Harmony Care at Beaumont
2660 Brickyard Rd, Beaumont, TX 77703 · Government - Hospital district · 98 certified beds · (409) 892-1533 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0609) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 9 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (76) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $371,472 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-25)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2025-12, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-12 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.7% | 2.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.9% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.4% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.9% | 13.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.2% | 9.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.9% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.41 | 2.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.89 | 2.06 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.2–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.4–13.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.26 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 46.0 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.00 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
76 citations, most serious first. The 25 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from physical abuse by CNA B. The non-compliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 03/05/26 and ended on 03/13/26. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dementia (decline in mental ability), anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer's disease (progressive, irreversible neurological disorder that shrinks the brain and kills brain cells). Record review of Resident #1's MDS Resident Assessment and Care Screening form dated 02/04/26 revealed under Cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #39)The facility failed to ensure Resident #39 was free from physical abuse when on 11/30/25 CNA A slapped Resident #39 in the face. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 11/30/25 and ended on 11/30/25. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of life, and further abuse.Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 12/01/25 indicated Resident #39 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dementia (loss of cognitive functioning) and cerebral infarction (lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells that deprives them of oxygen and vital nutrients which can cause parts of the brain to die off).Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #39…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect for 10 of 25 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #9, Resident #11, Resident #14, and Resident #216) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was free from sexual abuse when Resident #25 came into Resident #6's room and rubbed her right leg under the covers on 08/21/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was free from physical and verbal abuse by CNA F when CNA F called Resident #5 retarded, pushed and held him down on the bed during incontinent care, pulled him off the low bed, landing on the floor and held him down by his shoulder trying to put his shirt on and pinned him against the wall and stomped on his feet on 7/01/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was free from physical and verbal abuse by CNA M when CNA M told Resident #5 to sit your ass down multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 7 of 25 residents (Resident's #1,2,3,4,5, 6, 25) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop and implement interventions in Resident #25's the care plan revised 08/22/2025 to prevent Resident #25's inappropriate and unwanted touching of Resident #6 on 08/21/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was updated to indicate Resident #1 had an incident of resident-to-resident aggression on 03/19/2025, 07/24/2025 and 09/05/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan was updated to indicate Resident #2 had received aggression during a resident-to-resident incident on 03/19/2025. 4. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately to the abuse coordinator for immediate intervention and all alleged violations involving abuse were reported no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 3 of 25 residents (Resident #5, #7 and #8) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed ensure ST R reported a witnessed allegation of physical and verbal abuse immediately to the Abuse Coordinator approx. 1.5 weeks prior to 7/1/2025. ST R witnessed CNA M tell Resident #5 to sit you ass down multiple times and then forcefully push Resident #5 into a chair approx. 1.5 weeks prior to 7/1/2025. The Abuse Coordinator became aware of the incident on 7/3/2025 during a facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse for 2 of 15 residents (Residents #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 were free from sexual abuse. On 6/15/2024 at 2:03 p.m., Resident #1 provided oral sex to Resident #2 in the dining room of the facility. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The Immediate Jeopardy began on 06/15/2024 and ended on 10/07/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/24/2024 indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old male, initially admitted to facility on 06/17/2022 and readmitted to facility on 05/06/2024. His diagnoses included moderate intellectual disabilities (chronic condition that affects a person's ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #Unnamed & Resident #4) reviewed for abuse. 1. On 08/02/24 Resident #1 was grabbing Resident #Unnamed breasts. 2. On 08/25/24 Resident #1 touched Resident #4's breast. On 10/05/24 at 4:40 p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 10/06/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of the Plan of Removal. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 09/23/24 indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old, initially admitted to facility on 03/07/24 and readmitted to facility on 09/09/24. His diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #Unnamed) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prevent sexual abuse and potential further sexual abuse by Resident #1 when Resident #1 grabbed Resident #Unnamed's breast. 2. The facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prevent sexual abuse and potential further sexual abuse by Resident #1 when Resident #1 touched Resident #4's breast. On 10/05/24 at 4:40 p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 10/06/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope of pattern due to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #1 & #2) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's physician and responsible party were immediately notified on 04/19/24 after Resident #1 placed a pillow over Resident #2's face and said she tried to kill her. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's physician was immediately notified on 04/19/24 after she reported Resident #1 had put a pillow over her face while she was sleeping and tried to kill her. On 04/22/24 at 11:03 a.m., an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 04/23/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level with potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #2 and #3) reviewed for abuse. 1. On 04/03/24 Resident #3 self-propelled her wheelchair into Resident #1's room and Resident #1 pulled Resident #3 out of her wheelchair onto the floor. 2. On 04/19/24 Resident #1 placed a pillow over the face of Resident #2 and later admitted she was trying to kill Resident #2. On 04/20/24 at 02:29 p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 04/21/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level with the potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of thei Plan of Removal. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/20/24, indicated she was a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to place Resident #1 on one-on-one supervision or move her to a private room after she pulled Resident #3 out of her wheelchair after Resident #3 self-propelled her wheelchair into Resident #1's room. The facility failed to place Resident #1 on one-on-one supervision after Resident #1 tried to kill Resident #2 (her roommate) by placing a pillow over her face. On 04/20/24 at 02:29 p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 04/21/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level with the potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), was provided to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for CPR. The facility failed to ensure staff utilized the AED (automated external defibrillator- a medical device that analyzes the heart's rhythm and, if necessary, delivers an electrical shock to the heart in attempt to re-establish an effective rhythm) when Resident #1 was found on [DATE] unresponsive, not breathing, and no pulse. Resident #1 was pronounced deceased on [DATE]. An IJ was identified on [DATE] at 3:57 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was consulted for a change of condition for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility did not notify the physician when Resident #1 had a decline of meal intake. This failure could place residents at risk for delay in treatment and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/12/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year old female, admitted on [DATE], and her diagnoses included degenerative disease of nervous system, dementia the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function. Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] indicated she was able to make herself understood, sometimes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2024-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 11 resident (Resident #1) reviewed quality of care. The facility did not notify the physician when Resident #1 had a decline of meal intake. The facility did not obtain labs- CBC (complete blood count- used to measure different parts and features of blood), CMP (Complete Metabolic Panel-test used to monitor the blood sugar levels, the balance of electrolytes and fluid as well as the health of kidneys and liver), lipid (levels of cholesterol and other fats in the blood), A1C (blood test that measures average blood sugar levels over the past 3 months), thyroid (blood tests used to measure how well the thyroid gland is working), vitamin B12 and vitamin D hydroxy 25 as ordered by NP C on 02/23/24. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate care and medical interventions to maintain their health and prevent worsening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2024-03-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain laboratory services ordered by physician for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for labs. The facility did not obtain labs- CBC (complete blood count- used to measure different parts and features of blood), CMP (Complete Metabolic Panel-test used to monitor the blood sugar levels, the balance of electrolytes and fluid as well as the health of kidneys and liver), lipid (levels of cholesterol and other fats in the blood), A1C (blood test that measures average blood sugar levels over the past 3 months), thyroid (blood tests used to measure how well the thyroid gland is working), vitamin B12 and vitamin D hydroxy 25 as ordered by NP C on 02/23/24. This failure could place residents at risk of a delay in treatment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/12/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year old female, admitted on [DATE], and her diagnosis included degenerative disease of nervous system, dementia the loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision, to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents that smoke on the secure unit (Resident #33), 3 of 3 residents (Residents #6, #9 & #14) of the general population that smoke and for 1 of 1 unoccupied resident room reviewed for safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6, and Resident #14 did not smoke unsupervised within 25 feet of the flammable gas water heater. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33's environment was free of hazards, on 4/13/26 Resident #33 was observed smoking outside on the secure unit patio area, there was no designated signage, no fire extinguisher, no fire blanket, no ash tray and no fire-safety can. 3. On 4/13/26 the facility failed to supervise Resident #9 while smoking. 4. The facility failed to ensure an unoccupied room was free of unsecured chemicals in spray bottles. These failures could place residents at risk for injury and burns. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they had an RN for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week for 1 of 3 months reviewed for RN coverage. The facility did not have 8 hours of RN coverage on 12/13/2025, 12/14/2025, 12/20/2025, 12/21/2025, 12/27/2025, and 12/28/2025.This failure could place residents at risk by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN specific nursing activities and for coordination of events such as emergency care and disasters.Findings included: During an interview on 04/15/2026 at 11:15 a.m., the HR said the corporate submitted to the PBJ, however she would pull the sign in sheets and time sheets for the dates 12/13/2025, 12/14/2025, 12/20/2025, 12/21/2025, 12/27/2025, and 12/28/2025. She said those dates were the weekend coverage for the month of December 2025. During an interview on 04/15/2026 at 12:01 p.m., the HR said there were only 2 RNs during that period, and they were not covering the weekends. Record review of the RN time sheets for December 2025 indicated:* no RN coverage for the dates of 12/13/2025, 12/14/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food served under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to ensure the ham (approximately 10-inch by 4-inches) was stored in the refrigerator, covered and on a clean surface. The facility failed to ensure the deep fryer did not have dark cooking oil and was free of thick black buildup of grease and burnt food particles around to top of the deep fryer. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen hallway were free of a trash can with trash piled 3 feet above the can and on the floor approximately 3 feet around the trash can. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination, food borne illness and a diminished quality of life. The findings included:During observations and interviews on 04/13/2026 at 8:30 a.m., revealed an uncovered piece of ham approximately 10-inch by 4-inches, half of it touching a prep table with food particles and pieces of the paper that had covered the ham. The DM said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it formulated, adopted, and enforced policies regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also consider non-smoking residents for 1 of 2 smoking areas (main smoking area under the car port) reviewed for smoking safety. The facility failed to ensure paper and plastic trash were not discarded into the fire safety cans on 04/13/26. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, burns, and an unsafe smoking environment. