Gracy Woods Nursing Center
12021 Metric Blvd., Austin, TX 78758 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (512) 228-3300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 9 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $204,403 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-13)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2025-04, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-04 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.9% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.6% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.5% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.7% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 36.9% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.0% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.50 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.7%CMS range 30.9–65.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.4–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 95.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. The facility failed to put effective measures in place to prevent Resident #1 from eloping. Resident #1 was found 26 hours after he eloped. The facility did not have a plan in place for monitoring the windows to ensure resident supervision/monitoring was in place to prevent Resident #1's elopement. On 09/12/2025 at 5:05 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 09/13/2025 at 3:00 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of not actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place residents at risk of experiencing accidents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for pain, in that: The facility failed to: Provide pain medication ordered for resident with a diagnosis of malignant cancer who suffered from chronic pain. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 04/23/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:57 PM. While the IJ was removed on 04/26/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk for prolonged and unnecessary pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1) for pharmacy services. The facility failed to: Provide pain medication ordered, for three consecutive months for different time frames, for resident with a diagnosis of malignant cancer who suffered from chronic pain. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 04/23/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:57 PM. While the IJ was removed on 04/26/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. A second IJ was identified on 05/15/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect for 3 (Residents # 71, 85 and 87) of 5 residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #s 71, 85 and 87 were ordered nutritional supplements to promote wound healing based on risk factors based on standard of care. The facility failed to prevent Resident #71's, 85's and 87's wounds from getting infected. Resident #71 died in the local hospital on [DATE] due to sepsis (a serious condition resulting from the presence of harmful microorganism in the blood or other tissues and the body's response to their presence, potentially leading to the malfunctioning of various organs, shock, and death.) and infected wounds. Resident #85 was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] and diagnosed with sepsis. Resident #87 was diagnosed with a wound infection on 01/16/2024. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 01/19/2024 at 5:10 pm. The IJ template was provided to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident the resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 3 (Residents # 71, 85 and 87) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #s 71, 85 and 87 were ordered nutritional supplements to promote wound healing based on risk factors based on standard of care. The facility failed to prevent Resident #71's, 85's and 87's wounds from getting infected. Resident #71 died in the local hospital 01//2024 due to sepsis (a serious condition resulting from the presence of harmful microorganism in the blood or other tissues and the body's response to their presence, potentially leading to the malfunctioning of various organs, shock, and death.) and infected wounds. Resident #85 was transferred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure dietitian interventions of increased tube feedings and speech therapy were implemented when Resident #71 had a 10% weight loss in November 2023, leading to an overall weight loss of 32% from July 2023 to January 2024. Resident #71 also developed pressure wounds on her foot and hip that worsened, and she died on [DATE]. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 11/16/23 and ended on 01/17/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. The failure placed residents at risk of unplanned weight loss, malnutrition, worsening of wounds, and death. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #71 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident # 87) of 2 residents observed for wound care by 1 (Wound care nurse A) of 1 wound care nurse reviewed for competency, in that: 1) TLVN S did not perform hand hygiene and change her gloves while performing wound care on Resident #87 on 01/19/2024. TLVN S also performed wound care on Resident #87's two wounds at the same time. The facility failed to ensure TLVN S, TLVN T and RN I had skills and competencies completed to perform wound care on 01/19/2024. An IJ was identified on 01/19/2024 at 5:10 pm. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:03 pm. While the IJ was removed on 01/21/2024 at 4:35 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 4 of 24 residents (Resident #71, #85, and #87 and Resident #73) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1 The facility failed to prevent Resident #71's, 85's and 87's wounds from getting infected. Resident #71 died in the local hospital [DATE] due to sepsis (a serious condition resulting from the presence of harmful microorganism in the blood or other tissues and the body's response to their presence, potentially leading to the malfunctioning of various organs, shock, and death.) and infected wounds. Resident #85 was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] and diagnosed with sepsis. Resident #87 was diagnosed with a wound infection on [DATE]. 2. TLVN S did not perform hand hygiene and change her gloves while performing wound care on Resident #87 and performed wound care on two wounds at the same time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. 