inflammation in pancreas) with infected necrosis (tissue death), hepatic fibrosis (scar tissues in the liver), acute respiratory failure, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (Resident #55) of 5 residents reviewed for treatments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 received a continuous quality Jackson Pratt drain care and skin care at the incision site, since his admission on [DATE]. This failure could lead to outcomes, including pancreatic fistulas (an abnormal opening or tunnel that forms in the pancreas and allows pancreatic fluid to leak into surrounding tissues or organs), infections and hemorrhage.Findings included:Record review of Resident #55's face sheet dated 09/11/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included encephalopathy (disturbance in brain function), acute pancreatitis (inflammation in pancreas) with infected necrosis (tissue death), hepatic fibrosis (scar tissues in the liver), acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, including hand hygiene, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #70) of 6 residents reviewed for infection control practices, in that: The facility failed to:1. Ensure LVN I and CNA J changed dirty gloves when handling clean items and sanitized the surfaces while providing peri care and wound care to Resident #70. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #70's face sheet dated 09/10/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), aphasia (inability to communicate), muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy, pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for incidents. The facility failed to report Resident #1's injury of unknown origin to the SSA. Staff observed Resident #1 had discoloration to his buttocks area on 09/10/25. Staff confirmed Resident #1's discoloration was an acute (sudden) femur (thigh) fracture on 09/11/25. This failure could place residents at risk of untreated medical problems, worsening injuries, mental anguish, and reduced quality of life. Findings included:Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/18/25, reflected he was an [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman and ensured the written notice included a statement of the resident's appeal rights, which included the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which received such requests and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for discharge planning. 1. The facility failed to notify Resident #2 and Resident #2's RP of Resident #2's discharge, reasons for the move, and right to appeal in writing, in a language and manner they understood, and at least 30 days before Resident #2 was discharged from the facility on 09/04/25, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for pressure ulcers.The facility failed to follow the physician's orders for providing wound care for Resident #2 and Resident #3, on a regular basis.This failure could place residents at risk of worsening their wounds. Findings Include: 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 09/05/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included acute congestive heart failure ( sudden and severe failure of the heart) , obesity, asthma, acute respiratory failure and edema (Swelling). Record review of Resident #2's initial MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. Resident #2 had the risk of pressure ulcers/injuries and the recommended applications of ointments. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections in one of three residents (Resident #4) review for infection control. 1. LVN E failed to perform hand hygiene before and after glove changes while performing trach care and suctioning on Resident #4. 2. LVN E failed to follow sterile technique while Suctioning Resident 42. These deficient practices could place residents at risks for infection, respiratory distress, hospitalization.Findings include:Record review of Resident #4's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 01/13/2025 and readmission date of 05/06/2025. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included tracheostomy status (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the trachea-windpipe to allow breathing), acute and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided with care consistent with professional standards of practice, physicians orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had an order indicating an oxygen flow rate via his trach collar while on his room concentrator and portable oxygen unit as needed for hypoxia from 06/06/25 through 08/15/25. These failures could place residents at risk for symptoms and manifestations of hypoxia, the decreased perfusion of oxygen to the tissues and a decreased quality of care.Findings include: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/15/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in body tissues), dependance on renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents observed for a clean environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a homelike environment by not repairing the ceiling in his room in a timely manner. The deficient practice could place resident at risk of a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 07/23/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included Fracture of T11-T12 Vertebra (compression fractures of small bones forming the backbone), Dependence on Renal Dialysis (the need for dialysis treatment to replace the function of the kidneys), Heart Failure (congestive heart failure, is a chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's need), Embolism And Thrombosis of Deep Veins of Right Upper (a condition where a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for three (Resident #1, Resident #4, and Resident #8) of ten residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident #1 had orders to manage or maintain his colostomy (an opening in the large intestine) since admission date 05/23/2025. 2. Ensure Residents #4 and #8 had a physician's order for the days they received their dialysis treatment. Residents #4 and #8 both went to dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care, harm, or injuries. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spina bifida…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #2, 3, 4 & 5) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to have signage on resident doors that reflected PPE was required for high contact care for Residents #2, 3, 4 and 5 on 06/05/2025. The facility failed on 06/05/2025 when staff failed to wear PPE while providing high contact resident care (dressing, bathing, transfers, wound care, device) to Residents #3 and 4. The facility failed when ADON did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene while providing wound care for Resident #4's left heel on 06/05/2025. These failures could place residents at risk for infection, hospitalization, or death. Findings included : Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #2 reflected a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents review for catheter care. The facility failed when RN A did not re-insert Resident #3's foley catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder) when it came out on 06/05/2025 sometime around 7:00 am until 3:25 pm. Resident #3 voiced multiple times how she would prefer her catheter to be in because she could not tell when she was voiding on herself which made her uncomfortable. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infection, sepsis (is a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection, causing organ damage and sometimes death.) and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #3 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 7 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8) of 7 residents reviewed for a clean and homelike environment. 1. The facility failed to maintain temperatures between 71 degrees and 81 degrees Fahrenheit on the 100 and 200 halls on 05/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of living in an uncomfortable and unsafe environment, diminished quality of life and experience symptoms related to heat exacerbation. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's face sheet reflected at [AGE] year-old woman admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of primary osteoarthritis right shoulder (condition where connection arm bone and should brake joint break down over time), malignant neoplasm of brain (cancerous brain tumor), central pain syndrome (neurological condition caused by long-term pain) and generalized anxiety disorder (mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews , and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency (HHSC), but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse, for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #4) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) an incident of alleged abuse/neglect when Resident #4 grabbed Resident #3's walker and pushed it causing Resident #3 to fall and sustain a large skin tear on his forearm on 04/05/25. This failure could place residents at risk for harm to include physical abuse, a diminished quality of life, and psychosocial harm. Th e findings included: A review of Resident #3's face sheet, printed on 05/09/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included thrombocytopenia (a blood disorder that can lead to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for physician notification, in that: The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician or nurse practice of missed medications due to the resident being out on pass from the facility on 04/01/2025, 04/02/2025, 04/03/2025, 04/05/2025, 04/06/2025 04/07/2025 and 04/08/2025. This failure could result in decreased continuity of care, and a delay in needed treatment and services. Findings included: Review of Resident #1 face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old woman admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of apraxia (disorder that disrupts the brains' ability to plan and sequence motor movements), atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the walls in the heart), cerebral aneurysm (bulge or ballooning in a weakened area of a blood vessel in the brain), paranoid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all routine and emergency drugs and biologicals for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's aspirin, doxepin, divalproex, haloperidol, folic acid, multivitamin and metoprolol were administered according to the physician's orders. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician and a potential for decreased health status and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old woman admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of apraxia (disorder that disrupts the brains' ability to plan and sequence motor movements), atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the walls in the heart),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — patternProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed promptly to assist residents in obtaining routine dental services to meet the needs of 3 (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed for dental services. 1. The facility failed to provide or obtain dental services for Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4. 2. The facility failed to promptly provide dental services for Resident #3 due for denture placement and document why the referral did not occur within three days. This failure could place residents at risk of oral complications, pain, difficulty eating and diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old woman re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of brain (brain cancer), central pain syndrome (chronic pain due to damaged or dysfunction of brain or spinal cord), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), generalized anxiety disorder (mental condition that causes persistent and excessive worry),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to revise Resident #1's care plan to reflect her falls on 02/11/2025, 03/09/2025 and 03/23/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. Findings include: Review of Resident #1 face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old woman admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of apraxia (disorder that disrupts the brains' ability to plan and sequence motor movements), atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the walls in the heart), cerebral aneurysm (bulge or ballooning in a weakened area of a blood vessel in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 5 residents (Resident # 1 and #2) reviewed for a clean and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and #2's wheelchair was maintained. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an uncomfortable and unsafe environment, decreased feelings of self-worth, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 03/12/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included acquired absence of left leg above the knee, heart failure, End stage renal disease, other osteomyelitis lower leg (Osteomyelitis -infection in the bone that can be cause by bacteria or fungal). It was reflected Resident #1 was in the facility from 02/19/2025 through 02/28/2025. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS Assessment, dated 03/04/2025, reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and failed to protect and promote the rights of the residents for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to: 1.) Ensure CNA C was not on his phone during peri care with Resident #1 on 02/12/25. 2.) Ensure Resident #2 was not ambulating through the facility without a dignity (privacy) bag covering his foley catheter bag on 02/25/25. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of a decline of their sense of dignity, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth. Findings included: 1.) Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to keep Resident #1's head of her bed elevated at least 30 degrees while receiving enteral nutrition through a g-tube for approximately an hour on 02/17/25. She was found to have difficulty breathing and foam/secretions in and around her mouth. This failure could place residents at risk of tube malfunction, aspiration, and death. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), disease of digestive system, cerebral infarction (stroke), vascular dementia (dementia caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-03 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) reviewed for baseline care plan. The facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan within 48 hours of the admission date for Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6. This failure could affect newly admitted residents and place them at risk of not receiving continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff to ensure their immediate care needs were met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Face sheet, dated 01/02/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: respiratory failure, end stage renal disease (last stage of kidney failure), diabetes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #3, Resident #5, and Resident #6) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for Resident #3, Resident #5, and Resident #6. This deficient practice could affect residents and place them at risk for not having their needs and preferences met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Faces sheet, dated 01/02/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: respiratory failure, end stage renal disease (last stage of kidney failure), diabetes, high blood pressure, protein calorie malnutrition and tracheostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for 1 of 7 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for dignity in that: The facility failed to ensure staff closed Resident #2's door and pull the privacy curtain closed while changing the resident. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk for psychosocial harm due to a diminished quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's Face sheet, dated 01/03/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: heart failure, diabetes, high cholesterol, epilepsy (seizure disorder), dementia (memory, thinking, difficulty), arthritis, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, insomnia (difficulty sleeping), reflux, muscle weakness, paranoid schizophrenia (mental disorder), cognitive communication deficit (problems with communication), lack of coordination, and reduced mobility. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had clean sheets on her bed. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Faces sheet, dated 01/02/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: respiratory failure, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, lack of coordination, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), post-polio syndrome (muscle weakness from polio), heart block, anxiety, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, insomnia (difficulty sleeping) and infarction of spinal cord (stoke in the spinal cord).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status as demonstrated by Resident #2 experiencing a 25.38% weight loss in six months. He had an active decline in his weight from 05/01/24 - 11/01/24. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased nutritional status, decline in health, malnutrition, or hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, reduced mobility, muscle weakness, and feeding difficulties. Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/18/24, reflected a BIMS score of 12, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG (Functional Abilities) reflected he required substantial/maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to assess complete a skin assess when Resident #1 acquired a skin tear on 11/19/24. Four treatments were missed and he developed an infection requiring antibiotics. These failures placed residents at risk of improper wound management, the development of new skin integrity issues, deterioration in existing skin integrity, infection, and pain. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a 47-year-ole male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infraction (stroke), type II diabetes, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting away). Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/28/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice before discharge was provided to 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge, in that: Resident #1 and/or their representative were not provided a written notice of discharge prior to being discharged out of the facility. The Ombudsman was not provided a copy of the notice. This failure had the potential to affect the resident by not having the knowledge of why the resident was discharged , emotional distress, decline in quality of life, disregarding the residents rights, how to appeal the discharge, and the right to appeal the discharge. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #1's Face sheet dated 11/07/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnosis included respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (high blood sugar), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hypertension (high blood pressure), pulmonary hypertension (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights, in that: The facility failed to provide documentation that Resident #1 received sufficient preparation and orientation when she was discharged home, to ensure a safe discharge. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a neurological disorder that occurs when a chemical imbalance in the blood affects the brain), sequelae of cerebral infarction (symptoms after a stroke), chronic pulmonary embolism (a long-term condition where one or more blood clots form in the pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident's needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents for 4 of 5 residents (Resident ' s #81, #15, #44, and #7) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #81 ' s call light was within reach on 08/06/24 and 08/07/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 ' s call light was in reach on 08/07/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44 ' s call light was in reach on 08/07/24 and 08/08/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's call light was within reach on 08/11/24. This failure could place residents at risk of needs not being met. Findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #81's medical diagnosis dated 08/06/24 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included diabetes (a group of diseases that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #13, Resident#17, and Resident #63) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13, Resident#17, and Resident #63 to provide a safe bedroom free from obstacles with closets accessible to the resident . This failure could place residents at risk for falls and rooms being overheated from the air conditioner being turned off. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #13 undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #13 had a diagnosis of Paralytic syndrome (a condition of muscle wasting and loss of reflexes), Multiple sclerosis (an autoimmune disease that damages the central nervous system), and headaches. Record review of Resident #13 Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected BIMS score of 15 indicating Resident #13 was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 1 of 20 residents screened for abuse (Resident #11). The facility failed to immediately report to the State Agency (within 2 hours) an allegation of sexual abuse made by Resident #11 on 03/11/2024 and 08/09/2024, and additionally when staff had knowledge of allegations of rape as reported to the PMHNP as collateral information on 07/12/2024 and 08/02/2024. This deficient practice delayed the investigation for the allegation and could have placed residents at risk for abuse and could have resulted in undetected abuse and/or decline in feelings of safety and well-being or psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 08/09/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal hygiene for 3 of 15 residents (Resident #79, Resident #66, and #68) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Residents #79 was provided assistance with ADLS and eating as documented in his plan of care which made him feel frustrated and that nobody cared about him. The facility failed to provide regular showers to Residents #66 and #68 in accordance with their plan of care. This failure could place residents at risk of weight loss, malnutrition, loss of dignity, and emotional distress. Findings included: Resident #79 Record review of resident #79's face sheet, dated 08/08/24, admission date 09/01/23, documented an [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with Rhabdomyolysis (the breakdown of muscle tissue that leads to the release of muscle fiber contents into the blood, cirrhosis of liver, alcohol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 (Resident #81) of 5 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Residents #81's urinary bedside drainage bag was placed in a privacy bag on 08/06/24 and 08/07/24. This failure could have compromised residents' dignity for those who require tubing and a urinary bedside drainage bag. Findings included: Record review of Resident #81's medical diagnosis dated 08/06/24 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), Fractured Right Humerus (break in the upper arm bone), anemia (a condition marked by a deficiency of red blood cells or of hemoglobin in the blood, resulting in pallor and weariness), and end stage renal disease (gradual loss of kidney function). Record review of Resident #81's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #57 Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #57 and Resident #61) reviewed for notification of changes. A. The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of Resident #57 refusing his medication Mirtazapine (a medication for depression) and Risperidone (a medication used to control his schizophrenia). B. The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of Resident #61 was refusing his medications Coreg (a medication used to treat his heart failure). This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate medical treatments, which could result in severe illness or hospitalization. Findings included: A. 1. Record review of Resident #57's undated face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 06/26/24. Resident #57's had diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia (forgetfulness), Schizophrenia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for freedom from physical restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74 was free from restraint when Resident #74 was left sitting in a Geriatric (elderly) chair with the feeding tray fully attached throughout the day. This failure could unnecessarily inhibit the resident's freedom of movement or activity and could affect residents by placing them at risk of physical harm, pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and serious harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #74's face sheet dated 08/06/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including degenerative disease of the nervous system (chronic conditions that damage and destroy parts of the nervous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan furnishing services to attain, or maintain, the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #61) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #61 right to refuse medication and refusals of medications prior to survey. 2. The facility failed to care plan Resident #61 wishes to self-administer vitamin supplements prior to survey. 