Lake Hills Healthcare Center
1514 Indian Creek Rd., Brownwood, TX 76801 · For profit - Corporation · 94 certified beds · (325) 646-6529 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (26) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $22,084 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-04)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.7% | 14.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.1% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.5% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.5% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.4% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.6% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.7% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.15 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.76 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 7.4–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.5–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 73.3 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment was as free of accident hazards was possible and each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 21 resident (Resident #55) reviewed for accidents and hazards, in that: On 03/20/2025 at about 9:30pm, Resident #55 was able to get out of a window in a common room on the secure unit without staff's knowledge, pull off 3 wood fence pickets and leave the premises. Facility staff were not aware Resident #55 was not in the building until he was returned by law enforcement at approximately 01:00 AM on 03/21/2025. A past non-compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 04/02/2025 at 3:37 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 03/20/2025 and ended on 03/24/2025. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. The failure placed residents at risk for weather exposure, injury, hospitalization and/or death. Findings included: Review of Resident #55's electronic face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 Resident (Resident #34) of 4 residents reviewed for accident and hazards: The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's bed was on its lowest position while the resident was in his bed. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life leading to a variety of emotional and physical problems/issues as a result of accident hazards. Findings included: Record review of Resident #34's admission record dated 01/24/24 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and muscle weakness. He was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #34's care plan dated 01/23/24 indicated in part: Focus: Resident is High risk for falls r/t dementia. GOAL: The resident will be free of falls through the review date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to not use any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than four months on a full-time basis unless that individual has completed a training and competency evaluation program for 2 (Caregiver HA A and Caregiver HA D) of 4 Caregiver Hospitality Aides reviewed for nursing services.The facility failed to ensure Caregiver HA A and Caregiver HA D were certified within four months of their hire date. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving inappropriate care from individuals whose skill level was unknown. Findings included:Record review on 02/07/2026 of the facility's employee files revealed: -Caregiver HA A was hired 08/06/2025 and worked full time. An employability status check, dated 08/06/2025, indicated Caregiver HA A and had no CNA certification.-Caregiver HA D was hired 07/30/2025 and was currently working full time. An employability status check, dated 07/29/2025, indicated Caregiver HA D had no CNA certification.During an interview on 02/07/2026 at 2:49 PM, Caregiver HA D stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed in that: The facility's kitchen staff failed to clean the kitchen as directed by daily cleaning lists. The facility's kitchen staff failed to store food properly. The facility's kitchen staff failed to remove expired food from the refrigerator. The facility's kitchen staff failed to keep clean and dirty dishes separated during meal service. The facility's kitchen staff failed to cover drinks that were placed on delivery trays and sent to the hall during meal service. These failures placed residents at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. Findings included: During observation on 04/01/25 beginning at 9:10 AM the following was noted: 1. A box of [NAME] biscuits in the freezer #1 was soiled with an orange liquid. 2. Crumbs and an unknown soiled substance was at the bottom of refrigerator #1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the resident's physician when there was radiology results outside of clinical reference range for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for physician notification of radiology results. The facility failed to promptly notify Resident #17's physician by phone per facility protocol on 02/12/25 when x-ray results falling outside of clinical reference ranges reflected Resident #17 had a right femur fracture This failure could place residents at risk of a delay in medical treatment and could result in not receiving appropriate care and interventions. The findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet dated 04/03/2025 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition), major depressive disorder (mental health condition), hypothyroidism (an underactive thyroid), unspecified dementia (cognitive decline), hypertension (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained for 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication labeling and storage. The facility failed to maintain controlled substance record count sheet with accurate amount of lorazepam (a controlled substance) stored in medication room refrigerator. These failures could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #3's electronic face sheet dated 01/23/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently on 01/13/2025 with diagnoses to include: conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions (a mental health condition that causes seizures or convulsions) and anxiety. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: BIMS score of 03 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS Section I - Active Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs listed in Schedule II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976 and other drugs subject to abuse for 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication labeling and storage. The facility failed to maintain controlled substance record count sheet with accurate amount of lorazepam (a controlled substance) stored in medication room refrigerator. These failures could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications. Findings Included: During an observation on 01/23/2025 at 11:48 a.m., the medication room refrigerator had a locked box inside of the refrigerator that was not secured and could be removed easily from the refrigerator. Keys to the locked box, inside of the refrigerator, were stored on a hook that was secured to the left of the outside of the refrigerator. Anyone with access to the medication room had access to the locked box key. During an observation and interview on 01/24/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurate for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure Medication Administration Records were accurate in the electronic medical record for Resident #3. This failure could place residents at risk of having errors in care and treatment. The Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's electronic face sheet dated 01/23/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently on 01/13/2025 with diagnoses to include: conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions (a mental health condition that causes seizures or convulsions) and anxiety. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: BIMS score of 03 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS Section I - Active Diagnoses revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure that non-potable water was properly labeled and stored in the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure that cleaning supplies were stored separately from food in the kitchen. These failures could affect residents who received meals prepared meals in the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. The findings included: Observation on 01/23/24 beginning at 11:15 AM in the kitchen revealed: - 6 boxes, each containing 3 1-gallon plastic jugs of water with expiration date of 9/2/23 - 8 boxes, each containing 3 1-gallon plastic jugs of water with expiration date of 9/2/23 (sign on top of two of the boxes stating non-potable water do not drink; these boxes were stored on a shelf with 10 boxes, each containing 3 1-gallon plastic jugs of water that were not expired, making it very difficult to distinguish…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment in 1 of 2 shower rooms, and 2 of 18 resident restrooms as evidenced by: - 1 of 2 shower rooms did not have a mirror. - Two resident restrooms did not have a mirror. This failure could place the residents who use these restrooms and shower room at risk for a diminished quality of life and a homelike environment. Findings include: Observation on 01/24/24 at 04:31 PM of two resident rooms, 20 and 61, revealed it did not have mirrors in the restroom. The other rooms did have a mirror. Observation on 01/24/24 at 04:40 PM of the shower room in the locked unit revealed it did not have a mirror . The other shower room does have a mirror. Interview with DON on 01/25/24 at 12:21 pm. the DON stated he was unaware of the missing mirrors in the resident's rooms and will have this fixed. The DON Sstated the facility is about to have major updates done and will have this rectified.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that ensure the accurate administering of all drugs to meet the needs of the residents, for 1 (Front medication room) of 2 medication rooms inspected for medication storage. The medication room had expired vial of Tuberculin (TB) medication in the refrigerator. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the desired effect. The findings were: During an observation and interview on 01/23/24 at 02:28 PM revealed the medication room located by the front nurses station with RN D present. The door was locked so the nurse unlocked it. There was a small refrigerator in the medication room that contained an open vial of TB solution. The TB solution box had an open date of 08/01/2023 and the manufacturer's instructions on the box indicated Discard opened product after 30 days. RN D said she was not aware that the solution had been expired. During an interview on 01/23/24 at 02:36 PM the DON was shown the TB…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs in locked compartments for 1 of 1 medications storage compartment. The facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked when unattended for 2 (North hall cart and the Medicare hall cart) of 4 medication carts reviewed for drug storage. The discontinued controlled medications and biologicals kept in the DON's office were not kept behind 2 separate locks at all times. The medication carts for the North and Medicare halls were unlocked and unattended by staff. These failures could place the facility at risk of drug diversion and access to medications or accidental ingestion. Findings include: During an observation on 01/23/24 at beginning 12:16 PM the Medicare hall medication cart was seen unlocked and unattended for approximately 6 minutes. Inside the medication cart were several insulin pens, pill bottles and blister packets that contained several types of medication pills. There were some residents in the areas. During an interview on 01/23/24 at 12:22 PM the DON said the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 14 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #3 and #40) of 13 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A changed her gloves after they became contaminated while providing incontinent care for Resident #3 and Resident #40. This failure could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding include: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 01/25/24 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (brain damage), e. coli infection (bacterial infection), UTI (bladder infection), and heart failure (heart fails to pump blood adequately). She was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #3's MDS dated [DATE] indicated in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and interview the facility failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for labeling and storage of food inventory. The facility failed to label and/or date food items stored in freezers, refrigerators, and dry storage areas. The facility failed to remove damaged food cans from inventory and disposed of expired food items. These failures could place residents at risk of contamination, acquiring a food-borne illness, and weight loss. Findings included: During an observation on 11/20/22 from 10:40 AM to 12:15 PM of the walk-in cooler, refrigerators, dry storage area, and food preparation areas revealed the following: The walk-in cooler contained the following: 1. Two clear plastic bags of yellow semi-liquid substance in refrigerator. No label and no date opened or use by date on the bags. One bag was lying on a plastic serving tray and one bag was lying on top of a cardboard box. 2. One clear plastic bag with round, sliced lunchmeat. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in 9 of 112 (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) and Memory Care Unit hallway. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] A/B had chipped and scraped walls, rotting/missing baseboards, dirty, grimy, sticky floors, dirty and stained toilet. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B had only a recliner with no bed. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] A/B had broken baseboards, unpainted spackling. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken window seal, different shades of paint that did not match, and unpainted spackling. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] A/B had broken baseboards, nail holes and exposed nails, exposed drywall, broken window seal, missing window insulation foam, unclean floors, walls, toilet grout and caulking. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had no tile at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 8 of 24 residents (Resident #18, 33, 40, 43, 46,48,51, 111) and 1 of 2 units (Secure Memory Care Unit) reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility failed to make repairs to walls or doors for Resident #18. The facility failed to repair door jam for room for Resident #46. The facility failed to properly repair the door jam and door frame for room for Resident #111. The facility failed to place a bed in room for Resident #43. The facility failed to make repairs to chips in walls, or clean room for Resident #33. The facility failed to routinely clean room for Resident #48. The facility failed to repair chipped wood from doors for Rms 62-76 on the Secure Memory Care Unit (SMCU). The facility failed to repair missing tile at the threshold to RM [ROOM NUMBER], 64, 66, 68, 70, 72. The facility failed to repair chipped paint for handrails in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 3 of 3 Resident's (#39, #43, and #48's) reviewed for baseline care plan completion. The facility failed to complete baseline care plans for Resident #39, Resident #43, Resident #48 within the required 48-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk of not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified. Findings included: Resident #39 Review of Resident #39's electronic face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Restlessness and agitation, acute respiratory disease, Cellulitis, muscle spasm, dementia with behavioral disturbance Record review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed: A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score was, 03 (severe impairment). Record review on 11/22/2022 of Resident #39's electronic care plan revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #52 and Resident #7) of 20 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs to address antipsychotic and antidepressant medication use for Resident #52 and to accurately address the diet texture for Resident #52 who had an order for a mechanical soft diet but was stated to be on a puree diet on the comprehensive care plan. 2. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs to address the diet or swallowing difficulty for Resident #7. These failures could affect the residents by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Resident #52 Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective communications mandatory training for 4 of 17 direct care staff (RN E, CNA D, NA C, and DA A) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure effective communication training was provided to RN E, CNA D, NA C, and DA A. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for RN E revealed a hire date of 09/22/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on effective communication. Record review of the personnel file for CNA D revealed a hire date of 09/13/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on effective communication. Record review of the personnel file for NA C revealed a hire date of 02/26/2021 and no evidence of new hire training on effective communication. Record review of the personnel file for DA A revealed a hire date of 05/10/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on effective communication. During an interview on 11/22/22 at 04:40 PM the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its resident for 4 of 17 employees (RN E, CNA D, NA C, DA A,) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents was provided to RN E, CNA D, NA C, and DA A. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for RN E revealed a hire date of 09/22/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on resident rights and facility responsibilities. Record review of the personnel file for CNA D revealed a hire date of 09/13/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on resident rights and facility responsibilities. Record review of the personnel file for NA C revealed a hire date of 02/26/2021 and no evidence of new hire training on resident rights and facility responsibilities. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required training on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property and procedures for reporting related incidents for 4 of 17 employees (RN E, CNA D, NA C, DA A) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure training on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property and procedures for reporting related incidents was provided to RN E, CNA D, NA C and DA A. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for RN E revealed a hire date of 09/22/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation. Record review of the personnel file for CNA D revealed a hire date of 09/13/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the mandatory training on standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program for 3 of 17 employees (RN E, CNA D, and DA A) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control training was provided to RN E, CNA D, and DA A. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of illness due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for RN E revealed a hire date of 09/22/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on infection prevention and control. Record review of the personnel file for CNA D revealed a hire date of 09/13/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on infection prevention and control. Record review of the personnel file for DA A revealed a hire date of 05/10/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on infection prevention and control. During an interview on 11/22/22 at 04:40 PM, the Administrator stated her expectations was for all employees to do the trainings when assigned. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required compliance and ethics training for 3 of 17 employees (RN E, CNA D, and DA A) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure compliance and ethics training was provided to RN E, CNA D, and DA A. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for RN E revealed a hire date of 09/22/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on compliance and ethics. Record review of the personnel file for CNA D revealed a hire date of 09/13/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on compliance and ethics. Record review of the personnel file for DA A revealed a hire date of 05/10/2022 and no evidence of new hire training on compliance and ethics. During an interview on 11/22/22 at 04:40 PM, the Administrator stated her expectations was for all employees to do the trainings when assigned. The Administrator stated she was responsible for making sure new employees were entered into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents drug regimen were free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 5 (Resident #41) reviewed for unnecessary drugs. The facility failed to address pharmacist consultant recommendations for duplicate therapy in the months of December of 21, March of 22, September of 22 for Resident #41 inhaler medications of Symbicort and Advair. The facility failed to discontinue Advair in October of 22 after physician agreed with pharmacist consultant recommendation of duplicate therapy for Resident #41. These findings placed residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medications Findings included: Record review of Resident #41's Facesheet dated 11/21/22 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an active diagnosis list that included COPD, Acute upper respiratory infection and Other seasonal allergic rhinitis. Record review of Resident #41's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident had a BIMS of 3, meaning severe cognitive impairment, and an active diagnosis list…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a system of infection control to prevent infections for 1 of 5 (Resident # 28) reviewed for infection control. LVN-H failed to perform hand hygiene while providing wound care for Resident #28. This failure placed residents at risk for infection of wounds. Findings included: Record review of Resident #28 Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 12/17/21. An active diagnosis list that included CAD, Heart Failure, HTN, Diabetes Melitus. A risk for development of pressure ulcers. Record review of Resident #28's Wound Care Order dated 11/08/22 revealed: Wound Treatment Order: Location: Coccyx: Clean with Normal Saline/Wound Cleanser. Apply hydrocolloid dressing q 3 days. During an observation and interview on 11/22/22 at 08:15 AM of Resident #28 wound care performed by LVN-H. LVN-H donned gloves at treatment cart outside resident room without performing any hand hygiene and prepared all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-04-04 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide an activities program directed by a qualified professional for 1 of 1 activity directors (AD) reviewed for qualifications. The facility failed to ensure the AD was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional that met state licensing requirements. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. The findings included: Record review of the AD's employee file revealed the AD took the position on 06/03/2024, and evidence of training beginning 02/13/2025 as a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional that met state licensing requirements. Record review revealed once the course was done (May 2025), it would have been almost a year since being hired to be certified. During an interview on 04/03/2025 at 11:23 AM, the AD stated she was hired 8 months ago. She stated she had no prior experience nor prior SW…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$22,084 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $13,260 — penalty dated 2025-04-04
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-01-25
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-21 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOOPER, GRADY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2021 |
| SLP BROWNWOOD, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2021 |
| MISTRETTA, CASSANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2021 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675017. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.