1. R#1 was a resident at the facility for approximately 52 hours (08/10/2023 at 2:30 pm admission through 08/13/23 at midnight AMA) and displayed exit seeking, confused, and questionable cognitive behavior during his admission. 2. R#1 eloped two times within a 24-hr. period, and he was discharged AMA without an assessment and without consulting the facility MD or NP or obtaining an order. An (IJ) Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 08/22/2023 at 5:25 pm While the IJ was removed on 08/24/2023 at 6:30 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place all residents at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. 1. On 08/10/2023 resident was admitted by ambulance to the facility after an acute hospital stay with a diagnosis of altered mental status. 2. On 08/12/2023 at approximately 12:30 pm resident R#1 eloped from the facility. R#1 was returned by a staff member to facility on 08/12/2023 at approximately 3:00 pm. Resident was assessed, and no injuries found. 3. On 08/12/2023 at approximately 9:45 pm R#1 eloped a 2nd time from the facility. He was found by police who returned him to the facility. R#1 was not assessed for injuries, and he left AMA. An (IJ) Immediate Jeopardy was identified on An IJ was identified on 08/22/2023. While the IJ was removed on 08/25/2023 at 6:30 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to retain and use personal possessions, including furnishings, and clothing, as space permits, unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents for 3 of 12 residents (Residents #8, 19 and 25) reviewed for dignity and use of personal possessions.The facility failed to ensure NA K treated Resident #19 and Resident #8 with dignity when he tried to provide Resident #19 redirection and walked into Resident #8's room while speaking into a Bluetooth earpiece.The facility failed not to clutter Reisdent#25's space in her room with facility owned oxygen concentrator, oxygen cylinder and laundry basket of her roommate.These failures placed residents at risk of an escalation of behaviors in dementia and discomfort, accidents and a diminished quality of life. Findings included:1. Review of the undated face sheet for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living, receives the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal care for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #45 and Resident #88 and Resident #67) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide nail care to Resident #45 and Resident #88 and Resident #67, leaving the nails on the fingers and toes , long, and discolored. This failure could place residents at risk of social embarrassment, isolation, infection, injury, pain, deterioration of health and a diminished quality of life. Findings included:Resident #88Record review of Resident #88's face sheet dated 06/02/26 reflected Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was a [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with cerebral infarction (stroke), lack of coordination, muscle weakness, muscle spasm, anemia and contracture of the hand (tightening of the hand muscles).Record review of Resident #88's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy during personal care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #38) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure CNA D and CNA E provided privacy by drawing the privacy curtain during incontinent care for Resident #38. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling embarrassed, diminishing the residents' quality of life and not having residents' rights acknowledged.Findings Included: Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Heart failure, unspecified (heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs, but the exact type such as systolic or diastolic is not yet determined), obstructive and reflux uropathy, unspecified (urinary tract blockage or urine flowing backward into the kidneys. The root cause is not currently specified), Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 (Resident #38) of 1 resident reviewed for incontinent care with foley catheter. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's catheters' drainage bag was positioned lower than Resident's urinary bladder to prevent urine from flowing back to urinary bladder. This failure could place residents at risk of UTI and other serious infections. Findings included:Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Heart failure, unspecified (heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs, but the exact type such as systolic or diastolic is not yet determined), obstructive and reflux uropathy, unspecified (urinary tract blockage or urine flowing backward into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately equip to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 2 of 32 residents (Residents #53 and 84) reviewed for call system. The facility failed to ensure Residents #53 and 84 had functioning nurse call buttons on 06/02/2026, 06/03/2026, and 06/04/2026. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their needs met.Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #53 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included cerebral infarction (a medical condition that occurs when the blood flow to the brain is disrupted due to issues with the arteries that supply it), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body), history of falling, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 3 of 4 shower rooms (halls 200, 300, and 500) and 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the shower rooms for halls 200, 300, and 500 were clean, functional, and in good repair on 05/13/2026 and 05/14/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of infection, injury, and diminished quality of life. Record review of work orders dated 04/13/2026 to 05/13/2026 reflected no work order related to the shower rooms or the medication room sink and cabinet. All work orders on the list were completed. Observation and interview on 05/13/2026 at 9:29 AM revealed the hall 300 shower room had no paper towels or hand soap near the handwashing sink. The toilet had a large translucent plastic bag wrapped around the bowl with the lid closed on top of it, and when the lid was lifted, the plastic bag was filled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 2 medication carts (Cart A) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure medications in the hall 400 medication cart (Cart A) were stored in a clean environment. 