Calder Woods

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 163 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 37.1 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.98 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance devices and adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure CNA A utilized a gait belt and had assistance from another staff member during a bed to wheelchair transfer on 11/19/24 which resulted in Resident #1 having a fall and complaints of pain. Resident #1 was sent to the local hospital emergency room where she was found to have fractured neck bones. She was care flighted to another hospital out of town for surgery to the neck. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 11/19/24 and ended on 12/05/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began.This failure could place residents at risk for falls resulting in injury, pain, hospitalization, and possible death. Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 05/19/25 indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen.1. The facility failed to ensure that dietary staff wore hair restraints to prevent hair from contacting food, on 1/28/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure trash cans were properly covered on 1/28/2026.3. The facility failed to properly store, label, and date all food items located in the facility refrigerators, freezers and in the dry food pantry area on 01/28/2026 and 01/29/2026. 4. The facility failed to properly seal food product bags in the dry storage area to prevent exposure to air on 01/28/2026 and 01/29/2026. These failures could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses.Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 01/28/2026 beginning at 8:50 AM revealed the following:Kitchen area:CK A with an approximate 2.5-inch beard was not wearing a beard restraint while he prepared food.4 large gray trash cans open, not covered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for medication and supply storage room [ROOM NUMBER] of 1 reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure expired medical supplies were removed from the singular medication and supply storage room.This failure could place residents at risk of contamination causing illness and decreased effectiveness or failure of medical supplies.Findings included:Observation on [DATE] at 11:30 AM of the singular medication room revealed the following:Three enteral feeding bags with attached gravity set 1200mL capacity with an expiration date of [DATE].One enteral feeding bag with attached gravity set 1200mL capacity with an expiration date of [DATE].Two Aspira drainage kits with use by date [DATE].In an interview on [DATE] at 11:30 AM MA D, stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and help to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 out of 4 residents (R #18, R #32, R #21) reviewed for infection control. MA D failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff between residents (R#5, R #18, R #32, R #21) while performing medication pass. The failure placed residents at risk for cross contamination and the development of infections.Findings include:In observation of medication administration on 1/29/2026 at 8:12 AM MA D utilized the blood pressure cuff on Resident #5, Resident #18, Resident #32, and Resident #21 and failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff between the residents.In an interview on 1/29/2026 at 8:50AM with MA D, she stated that it is proper practice to cleanse the blood pressure cuff between residents with a Sani-wipe and wait 2 minutes for it to dry before using the equipment again. She stated that if the cuff is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 10 (Resident #28) residents in 1 of 3 (DR #1) dining rooms.The facility failed to promote Resident #28's dignity during lunch on 01/28/2026 when staff did not serve Resident #28's lunch tray until twenty-two minutes after her tablemates were served.This failure could affect all residents who eat in the dining room, by contributing to poor self-esteem, and unmet needs.Findings included:Record review of Resident #28 Face Sheet dated 01/28/2026 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #28's diagnoses included vitamin B deficiency, pain in left knee, hyperthyroidism (excessive production of thyroid hormones), heart disease with heart failure, muscle weakness, limitation of activities due to disability,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 (Resident #2) residents who were reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had orders for her oxygen therapy. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's oxygen humidifier was changed when emptied. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care.The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 08/11/25, indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, hypertension (high blood pressure), and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 08/06/25, indicated Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records maintained for each resident were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure CNA Z documented that incontinent care was provided for Resident #1 from 6:27 p.m. on 08/09/25 through 6:00 a.m. on 08/10/25. The facility failed to ensure LVN V documented on a nurse progress note on 08/10/25 when Resident #1 was crying in pain, level of pain, and required pain medication. These failures could place residents at risk for delayed care and appropriate interventions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/11/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], and her diagnoses included left femur (thigh bone) fracture, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, cellulitis (bacterial infection) of buttocks, cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 (Resident #3) residents reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA B failed to perform hand hygiene while performing incontinent care for Resident #3. These failures could place residents at risk for infection through cross contamination of pathogens. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 08/11/25 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder, hypertension (high blood pressure), and constipation. Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected her BIMS score was 99 (unable to complete the interview). The other fields of the MDS assessment were not yet filled out except…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately documented for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to document a physician ordered x-ray was completed, the results, or physician notification in Resident #1's medical record. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed care and appropriate interventions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/06/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year old female, admitted on [DATE], and her diagnoses included dementia (decline in cognitive function), pleural effusion (collection of fluid around the lungs), wheezing (high pitched whistle sound made when breathing), delirium due to know physiological condition, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), insomnia (sleep disorder), and anxiety (excessive, persistent, and uncontrollable worry and fear about everyday situations). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of the residents for 1 (Resident #139) of 13 residents reviewed for controlled medications. Resident #139's hydrocodone 5mg / acetaminophen 325 mg (narcotic pain medication for moderate or severe pain) 20 tablets were not accounted for at the time of discharge 09/11/24 and remained unaccounted for 55 days. This failure could place residents at risk for medication overdose, medication under-dose, ineffective therapeutic outcomes, and drug diversion. Findings : Record review of a face sheet dated 11/06/24 indicated Resident #139 admitted on [DATE] was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of fractured right hip and fractured right upper arm. The face sheet indicated discharged on 09/11/24 to another facility. The face sheet did not have contact information for the Resident #139. There was contact information for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #136) reviewed for infection control. LVN C failed to wear a gown during wound care for Resident #136 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #136's face sheet dated 11/06/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included elevated white blood cell count (when the body produces more white blood cells than normal which could be caused by infection) and stage 3 (a deep wound that extends through the skin and into the subcutaneous tissue) pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and soft tissue that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,069 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-10-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $400K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX