No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brookhaven Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

1855 Cheyenne Dr., Carrollton, TX 75010 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (972) 394-7141 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$24,739 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $24,739 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-27)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (75%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Airrosti<0.1 mi
4333 N Josey Ln · (800) 404-6050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4323 N Josey Ln Ste 102 · (469) 896-1777 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Tom Thumb0.4 mi
4112 N Josey Ln · (972) 394-4127 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2719 Merlin Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1914 Cheyenne Dr · (972) 201-4164

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.5%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.9%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.3%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.7%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.6%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.9%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.8%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.0%88.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission37.4%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.9%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.672.171.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.472.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
19.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 19.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.0%CMS range 23.0–48.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.6%CMS range 9.6–21.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge19.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge14.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.6–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
75.3%
Total nursing turnover
72.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 114.9 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 75% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-23)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for three (Residents #1, #3, and #4) of five residents reviewed for abuse.The facility Administrator and DON failed to protect Resident #1, Resident #3, and Resident #4 from abuse by Resident #2.On 09/09/25, Resident #2 pushed the wheelchair of Resident #4. Resident #4 hit Resident #2. Resident #2 hit Resident #4 back.On 09/29/25 Resident #2 cursed at Resident #1 and Resident #3. He also pulled out a knife from his shoe and threatened them with it.On 10/02/25 Resident #2 threated to kill Resident #1 and chased after her on 10/02/25. Resident #1 suffered psychosocial harm. An IJ was identified on 10/02/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:50 PM. While the IJ was removed on 10/03/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on the Plan of Removal. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for accidents and supervision. 1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #27 had adequate supervision when he eloped from the facility on 11/12/24 at 4:41 p.m. The resident left the building through a door which did not sound an alarm when he exited. On 11/13/24, the police found Resident #27 when he attempted to enter a school. The police returned Resident #27 to the facility at 8:24 a.m. Resident #27 was gone from the facility over 15 hours and his whereabouts during the time he was missing were unknown. 2) The facility failed to ensure all exit doors were armed to go off with an alarm sound to notify staff the door was opened. The noncompliance was identified as PNC, past non-compliance. The IJ, Immediate Jeopardy, began on 11/12/24 and ended on 11/13/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment that was free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with adequate supervision to prevent him from eloping from the facility on 11/28/23. 2. The facility failed to ensure an exterior door alarm was reset and functioning properly after allowing an outside vendor to utilize the door for a delivery. The facility concluded Resident #1 eloped through the facility's exit door that did not alarm when opened. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began 11/28/23 and ended on 11/30/23. The facility corrected the non-compliance before surveyor's entrance. These failures placed residents at risk of harm and/or serious injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 12/28/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 residents reviewed for neglect. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not neglected when she fell from her bed and remained on the floor beside her bed for approximately 4 hours on 07/30/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN A and CNA B did Routine Resident Checks every 2 hours on Resident #1 during their shift on 07/30/25. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The facility corrected the non-compliance before surveyor's entrance. These failures could place residents at risk for humiliation, fear, shame, agitation, decreased quality of life and possibly death. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included: hypokalemia (condition where the potassium levels in the blood are lower than normal), cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #10) of 6 residents, reviewed for infection control. 1. LVN A failed to don PPE prior to performing the high contact resident care activity on a resident who was on enhanced barrier precaution. This failure placed residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections.Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 04/23/26, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, had a BIMS score of 15 indicating her cognition was considered intact and functioning normally. The resident had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of left buttock, malnutrition (refers to deficiencies, excesses, or imbalances in a person's intake of energy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid in subpart C to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR services and assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received the Occupational Therapy that was recommended by the IDT meeting on 08/29/25. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving needed specialized services that could impact their healing. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 10/04/25, reflected the resident had a BIMs score of 15 and was cognitively intact. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included seizure disorder, quadriplegia (inability to move extremities), anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected there were no care plans for PASARR services. Review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay that included diagnoses, course of treatment, pertinent labs, a final summary of the resident's status and reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for closed records.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was discharged from the facility with a discharge summary that included an accurate and current description of the clinical status of the resident.The facility failed to provide the required notice to the Office of the long-term Care Ombudsman regarding the discharge of Resident#1.This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate and timely care due to confusion among various facilities, agencies, practitioners, and caregivers involved with the resident's care.Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE], reflected the [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months for 2 of 19 residents (Residents #7 and Resident #48) reviewed for quarterly assessments. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #7's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/12/2025, was completed within 90 days of the previous assessment. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #48's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/19/2025, was completed within 90 days of the previous assessment. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their assessments completed timely.Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #7's admission Record, dated 07/23/2025, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #7's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had diagnoses including Hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal/oral hygiene for one (Resident #67) of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The facility failed to ensure Resident #67 received personal hygiene care, in respect to facial hair across her chin. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for not having their care and treatment needs met.Findings included: Review of Resident #67's Face Sheet, dated 07/23/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, who most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), muscle weakness (decreased strength in the muscles), and lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement is due to a muscle control problem that causes an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for one medication cart (200 hall) of the facility's' four medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Residents #47 Basaglar Kwik pen 100unit/1ml, and Resident#11 Humulin 70/30 100 units/ml, were dated when opened.The facility failed to ensure that an opened bottle of Novolin 70/30 bottle was properly labeled and dated before storing in the 200-hall medication cart. This failure could affect residents by diminishing the effectiveness, and therapeutic benefits of the medications and/or result in medication error.The findings included: Review of Resident #47's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03.28.2025 reflected the Resident #47 was a [AGE] year-old female and had a BIMs score of 2,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed conduct a Comprehensive Assessment within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #111) reviewed for Comprehensive Assessments and timing. The facility failed to ensure a Comprehensive MDS Assessment for Resident #111 was completed within 14 days after her admission to the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included: Review of Resident #111's Face Sheet, dated 07/22/25, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including history of falling (past instances of falling). Review of Resident #111's electronic medical record on 07/22/25 reflected no evidence that an MDS Assessment had been completed. During an interview with the [NAME] President of Reimbursement on 07/22/25 at 12:09PM, he stated the facility did not currently have a full-time MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for the resident that met professional standards of care within 48 hours of the resident's admission for two (Resident #4 and Resident #111) of six residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for Resident #4 and Resident #111 within 48 hours of their admissions. This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk of not receiving effective and person-centered care and services.Findings included: Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 07/23/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning, bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to maintain sanitary, clean, and safe medication storage and preparation.This failure placed residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and blood borne infections.Findings included: An observation on 07/22/25 at 1:37PM revealed there was an unlabeled vial of insulin lispro with blood stains on the vial and box. The insulin vial and box were in the top drawer of hall 200 medication cart stored with other medications. An interview on 07/22/25 at 1:37PM with LVN A revealed that she did not realize the insulin box and vial had blood stains. She stated that nursing staff was responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's responsible party had the right to exercise the resident's rights for one (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's representative was involved in the decision making before providing a haircut and beard trim. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their preferred responsible party represent them in care decisions. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from a short-term care hospital. Also, Resident #1's face sheet identified his representative was a family member. Diagnosis included: Alzheimer's Disease (A progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Cerebrovascular Disease (conditions that affect blood flow to your brain), Unspecified Psychosis Unspecified Psychosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skills set to provide nursing and related services for one (Hospitality Aide A) of three employees reviewed for staff qualifications. 1. The facility failed to ensure Hospitality Aide A had a current nurse aide certification while employed at the facility while actively providing care for residents on 02/12/25: 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM shift, 02/10/25: 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM shift, 02/08/25: 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM shift, 02/07/25: 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM shift. This failure could result in residents being provided care by staff who do not have the training and competency needed for providing care. Findings include: Record review of Hospitality Aide A's personnel file revealed her date of hire was not listed. She did not have a CNA license. Record review of the facility's schedule revealed Hospitality Aide A was listed as a CNA and counted as a CNA in the numbers for the schedule on dates: 02/12/25: 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM shift 02/10/25: 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM shift 02/08/25: 6:00 AM - 2:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 10 residents (Resident # 55 and Resident #12) reviewed for Accidents and Supervision. The facility did not provide supervision for Resident #55 and Resident #12 while smoking on 08/30/24. This failure could place residents at the facility at risk of injuries related to burns. The findings included: Record review of Resident #55's Face Sheet, dated 08/30/24, revealed that he was a [AGE] year old male with an initial admission date to the facility of 02/07/24. Resident #55's active diagnoses included: dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning), major depressive disorder, seizures, hemiplegia (paralysis that affects one side of the body), unspecified affecting right dominant side, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences of 1 (Resident #44) of 5 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #44 had a mobility device that was operable and comfortable to her that promoted independence, safety, and psychosocial need. This failure could place residents at risk of increased isolation, depression and increased risk of injury. Findings Include: Record Review of Resident #44's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/13/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #44's active diagnoses included: Unspecified Dementia, Unsteadiness on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle leading to its shrinking and weakening) and unspecified glaucoma (progressive eye condition that can cause blindness). Resident #55 had a BIMS score of 9, indicating a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to resolve a grievance in a timely manner for 1 of 5 (Resident #44) residents reviewed for grievances. 1.The facility failed to make prompt efforts to ensure Resident #44's grievance was initiated, reported, and resolved in a timely manner. These failures could affect the Resident's ability to file a grievance without the fear of discrimination, reprisal or retribution and their right to have their grievances resolved in a timely manner. Findings Included: Record Review of Resident #44's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/13/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #44's active diagnoses included: Unspecified Dementia, Unsteadiness on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle leading to its shrinking and weakening) and unspecified glaucoma (progressive eye condition that can cause blindness). Resident #55 had a BIMS score of 9, indicating a moderately impaired cognition. Record Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #55) of 5 resident's reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55's Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05/14/2024, reflected his current diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (clinical depression). This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings Included: Record Review of Resident #55's Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/14/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #55's active diagnoses included: Aphasia (brain disorder that affects the ability to speak or understand language), Hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (weakness on one side of the body following a stroke) and muscle weakness. Record Review of the MDS Section I, Active Diagnoses revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit an accurate PL1 (PASARR Level 1) screening when residents admitted with a diagnosis of Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability or Developmental Disability for 1 (Resident #55) out of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility failed to submit a new PL1 screening when Resident #55 was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder after admission to the facility. These failures could affect residents by not receiving a Level II PASARR Evaluation to access for needed services. Findings Included: Record Review of Resident #55's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/14/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #55's active diagnoses included: Aphasia (brain disorder that affects the ability to speak or understand language), Hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (weakness on one side of the body following a stroke) and muscle weakness. Resident #55 had a BIMS score of 1 indicating a severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames that met the residents clinical and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #55) out of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #55's comprehensive care plan included his diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder. This failure could place residents at risk of having received inadequate interventions not individualized to their care needs and diagnoses. Findings Included: Record Review of Resident #55's Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/14/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #55's active diagnoses included: Aphasia (brain disorder that affects the ability to speak or understand language), Hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (weakness on one side of the body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the facility residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and proper foot health for 1 (Resident #11) of 1 residents reviewed for foot care services. The facility failed to provide podiatry services for Residents (Resident #11). This failure could lead to increased potential negative outcomes related to foot health including development of sores, infections, amputation and death for a resident with diabetes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's Face Sheet, dated 08/30/24, revealed that he was a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date to the facility of 04/14/24. Resident #11's active diagnoses included: Type 3 Diabetes with mellitus without complications, hyperosmolality (occurs when very high blood sugar leads to severe dehydration, highly concentrated blood and mental status changes) and hypernatremia (a rise in serum sodium concentration), phosphorus metabolism (is a complex…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. RN B and LVN C failed to document the administration of Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution (inhaled treatment used to prevent difficulty breathing and coughing) to Resident #1 as ordered. LVN C failed to document the administration of Robitussin Mucus+Chest Congest Oral Liquid (used for cough and congestion) to Resident #1 as ordered. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving their medications as ordered by a physician and worsening of their condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 8/30/24 revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Record review of Resident #1's 5-Day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist in obtaining routine and emergency dental care for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to complete and submit a dental referral for Resident #55 This failure could place Resident's at risk for oral complications, dental pain and diminished quality of life. Findings Included: Record Review of Resident #55's Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/14/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #55's active diagnoses included: Aphasia (brain disorder that affects the ability to speak or understand language), Hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (weakness on one side of the body following a stroke) and muscle weakness. Resident #55 had a BIMS score of 1 indicating a severe cognitive impairment. Review of the assessment revealed that Resident #55 had no dental issues identified and he required setup or clean-up assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for three of five residents (Resident #52, Resident #70, and Resident #85) reviewed for catheter care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D and CNA E maintained the foley catheter drainage bag below Resident #52's bladder during a mechanical lift transfer. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN P maintained Resident #70's foley catheter drainage bag below the bladder level during wound care on 06/03/24. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #85's catheter bag did not had contact with the floor. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving care appropriate to address their incontinence. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #52's face sheet dated 06//06/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included obstructive and reflux uropathy (a disorder of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 medication cart (Nurses cart hall 300) of 3 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed remove damaged medications from the Nurses Cart hall 300 timely for disposition. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to possible drug diversion and at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medication. Findings Included: Record review and observation on 06/04/24 at 12:17 PM of Nurses Cart Hall 300, with LVN N revealed: - the blister pack for Resident #39's tramadol 50 mg tablet (controlled medication used for pain) had 2 blister seals broken and the pills still inside the broken blisters and taped over. - the blister pack for Resident #50's tramadol 50 mg tablet (controlled medication used for pain) had 6 blister seals broken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility refrigerator and freezer had a visible use-by date and covered. 2. The facility failed to discard food stored in the refrigerator that should no longer be consumed. 3. The facility failed to ensure staff were only using clean utensils when accessing bulk foods. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included: Observation in facility's walk-in freezer on 06/04/24 at 09:36 AM revealed beef patties were not covered appropriately. Observation in Facility's refrigerator on 06/04/24 at 09:42 AM revealed a bunch of cilantro was rotten and a box of diced potato did not have a visible use-by date on it. Observation in facility's kitchen's prep area on 06/04/24 at 09:51 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of sixteen residents (Resident #78, Resident #13, and Resident #51) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure that CNA D performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #78 on 06/04/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure that CNA F changed his gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #13 on 06/04/24. 3. The facility failed to ensure that CNA L changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #51 on 06/04/24. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #78's Face sheet dated 06/06/24 reflected a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of the resident needs for 2 (Resident #6, and Resident #83) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 and Resident #83's call light was placed within reach. These failures could place residents at risk of injuries and unmet needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #6 Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE], diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), dementia (loss of cognition cognitive communication deficit), unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking, generalized muscle weakness, and a BIMS score of 7 (severely impaired cognition). Review of Resident #6 Care Plan dated initiated 04/04/2023 and revised 05/03/2024 reflected resident had a history of falls and had a fall with injury to his forehead on 04/04/2024 due to an unsteady…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #53, Resident #74) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1- Resident #53 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed. 2- Resident #74 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1-Record review of Resident #53's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #53 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), Hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) affecting right side, and dementia.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 21 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for quality of care. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #44's splint was placed on his right arm and hand on 06/04/24 and 06/05/24 per physician orders. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and treatment needed to meet their needs and could result in decreased Range of Motion and worsening of contractures. Findings included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 06/06/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech caused by brain damage), hemiplegia right side (paralysis), and cerebral vascular accident (stroke). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision for one Resident (Resident #51) of three residents reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #51 received two-person assist when providing incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk for accidents and injury. The findings were: Record review of Resident #51's Face sheet dated 06/06/24 reflected Resident #51 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included paraplegia (paralysis that affects legs, but not arms) and chronic respiratory failure. Record review of Resident #51's Comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 04/05/24, reflected Resident #51's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #51 was dependent of care for all ADLs. He requires 2 persons assist with roll left and right. He was always incontinent of urine and bowel. Record review of Resident #51's Care Plan initiated 04/21/20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for feeding tubes. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's hydration bag for the tube feeding pump was labeled and dated. This failure could result in complications of enteral feedings such as receiving incorrect hydration or elevated risk of infection with using the same hydration bag over multiple days. The findings were: Review of Resident #26's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #26 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Cancer (abnormal proliferation of cells), Hypertension (high blood pressure) and Heart Failure (insufficient pumping of the heart) and unspecified Neurological conditions (disease that affects the nervous system). Resident #26 had a feeding tube.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for contaminated sharps disposal bins, attached to one (300 Hall MA Medication Cart) of one 300 Hall MA Medication Cart and one (300 Hall Nurse Medication Cart) of one 300 Hall Nurse Medication Cart reviewed for hazards. MA B failed to ensure contaminated sharps in the sharps bin attached to the 300 Hall MA Medication Cart, were below the full line. MA B failed to ensure medications found on the sharps bin insert lid on the 300 Hall MA Medication Cart, were disposed of properly. RN C failed to ensure contaminated sharps in the sharps bin attached to the 300 Hall Nurse Medication Cart, were below the full line. These failures placed residents at risk of being exposed to contaminated sharps, possible bloodborne pathogens, and access to unprescribed medications. Findings included: An observation on 01/30/2024 at 10:07 AM, revealed the plastic insert contained inside the sharps bin attached to MA B's 300 Hall MA Medication Cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 (Resident # 15 and #20) of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. MA B failed to administer medications timely as ordered by physician to Resident # 20 LVN D failed to administer medications timely as ordered by physician to Resident # 15 The deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects from their medications as intended by the prescribing physician order. The findings included: Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 01/30/24 revealed an [AGE] years old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal), hypothyroidism (happens when the thyroid gland doesn't make enough thyroid hormone) and malignant neoplasm of unspecified site…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one (300 Hall MA Medication Cart) of six of six medication carts reviewed for medication storage. MA B failed to ensure medications found on the sharps bin insert lid on the 300 Hall MA Medication Cart, were disposed of properly. This failure placed residents at risk for unauthorized access to the medication cart and a harmful medication can be consumed placing residents at risk for administration of harmful medication. Findings included: An observation on 01/30/2024 at 10:07 AM revealed, MA B's 300 Hall MA Medication Cart, had eight pills stuck between the plastic insert of the sharps (needles, blades [such as scalpels] and other medical instruments that are necessary for carrying out healthcare work and could cause an injury by cutting or pricking the skin) container and the lid, which prevented the lid from closing properly. Residents were observed self-ambulating through the hall in thier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all residents had a means to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 2 (Residents #3 and #4) of 9 residents reviewed for resident call systems. Residents #3 and #4 were moved to the same room on a covid unit for quarantine after testing positive for the virus. The room did not contain a call system for use at the bedside. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to notify staff when care was needed. Findings included: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 12/28/23 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old ma major depressive disorder, le admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pain in unspecified joints, acute pancreatitis, primary hypertension (high blood pressure), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (Residents #1) of three residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Resident #1's care plan failed to address interventions to prevent complications related to her PICC line. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs and interventions to prevent complications related to each individuals identified concerns. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 08/05/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's brief interview for mental status was cognitively intact by staff assessment. The resident had IV medications. Her diagnoses included acute and subacute endocarditis (inflammation of heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of six medication carts reviewed for medication storage; the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, ensure all drugs were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to these drugs, to meet the needs of each resident, for one (Resident #75) of four residents reviewed for medication storage; the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to keys for two (300-hall) of three medication and treatment carts. 1. The 300 and 400 Hall medication cart had 2 insulin pens that had no resident listed or open/expiration dates. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #75's medications were secured inside of the medication cart on 04/25/23. 3. The facility failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in the facility's kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation of the facility's refrigerator on 04/23/23 at 9:21 AM revealed: - 1 roll of meat thawing directly on the 2nd shelf rack from the top and above a box of potatoes; - 1 carton of milk dated best by 04/20/23; - 1 orange with white fuzzy spots; and - 4 green bell peppers with white spots. Observation of the facility's freeze on 04/23/23 at 9:27 AM revealed: - plastic wrap and strips of tape left on shelf rack and floor; - pieces of corn, green beans, and sherbet cup on the floor; - red spill on a shelf rack; - 1 box of beef patties open and exposed to air; - 1 box of white ranch dinner roll dough open and exposed to air; - 1 box of chocolate chip cookie dough open and exposed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, which included but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57 bedside commode was clean and sanitary. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life due to the lack of a clean and sanitary homelike environment. Findings included: Review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 04/25/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), abnormal posture, and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #57's care plan did not address his use of a bedside commode. Review of Resident #57's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he had a BIMS score of 15. Further review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health for one (Resident #75) of five residents reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #75 received foot care. This failure could place residents at risk of diminished quality of life by not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #75's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anemia, hypertension, renal failure, neurogenic bladder, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, malnutrition, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Her BIMS score was 10 out of 15, which revealed she was moderately impaired. She required extensive assistance with one-person physical assistance regarding personal hygiene. She required total dependence with one-person physical assistance regarding bathing. Review of Resident #75's care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #75) of three residents observed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #75's catheter bag was changed as ordered by the physician. These failures could place residents with urinary catheters at risk for urethral tears, dislodging of the catheter, and urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #75's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anemia, hypertension, renal failure, neurogenic bladder, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, malnutrition, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Her BIMS score was 10 out of 15, which revealed she was moderately impaired. Her appliances used was an indwelling catheter and she was always incontinent. Review of Resident #75's care plan, undated, reflected her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for gastrostomy tube management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #24's head of bed was elevated at a minimum of 30-degree angle during medication administration and bolus feeding (a way to deliver food directly to the stomach) via gastrostomy tube (G-tube) (A tube directly inserted through the skin to the stomach to deliver nutrition). The facility failed to check the Resident #24's residual before administering medications This failure could place residents who receive enteral feedings by G-tube at risk for injury, aspiration into the lungs (fluid or food enter the lungs accidently), decreased quality of life, hospitalization and decline in health. Findings include: Record review of Resident #24's face sheet dated 4/25/23 revealed a 49- year-old-male…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the resident's care plan, and the resident's goal and preferences for one (Resident #26) of two residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility failed to dispose of Resident #26's suction catheter after use. These failures placed the residents at risk of respiratory infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #26's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, aphasia, seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, and respiratory failure. Her BIMS score was 0 out of 15, which revealed she was severely impaired. She required total dependence with one-to-two-person physical assistance regarding ADLs. She received oxygen therapy, suctioning, and tracheostomy care. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biological's) to meet the needs of each resident, for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #50 and # 78) observed during medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50's and Resident #78's medications were administered at the scheduled time per the physician orders. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: A record review of Resident #78's face sheet, dated 5/2/23, revealed an admission date of 11/22/22, with diagnoses which included hypertensive urgency, obesity, dehydration, acute kidney failure, muscle weakness, cognitive communication problem and Type 2 diabetes. A record review of Resident #78's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #78 was a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for two (Residents #50 and #23) of four residents reviewed for infection control. MA X failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Residents #50 and #23. This failure could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: Observation on 04/23/23 at 9:25 AM of MA X using a wrist blood pressure monitor for Resident #50. At 9:27 AM MA X took the same wrist blood pressure monitor to Resident #23. MA X did not sanitize or clean the wrist blood pressure monitor between the two residents. In an interview on 04/23/23 at 9:32 AM with MA X revealed she did use the wrist blood pressure monitor on Resident #50 and Resident #23 without cleaning or sanitizing it in between the residents. MA X said she knew she should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-04-25 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing was posted as required. The facility failed to post the daily staffing information posting from 04/20/23 to 04/23/23. This failure could place the residents, families, and visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding the daily nurse staffing data and facility census. Findings included: Observation on 04/23/23 at 9:07 AM revealed the daily nurse staffing posting was dated 04/20/23. Observation on 04/23/23 at 9:30 AM revealed the daily nurse staffing posting was dated 04/20/23. In an interview on 04/25/23 at 12:00 PM with the Administrator revealed the nursing department was responsible for ensuring the daily nurse staffing was updated daily. In an interview on 04/25/23 at 12:25 PM with the DON revealed he was responsible for ensuring the daily nurse staffing was updated daily but he was not in the building over the weekend. The DON said he normally assigned a nurse to update the posting over the weekends since he was not in the building. The DON said he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$24,739 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $9,272 — penalty dated 2025-08-27
  • $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-12-18
  • $7,446 — penalty dated 2023-12-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OLNEY-HAMILTON HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2021
HUFF, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2021
PMG OPCO - CARROLLTON, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2026
BAUDER, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2025
COIL, RYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
DVORAK, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
BAUDER, KELLYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2026
BAUDER, MADISONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2026
BAUDER, PARKERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2026
BOULWARE, STEVENIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2026
BOULWARE, THOMASIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2026
WALKER, KATIEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2026
PRIORITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 5%Other / private 31%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$268per resident / day
operating cost
$8,147per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$235per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455412. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next