Apex Secure Care Brownfield
1101 E Lake St, Brownfield, TX 79316 · For profit - Partnership · 108 certified beds · (806) 637-7561 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,738 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-14)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.1% | 3.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 43.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.5% | 98.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.6% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.65 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 62.5 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.47 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.43 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective Infection Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 11 residents (Resident #32 and Resident #36) reviewed for infection control. LVN A provided wound care to Resident #32 with contaminated supplies: scissors and dermal wound cleanser (often no-rinse spray solutions designed to remove dirt, debris, and exudate from acute and chronic wounds) after she had used the same supplies to provide wound care for Resident #36 who had a positive wound culture on 4/8/26 for STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE (GROUP-B) (an opportunistic bacteria that can cause skin and soft tissue infections, including cellulitis, abscesses, and occasionally, severe necrotizing infections) and STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS ( a bacteria that can cause infections ranging from minor skin abscesses to life-threatening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received direct supervision from staff on while smoking when Monitor Tech A was observed on a cell phone while assigned to monitor residents in the smoking area on 11/22/2024. 2. Monitor Tech A failed to follow protective measures put in place to use cigarette extenders and smoking aprons for residents' safety while residents were outside smoking, resulting in a burn to Resident #1 on 11/22/2024. 3. An Immediate Jeopardy situation was determined to have existed on 11/22/24. It was determined to be past non-compliance due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance on 11/27/24 before the beginning of the survey. This failure could place residents at risk for physical harm, pain, mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the facility and failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in 3 of 24 resident rooms (E2, E9, and F3) and 1 of 1 areas for visitation reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure residents that used common areas and rooms were clean, safe, and did not need repair. 2. The facility failed to have a designated visitation area with adequate seating for visitors and residents. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unclean, uncomfortable, and unhomelike environment which could cause a decline in resident psychosocial well-being.The findings included: During an observation and interview on 4/12/26 at 10:32 AM, Resident #37 in room F3 said there was water leaking from the ceiling in his room and he worried about the ceiling falling down. Resident #37 stated he hated the leak in the ceiling and that it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week in the facility for 6 (10/4/2025, 10/5/2025, 10/11/2025, 10/12/2025, 10/19/2025, and 11/9/2025) of 67 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to maintain RN coverage of eight hours a day for 6 days. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care.Findings included: Record review of the facility's employee survey roster dated 4/12/26 revealed there were three RNs employed at the facility. Record review of Punch Detail Reports, dated 10/4/2025, 10/5/2025, 10/11/2025, 10/12/2025, 10/19/2025, and 11/9/2025, revealed there were no hours logged for RN coverage. Record review of an email dated 4/13/2026 at 10:53 AM, revealed the ADM's response to the surveyor read, unfortunately, facility did not have RN coverage dates requested, when punch-in details for RN coverage were requested for 10/4/2025, 10/5/2025, 10/11/2025, 10/12/2025, 10/19/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent cross contamination and the potential for foodborne illness for (64 of 64) residents reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure opened food items open in the refrigerator and dry storage areas were labeled with the open or use by date.2. Food transportation carts were dirty.3. Clean plates, serving utensils, and pans were stored facing upwards stored on a table.4. The facility failed to ensure staff followed hygienic practices for proper hand hygiene and use of hair restraints.5. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] D used gloved hands instead of utensils to handle prepared food, 6. Bleach, lime scale, and soak tank concentrate were stored on the floor in the food prep area. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings include: On 4/12/26 at 9:58 AM an initial kitchen observation tour began. The tour ended at 10:44 AM and revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public, in 1 of 1 dining rooms, 1 of 2 dry pantries (Dry Pantry A), around 1 of 1 nursing stations and 1 of 7 Hallways (Hall C), in that: The facility failed to ensure the dining room floors were in good condition.The facility failed to ensure the dining room ceiling was in good condition and not leaking.The facility failed to ensure Dry Pantry A's ceiling was in good condition and not leaking.The facility failed to ensure the floors around the nursing station were in good condition.The facility failed to ensure Hall C did not have water damage on the ceiling tiles outside Room C9. These failures could lead to resident injuries, falls, spread of infections and cause the facility to have an unsightly appearance. The findings include: Observations on 04/12/26 beginning at 9:58 AM, revealed the dining room was noted to have an area on the ceiling near the kitchen that was leaking water with 3 buckets on the floor with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for respect and dignity.LVN A failed to provide privacy for Resident #32 when LVN A failed to close the window blinds, the door, or the privacy curtain during wound care. This failure could place residents at risk of emotional distress, embarrassment, and lower self-esteem.Findings include: Record review of Resident #32s undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #32 had a medical history of dementia, pressure ulcer of left buttock stage 2 (a shallow, open wound), and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #32's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] Section C- Cognitive patterns revealed a BIMs score of 99 which indicated Resident #32 was unable to complete the interview. Section C1000 Cognitive Skill for Daily Decision Making revealed Resident #32 was severely impaired and never/rarely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe, and appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 food forms (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) for 1 of 1 (Dinner) meal reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable for the dinner meal on 04/13/26. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During confidential individual interviews 2 of 10 residents voiced concerns related to food palatability. One resident stated the food was cold. One resident stated the food was not good. Observation on 04/13/26 at 6:03 PM the test trays arrived at the family dining room and were sampled by three surveyors at 6:05 PM with the following results: Regular Meal - Regular TextureFish Sandwich - mushy texture, freezer tasteTator tots - cold/lukewarmSalad - okay Regular Meal - Mechanical Soft TextureFish - lukewarm beans - cold Regular Meal -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 5 (LVN C) nursing staff reviewed in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN C maintained an active nursing license while working as a nurse. The failure could place residents at risk of receiving care from an unlicensed professional. The findings include: Record review of the facility employee records on [DATE] at 4:20 PM, revealed LVN C had an LVN/LPN license with an expiration date of [DATE]. Record review of the facility's punch-detail report from [DATE] to [DATE] revealed the following:LVN C worked:[DATE] - 11.1 hours[DATE] - 11.08 hours[DATE] - 11.93 hours[DATE] - 11.17 hours[DATE] - 12.07 hours[DATE] - 9.07 hours[DATE] - 5.0 hours[DATE] - 10.92 hours[DATE] - 3.03 hours[DATE] - 12.82…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition in 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: The facility failed to ensure the kitchen oven door remained closed and secure. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving unevenly cooked meals and at risk for fire emergencies.The findings included: During the initial kitchen observation on 04/12/26 beginning around 10:09 AM, the left oven door was opened, and a cardboard square came out from between the bottom of the stove and the top of the oven door and fell on the floor. The oven door did not close and had about two to three inches gap between the door and the stove.During an interview on 04/12/26 at 10:25 AM, [NAME] B stated the spring went out on the oven door about two to three weeks ago. [NAME] B stated she thought it had been reported. [NAME] B stated they had been using the cardboard square to help keep the oven door closed all of the way. During an interview on 04/14/26 at 1:35 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the hallways were equipped with firmly secured handrails on each side for 1 of 6 (Hall C) hallways reviewed in that: The facility failed to ensure the handrail in Hall C between Rooms C3 and C4 was firmly attached to the wall. This failure could lead to resident injuries or falls. The findings include: Observation on 04/13/26 at 10:12 AM, the handrail in C Hall between Rooms C3 and C4 was noted to be loose/wobbly and not firmly attached to the wall. Interview on 04/14/26 at 1:35 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor stated he did not know about the handrail in C Hall or the water damage on the ceiling tiles. The Maintenance Supervisor stated if it was not written in the Maintenance logbook, then he did not know about it. The Maintenance Supervisor stated a resident could fall with a loose handrail. Interview on 04/14/26 at 2:44 PM, the ADM stated the Maintenance Supervisor was trained on repairs, but he will start fixing one thing and then another area will need immediate attention. The ADM stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 8 of 16 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure evening medications refused by Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8 were accurately documented in the Medication Administration Record by CMA A, on 09/21/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications and could contribute to possible adverse reactions.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's, undated, face sheet revealed in part, an [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 08/27/24. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia (loss of cognitive functioning), unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance and Intermittent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 2 treatment carts (treatment cart for Hall A, B and C) reviewed for proper medication storage.LVN C failed to ensure the treatment cart, which contained medications, was not left unlocked and unsupervised in the hallway near the nurse's station.This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm, drug overdose, or drug diversions.During an observation on 10/02/25 at 1:59 PM, the treatment cart for Hall A, B and C was observed sitting outside the nurse's station and was unlocked and unsupervised. The cart was located in close proximity to residents and no staff were present to supervise the cart. Upon inspection of the drawers in the cart with LVN C, prescription medications, creams, and supplies were observed. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to resident's and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 12 of 21 confidential residents. The facility failed to ensure 12 of 21 confidential residents were provided, through postings in prominent locations; the Grievance Procedure, were provided access to the Grievance form, were provided information in regards to who the facility grievance officer was, their contact information, how to file an anonymous grievance, and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. This failure could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Interviews and Record Review during Resident Council on, 02/10/2025 at 2:00pm, 12 of 21 confidential residents, stated they did not have access to the Grievance form, they did not know they could file a Grievance anonymously, the Grievance procedure had never been discussed in Resident Council, and they had not observed a posting of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: 1. The facility failed to store and date foods stored in the refrigerator. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods were served at temperature above 135 degrees Fahrenheit. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: The following observations were made on 02/09/25 beginning at 09:45 AM during initial observation of the kitchen: Observed the following in the walk-in refrigerator: Styrofoam cup covered with tin foil on top shelf no label and no date. Bag of white shredded cheese opened with no label and no date. Pie uncovered and no date. Styrofoam cup with lid on top shelf with no label and no date. Observed the following in the panty: Personal jacket on top of open backet with individual syrup condiments. Home cookies in open container in paper sack no date. Personal drink on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 4 of 20 residents (Resident #27, #51, #328, and Resident #16) reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA A failed to utilize hand hygiene when assisting Residents #27, #51, and #328 with their meals on 2/09/2025. 2. LVN B failed to utilize hand hygiene between glove changes when providing wound care to Resident #16 on 2/10/2025. These failures could place residents at risk for infection, and cross-contamination. Findings include: Resident #27 Record review of Resident #27 undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #27 had a medical history of muscle wasting and atrophy (a condition where muscles shrink and lose mass, resulting in weakness and decreased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The residents' hand sink in room D5 was not operational for 2 of 3 days. 2. The hand sink in the women's restroom was not operational for 2 of 3 days. 3. The hand sink and toilet in room A8 was not operational for 1 of 3 days. 4. The hand sink and toilet in room A6 was not operational for 1 of 3 days. These failures could place residents and the public at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is nonfunctional, uncomfortable, unsanitary, and unsafe. The findings included: During an observation on 2/9/2025 at 10:32 AM the hand sink in residents' room D5 was observed with standing water in the basin of the sink. The water continued to rise in the basin of the sink as the water ran, after being turned on. During an observation on 2/9/2025 at 12:05 PM the toilet in resident's room A6 was observed to be full of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 (Resident #2) of 21 residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was treated with respect, dignity, and care when they failed to ensure Resident #2's room was cleaned daily, furnished with a covering on her bedroom window, and a furnished with a privacy curtain. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth, psychosocial harm and distrust with staff. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #2 's face sheet dated 02/20/2024 revealed she was [AGE] years old and was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of 31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to reside and recieve services in the facility with reasonable accomodation of the resident's needs and preferences for 1 (Resident #2) of 21 residents reviewed for accomodation of needs. The facility failed to provide a working communication system, that was easily at reach at the bedside, that would allow Resident #2 the ability to safely call for staff for assistance. This failure could place residents at risk of not having a means of directly contacting caregivers in an emergency or when they needed support for daily living. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2 's face sheet dated 02/20/2024 revealed she was [AGE] years old and was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of 31 minutes to 59 minutes, subsequent encounter (bleeding in the space around the brain),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviewn and record review, the facility, failed to ensure sure each resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the facility and failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in 1 (Resident #2) of 21 resident's rooms and restrooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's room was cleaned daily, homelike, clean, safe, and did not need repairs. These failures could place residents at risk for living in an unsafe, unclean, uncomfortable, and unhomelike environment which could cause a decline in resident psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2 's face sheet dated 02/20/2024 revealed she was [AGE] years old and was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of 31 minutes to 59 minutes, subsequent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness were provided with an accurate PASRR Level I for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for PASRR screening, in that: Resident #16 did not have an accurate and updated PASRR Level 1 assessment reflecting a diagnosis of mental illness. These failures could place residents, with an inaccurate PASRR Level 1 and no PASRR Level 2 Evaluation, at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings included: Resident #16: Record review of Resident #16's electronic face sheet dated revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet included the following diagnoses: Type 2 Diabetes (problem in the body where blood sugar levels are not regulated, leading to high blood sugar levels) with Diabetic Neuropathic Arthropathy (nerve damage caused by high blood sugar levels), Unspecified Head Injury, Generalized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, facility-sponsored group, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 3 of 21 residents reviewed for activities. The facility: 1. Failed to engage in activities at scheduled times. 2. Failed to offer engaging activity replacement for scheduled activities that were cancelled or not completed. This failure could affect Residents of the facility by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. The findings include: Resident #20 Record review of Resident #20's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet listed under Diagnoses Information, Diabetes (blood sugar issues), heart failure (heart does not pump blood as well as it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for all residents for 2 of 3 (02/10/25 noon meal and 02/11/25 noon meal) meals observed. The facility failed to follow the week 4 menu for two lunch services served at the facility on Monday 02/10/25 and Tuesday 02/11/25. These failures could place residents that eat food from the kitchen at risk of poor intake, and/or weight loss. The findings included: Observation on 02/10/25 at 12:00 PM of dining room lunch meal trays being served consisting of cilantro lime chicken, mashed potatoes, beans, fruit cocktail and beverage. Observation on 02/10/25 at 01:15 PM of test meal tray served consisting of cilantro lime chicken, mashed potatoes, beans, fruit cocktail and beverage. Observation on 02/11/25 at 12:15 PM of dining room lunch meal trays being served consisting of beef goulash, squash medley, mixed green salad, baked cookie, and beverage. Record review Monday Week 4 menu dated 09/27/24 revealed noon menu cilantro lime chicken, rice pilaf, charro beans, tortilla chips, salsa,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 3 of 3 refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Room D6, D8, and E9) in that: The refrigerator located in Room D6 did not have a temperature log present for the refrigerator. The refrigerator located in Room D8 did not have a temperature log present for the refrigerator. The refrigerator located in Room E9 did not have a temperature log present for the refrigerator. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: During an observation on 02/09/2025 at 10:37 AM, Resident Room E9 contained a personal refrigerator. There was not a log present indicating the refrigerator's daily temperatures. The refrigerator contained perishable food items such as mayonnaise and cheese. During an observation on 02/09/2025 at 10:45 AM, Resident Room D6 contained a personal refrigerator. There was not a log present indicating the refrigerator's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent the abuse of residents for one (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure the Abuse and Neglect Policy was implemented by the facility's staff member, when monitoring tech (MT A) abused Resident #1 and M T B, who witnessed this abuse failed to intervene and report it. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and serious harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's (R#1) admission Record dated 06/28/24, indicated R#1 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia (infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs, which may fill with fluid), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty paying attention to a conversation, responding accurately), unspecified symbolic dysfunctions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan area for physician order for wound treatment of left above the knee amputation (stump). These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their individualized needs. Findings include: Resident #1: Record Review of Resident #1 face sheet, date retrieved on 05/21/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of high blood pressure, depression, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart attack, amputation above the know on both right and left leg. Records Review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 14 which means Resident #1 is cognitively intact. Record Review of Resident #1's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident the resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for (Residents #1) resident reviewed for pressure ulcer care, in that: 1. Resident #1's wounds were left uncovered and exposed on the left side above the knee amputation. These failures could place residents with wounds at an increased and unnecessary risk of complications such as pain, acquiring new wounds, worsening of existing wounds, and infection. Findings included: Resident #1: Record Review of Resident #1 face sheet, date retrieved on 05/21/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of high blood pressure, depression, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart attack, amputation above the know on both right and left leg.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 Residents observed for infection control for practices (Resident #1) in that: 1. Facility staff failed to change Resident #1's humidification bottle of oxygen t. The bottle on the oxygen tank was dated 02/04/2024. Resident #1 was observed actively using her oxygen. 2. CNA A failed to wash hands prior and during incontinent care with Resident #1. CNA A failed to use appropriate PPE during incontinent care for Resident #1 that was on barrier precautions for wounds. 3. LVN failed to wash hands before or during wound care for Resident #1. LVN failed to use the appropriate PPE during wound care for Resident #1 that was on barrier precautions for wounds. These failures could place residents at risk for infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1)The facility failed to ensure foods were processed, stored, and pureed under sanitary conditions. 2) The facility failed to ensure food and non-food contact surfaces were clean. 3) The facility failed to ensure staff stored personal items in a manner that prevented contamination. 4) The facility failed to ensure food were accurately dated and labeled. 5) The facility failed to protect foods from potential contamination, and 6) The facility failed to ensure staff used good hygienic practices. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: - The following interviews and observations were made during a kitchen tour on 1/7/24 that began at 10:15 AM and concluded at 11:12 AM: There was a spray bottle of Peroxide Multi Surface Cleaner and Disinfectant on a shelf with bread and next to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 2 of 24 residents (Residents #2, #26) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available for Residents #2, #26 prior to administering Asenapine Transdermal Patch (an antipsychotic used to treat the symptoms of schizophrenia; a mental illness that causes disturbed or unusual thinking, loss if interest in life, and strong or inappropriate emotions). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications without their prior knowledge or consent, or that of their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sure each resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the facility and failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in 10 of 24 resident rooms (C1, C5, C8, C9, C10, D1, D3, D4, D7 and D8), reviewed for environment, in that: 1)The facility failed to ensure resident use equipment was safe and in good repair (C1, C9, C10, D1, D7 and D8). 2) The facility failed to ensure resident use equipment and areas were maintained in a clean manner (C5, D7 and D8). 3) The facility failed to ensure resident use hot water was maintained at a comfortable temperature which was at core body temperature or above (98.6 degrees F) (C8, D1, D3, D4, D7 and D8). These failures could place residents at risk for living in an unsafe, unclean, uncomfortable, and unhomelike environment which could cause a decline in resident psychosocial well-being. The findings included: On 1/7/ 24 and 11:21 AM, an observation was made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 3 of 3 food forms (regular, mechanical soft and puree) for 3 residents (Residents #11, 39 and 48) reviewed during mealtimes. The facility failed to ensure Residents #11, 39 and 48 received their meals according to the menu. This failure could place residents at risk for unwanted weight loss and hunger. The findings included: Resident #11 : Record review of the Order Summary Report for female Resident #11 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses listed of, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (mental disorder), need for assistance with personal care, unspecified dementia (cognitive impairment) and unspecified, protein calorie malnutrition (malnutrition), Vitamin B deficiency, unspecified, and adult failure to thrive. Record review of the Order Summary Report dated 1/8/24 for Resident #11 revealed a diet order stating, regular diet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe, and appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 food forms (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability. 1) The facility failed to provide food that was palatable for 3 of 3 food forms served (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) at 1 of 1 meal observed (1/8/24 lunch). These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During confidential individual interviews 2 of 11 residents voiced concerns related to food palatability. One resident stated the food was cold when it was received. Another Resident stated the food was awful and sucks. The Resident further stated the food had no taste to it. - The following interviews and observations were made during a kitchen tour on 1/8/24 that began at 11:30 AM and concluded at 1:03 PM: On 1/8/24 at 11:30 AM, and interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager. She was informed that a test tray was requested. Regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests in the kitchen and 1 of 4 corridors (Hall C) in that: 1)Live roaches were observed crawling on the walls and floor in the kitchen and floor of 1 of 4 corridors (Hall C), and 2) The pest control program was further compromised due to the facility having harborage areas that were not repaired (holes in walls and loose wallboard). These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness and infections. The findings include: ~ The following interviews and observations were made during a kitchen tour that began on 1/7/24 at 10:15 AM and concluded at 11:12 AM: On 1/7/24 at 10:59 AM an adult roach was observed crawling on the floor near the three-compartment sink. During an interview with Dietary staff B on 1/7/24 at 10:59 AM, she stated, there were a few roaches in the kitchen. She added the last time she had seen roaches in the facility was this morning (1/7/24). On 1/7/24 at 11:01 AM an interview was conducted with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 25 residents reviewed (Resident #31) in 1 of 24 resident rooms reviewed: The facility failed to provide a safe environment 1 of 1 resident with a diagnosis of Huntington's disease (Resident #31) related to extension cords on 1/07/24 and 1/08/24. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries from contact with the surrounding environment due to resident involuntary movements. The findings included: Record review of the Order Summary Report dated 1/8/24 for male Resident #31 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses of Huntington's disease (progressive breakdown (degeneration) of nerve cells in the brain causing involuntary body movements), Dysphasia, oropharyngeal phase (swallowing disorder), cognitive communication deficit (dementia disorder), lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer, based on a resident's comprehensive assessment, a therapeutic diet when there was a nutritional problem, and the health care provider ordered a therapeutic diet for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #11, 39 and 48): The facility failed to provide Residents #11, 39 and 48 with their physician ordered therapeutic diets that included pureed, thickened and/or fortified foods for the noon and evening meals on 1/7/24 and the noon meal on 1/8/24. This failure could place residents at risk for hunger, weight loss, aspiration and chemical imbalances. The findings included: Record review of the Order Summary Report for female Resident #11 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnosis listed of, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (mental disorder), need for assistance with personal care, unspecified dementia (cognitive impairment) and unspecified, protein calorie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for 1 of 3 residents fed by gastrostomy tube (Resident #31). 1)The facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided G-tube (gastrostomy tube) care in a manner to prevent complications and prevent staff miscommunication related to Resident #31's care on 1/07/24 and 1/08/24. These failures could result in the spread of resident infections. The findings included: Record review of the Order Summary Report dated 1/8/24 for male Resident #31 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was years old [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses of Huntington's disease (progressive breakdown (degeneration) of nerve cells in the brain causing involuntary body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #165) reviewed for dialysis, in that: Resident #165 did not have physician's orders for dialysis treatments, graft dressing changes related to dialysis or resident care before and after dialysis. This failure could affect residents receiving dialysis treatments and place them at risk of not receiving proper medical care related to dialysis services resulting in a decline in health. The findings were: Review of Resident #165's face sheet dated 01/07/24 revealed an admission date of 01/05/24 with diagnoses which included: acute and chronic respiratory failure (lung problems), type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), and end stage renal disease (kidney disease). Review of the facility's document titled, Resident Matrix, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received, and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 3 of 3 meals (1/7/24 - Lunch, 1/7/24 - Supper and 1/8/24 - Lunch) observed for 2 of 2 residents with orders for puréed diet (Residents #39 and 48). The facility failed to provide food that was in a form to meet resident needs, 3 of 3 meals observed (1/7/24 - Lunch, 1/7/24 - Supper and 1/8/24 - Lunch) for 2 of 2 residents with orders for puréed diets (Residents #39 and 48). This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake and choking. The findings included: Resident #39 Record review of the Order Summary Report dated 1/8/24 for male Resident #39 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses of major depressive disorder (mental disorder), muscle weakness, unspecified, dementia (cognitive decline), generalized anxiety disorder (mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,738 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $13,070 — penalty dated 2026-04-14
- $14,668 — penalty dated 2024-12-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-13 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THEORA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/23/2025 |
| SPORE, SCOTT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/23/2025 |
| MERIDIAN LTC LTD | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| BRITTON, CARL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| CHEBIB, PAUL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| WOLCOTT, ROGER | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| CHILDRESS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/23/2025 |
| HOLCOMB, HOLLY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| STRATTON, EMILEE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| GARCIA, RAYMOND | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/10/2025 |
| SSS HOLDINGS LP | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $698K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.