Cibolo Creek

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 88.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.54 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and to ensure resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #70) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #70 received adequate supervision when Resident #70 was missing on 8/28/2025 for approximately 45 minutes and found lying next to her wheelchair outdoors on an enclosed, outdoor patio. An IJ was identified on 9/3/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 9/3/2025 at 12:10 PM. While the IJ was removed on 9/5/2025 at 10:09, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the new procedures and training. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate supervision and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status in life-threatening conditions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for change of condition, in that; The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician and family on 11/18/2024 when she was found sleepier than usual or notify Resident #1's physician and the resident's family when the resident was found unresponsive and twitching with a significant alteration in mental status at approximately 5:00 a.m. on 11/19/2024 and was treated for altered mental status at the hospital. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 11/18/2024 and ended on 11/19/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for serious harm, permanent disability and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, in that; The facility failed to immediately assess and intervene when Resident #1 was found unresponsive and twitching on 11/19/2024 at 5:00 a.m. by LVN A until the next shift arrived and LVN B intervened. This change of condition required treatment in a local hospital for altered mental status. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 11/19/2024 and ended on 11/19/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This deficient practice could affect residents who experience a change of condition and result in a delay in care, significant injury including permanent disability and death. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/20/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision, in that; The facility failed to adequately supervise Resident #1, who had a history of bringing multiple medications including narcotics into the facility without notifying staff, when she consumed a marijuana laced brownie and was found to have both Ambien and trazadone in an unmarked unlabeled container at bedside on 11/19/2024. On 11/19/2024, Resident #1 was found unresponsive and twitching in her room after staff failed to check on her between 11:00 p.m. on 11/18/2024 to 5:00 a.m. on 11/19/2024 despite seeing an unknown visitor in Resident #1's room on the evening of 11/18/2024 . This failure resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/22/2024 at 12:50 p.m. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:03 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 11/23/24 the facility remained out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property, by not screening staff annually for 3 of 7 staff (MA AG, FSM, AD) employed longer than 1 year in that: Medication Aide (MA AG did not have a current EMR/NAR. FSM did not have a current EMR/NAR. AD did not have a current EMR/NAR. The failure could place residents at risk of being abused, neglected, or exploited by unemployable staff. The finding were: Record review of the policy on Abuse/Neglect and Misappropriation, dated 2025 was documented, the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Screening, a. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, o misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background,. Checks shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food for 1 of 1 kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. 1. The facility failed to maintain the temperature of walk-in refrigerator at or below 41 degrees F for the last 3 months2. The facility failed to take temperatures for the cold foods (to include milk for 09/05/25 breakfast and fresh fruit cups for 09/05/25 lunch). 3. The facility failed to ensure food products were labeled with discard dates. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness.The findings included:Record review of facility's Resource: Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log for the walk-in refrigerator, dated June 2025, reflected the following days had temperatures that were above 41 degrees Fahrenheit:(day: degrees Fahrenheit for morning and/or evening)2: morning 423: evening 434: morning 43 and evening 435: morning 437: morning 428: morning 429: evening 4211: morning 4312: morning 4214: morning 43 and evening 4315: evening 4316: morning 4317:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the medical records. In accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are Complete; Accurately documented; Readily accessible; and systematically organized for 3 _of 16 (#20, #38, #5) residents reviewed for clinical records in that:1.Resident #20 did not have a current care plan conference meeting documented in her file. 2. Resident #38 did not have a current care plan conference meeting documented in her file. 3. The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of Resident #5's July MAR per doctor's orders. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or incomplete clinical records.The findings included: Record review of Resident #5's admission record, dated 09/05/2025, reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted [DATE] and re admitted [DATE], with diagnoses to include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerators reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to ensure the walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen was functioning properly. This failure could place residents at risk for foodborne illness.The findings included:Record review of facility's Resource: Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log for the walk-in refrigerator, dated June 2025, reflected the following days had temperatures that were above 41 degrees Fahrenheit:(day: degrees Fahrenheit for morning and/or evening)2: morning 423: evening 434: morning 43 and evening 435: morning 437: morning 428: morning 429: evening 4211: morning 4312: morning 4214: morning 43 and evening 4315: evening 4316: morning 4317: morning 4318: morning 4219: morning 4222: morning 4224: morning 4325: morning 4226: morning 43 and evening 4228: morning 4329: morning 43 Record review of facility's Resource: Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log for the walk-in refrigerator,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to revise Resident #9's comprehensive care plan to reflect the resident's ADL self-care performance for transfers. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of receiving improper care.The findings were: Record review of Resident #9's admission record, dated 09/04/2025, reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted [DATE] and re admitted [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with daily life and activities), muscle weakness, acquired absence of left leg above knee (04/01/2023), and acquired absence of right leg below knee (12/31/2018). Record review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #2 and #3) reviewed for medications and pharmacy services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 clobetasol propionate 0.05% prescription shampoo and over-the-counter polysporin were secured when they were left in the resident's room. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's Simbrinza ophthalmic suspension x 2 bottles and 5 medication cups of an unknown ointment were secured when the resident was not in the room. These deficient practices could put residents at risk for inaccurate or inappropriate administration of medications. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 11/23/2024 revealed an admission date of 11/09/2024 with diagnoses which included: atrial fibrillation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans, in that; The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan with interventions that addressed Resident #1's behaviors of bringing in medications from home, from other providers and from visitors and self-medicating without telling staff. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their needs and preferences met. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/20/2024 revealed an admission date of 10/15/2024 with diagnosis which included: displaced bimalleolar fracture of left lower leg (broken bone of the ankle), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that are complete; and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records, in that; The facility failed to ensure staff documented Resident #1's unresponsiveness and SBAR assessment, the pills found in her room on 11/19/2024 or interventions for her change of condition including notification/activation of 911 and transfer to the hospital for treatment. This failure could result in residents not having an accurate overall view of their care and services. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/20/2024 revealed an admission date of 10/15/2024 with diagnosis which included: displaced bimalleolar fracture of left lower leg (broken bone of the ankle), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, complete rotator cuff tear or rupture of right shoulder (muscles and tendons which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #19, #21 and #49) who were observed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Residents #19, #21, and #49. This deficient practice could affect any resident and keep them from calling for help as needed. The findings included: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 08/01/2024, reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, and anxiety, age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting, unspecified side, weakness, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record review of Resident #19's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. [NAME] I was not wearing a moustache or beard guard while preparing food. 2. The walk-in refrigerator and walk in freezer both contained improperly stored food items. These deficient practices could place residents who consumed meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: 1. Observation on 07/30/2024 at 9:36 a.m. revealed [NAME] I was standing at the kitchen range and preparing the lunchtime meal. Further observation revealed three containers of food were on the kitchen range and were uncovered. Additional observation revealed [NAME] I had a moustache and a beard and was not wearing a moustache restraint or a beard restraint. During an interview, at the same time as the observation, [NAME] I stated that he does not wear moustache or beard restraints, had never been directed to do so, and said, I don't know if we have any [restraints].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-11-23
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-04 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX