Mesa Hills Post Acute
901 Wildrose Ln, Brownsville, TX 78520 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 166 certified beds · (956) 546-4568 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $5,734 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-17)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.7% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.2% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.2% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.5% | 9.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.3% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.7% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.2% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.25 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.5%CMS range 23.6–63.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 7.7–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 3.5–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.25 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 166 beds and averages 111.0 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.13 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure Resident#1 received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 04/12/2024 and was found by the police department approximately 4.3 miles away from the facility. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 04/12/2024 and ended on 04/25/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could prevent residents from receiving appropriate supervision which could lead to residents sustaining serious injury, harm, or death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic facility face sheet dated 04/15/2025, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis of Dementia, Schizophrenia (a mental condition that affects how people think,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from Resident #1's physical abuse on 04/13/26 at around 11:00 PM. This failure could lead to residents suffering physical injuries and fear.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/30/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 02/18/26 and a current admission date of 04/06/26. Pertinent diagnoses included Personal History of Other Mental and Behavioral Disorders. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #1 had not displayed any physical or verbal behaviors towards others. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 04/30/26 revealed the focus [Resident #1] is physically aggressive r/t Anger, Poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to report and investigate abuse of residents for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for incident reporting and investigating. The facility failed to follow their abuse policy when they did not report and have evidence of a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse when Resident #1 hit Resident #2 on 04/03/26. The facility failed to follow their abuse policy when they did not report and have evidence of a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse when Resident #1 alleged a doctor or the DON hit his left leg on the bed frame on 04/03/26, resulting in a 1 centimeter skin tear. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse and/or continued abuse and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/09/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, within two hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency within two hours, when Resident #1 hit Resident #2 on 04/03/26. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency within two hours, when Resident #1 alleged a doctor or the DON hit his left leg on the bed frame on 04/03/26, resulting in a 1 centimeter skin tear. These failures could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse due to unreported allegations of abuse and neglect.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/09/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to have evidence of a thorough investigation regarding an allegation of abuse when Resident #1 hit Resident #2 on 04/03/26. The facility failed to have evidence of a thorough investigation regarding an allegation of abuse when Resident #1 alleged a doctor or the DON hit his left leg on the bed frame on 04/03/26, resulting in a 1 centimeter skin tear. These failures could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse due to uninvestigated allegations of abuse and neglect.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/09/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], diagnoses included: type 2 diabetes (high levels of sugar in blood), osteoporosis (weak and fragile bones), hepatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident needs, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan reflected his diagnosis of diabetes, major depressive disorder, and ADLs with assistance needed.This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their needs.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 04/09/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], diagnoses included: type 2 diabetes (high levels of sugar in blood), major depressive disorder (mental health condition with persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest, various emotional/physical problems), and unspecified dementia (decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) observed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene when she was feeding Resident #1 and Resident# 2 at the same time, on 3/10/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination and the spread of infection.The findings include:1.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3/10/2026, indicated a [AGE] year-old male and an admission date of 8/06/2025. Resident # 1 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease (progressive, irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and the ability to carry out simple tasks), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Other Lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASRR program, including incorporating the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's care planning for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of seventeen residents positive for PASRR. The facility failed to ensure the service request form was sent to the state PASRR unit, within 30 days of the IDT meeting, to assist Resident #1 and Resident #2 with receiving services identified in the meeting plan. This failure could affect PASRR positive residents by placing them at risk of their specialized needs not being met. Findings included: 1.Review of Resident #1's Resident Face Sheet dated 7/16/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility 10/8/24. She was diagnosed with bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels, alternating between periods of mania or hypomania and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 3 (Resident #252, Resident #97 and Resident #72) of 8 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. Resident #72's comprehensive care plan was not revised after he returned from being hospitalized on [DATE] for a recurrence of pneumonia. 2. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #252's antibiotics for positive sputum culture. 3. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #97's cigarette use. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for storage, preparation and sanitation. The facility failed to ensure all food products in walk-in freezer were labeled and dated. The facility failed to ensure employee medication and a soft drink cup were not stored in refrigerated. The facility failed to properly thaw raw chicken that was observed in the sink designated for vegetables only. The chicken was not under running water. There was raw ground beef on the sink counter next to the sink that contained the raw chicken. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation and initial tour of the kitchen on 05/04/25 at 8:50 a.m. revealed raw chicken in a 2-compartment sink labeled Vegetables only with no water running as well as raw ground beef on the counter of the sink. Inside the reach-in refrigerator was a small box labeled as medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #62) of 8 residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility failed to ensure Resident #62's OOH-DNR was completed. The OOH-DNR form did not have the physician's signature. This failure could affect all residents who have implemented Advance Directives and established their choice not to be resuscitated at risk of receiving CPR against their wishes. The findings were: Record review of Resident #62's electronic face sheet dated [DATE] reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. His diagnoses included: Metabolic Encephalopathy (any disease or disorder of the brain, characterized by changes in brain function or structure), Unspecified Dementia (a group of symptoms caused by disorders that affect the brain in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems), muscle weakness, and bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 was coded in the MDS for falls. This failure could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #36's face sheet dated 05/06/25 revealed Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. Resident #36 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and hemiplegia (paralysis or severe weakness on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) affecting left and right side. Record review of Resident #36's comprehensive care plan reflected: Resident #36 is at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health for 1 Resident (Resident #91) of 8 residents reviewed for foot care. The facility did not provide adequate foot care for Resident #91. Resident #91's nails were greyish/black, thick, and long. The nail of her right big toe was curving and growing toward her second toe. This failure could put residents at risk for infection, impaired mobility, and poor foot health as well as a decline in their quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #91's admission Record indicated Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance (the loss of cognitive function that interferes with daily life and activities), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease in which your blood glucose, or blood sugar, levels are too high), muscle weakness, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #97). The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure Resident #97 did not obtain and keep cigarettes at his bedside. This failure could place residents who require supervision to prevent accidents and ensure their environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible, at risk for decreased quality of life or injury that could result in unnecessary hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #97's face sheet dated 05/04/25 indicated Resident #97 was a [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (body's inability to use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar levels requiring insulin injections to manage) without Complications, Essential (Primary)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 Resident out of 5 (Resident #42) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Protections (EBP) for infection control practices. LVN A failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions for an indwelling medical device (gastrostomy tube) for Resident #42. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #42's admission Record, dated 5/5/25, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (a condition that affects one side of the body, usually caused by a stroke or other brain injury) and gastrostomy status (is the presence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 4 of 10 (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6)) residents reviewed for environment. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's room was thoroughly cleaned, the walls and in good condition. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's room was thoroughly cleaned, and in good condition. 3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's room was thoroughly cleaned; and in good condition; and had privacy from the outside. 4.The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's door to bathroom did not have a hole and walls were painted and free from black spots. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unclean, and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding, for one Resident (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for feeding tubes, in that: Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C was not competent in and did not follow facility protocols regarding feeding tube nutrition and care. CNA A adjusted Resident #2's feeding pump while providing Resident #2 with incontinent care. This failure could place residents with feeding tubes at risk for reflux, aspiration, nausea, vomiting, cramps, or diarrhea. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's Face sheet dated 4/17/25 revealed age [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis gastrostomy (opening in the stomach for food status. Record Review of Resident #2's Care plan dated 3/12/21 revealed: The resident requires tube feeding related to dysphagia and history of swallowing problem. Date initiated 3/25/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, within two hours, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect, The facility did not report the allegation of resident abuse to the State Survey Agency within the frame for Resident #1 who had been found with drug paraphernalia in his room. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse due to unreported allegations of abuse and neglect. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 03/30/2025 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to facility on 7/19/2023, relevant diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident #3) The facility did not ensure Resident # 3's smoking supplies were stored at Nurses' station. This failure could place 4 residents who require supervision, at risk for a decreased quality of life or injury that could lead to an unnecessary hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated indicated Resident #3 was [AGE] years old male and admitted on [DATE] diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (the most common form of diabetes, characterized by the body's inability to use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar levels, and often requiring lifestyle changes medication, or insulin injections to manage), anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent and excessive fear or worry that interferes with daily life, often accompanied by physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this was not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 17 residents reviewed for nutritional status (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have a significant weight loss in 3 months. The facility failed to follow the dietitian recommendations to Resident #1 who had experienced significant weight loss. These failures could place residents at risk for malnourishment, illness, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 3/29/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of bipolar disorder, current episode manic severe with psychotic features (a chronic mental health condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (Resident #72 ) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to promote Resident #72's dignity by not covering his catheter's urinary collection bag with a privacy bag. This failure could place residents with catheters at risk for a loss of dignity, decreased self-worth and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: Record review of Resident #72's admission record dated 03/24/24, reflected Resident #72 was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, schizophrenia (severe mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks), bipolar disorder (mental disorder characterized by periods of depression and abnormally elevated moods), metabolic encephalopathy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #11 and Resident # 35) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility staff did not provide Resident #11 and Resident #35 with a call light that was within reach. This failure could place residents who utilized call lights at risk for not having his/her needs met. Findings included: 1)Record review of the admission record for Resident #11 dated 03/27/24 reflected Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnosis that included diabetes (sustained high blood sugar levels), morbid obesity (overweight), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (lung disease), legal blindness and asthma (inflammatory disease of the airways of the lungs.) Record review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #11 reflected Resident #11's cognitive status was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #11's in-room activities. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving individualized interventions for their care needs. The findings included: Record review of the admission record for Resident #11 dated 03/27/24 reflected Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnosis that included diabetes (sustained high blood sugar levels), morbid obesity (overweight), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (lung disease), legal blindness and asthma (inflammatory disease of the airways of the lungs.) Record review of the admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who entered the facility with an indwelling catheter and is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of 8 residents (Resident #72) reviewed for incontinent care and catheter care, in that. The facility failed to obtain documented MD orders from re-admission from hospital for catheter use which included catheter size, balloon inflation parameter and frequency of care for Resident #72. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper catheter care practices. Findings included: Record review of Resident #72's admission record dated 03/24/24, reflected Resident #72 was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, schizophrenia (severe mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks), bipolar disorder (mental disorder characterized by periods…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #77 and Resident #81) reviewed for enteral nutrition, in that: The facility failed to follow physician's orders to ensure that Resident #77 and Resident #81 received the appropriate amount of enteral nutrition. This deficient practice could affect residents receiving optimal enteral nutrition and place them at risk of health complications and decline. The findings include: Record review of care plan for Resident # 77 revealed: Resident is totally dependent on (1) staff for peg tube feedings. Patient is NPO . Initiated/revised 2/16/2024. Resident requires tube feeding r/t dysphagia. Refer to physician orders for peg tube care and feedings. Date initiated: 2/16/24. Record review of admission record/face sheet for Resident #77 revealed: Diagnosis of unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition and gastrostomy status. Record review of MAR revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a prescribed medication was given for 1 of 5 residents (Residents # 25) reviewed for Medication Pass. The facility failed to prevent Resident #25 from missing his daily nose spray . These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic dosage of medications prescribed by the physician. The findings included: Record review of Order Summary revealed Resident #25 ordered Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray 2 sprays in each nostril daily for Nasal Congestion. Record review of Resident #25's MAR revealed Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray not given on 3/26/24 with a numerical code of 9 = Other/See Nurse Notes. Nurse notes on medication order for Fluticasone Propionate revealed medication last order date 3/26/24. No other notes noted. Observation of Medication Pass on 03/26/24 at 07:31 AM with LVN H revealed Resident #25 did not receive his nasal spray. In an interview with LVN H on 3/26/24 at 7:40 am after the med pass for Resident #25 was complete, she stated that she needed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for one Resident (R#14) of nineteen residents whose medications were reviewed, in that: The facility's Pharmacy Consultant recommended that the physician review the use of duplicate antipsychotic therapy with Risperidone and Quetiapine. The facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented his rationale for making changes to Resident #14's antipsychotic therapy in Resident #14's medical record. These failures could place all residents receiving anti-psychotic medications at risk for adverse drug consequences. The findings were: 1) Record review of Resident #14's Physician's orders for March 2024 revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnosis that included schizophrenia (characterized by thoughts or experiences that seem out of touch with reality, disorganized speech or behavior, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable in 1 of 2 medication rooms (medication storage located in 100 hallway) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure that all medical supplies in the medication storage room in the 100 hallway were not past their expiration date. The facility's failure could result in residents receiving expired medical supplies, such as formula, as well as those supplies not being maintained at their best therapeutic level. The findings include: Observation of medication storage room in the 100 hallway on 03/26/24 at 04:15 PM revealed 12 cartons of Diabetisource tube feed formula passed the used by date of March 11, 2024 were located among currently dated cartons of Diabetisource tube feed formula. Interviewed LVN G who witnessed the medication storage and labeling review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to label and date frozen food items in one of one walk in freezers. These failures could residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness and impact the health and nutrition of residents. Findings included: Observation on 03/25/24 at 9:02 am of the walk-in freezer revealed frozen food items, 10 bags of peas, 5 bags of green beans, 10 bag of corn, 5 bags of beef, 3 bags of pork and 2 bags of chicken that were undated. Interview on 03/25/24 at 9:15 am with the Dietary Manager revealed all the listed frozen food items had not been dated when they were received and placed in the walk-in freezer because he would keep inventory of food items placed in the freezer and made sure those items were used first and then he would order more food items to place in the freezer. The Dietary Manager said the freezer temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 1 (Resident #72 ) of 8 residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to correctly transcribe the physician orders for Resident #72 related to indwelling catheter and document the treatment orders for catheter care. This failure could place resident at risk of not receiving needed care or treatments by misleading care providers regarding what care or treatment resident should receive. The findings include: Record review of Resident #72's admission record dated 03/24/24, reflected Resident #72 was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, schizophrenia (severe mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks), bipolar disorder (mental disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services with reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences for 2 (Resident # 17, Resident #19) of 15 residents reviewed for accommodations of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's and Resident's 19's call light was within reach. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of injury or harm due to not being able to call for assistance. The findings were: Record review of Resident #17's admission Record indicated Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old admitted to facility on 02/22/22 with diagnoses of anemia (condition in which the blood doesn't have enough red blood cells), hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure), and chronic kidney disease, stage 5 (the kidneys are getting very close to failure or have already failed). Record review of Resident #17's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #17: -understood and was understood by others, -was moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review; it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on 1 of 3 medication carts (200) reviewed for medication storage in that: 1 liquid medication and 2 ointments found in 200 hall carts were not marked with the date they were opened and accessed. 1 ointment medications in the 200-hall medication cart were past the expired date. The failure could place residents receiving medication at risk for administration of medication incorrectly or that are ineffective resulting in exacerbation of the disease being treated or the introduction of infection from contamination. Findings include: During observation of 200 hall cart (back cart) on 02/03/23 at 09:33 AM revealed undated and expired medications. Findings include the medication Pink Bismuth regular strength -used for upset stomach reliever. Pink Bismuth was noted opened and used with no opened date. An antibiotic ointment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of 8 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for care plans in that: Resident #10's comprehensive person-centered care plan did not address the resident's behavior of removing her nasal cannula used (O2 tubing) for oxygen therapy. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The findings included: Record review of the admission record dated 02/02/23 for Resident #10 indicated Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #10's diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assure acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of one (Resident #50) of 10 residents whose medications were reviewed for pharmacy service. -LVN A prepped medications for Resident #50 and placed them unsecured in a medicine cup on the top drawer in the 300 hall medication cart to administer at a later time. This failure could place residents at risk of medication errors. The findings included: 1.) Record review of Resident #50's face sheet dated 02/03/2023 indicated Resident #50 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, gastroparesis, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, hypertension, tracheostomy, and depressive disorder. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$5,734 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $5,734 — penalty dated 2025-04-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIBERTY COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 1 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2023 |
| MUSTAFA, MARIAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| STRATTON, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| RGV COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2023 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $717K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455423. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.