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 04/13/26 at 12:20 p.m. revealed the two red fire cans in the main designated smoking area, under the car port, contained cigarette butts, empty cigarette paper boxes, empty soda cans, chip bags, plastic and paper trash. The Maintenance Director emptied the trash out of both fire cans and said everyone was responsible for the smoking area and was unsure who would have put the trash in the fire cans, but if he had to guess, he said the trash was probably placed by other staff and residents. The Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the nurse call system was accessible for 1 of 6 (Resident #30) reviewed for resident call system. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30'a call light was within reach after her incontinent care was finished on 04/13/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of not being able to directly contact the staff to obtain assistance for activities of daily living or help in an event of an emergency.Findings included: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet dated 04/14/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with admission date of 03/20/2026. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by systemic metabolic disturbances, leading to confusion, memory loss.) type 2 diabetes (high levels of sugar in the blood), essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), immunodeficiency (condition in which the immune system is weakened or absent, reducing the body's ability to fight infections and abnormal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy.The facility incorrectly coded Resident #6's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] as not using tobacco when he did use tobacco.This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings include:Record review of Resident #6's admission record dated 04/15/2026 indicated Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] and he was [AGE] years old. His diagnoses included end stage renal disease (kidney failure), heart disease, depression and anxiety.Record review of Resident #6's smoking assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #6 used tobacco and required supervision.Record review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #6 did not use tobacco.Record review of Resident #6's care plan dated 04/21/2025 indicated Resident #6 was a tobacco smoker and was at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for baseline care plan. The facility failed to revise Resident 30's baseline care plan included her g-tube This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet dated 04/14/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with admission date of 03/20/2026. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by systemic metabolic disturbances, leading to confusion, memory loss), dysphagia ( difficulty swallowing), immunodeficiency (condition in which the immune system is weakened or absent, reducing the body's ability to fight infections and abnormal cells).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain good personal hygiene, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 was provided with a shower on 04/08/2026, 04/10/2026, and 04/13/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services needed to maintain quality of life and prevent decline in their mental and psychological well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet dated 04/14/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with admission date of 03/20/2026. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by systemic metabolic disturbances, leading to confusion, memory loss.) type 2 diabetes (high levels of sugar in the blood), essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), immunodeficiency (condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 4 residents of 14 sampled reviewed for the environment. The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the Resident #6 and Resident #34's room was free of gnats and flies. The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to ensure Resident #23 and Resident #45's room was free of roaches. The failures could place residents at risk of potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, food-borne illness, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #6 's admission record dated 04/15/2026 indicated Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] and he was [AGE] years old. His diagnoses included end stage renal disease, heart disease, depression and anxiety. Record review of Resident #6 annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #6 BIMS score was a 15 which indicated his cognition was intact. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for 2 of 4 months of controlled drug count records reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the controlled drug (medication) count record was signed acknowledging that the controlled drugs (medications) were counted by LVN A, LVN B, LVN C, MA D, LVN E and LVN F. The facility failed to ensure LVN A, LVN B, LVN C, MA D, LVN E and LVN F signed the controlled drug count records acknowledging the controlled drugs were counted and correct each time they took possession of the medication cart for the months of January and February. This failure could place the facility at risk for drug diversion.Findings included: Record review of the controlled drug count sheets indicated signing below acknowledges that you have counted the controlled drugs on hand and have found that the quantity of each medication counted is in agreement with the quantity stated on controlled Drug Administration Record. missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they had an RN for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week for 8 of 8 months reviewed for RN coverage. * The facility did not have RN coverage every day in April 2025, May 2025, June 2025, August 2025, September 2025, October 2025, and November 2025.* The facility did not have an RN for 8 consecutive hours every day in April 2025, May 2025, June 2025, July 2025, and August 2025.These failures could place residents at risk by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN specific nursing activities and for coordination of events such as emergency care and disasters. Findings included: During an interview on 12/02/25 at 10:16 a.m. the Administrator said on the Exel form of the RN hours the Raw Hours were potential hours to work and the Work Hours were the actual hours worked. He said he clarified if there were no hours under the Work Hours then the nurse did not work. During an interview on 12/03/25 at 01:56 p.m. HR said there were only 2 RNs employed at the facility-the DON and RN R. Record review of the RN time sheets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow guidelines for mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. The facility failed to submit direct care staffing information on the schedule specified by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), but no less frequently than quarterly for 1 of 4 quarters reviewed for payroll data information. (Quarter 3 2025) *The facility failed to submit staffing information to CMS for the 3rd quarter of the fiscal year 2025. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. Findings included:Record Review of the facility's Civil Rights form (3761) dated 12/03/25 indicated the following:2 RNs 9 LVNs 20 Direct Care Staff9 Dietary8 Housekeeping & Laundry 6 All OthersRecord review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report (payroll-based staffing), CASPER Report (Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Report) 1705D FY Quarter 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 2 units (secure unit) and room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] reviewed for homelike environment. 1.The facility failed to provide home-like furniture in TV room and dining room area just with a table. 2.The facility failed to ensure the walls of room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have scratches and areas of missing paint. 3.The facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER]. These failures placed the staff and visitors at risk of living and working in conditions of institution which can lead to decline of mental, social skills and increase of behaviors. Findings included: During an observation on 12/03/25 at 11:30 a.m. revealed a plain table with no placements or tablecloths. The table had no decorations. The dining room area / TV room had bare walls and was not homelike. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the written abuse policy that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, for 7 of 7 staff reviewed for abuse. (LVN A, LVN F, Former SW, CNA B, CNA G, CNA M, and CNA Q)The facility did not screen potential employees LVN A, LVN F, Former SW, CNA B, CNA G, CNA M, and CNA Q to include attempting to obtain information from previous employers and/or current employers.This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress.Findings included:Record review of the Abuse and Neglect policy dated June 2023 indicated the following: Policy Statement: It is the policy of the facility to administer care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, corporal punishment, misappropriation of property, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment. The facility follows the federal guidelines dedicated to prevention of abuse and timely and thorough investigations of allegations. These guidelines include compliance with the seven (7) federal components of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure food items in the dry pantry were labeled, dated, and sealed.This failure could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for foodborne illnesses.Findings include:An observation of dry storage on 12/01/2025 at 8:10 AM indicated the following:*2 large plastic gallon zipper top bags each with an 5-pound, opened and used original container bag labeled cornbread and muffin mix with no use by date or open date,*1, 11-ounce box of vanilla wafers with bag ripped open in the original yellow Nilla wafer box. The tabs were opened, and the bag was not sealed, exposing the wafers to the elements, with no use by date or open date,*1, opened and used 12-ounce bag of Best Choice ribbon pasta not sealed and with no use by date or open date,During an interview on 12/01/2025 at 8:20 AM, the DM said she did not know when or who opened the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's governing body failed to operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, regulations, and codes for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Social Worker (SW).The facility did not employ or contract a SW as required by state regulations. This failure could place residents at risk of administrative duties not being carried out attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Findings included:Record review of a employee list provided by the DON on 12/01/25 indicated there was no SW listed. During an interview on 12/01/25 at 01:15 p.m., the VPO said they did not have a SW working for the facility either contract or part-time. He said they had not had one for a couple of weeks. He said they were advertising for a SW but had no responses yet. During an interview on 12/01/25 at 01:21 p.m. HR said they did not have a SW currently. She said the previous one was terminated a couple of weeks ago. Record review of the employee file for the former SW…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in safe operating condition for 1 or 1 facility kitchen.The walk-in freezer had excessive accumulation of ice build- up.This failure had the potential to affect residents by placing them at risk for food borne illness. Findings were:An observation of the walk-in freezer and interview on 12/01/25 at 9:00 a.m. revealed the temperature was -19. The walk-in freezer had excessive amounts of ice build-up on the top shelf, and around the electrical cord of the freezer fan was a large block of ice build-up appearing to be so heavy, the electrical cord was drooping. There was also ice accumulation on left side of the doorway wall entering the walk-in freezer. There were 30, 1-inch thick, 6-inches long icicles covering the upper left area of the wall. On the ceiling of the walk-in freezer were multiple frozen water drops. The DM said she had talked to the maintenance department about the freezer, but did not have any evidence that a requisition had been made for the repairs needed.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for staff for 1 of 1 facility kitchen floor reviewed for environmental concerns. The floor under the back of the stove was missing 8-10 tiles. These failures could place staff at risk for exposure to an unclean, unsanitary environment, risk of falls and other injuries due to an unsafe environment.Findings were:An observation on 12/01/25 at 9:15 a.m. of the kitchen floor revealed the flooring under the back of the kitchen stove, had 8-10 floor tiles were missing. Around the edges, there was a build up of dirt and brown grime.During an interview with the DM on 12/01/25 at 9:20 a.m., she said she had been in the facility for 6 months, and was trying to get things done. She confirmed the condition of the floor missing tiles. The DM said the floor in the kitchen had been like that for several months. The DM said she did not have any evidence that a repair requisition was made for the floor. The DM said the dietary department did not have their own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for advanced directives.The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 who was listed as a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) had valid Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) form that was not missing required information.This failure could place residents at risk of not having their end-of-life wishes honored and incomplete records.Findings included:Record Review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated [DATE] , indicated a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Major Depressive Disorder (a mental disorder characterized by pervasive low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure in activities), and Schizoaffective disorder bipolar type [a serious mental illness combining symptoms of schizophrenia (hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking) with mood swings from bipolar disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #4)* The facility did not have appropriate diagnoses for Resident #4's Abilify (antipsychotic).* The facility did not have behavior monitoring for Resident#4's Lexapro (antidepressant).These failures could place residents at risk for unintended, harmful events attributed to the use of a medication without the appropriate monitoring or indication for use. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 12/03/25 indicated Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized variously by hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking and behavior, and flat or inappropriate affect with a strong belief that they are being persecuted, spied on, or conspired against by others), schizoaffective disorder (mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. (Resident #16) The facility did not accurately complete the MDS assessment to indicate Resident #16 used tobacco. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 12/03/25 indicated Resident #16 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), major depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), cerebral infarction (lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells deprives them of oxygen and vital nutrients which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for new admissions.The facility did not accurately complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for Resident #16 to address his smoking.This failure could lead to residents not receiving necessary care and decreased quality of life.Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 12/03/25 indicated Resident #16 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), major depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), cerebral infarction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #4's care plan addressed his psychiatric diagnoses or his psychotropic medications.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 12/03/25 indicated Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized variously by hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking and behavior, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 1 treatment carts (treatment cart) of 1 of 3 medication carts (200 Hall cart) reviewed for medication storage. - The facility failed to ensure the medication treatment cart was locked when left unsecured and unsupervised at the main nurse station. - The facility failed to ensure Hall 200 Nurse Cart was locked when left unsecured and unsupervised at the main nurse station. These failures could place residents at risk of adverse reactions to medications, misappropriation of medications and not receiving therapeutic effects of medication.Findings include: During an observation and interview on 12/01/25 at 09:15 a.m., the treatment cart was noted to be unsecured and unsupervised at the main nurse station. Located inside the unlocked medication treatment cart was the following items labeled as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections during medication pass for 1 of 4 medication carts (Hall 200 medication cart) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure the Hall 200 medication cart was clean and free of spills and buildup of grime. This failure could place residents at risk for medications being stored in unsanitary cart and infections.Findings included: During an observation and interview on 12/02/25 at 10:20 a.m., medication cart for the long Hall 200 had a buildup of black substance on inside of the second drawer where medications were kept in the drawer. The lower drawer contained bottles of liquid medications that had spills of liquid medications on the bottles and labels. The bottom of the drawer had a sticky substance. LVN C said the cart needed to be cleaned and spills could make labels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 1 (Residents #30) of 2 residents reviewed for smoking. The facility failed, on12/03/25, to ensure that Resident #30 did not keep his personal cigarettes and lighter in his possession and was attempting to smoke unsupervised. This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe smoking environment and injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #30's comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, and seizure disorder. Resident #30's BIMS score was 05, indicating his cognition was severely impaired. Record review of Resident #30's care plan dated 05/09/25 indicated he was a tobacco smoker and was at risk for injury. The interventions included to keep his smoking material at the nurses' station and observe, as needed, when smoking to assure resident's safety. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for the residents in rooms #203, #215, and #220 (three of ten resident rooms) that were observed for physical environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure the rooms and bathrooms for rooms #203, #215, and #220 were clean and free of dead bug carcasses and dead cock roaches on 09/22/2025 and 09/23/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure the bathroom vanity for room [ROOM NUMBER] was in good repair. Two of two doors for the bathroom vanity were missing on 09/23/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure the broken and missing tile was repaired and replaced in the bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and caulk and flooring around the toilet were stain free on 09/23/25. These failures could place the residents at risk for diminished quality of life.Findings included:During an observation and interview on 09/22/25 at 11:07 a.m. in the bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER], there were numerous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for infection control. CNA W and CNA CD did not complete hand hygiene after changing gloves and when going from dirty to clean, while providing incontinent care for Resident #16. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 09/24/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 11/09/2020 with diagnoses which included: diabetes mellitus type 2, severe obesity, difficulty in walking, and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/19/2025, revealed Resident #16 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care was developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment and revised to reflect the current status for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) reviewed for care plan timing The facility did not develop a comprehensive care plan within 7 days of the completion of the comprehensive assessment for Residents #2, #3, and #4. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and services timely.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 08/28/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and his diagnoses included C1-C4 complete quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all four limbs), diabetes (high blood sugar), hyperlipemia (high levels of fats in the blood), chronic embolism and deep vein thrombosis of bilateral lower extremities (presence of a blood clot), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility did not accurately complete the MDS assessment to indicate Resident #2's active diagnoses. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 08/28/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and his diagnoses included C1-C4 complete quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all four limbs), diabetes (high blood sugar), hyperlipemia (high levels of fats in the blood), chronic embolism and deep vein thrombosis of bilateral lower extremities (presence of a blood clot), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (problem with brain , nerves or spinal cord causes loss of bladder control), hypertension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN A utilized enhanced barrier precautions with wearing a gown while providing wound care to Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 08/28/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a type of bleeding near your brain that can happen after a head injury) without loss of consciousness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit (problem with communication that results from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for the residents in rooms 217 through 224 (8 rooms for this hallway) and 1 resident of 8 residents (Resident #1) that were observed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure the hallway and the attached rooms 217 through 224 were free of odors. The facility failed to ensure a dresser in Resident #1's room was in good repair. These failures could place the residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. An observation on 07/08/25 from 8:20 AM to 9:26 AM revealed a foul odor starting from the beginning of the hallway extending to the end of the hallway. As the State Surveyor walked through the hallway it was strongest of the odor in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The odor smelled of urine, feces, and body odor all combined making it hard to breath as the State Surveyor walked the length of the hallway (rooms 217 - 224). An observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, so the facility was free of pests and rodents for five (Residents #1, # 2, #3, #4, and #5) of fifty-five residents reviewed for effective pest control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, # 2, #3, #4, and #5's rooms were free of pests. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to bugs and bug bites. Findings included: An observation and interview on 07/08/25 at 8:33 AM revealed two cockroaches scattered from the center of the room to the wall, as the State Surveyor entered Resident #1's room. Resident #1 stated her roommate was gross and gets poop everywhere. She has food and soda that attracts the roaches. An observation on 07/08/25 at 8:48 AM revealed five dead cockroaches and one live cockroach in Resident #2 and Resident #3's room. The residents were not in the room at the time. An observation and interview on 07/08/25 at 9:27 AM revealed a small cockroach ran across…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for grievances. The facility did not thoroughly investigate or take prompt action to resolve grievances voiced by Resident #1 that she did not want CNA A or CNA B enter her room or provide care. This failure could place residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year old female, admitted on [DATE], and her diagnoses included dementia (loss of cognitive functioning), anxiety (intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), schizophrenia (serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave), unspecified mood disorder (complex mental health condition), paranoid personality disorder (mental health condition marked by a long-term pattern of distrust and suspicion of others without adequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week reviewed for RN coverage for 24 of 45 days reviewed for nursing services. (10/7/24, 10/9/24, 10/10/24, 10/11/24,10/14/24, 10/15/24, 10/21/24, 10/22/24, 10/23/24, 10/24/24, 10/25/24, 10/28/24, 10/29/24, 10/30/24, 10/31/24, 11/1/24, 11/2/24, 11/3/24, 10/19/24, 10/20/24, 11/9/24, 11/10/24, 11/16/24 and 11/17/24) The facility did not have 8 consecutive hours a day for 7 days a week of RN coverage for 24 days. This failure could place residents at risk of lack of nursing oversight and a higher level of care. Findings included: Record review of a Calculated Time by Entry form from 10/6/24 through 11/19/24 indicating RN hours worked indicated no RN hours for 10/7/24, 10/9/24, 10/10/24, 10/11/24,10/14/24, 10/15/24, 10/21/24, 10/22/24, 10/23/24, 10/24/24, 10/25/24, 10/28/24, 10/29/24, 10/30/24, 10/31/24, 11/1/24, 11/2/24, 11/3/24. The report indicated less than 8 hours a day worked on 10/19/24 - 4.90 hours, 10/20/24 - 5.18 hours, 11/9/24 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS for 2 of 3 quarters reviewed for administration (Quarter 2 2024 (January 1-March 31), Quarter 3 2024 (April 1-June 30), Quarter 4 2023 (July1- September 30) 1. The facility failed to submit staffing information to CMS for FY Quarter 2 2024 (January 1-March 31); and 2. The facility failed to submit staffing information to CMS for FY Quarter 3 2024 (April 1-June 30). This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. Findings included: Record Review of the facility's Civil Rights form (3761) (Texas Health and Human Services form that list the facility staff to ensure the facility is not violating the Civil…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 stove, 1 of 2 walk-in coolers, 1 of 1 milk box in the kitchen; and 1 of 15 resident rooms on 1 of 2 Halls (long part of Hall 200) reviewed for essential equipment. * The facility failed to ensure the gas stove was in safe operating condition. Two burners on the back of the stove and 1 burner on the front of the stove would not ignite when the knobs were turned. The side of the griddle next to the burners had black buildup. * The facility failed to maintain the walk-in freezer. The walk-in freezer had a door gasket that was loose and hanging. * The facility failed to maintain the milk box. The milk box had a loose gasket with mildew on it. * The facility failed to ensure room [ROOM NUMBER]'s electric bed was in safe operating condition. The electrical cord plugged into the wall socket was spliced together. These failures could place the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 preparation kitchen. The facility did not ensure baking sheets and baking pans did not have dark colored build up on the outside and inside. The facility did not ensure the foods labeled were disposed of after the use by date. The facility did not ensure foods removed from their original package were labeled with the required information of what the food was in the container and the use by date or date it was placed in the container. The facility did not ensure red bucket of sanitizing solution to clean surfaces in the kitchen had the right amount of cleaning solution. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: During observation and interview on 11/18/24 of the kitchen on initial tour indicated: * at 08:22 a.m. there were -4 large baking sheets with dark colored buildup on the inside corners and all along the outside edges; they were stacked together -3 large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for 1 of 2 Halls (Hall 200 long) and the dining room reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to maintain the 200 long hall. Door frames of resident's rooms were not intact. Floor tiles were discolored tiles. There was a buildup of glue, paint, and debris behind all the doors to resident's rooms. The facility failed to maintain the exit corridor from the long hall 200 to the smoking area. There were 6 missing floor tiles that each measured 12 inch by 12 inch. The facility failed to maintain the main dining room floor. The tile in the main dining room along the back wall on the floor had a 2-inch-wide buildup of old paint and dried glue. There was one missing tile near the door. The facility failed to maintain an unlocked closet closet on the 200 long hall that was labeled oxygen on the door. The closet was empty and the walls were covered with black fuzzy substance in clusters on all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 (Resident #28) of 13 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's nystatin powder (prescription powder treats fungus or yeast) was not left on her nightside table and within the eyesight of the nurse This failure could place residents at risk for medication overdose, medication under-dose, ineffective therapeutic outcomes, and drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of Resident #28's face sheet dated 11/20/24 indicated Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] was [AGE] years old female with diagnoses of severe obesity and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). Record review of Resident #28's MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #28's cognition was intact and had diabetes. Review of Resident #28's physician orders dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involves abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency, for 4 of 15 residents (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse. 1. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency within 2 hours when it was reported on 01/25/2024 that Resident #4 cursed at and hit Resident #5. 2. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency within 2 hours when it was reported on 08/27/2024 that Resident #6 hit Resident #7. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 01/23/2024 indicated Resident #4 was [AGE] years old male,, initially admitted to facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the PASRR comprehensive service plan was implemented for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR assessments. (Closed Record #8) The facility did not provide and arrange for specialized physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy services for Closed Record #8 as recommended and agreed upon by the IDT within the time frame set by PASRR. This failure could place residents who are PASRR positive at risk of not receiving the necessary services that would enhance their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 10/22/24 indicated Closed Record #8 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder, such as depression and bipolar disorder), cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture due to abnormal brain development, often before birth), dysphagia (difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure they had a full time DON and failed to ensure there was an RN for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for DON and RN coverage. The facility did not have a full-time DON as of 08/16/24. The facility did not have RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours on from 09/16/24 through 09/20/24, 09/23/24 through 09/25/24, 09/27/24, and 09/30/24. These failures could place residents at risk of lack of nursing oversight and a higher level of care. Findings included: Record review of staff hours from 08/01/24 through 09/30/24 indicated there was no DON in the facility from 08/16/24 through 09/30/24. Record review of staff hours from 08/01/24 through 09/30/24 indicated there was no RN coverage on 09/16/24, 09/17/24, 09/18/24, 09/19/24, 09/20/24, 09/23/24, 09/24/24, 09/25/24, 09/26/24, 09/27/24, and 09/30/24. During an interview on 09/25/24 at 9:00 a.m., the Administrator said the facility did not have a current DON, however she was in the process of hiring a DON. She said there was no DON in the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believed that it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record, and indicate the duration for the PRN order for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #s 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, and #3 had a stop date for PRN anti-anxiety and antipsychotic medications. 2. The facility failed to monitor Resident #1's behaviors for his prescribed Ativan during the months of August and [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications and of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their psychotropic medications. The findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/23/24 indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involves abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency, for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #Unnamed and Resident #4) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse. The facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency when it was reported on 08/02/24 that Resident #1 touched Resident #Unnamed breasts. The facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency when it was reported on 08/25/24 that Resident #1 touched Resident #4's breast. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 09/23/24 indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old, initially admitted to facility on 03/07/24 and readmitted to facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise and the facility failed to offer a therapeutic diet when there was a nutritional problem and the healthcare provider ordered a therapeutic diet for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #s 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) reviewed for weight loss and nutrition. The facility failed to ensure systems were in place to monitor for weight changes. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not sustain a significant weight loss of 47 lbs./20% weight loss X 1 month, 51 lbs./22% weight loss X 3 months, and 49 lbs./21% weight loss X 6 months. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not sustain significant weight loss of 7.5% change (comparison weight 03/14/24, 117.6 lbs., -15.3%, -18 lbs.) 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's central line (a tube that is inserted into a large vein in the neck, chest, groin, or arm to give fluids, blood, medications, or to do medical tests quickly) dressing was changed every seven days per the physician's order. 2. The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Nurse changed gloves and performed hand hygiene between glove changes during wound care, after picking up a packaged mint off the floor, and before and after entering and exiting Resident #6's room. These failures could place residents at risk for infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 7/1/24 indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care and that was developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had a baseline care plan completed within 48 hours of his admission on [DATE]. This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk of receiving inadequate care and services. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 7/1/24 indicated Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis (a common and potentially serious bacterial skin infection) of the left lower limb, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes (high blood sugar), Charcot's joint syndrome (a rare complication of diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's care plan was not closed on 12/19/23 and was being reviewed and revised quarterly. This failure could place residents at increased risk of not having their individual needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 6/28/24 indicated Resident #9 was an [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, blindness, heart disease, schizoaffective disorder (a mental condition including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility was demonstrably unavoidable for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for range of motion. The facility failed to assess and provide hand rolls and/or positioning devices in Resident #1's right hand to prevent future decline in ROM. This failure could place resident at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/20/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included epilepsy (seizures), falls, mood disorder (intense shifts in mood), intellectual disabilities, GERD (reflux disease), functional quadriplegia (complete immobility due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-08 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs could not be met in the facility for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge requirements. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility, after being treated at a behavior hospital. This failure could place discharged residents and residents residing in the facility at risk of being discharged and not allowed to return to the facility causing a disruption in their care and/or services. Findings included: Record review face sheet dated 6/3/24 indicated Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE] and her original admission date was 07/01/22. She was [AGE] years old with diagnoses included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person ability to think, feel and behave clearly), persistent mood disorder (chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-08 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they were hospitalized for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge requirements. The facility failed to follow the written policy to ensure Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility, after being treated at the Behavior Hospital and after being treated at Hospital C. This failure could affect discharged residents and placed residents residing in the facility at risk of being discharged and not allowed to return to the facility causing a disruption in their care and/or services. Findings included: Record review of the policy titled Transfer or Discharge Notice dated 12/20/12 indicated Our facility shall provide a resident and /or resident's representative with a 30-day written notice of an impending discharge notice . Record review face sheet dated 6/3/24 indicated Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE] and her original admission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve resident grievances for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for grievances. There was no grievance available or evidence of resolution when Resident #2 reported to CMA H she did not want CNA M to come in her room or provide her care. This failure could place all residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 05/22/24 indicated she was [AGE] years old, was admitted [DATE], and her diagnoses included dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), and schizophrenia (serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave). Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was able to make herself understood and understood others and she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for Resident #1's aggressive behaviors toward others. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/14/24 indicated he was [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE], and his diagnoses included encephalopathy (brain dysfunction), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided or arranged by the facility as outlined by the comprehensive care plan meets professional standards of quality for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #s 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for skin assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, and #3 received a weekly skin assessment. This failure could place the resident at increased risk of not having their individual needs met and of not receiving adequate care and medical interventions to maintain their health and prevent worsening health conditions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/14/24 indicated he was [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE], and his diagnoses included encephalopathy (brain dysfunction), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLS. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's fingernails were trimmed. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of physical, mental and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/14/24 indicated he was [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE], and his diagnoses included encephalopathy (brain dysfunction), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 3 of 7 residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. Resident #1's comprehensive person-centered care plan was not updated to reflect behavior of physical aggression toward another resident. 2. Resident #2's comprehensive person-centered care plan was not updated to reflect an altercation when another resident had been physically aggressive with her. 3. Resident #3's comprehensive person-centered care plan was not updated to reflect when another resident had been physically aggressive with her. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the necessary care and services they required. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/20/24, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse or neglect were reported to the Administrator immediately. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy dated June 2023 indicated .All allegations and/or suspicions of abuse/neglect must be immediately reported to the facility Administrator or designee in the absence of the administrator. The Administrator is the Abuse Coordinator. the allegation of abuse must be reported to HHSC immediately and not later than 2 hours after receiving the allegation of abuse. Record review of a face sheet indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, which included injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure the abuse coordinator and/or designee reported immediately to HHSC after Resident #1 threatened if she had a knife she would stab herself and someone else in the heart. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy for 4 of 7 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for personal privacy in that: CNA A failed to provide privacy for Resident #1 during bed mobility and personal care while Resident #2 was in the room. The facility failed to provide privacy for Residents #3 and #4. The room did not have a privacy curtain to allow for privacy when the residents were in the room. These failures could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity, and decreased quality of life due to a lack of privacy during their care. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, undated, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke (lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells deprives them of oxygen and vital nutrients which can cause parts of the brain to die off) with left side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to equip each room to assure full visual privacy for each resident for 2 (Rooms 221 A & B and room [ROOM NUMBER] A & B) of 26 dual rooms reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to provide curtains to ensure residents' privacy in 2 dual occupancy rooms throughout the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased self-worth by being exposed during resident care. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 10/12/2023 at 2:30 pm, resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]A was sitting in his wheelchair in his room. There was not a privacy curtain between resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]A and resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]B. Resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]A bed (nearest to the door). Resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]A bed said he wished he had a privacy curtain between the beds in the room so he could have privacy when he wanted it. Resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]A bed said he had been in this room for approximately 1 month and had never had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$371,472 in federal fines across 10 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2026-03-25
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-12-03
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-29
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-29
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-29
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-29
- $53,336 — penalty dated 2025-09-29
- $17,068 — penalty dated 2024-10-06
- $47,259 — penalty dated 2024-10-06
- $149,739 — penalty dated 2024-03-27
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-26 for 19 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/15/2024 |
| BEAUMONT HOLDINGS BH, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2024 |
| ELITE HC INVESTORS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2024 |
| BODANSKY, HERSHEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2024 |
| HELLER, YESHAYA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2024 |
| WEISS, CHAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2024 |
| PAWLIK, DANNY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| VINTON, VICTOR | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 06/05/2024 |
| RUFF, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/15/2024 |
| BEAUMONT ACAPELLA, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/18/2024 |
| BEAUMONT OPERATING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2024 |
| DH BEAUMONT OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/18/2024 |
| JIAN, PETER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2024 |
| PARKER, TERESA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675595. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.