2. The facility failed to follow its pharmacy services policy when it allowed storage of a dose of Resident #1's Tramadol taped into a compartment with a broken seal. These failures could place resident's medications at risk of prompt identification of loss, and potential diversion of controlled medications. Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder- bipolar type (a chronic mental illness that combines features…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the medication storage room sink and the under-sink cabinet was in good repair on 05/13/2026 and 05/14/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the full benefit of their pharmaceutical regimen and infection. Record review of work orders dated 04/13/2026 to 05/13/2026 reflected no work order related to the shower rooms or the medication room sink and cabinet. All work orders on the list were completed. Observation on 05/13/2026 at 10:51 AM in the medication room revealed the bottom fascia (front) board was broken and falling off the cabinet. The cabinet covering the right side of the under-sink area was half sized, vertically, so the inner cabinet was opened to the room. The floor of the cabinet, made of particle board, was crumbling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and failed to protect and promote the rights of the residents for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents observed for dignity. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was clean while in the dining room being assisted with feeding. Resident #1 was in the dining room being fed with fecal matter on both of his hands. This failure could place residents at risk of experiencing humiliation, degradation, and a decreased quality of life.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/03/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet did not indicate active diagnoses. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 11 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control/sanitary environment. The facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene for Resident #1 and fecal matter was removed from his hands prior to being fed in the dining room. This failure could place residents at risk for developing communicable diseases and infections.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/03/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Active diagnosis reflected progressive neurological conditions, hypertension (high blood pressure), viral hepatitis (inflammation of the liver),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to date food and beverages found within the facility's freezer and refrigerator on 12/29/2025The facility failed to date and properly seal food products in facility freezer and refrigerator on 12/29/2025. These failures could place the residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of cross contamination, loss of nutritional value, weight loss, and foodborne illness. Findings included:In an observation on 12/29/2025 at 9:15 AM, the facility's one door freezer was found to contain an open undated box of breakfast sausage patties with a partially opened bag of breakfast sausage patties that were exposed to air. The freezer contained a large clear plastic bag with green peas covered with ice. There was no date or label on the bag. The freezer contained 5 individual servings of vanilla ice cream that had leaked into inside of the box and the lids on two of the containers had slid to the side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure evidence reflects the facility did not complete a discharge summary to include a recapitulation of the resident's stay and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge as resident was discharged to the hospital for a change in condition and the family chose to not readmit to the facility for 1 (Resident #94) of 4 residents reviewed for safe transfer or discharge. The facility failed to record the reasons for the transfer/discharge in Resident # 94's medical record when discharged on 11/30/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged without alternative placement, discharge options, their rights to appeal and access to advocacy services. Findings included:Record review of Resident # 94's face sheet dated 12/31/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 11/30/2025.Record review of Resident # 94's continuity of care document dated 12/31/2025 reflected diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an accurate comprehensive person-centered care plan that met the residents' medical needs and treatment plan for 1(Resident # 38) of 6 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to provide interventions / approaches consistent with facility policy of being a non-smoking facility for Resident # 38 vape use listed as a problem on her care plan. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their current needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident # 38 face sheet dated 12/31/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE].Record review of Resident # 38 continuity of care document dated 12/31/2025 reflected a diagnosis of unspecified visual loss, cough, pain, age related cataract bilateral (a clouding of the eye's natural lens causing blurry or hazy or dim vision on both eyes), depression, muscle weakness, lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-24 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed certified or registered in accordance with applicable state laws for 13 Nurse Aides of 13 nurse aides reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to ensure NAs A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K ,L ,M, Nurse Aide Curriculum skill performance checklists were checked off. This failure could place residents at risk of not being provided care by qualified staff, which could cause inadequate care and injury resulting in decreased health and psycho-social well-being.Findings include:Record review of NA A's employee record revealed they were hired 10/09/25 as a Nurse Aide trainee. The Nurse Aide Program training was completed on 10/03/25. There was no proof of a Nurse Aide Curriculum skill performance checklist. Record review of NA B's employee record revealed they were hired 09/02/25 as a Nurse Aide trainee. The Nurse Aide Program training was completed on 09/02/25. There was no proof of a Nurse Aide Curriculum skill performance checklist. Record review of NA C's employee record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet the preferences and goals of each resident and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for care plan. The facility failed to update Resident #1's care plan after an X-ray (a form of electromagnetic radiation used in medicine to create images of the inside of the body for diagnostic purposes) result dated 10/17/2025 reflected a nondisplaced fracture of the medial epicondyle (a bony prominence on the inner side of the elbow where muscles and the ulnar collateral ligament (is a circular ligament on the inner side of the elbow that connects the upper arm to the forearm bone) attach ) of the distal end of the right humerus (the long bone in the upper arm, connecting the shoulder blade to the forearm bones.) This deficient practice placed Residents at risk for not getting right interventions, risk for harm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1. The facility failed to dispose of open stored perishable food products. 