3. The facility failed to accuracly care plan Resident #68's diagnoses of malnutrition (protein or calorie) by care planning for a recommended diet for weight reduction and not weight gain. This failure placed residents at risk of their needs having gone unmet. Findings included: Record review of Resident #61's undated face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 05/10/24. Resident #61's had diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #5) of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's Oxygen tubing was changed every seven days and there was water filled in the humidifier daily. This failure could place all residents who use respiratory equipment at risk for respiratory complications including infections. Record review of Resident #5 undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 had a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a disorder affecting the lungs making it difficult to breath), Hypertension (elevated blood Pressure), and Heart Failure. Record review of Resident #5s admission MDS dated [DATE] reflected Bims score of 14 indicating Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Section GG of the MDS reflected Resident #5 required substantial/maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' drug regimen were adequately monitored and free from unnecessary drugs for 1 (Resident #54) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to monitor Resident #54 for side effects/adverse reactions (bruising bleeding,dark black bowel movements) or the use of Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication- blood thinner) prior to survey. These failures could place residents at risk of bruising, and bleeding. Findings included: Record review of undated face sheet reflected Resident #54 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #54 had the following diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease (kidney failure), Diabetes Type 2 (elevated blood sugars), Heart Failure, and Hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Record review of Resident #54s Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected she had a BIMs score of 14 indicating resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also reflected Resident #54 required assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate below 5% for 3 of 25 (error rate 12%) opportunities for errors during medication pass. 1)The facility failed to administer Resident # 34 his folic acid tablet during the medication administration observation. 2) The facility failed to administer Resident #76 his probiotic capsule and his men's multivitamin with minerals during the medication administration observation. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of undated face sheet reflected Resident #34 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #34 had the following diagnoses of Neuropathy (nerve pain), Chronic Viral Hepatitis (a condition causing liver failure), Muscle Weakness, and Delusional Disorder. Record review of Resident #34s admission MDS dated [DATE] reflected she had a BIMs score of 14 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to self-administer medications and safely store medications in room if the IDT determined that the practice was clinically appropriate for one of eight residents (Resident #61) reviewed for medication self-administration. The facility failed to assess for IDT approval for Resident #61 to self-administer his medication and did not provide a secure area in the resident's room to store the medications prior to surveyor entry. This failure could place residents at risk of consuming unsafe medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #61's undated face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 05/10/24. Resident #61's had diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (an impairment in the way the body regulates and uses sugar), Aortic Valve Stenosis (a thickening of the heart valves), and Congestive Heart Failure (a weakening of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were accurately documented for one (Resident #68) of twenty residents reviewed for accurate clinical records, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #68's medication administration record accurately reflected the medications Resident #68 received. Findings included: Record review of Rresident #68's face sheet, dated 08/08/24, admission date 05/28/24 and 07/27/24, documented an [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, limitation of activities due to disability, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #68's initial MDS dated [DATE] reflected resident had a BIMS score of 6 indicating the resident was severely cognitive impaired. Section GG - Functional Abilities and Goals at admission reflected Resident #68 had the ability to use suitable utensils to bring food and/or liquid to the mouth and swallow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #57, and Resident #61) of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. The Medications Assistant failed to preform hand hygiene before and after medication administration between Resident #57, and Resident #61 61 during the morning medication pass. These failures have the potential to affect all residents in the facility by exposing them to care that could lead to the spread of viral or secondary infections and communicable diseases. Findings included: Record review of Resident #57's undated face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 06/26/24. Resident #57's had diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia (forgetfulness), Schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents/resident representatives were informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for consents. The facility failed to obtain written consent from Resident #1's Representative (RP) before administering her Ativan (for anxiety) and Depakote (for behavioral issues). This failure could place residents at risk of not having their preferred responsible party represent them in medical and care decisions. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior), major depressive disorder, and other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there was a need to alter treatment significantly for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for changes in treatment. The facility failed to obtain written consent from Resident #1's Representative (RP) before administering her Ativan (for anxiety) and Depakote (for behavioral issues). This failure could place residents at risk of not having their preferred responsible party represent them in medical and care decisions. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior), major depressive disorder, and other specified persistent mood disorders. Review of Resident #1's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress, including his/her response to treatments and/or services, and changes in his/her condition for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents review for resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's bruises identified on 04/26/24 were reflected in Resident #1's skin assessments. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 06/28/24, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE], her own RP, and had diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (the decrease in size and wasting of muscle tissue), Alzheimer's disease with late onset (A progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, in that the facility did not completely and accurately document the treatment administration for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for Treatment Administration Records. The facility failed to document the wound care to Resident #1, as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of delay in wound infection and healing process. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 06/14/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction (stroke), Dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), Acute Respiratory Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Heart failure, Hypertension, Major Depressive Disorder, Obesity, Hyperlipidemia (excess fat in blood) ,), Muscle Weakness and, ,Lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #1's initial MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect result in bodily injury, to other officials (including the State Agency) for 1 (Resident #5) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property, in that: The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency within two hours after Resident #5 alleged he was abused by Housekeeper D on 02/24/24 at 7:00 p.m. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling unsafe, injury, and revictimization by the same alleged perpetrator. Findings included : Record review of Resident #5's admission record, dated 03/20/24, revealed he was a male resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], his own RP and had diagnoses including sequela…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 5 of 7 residents (Residents #128, #5, #53, #127 and #31) reviewed for infection control in that: a) MA A, MA B and MA C did not clean and disinfect the wrist blood pressure monitors when it was used on Resident #128, Resident #127, Resident #31, and Resident #5. b) MA B while providing incontinent care for Resident #53, contaminated the whole packet of wet wipes by pulling out wipes from the packet with unclean gloves. These failures could place the residents at the facility at risk of transmission of diseases and infection. Findings included: a) Record review of Resident #128's face sheet dated 06/26/23 reflected Resident #128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was a [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with Hypertensive heart (a constellation of changes in the left ventricle, left atrium, and coronary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in that: 1. Flies were observed in all areas of the facility. These failures placed residents at risk for disease and infection and a diminished quality of life. Findings Include: Observation on 06/26/2023 at 12:45 PM one to five flies at each of the seven tables in the dining area. Observed three residents at one table who actively waived flies away and heard the residents discuss that the flies landed on their food. Observed on 06/26/2023 at 2:00 PM a fly in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Observed on 0/26/2023 between 2:09 PM and 2:26 PM in the dining room three flies on an empty table, a fly in the air, a fly on an incomplete puzzle, 2 additional flies in the air, and seven flies on an empty table. Observation on 06/26/2023 between 12:35 PM and 12:45 PM in the dining room of one fly on the bread of a resident's food; one fly on the lip of resident's drinking cup; one fly on the lid covering a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, or injuries of unknown origin were reported immediately but not later than 24 hours after the allegation was made for one of three residents (Resident #15, Resident #51, and Resident #71) reviewed. The facility failed to report to the State survey agency that Resident #71 was smoking in her room, in the facility, a prohibited smoking area outside the facility and was in possession of illegal drugs and paraphernalia in her and offered the drugs to Resident #15 and Resident #51. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #15's 06/29/2023 face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia ( happens when you don't have enough oxygen in your blood), drug induced subacture dyskensia (involuntary movement disorder), cerebral palsy, (a group of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-20 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents and resident representatives the HHSC complaint number, at 1 of 2 nursing stations, 1 of 1 dining rooms, 1 of 1 front lobby areas, and 1 of 1 activity rooms observed, in that: The facility failed to post the HHSC complaint number and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal regulation, including but not limited to resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property in the facility. This failure placed residents at risk of being unaware of who and how to contact the State Survey Agency and their right to file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal regulation. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 03/20/24, revealed she was a female resident who was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$294,614 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 4 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $16,575 — penalty dated 2025-12-10
- $114,936 — penalty dated 2025-08-15
- $102,851 — penalty dated 2025-02-25
- $23,366 — penalty dated 2024-08-13
- $36,886 — penalty dated 2023-10-24
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-07 for 5 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-09 for 12 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-25 for 46 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-25 for 37 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARPU, PRASANNA | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| MARKS, BENJAMIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| NEWTON, ELIZABETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/01/2024 |
| 6909 BURNETT MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| EFROYMSON, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455862. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.