2. The facility failed to properly label and date food products in the walk-in refrigerator and walk in freezer. 3. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Manager wore a facial hair restraint while performing duties throughout the kitchen. These failures could place residents who were served from the kitchen at risk for consuming contaminated food and developing foodborne illnesses.Findings included: Observation on 07/29/2025 at 8:15 AM revealed the Dietary Manager had a mustache in which was not covered with a facial hair restraint while he was performing duties in the kitchen area. Observation revealed Dietary Manager was not wearing a facial hair restraint while walking throughout the main kitchen area, food preparation area, and the walk-in refrigerator. Observation revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for 2of 6 residents (Resident # 73 and Resident #47) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure:*Resident #73 could communicate his needs and preferences. *Resident #47 had access to call light button. These failures could place residents at risk of isolation, not receiving needed care or nursing interventions to meet the resident's needs. Finding included: Record review of Resident #73's Face Sheet dated 06/17/2025, revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was an [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses of: Insomnia (sleep disorder characterized by difficulty falling asleep), Dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), Hypertensive Heart disease with heart failure (a condition where high blood pressure (hypertension) over time damages the heart, leading to heart failure), and Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). Review of Resident #73's Quarterly MDS, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a homelike environment for 2 or 3 residents (Resident #87 and Resident #14) observed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to ensure Resident #87's and Resident #14's bedroom walls were upkept and homelike. This failure could cause residents psychological distress or feel uncomfortable. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a homelike environment for 2 or 3 residents (Resident #87 and Resident #14) observed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to ensure Resident #87's and Resident #14's bedroom walls were upkept and homelike.This failure could cause residents psychological distress or feel uncomfortable.Findings Included:Resident #87Record Review of Resident #87's face sheet revealed was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #87 had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition that is marked by symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #44 and Resident #41 and #103 of 4 medication carts MC A reviewed for pharmaceutical services. 1. The facility failed to document controlled medications from the medication cart on the narcotic count sheets for Resident #44, Resident #41, and Resident #103. 2. The facility failed to remove a discontinued bottle of controlled medication from the medication cart for Resident #103. This failure could place residents at risk of medication errors and drug diversion.Findings include: Record review of Resident #44's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, muscle spasms, acute pain due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #2, Resident #63, and Resident #33) and 2 of 5 staff (LVN C and CNA A) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A was conducting hand hygiene between each resident when passing lunch trays on hall 500. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN C was sanitizing surfaces before and after when providing wound care for Resident #2, Resident #63, and Resident #33.These failures could place residents at risk of transmission of disease and infection. Findings included: Observation on 07/29/25 at 12:21 pm on hall 500 hall revealed CNA A pushed the meal cart down the hall. Without conducting hand hygiene CNA A picked up a tray and brought it to Resident #2's room. CNA A then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all routine and emergency drugs and biologicals for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's ciprofloxacin-dexamethasone (antibiotic ear drops) was acquired and administered according to physician's orders. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician and a potential for decreased health status and decreased quality of life. Findings include:These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician and a potential for decreased health status and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Review of Resident #1 face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-28 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include effective communications as mandatory training for 16 of 16 employees (MDS, CNA S, CNA T, MA U, CNA V, CNA W, CNA Y, CNA Z, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, RN II, LVN JJ and SW) reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to provided MDS, CNA S, CNA T, MA U, CNA V, CNA W, CNA Y, CNA Z, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, RN II, LVN JJ AND SW with effective communications as mandatory training. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. The findings included: Review of CNA S's personnel record had a hire date of 06/16/15, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of effective communications as mandatory training. Review of CNA T's personnel record had a hire date of 02/09/16, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of effective communications as mandatory training. Review of MA U's personnel record had a hire date of 05/18/20, with annual training in-services provided by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-28 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include training on the QAPI program to outline and inform staff of the elements and goals of the facility QAPI program for 16 of 16 employees (MDS, CNA S, CNA T, MA U, CNA V, CNA W, CNA Y, CNA Z, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, RN II, LVN JJ and SW) reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to provide MDS, CNA S, CNA T, MA U, CNA V, CNA W, CNA Y, CNA Z, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, RN II, LVN JJ AND SW on the QAPI program as mandatory training. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. The findings included: Review of CNA S's personnel record had a hire date of 06/16/15, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of the QAPI program as mandatory training. Review of CNA T's personnel record had a hire date of 02/09/16, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of the QAPI program as mandatory training. Review of MA U's personnel record had a hire date of 05/18/20, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-28 · tag F0946 — widespreadProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to communicate the compliance and ethics program's standards, policies and procedures through a training program or other practical manner which explains the requirements for 16 of 16 employees (MDS, CNA S, CNA T, MA U, CNA V, CNA W, CNA Y, CNA Z, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, RN II, LVN JJ and SW) reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to provide MDS, CNA S, CNA T, CNA U, CNA V, CNA W, CNA Y, CNA Z, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, RN II, LVN JJ AND SW on the compliance and ethics program's standards, policies and procedures through a training program or other practical manner as required. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. The findings included: Review of CNA S's personnel record had a hire date of 06/16/15, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of the compliance and ethics program's standards, policies and procedures as required. Review of CNA T's personnel record had a hire date of 02/09/16, with annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 5 of 24 resident rooms for Residents #69, #74, #31, #12, #15 whose rooms were observed for housekeeping and maintenance services. 1. Resident #69's room did not have a pull string for the overhead light, the wall paper on the wall behind the head of the bed was peeling off, the cover to a drawer on the right bottom closet was missing, and the privacy curtain was torn from the top and the torn portion was used to tie the bottom of the curtain so it would not drag on the floor. 2. The facility failed to provide a functional accessible bathroom and a functioning light switch with a plate cover in Resident #74's room. 3. The facility failed to ensure room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have a broken base board, peeling wallpaper, and missing toilet tank top cover. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's room did not have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 5 of 21 residents (Resident #13, #31, #70, #69, and #74) reviewed for care plans: 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #13's Care Plan reflected they refused staff assitance with their personal refrigerated items. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #31's Care Plan reflected they refused staff to assist with their personal refrigerated items. 3. The facility failed to ensure Residents #70's Care Plan reflected they refused staff to assist with their personal refrigerated items. 4. The facility failed to revise Resident #69's comprehensive care plan to reflect the resident no longer received a puree textured diet or crushed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 8 medication carts and 2 of 21 Residents (Resident #72 and #84) reviewed for labeling and medication storage: 1. The facility failed to ensure the medication cart used on the 200-unit had pharmacy labels on 7 out of 11 insulin pens in the cart, medications were not left on the mediation cart counter, and the medication cart was locked. 2. The facility failed to ensure the medication cart used on the 400-unit was locked and medications were not left on the medication cart counter. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #72 did not have medicated mentholated ointment (combination product that is used to relieve itching, minor muscle, or joint pain. This product may also be used as a chest rub to soothe symptoms associated with the common cold.) at his bedside. 4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies, and skills set to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 6 (DA K, DA L, DA M, DA N, DW P, and DA O ) of 10 dietary staff reviewed for qualified dietary staff, in that: The facility failed to ensure the DA K, DA L, DA M, DA N, DW P, and DA O had their Texas Food Handler Certificate. This failure could place residents who ate food from the facility's kitchen at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and place them at risk for food born illnesses. Findings included: Record review of four (4) certificates with completion dates ranging from 6/8/23 to 2/24/25. Certificates were titled Texas Food Handler Certification and indicated, renewal due 2 years from completion date. It was noted that certificates for DA K, DA L, DA M, DA N, DW P, and DA O were not found in this stack of certificates. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 5:35 p.m. the DS stated DA K, DA L, DA M, DA N, DW P, and DA O just washed dishes and he did not think they need a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to have hand soap at the handwashing station in the kitchen. 2. The facility failed to keep dish racks and juice lines off the floor. 3. The facility failed to not store a basket of milk cartons on the walk-in cooler floor. 4. The facility failed to date an open package of turkey and 2 open bags shredded cheese. 5. The facility failed to date a container of onions, discard a rotten potato, close a bag of grits, and to store an open bottle of sauce in the refrigerator. 6. The facility failed to cover Resident #36's lunch tray when placed on the hallway cart. 7. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean and there was a cleaning log. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. During an observation on 2/25/25 at 9:10 a.m. the kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enact a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption, for 2 (Residents #70 and #31) of 3 residents reviewed, in that: 1. Resident #70's personal refrigerator was observed to have spoiled food and no temperature log. 2. Resident #31's personal refrigerator was observed to have expired food and an incomplete temperature log. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which might be spoiled. The findings included: 1. During an observation on 2/25/25 at 9:53 a.m. Resident #70 had a personal refrigerator. There were many containers of lunch meat on a dresser and in the resident's bed. Some of the containers of lunch meat had green spots. On a bedside table were numerous bottles with liquid stains on the outside of them. Resident #70 stated staff did not help him discard of food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 5 of 21 residents (Resident #89, Resident #67, Resident #40, Resident #66, and Resident #74) reviewed for infection control: 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A practiced proper hand hygiene when administering medications to Resident #89, Resident #67, and Resident #40. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN J wore a gown during peg tube medication administration for Resident #66 who had orders for EBP and did not contaminate her gloves. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74's indwelling urinary catheter bag was not on the floor. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: 1. a. Record review of Resident #89's face sheet dated 2/26/25 revealed a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 of the facility's laundry department reviewed for patient care equipment in safe operating condition. The facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 washing machines and 1 of 2 dryers were operable. These failures could place residents at risk of needs not being met due to equipment not being operable. The findings included: A record review of the facility's resident roster dated 2/24/25 revealed a census of 84 residents. During the Resident Council meeting conducted on 2/26/25 at 10:08 a.m., residents revealed the facility had only 1 out of 2 washers and 1 out of 2 dryers that were operable and would often break down. Residents also revealed the laundry is often backed up. During an observation and interview on 2/28/25 at 7:53 a.m., the Laundry Assistant Manager stated, the facility had two washing machines and two clothes dryers, but only 1 washer and 1 dryer were operable. The Laundry Assistant Manager stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents for 09 of 16 employees (CNA W, CNA Y, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, LVN JJ, and SW ) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents was provided to CNA W, CNA Y, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, LVN JJ, and SW. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings included: Review of CNA W's personnel record had a hire date of 06/01/21, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents. Review of CNA Y's personnel record had a hire date of 10/20/23, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the mandatory training on standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program for 7 of 16 staff (DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, LVN JJ, and SW) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control training was provided to DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, LVN JJ, and SW. This failure could place residents at risk of illness due to lack of staff training. The findings were: Review of DS's personnel record had a hire date of 05/22/23, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of education on infection control topics. Review of Act D's personnel record had a hire date of 12/02/24, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of education on infection control topics. Review of LVN FF's personnel record had a hire date of 11/19/21, with annual training in-services provided by the facility that did not include evidence of education on infection control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory behavioral health training for 15 of 16 employees (MDS, CNA S, MA U, CNA V, CNA W, CNA Y, CNA Z, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, RN II, LVN JJ and SW) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective behavioral health training was provided to MDS, CNA S, MA U, CNA V, CNA W, CNA Y, CNA Z, DS, ACT D, LVN FF, LVN GG, RN HH, RN II, LVN JJ and SW. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. The findings included: Review of MDS's personnel record had a hire date of 12/17/21 revealed no evidence of behavioral health training. Review of CNA S's personnel record had a hire date of 06/16/15 revealed no evidence of behavioral health training. Review of MA U's personnel record had a hire date of 05/18/20, revealed no evidence of behavioral health training. Review of CNA V's personnel record had a hire date of 09/16/19 revealed no evidence of behavioral health training. Review of CNA W's personnel record had a hire date of 06/01/21 revealed no evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to fully investigate and address Resident #36's grievance report of missing personal property, including two computers, a wallet, DVDs, and food items, and did not assist Resident #36 in replacing his identification and bank card. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their grievances resolved. The findings included: Record review of Resident #36's continuity of care document (CCD), dated 2/28/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system), disorder of brain, and age-related physical debility. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from Misappropriation of property for one (Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 was free from misappropriation of property when he was forced to leave his room and belongings after a bed bug infestation and when he returned his wallet, DVDs, snacks, and two laptops were missing. This failure could place residents at risk of Exploitation/Misappropriation of Property and financial distress. Findings include: Record review of Resident #36's continuity of care document (CCD), dated 2/28/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system), disorder of brain, and age-related physical debility. Record review of Resident #36's annual MDS assessment, dated 12/9/24, revealed his cognition was intact for daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the State Agency) and the Abuse Coordinator for 1 (Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report to the state agency when Resident #36 alleged his wallet, DVDs, snacks, and two laptops were missing. This failure could place residents at risk of Exploitation/Misappropriation of Property and financial distress. Findings include: Record review of Resident #36's continuity of care document (CCD), dated 2/28/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained free of accidents and hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 (Resident #47, and Resident #70) of 21 residents reviewed for accidents. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 did not have an insulin needle on her bedside table. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #70 did not have a power strip in his room and a fan plugged into it. This failure could place the resident at risk of hazards and/or accidents. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #47's CCD 2/28/25, documented a [AGE] year-old female admitted to facility's secure unit on 10/19/24 with diagnoses, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic health condition that affects how the body turns food into energy), depression, hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland doesn't make enough thyroid hormone), and anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for dialysis: The facility did not maintain communication, coordination, and collaboration with the dialysis facility for Resident #21. This failure could affect residents who received dialysis treatments and place them at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 2/28/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (chronic condition in which the body become resistant to insulin or doesn't produce enough insulin to maintain normal glucose levels), and chronic kidney disease stage 5 (also known as end stage renal disease; when the kidneys have lost nearly all of their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #69 and #66) reviewed for medications and pharmacy services: 1. MA D prepared Resident #69's medications and allowed LVN A to administer them to the resident. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN J administered all of Resident #66's arginine-based powder mixture (designed to support the unique nutritional needs of people with chronic wounds. It delivers 4.5 grams of L-arginine and Vitamins C and E for wound management.) via his PEG tube (is a surgery to place a feeding tube. Feeding tubes, or PEG tubes, allow you to receive nutrition through your stomach.) These deficient practices could put residents at risk for inaccurate or inappropriate administration of medications. The findings included: 1. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 2 Dumpsters (Dumpster #1) reviewed for disposal of garbage. The facility failed to ensure Dumpster #1 was closed and trash was not on the ground outside the dumpster and around the facility grounds. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents. The findings were: During an observation on 2/25/25 at 11:02 a.m. revealed the side door to dumpster #1 was open. During an observation on 2/26/25 at 5:41 p.m. revealed the side door to dumpster #1 was open. On the ground behind the dumpster was a food wrapper, used gloves, and used masks. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 5:41 p.m. the DS stated the dumpster should not be open but is shared with the whole facility and sometimes others leave it open. The DS stated the trash on the ground and the open dumpster can attract animals and should not be there. The DS stated maintenance was in charge of pick up trash off the facility grounds outside. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 21 residents (Residents #69 and Resident #74) reviewed for medical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #69's physician's orders were updated to include the resident no longer received a puree diet, thickened liquids, and crushed medications. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74's physician's orders were updated to include the resident was a DNR status. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of improper care due to inaccurate medical records. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #69's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia-oropharyngeal phase (difficulty swallowing due to dysfunction in the mouth and throat), and vitamin deficiency. Record review of Resident #69's most recent annual MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were equipped to assure full visual privacy for each resident for 1 (Resident #66) of 21 rooms reviewed for full visual privacy. The facility failed to provide Resident #66 with a privacy curtain. This failure could cause a decrease in feelings of self-worth by being exposed during cares. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #66's CCD, dated 2/28/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (when the blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced. This prevents brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients. Brain cells begin to die in minutes.), gastrostomy status (presence of an artificial opening in the stomach), pressure ulcer of unspecified part of back stage 4, protein calorie malnutrition, anemia (where there are insufficient healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to carry oxygen to the body's tissues), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for infection control, as indicated by: CNA A, CNA B and CNA C failed to change dirty gloves while handling clean items while providing peri care to Resident #1 and, Resident # 2. This failure could place the residents at risk of transmission of diseases and infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated [DATE] reflected, Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] She was a [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with Pain, Iron deficiency, Vitamin deficiency, Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, Anxiety, Insomnia, Hypertension and Age-related physical debility. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected her BIMS was 03 indicating her cognition was severely impaired. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences, and 483.65 of this subpart and ensure infection control measures during implementation of care, handling, cleaning, storage and disposal of equipment, supplies, biohazardous waste and including infection control practices for mechanical ventilation/tracheostomy care including the use of humidifiers were followed by staff for 1 (Residents #1) of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care, The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's nasal cannulas and tubing were properly stored when not in use. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 05/20/24, revealed a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #2) reviewed for care plan, in that: The care plan for Residents #2 failed to address any of the resident's need, because Resident #2 did not have a care plan. These failures could affect the resident by placing him at risk for not receiving care and services to meet his needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's initial MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the sections revealed: C - Cognitive Patterns reflected he had a BIMS of 12 (suggesting moderately impaired cognition) with disorganized thinking, Section H - Bladder and Bowel reflected he had an Ostomy (a life-saving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were dated, labeled, and sealed appropriately. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included: Observations of the facility's kitchen refrigerator on 04/01/2024 at 9:22am revealed the following items were not sealed and exposed to air, labeled, or dated: Two plastic bags of cheese not dated, labeled, and sealed. One plastic bag of ham deli meat not dated, labeled, and sealed. 4 Prepped cups of orange juice not dated, labeled. Milk in a pitcher not dated and labeled. 8 Prepped cups of ketchup, ranch and thousand island dressing not dated and labeled. A container of strawberries not labeled and dated. One plastic bag of lettuce not labeled and dated. Observations of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 16 (Resident #1, and Resident #2) residents in 1 of 1 dining room. The facility failed to promote Resident #1 and 2's dignity while dining when staff did not serve the residents their lunch tray at the same time as other residents at the same table. This failure could affect all residents who were eat in the dining room, by contributing to poor self-esteem, and unmet needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 004/01/2024 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, insomnia, heart failure, respiratory disease, depression, protein-calorie malnutrition, high levels of fat particles in the blood, psychoactive substance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident rights for personal privacy for two of seven (Resident # 3, and Resident # 4) residents observed for resident rights. CNA B and CNA C did not provide privacy to Resident #4 when providing care. The facility failed to provide privacy to Resident #3 while she was lying in bed with no clothing on from the waist down. The deficient practice could affect all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for loss of dignity and privacy. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 04/01/2024 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3's diagnoses included dementia, obesity, insomnia, anxiety disorder, high blood pressure, long term use of aspirin, reflux disease, constipation, muscle spasm, chest pain, pain, convulsions, and protein-calorie malnutrition . Record Review of Resident #3's MDS revealed her BIMS was a 13 cognitively intact. Resident #3 is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from abuse for 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. CNA A called Resident #1 dumb and asked why he can't change himself when he asked for assistance on Thursday, 3/7/24 at approximately 8:30 pm. Resident #1 stated CNA A's words made him feel embarrassed and angry. Resident #3 entered the room of Resident #2 on Saturday 3-02-24, and hit Resident #2 on the foot 4 times. This failure could place residents at risk of fear and physical/psychosocial injury. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia, nutritional deficiency, meningitis (infection in spinal cord), GERD, pain, muscle spasm, unspecified convulsions/epilepsy, depression, TBI (traumatic brain injury), hydrocephalus (swelling in brain), and metabolic encephalopathy (A medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who requires dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for three (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of four residents reviewed for dialysis, in that: The facility failed to ensure current active physician's orders for the type or frequency of dialysis treatments were in place for Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3 and that physician's orders were in place for monitoring the dialysis access site for Resident #1. These failures could place residents on dialysis at risk of severe blood loss, infection control complications, and hospitalization. Findings included : Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, type II diabetes, and dependence on renal dialysis (a process…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-04 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, and family members and legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility for 1 of 4 required postings (survey results) reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the results of the recertification survey dated 12/31/2026 were present in the survey inspection results binder on 06/02/2026 and 06/03/2026. This facility placed residents and their responsible parties at risk of not being able to inspect survey results. Findings included: Review of the survey event database utilized by HHSC to track surveys reflected the facility was a special focus facility, indicating there would be two full recertification surveys every calendar year. It also reflected the most recent full recertification survey was 12/31/2025. Observation on 06/02/2026 at 10:45 AM revealed a white binder on the shelf behind the reception desk, in a placement reachable to passersby, including those in wheelchairs, with the title Survey Inspection Results on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$204,403 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $33,030 — penalty dated 2025-09-13
- $98,956 — penalty dated 2024-05-16
- $50,253 — penalty dated 2024-01-26
- $22,164 — penalty dated 2023-08-24
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RODRIGUEZ, BENJAMIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 01/01/2024 |
| MURRELL, EDWARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2024 |
| GRACY WOODS SNF LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| SHAPIRO, MENACHEM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675918. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.