No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Medina Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center

913 Hwy 90 W, Castroville, TX 78009 · For profit - Partnership · 116 certified beds · (830) 931-2900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (830) 931-2900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609) — most recent Oct 2024
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11930 US HWY 90, Suite 110 · (210) 644-2500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1718 Briar Spg · (510) 473-8965 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
15495 US Highway 90 E · (830) 582-4100

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.9%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.2%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.2%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.2%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.9%88.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.6%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.3%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.922.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.082.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.9%CMS range 35.0–56.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.5–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 5.2–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
37.5%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 89.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-27)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #41, and Resident #42) who were reviewed for resident assessments. 1. The facility failed to document Resident #4's use of anticonvulsant medication on the quarterly MDS assessment. 2. The facility failed to document Resident #41's use of diuretic medication on the annual MDS assessment.3. The facility failed to document Resident #3's admission to hospice services on the Significant Change Assessment.4. The facility failed to document Resident #42's hospice services on her last quarterly MDS assessment. These failures could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: 1. Record review Resident #4's admission sheet dated 9/08/2024 with an original date of 3/14/2017 documented an [AGE] year-old female resident with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #21 and Resident #91) reviewed for infection control: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D and CNA E wore a PPE gown during incontinent care for Resident #21 who was on EBP. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA D did not touch a clean brief with dirty gloves during incontinent care for Resident #21. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN F cleaned the rubber hub of an insulin pen prior to placing a needle cap on the pen and administering it to Resident #91. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN F sanitized her hands between glove changes while preparing and administering insulin to Resident #91. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices.The findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident having pressure ulcers received care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent further development of skin breakdown or pressure ulcers for 1 of 4 resident (Residents #21) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure on 2/25/26 LVN A cleansed Resident #21's entire wound bed, did not use wound vac canister tubing that was touching the floor, and sanitized the entire surface area of scissors used to cut wound supplies. These failures could result in the residents with pressure ulcers worsening in size and staging.The findings included: Record review of Resident #21's admission record, dated 2/27/26, revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis due to methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (a life-threatening systemic infection caused by bacteria entering the bloodstream, specifically a strain of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nurse services. The facility failed to have RN coverage for 2 days on 9/01/2025 and 12/26/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not having staff with advanced care skills available to meet their needs.The findings included: Review of the facility's RN timecards from 8/1/2025 through 2/24/2026, revealed there were no RN hours for Monday 9/1/2025 and Friday 12/26/2025 Review of the facility's census dated 9/01/2025 documented a population of 90 residents. Review of the facility census dated 12/26/2025 documented a population of 90 residents. During an interview with the DON on 02/26/26 at 2:08 PM, the DON stated it was important to have sufficient RN staff at the facility to monitor the LVNs and to be present if there was an issue in the building. During an interview with the Administrator on 02/27/2026 at 3:12 PM, the Administrator stated it was important for there to be sufficient RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #71) reviewed for administration. The facility failed to document an incident Resident #71 had with Resident #83 in her electronic medical record. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of delayed or improper care due to inaccurate medical records.Record review of Resident #71's admission record, dated 2/25/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #71's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/31/25, revealed the resident's BIMS score was 13 (intact cognition). Record review of Resident #71's comprehensive care plan, initiated 10/06/25 and revised 12/16/25, revealed the resident was resistant to care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for one of one laundry room reviewed for physical environment.The 2 dryers were found to have built up lint on top of the lint screen.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for burns due to a fire hazard. Findings included:During an observation of the laundry room and interview on 02/27/26 at 1:57 pm, the dryers were found to have about 2-3 inches of lint on top of the lint screens. The bottom part of the lint screens appeared to have been swept off with only a small amount of lint staying in the bottom of the dryer. The Housekeeping Supervisor stated that the Maintenance Director usually cleaned the upper part of the lint screen at least once a day since there were wires that might cause issues. The Housekeeping Supervisor stated that the Maintenance Director had been out ill for a few days and the Assistant Maintenance Director had other duties. She stated she did not know if other arrangements were going to be made for cleaning the dryers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure that sanitizing buckets were not near containers of food. 2. The facility failed to discard expired flour. 3. The ice machine had an unknown black substance inside the top of the machine. 4. The dishwasher sanitation log was not completed for several days and had an expired bottle of test strips. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: During an observation, during the initial kitchen tour, on 11/12/24 starting at 09:41 a.m., revealed there were 2 sanitizing buckets next to a tray of uncovered onions dated 11/11. There was one container of flour with a discard date of 11/7 and another bag of flour with discard date of 10/28. The dish machine sanitation record log was not filled out for 11/8, 11/9, 11/10, 11/11, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #15) of 8 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #15's provider of her change of condition on [DATE] when she developed dysuria (a painful or uncomfortable feeling when urinating, often described as a burning, stinging, or itching sensation in the urethra or urethral meatus) and visual hallucinations (Seeing things that aren't there, such as flashing lights, animals, or people). This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for a delay in medical treatment, decline in health, and death. The findings included: Record review of the admission Record, printed [DATE], reflected Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old female…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 7 Residents (Resident #36) whose records were reviewed for assessments. MDS staff failed to ensure Resident #36's MDS assessment reflected he was hearing impaired and used an amplifier as a hearing aid. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could result in residents not receiving the care and services as needed. The findings were: Review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 11/15/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction and Major Depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic symptoms. Review of the significant change MDS,, dated 10/1/24, revealed Resident #36's BIMS score was 11 reflecting moderate cognitive impairment; he had minimal difficulty hearing and did not use a hearing device. Review of progress note dated 11/12/2024 read: Was informed by [Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all PASRR Level I residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR Level II Evaluation and Assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to identify Resident#55 as having diagnoses indicative of Mental Illness including MDD on the PASRR screening dated 3/10/23, which would require a PASRR Level II assessment. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life related to not receiving or benefiting from specialized services. The findings include: An interview of Resident #55 was attempted on 11/12/24, the resident was a poor historian. Review of Resident #55's admission sheet, dated 7/8/24, noted the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Dementia, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, MDD. Review of Resident #55's quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a diagnosis of mental illness on the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #52) whose records were reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to recognize on the Level I PASRR screening that Resident #52 had the mental illness diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) which would qualify Resident #52 for a PASRR evaluation. This deficient practice could place residents with mental illness at risk for not obtaining the services needed to treat their mental health diagnoses. The findings include: Attempted to interview Resident #52 on 11/13/24, resident was a poor historian. Record review of Resident #52's admission sheet, dated 5/26/24, noted the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system), Angina (a condition of insufficient oxygen in the blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review revealed the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 2 of 7 Residents (Resident #36 and Resident #15) whose records were reviewed for Care Plans. 1. Staff failed to ensure Resident #36's Care Plan reflected he was hearing impaired and used an amplifier as a hearing aid. 2. The facility failed to update Resident #15's Care Plan to reflect a history of UTIs with interventions for staff to monitor the resident for possible UTI symptoms. This deficient practice could affect any resident and result in residents not receiving the care and services they needed. 1. Review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 11/15/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction and Major Depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 7 Residents (Resident #36) whose records were reviewed for activities of daily living. Nursing staff failed to brush Resident #36's teeth and wash his face for 1 of 4 survey dates, 11/14/24 and nursing staff failed to clip his nails for an undetermined amount of time. This deficient practice could affect residents who required assistance and could result in poor hygiene and feelings of dissatisfaction. The findings were: Review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 11/15/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified sequele of cerebral infarction and Major Depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic symptoms. Review of significant change MDS assessment, dated 10/1/24, revealed Resident #36's BIMS was 11 reflecting moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 (Resident #191 and Resident #15) of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care and or incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA L and CNA M did not leave stool on Resident #15 when performing incontinent care. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA J and CNA K kept Resident #191's urine catheter bag below the level of the bladder during incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of the admission Record, printed 11/15/24, reflected Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a serious condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked, causing an area of dead brain tissue), extended spectrum beta…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for two of ten residents (Resident #24 and Resident #41) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure medication doses noted on the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) matched doses recorded on the Controlled Drug Reconciliation Log for Resident #24 and #41. This deficient practice could put residents at risk for pain, anxiety, misappropriation, and drug diversion. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's admission sheet, dated 8/18/24, noted the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Dementia, Angina, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Review of Resident #24's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 8/22/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of ten residents (Resident #55) reviewed for medication labeling and storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55's insulin pen was labeled with the date it was opened. This deficient practice could place residents who receive medications at risk of not obtaining the therapeutic level of their prescribed medications. The findings include: Review of Resident #55's admission sheet, dated [DATE], noted the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Dementia, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Review of Resident #55's quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], noted the resident BIMS was 8, indicating he had moderate cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of Type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 (Resident #15 and Resident #191) of 8 residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. 1. The facility failed to timely document Resident #15's complaints of dysuria (a painful or uncomfortable feeling when urinating, often described as a burning, stinging, or itching sensation in the urethra or urethral meatus) on 11/03/24 and 11/11/24. 2. The facility failed to document a wound care order in active orders, when it was ordered on 11/12/24, and not active until 11/14/24, for wound care treatment for Resident #191 who developed a open reddened area to her gluteal folds after admission. This failure could affect any residents who have medical records and could result in misinformation about professional care provided. Findings included: Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #191) reviewed for hospice services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #191's most recent Physician Certification of Terminal Illness and Hospice Election form were completed and were part of the hospice documents at the facility. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of the admission Record, dated 11/15/24, reflected Resident #191 was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #15) reviewed for infection control 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA L and CNA M used appropriate hand hygiene between glove changes when providing incontinent care to Resident #15. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: Record review of the admission Record, printed 11/15/24, reflected Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a serious condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked, causing an area of dead brain tissue), extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance ( enzymes that make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 2 multi compartment sinks (Dishwashing Sink) reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not ensure the dishwashing sink was not leaking and used a food safe repair sealant. This failure could place the residents at risk of foodborne illness for consuming food washed in potentially contaminated water. Findings included: During an observation on 11/14/24 at 4:48 p.m. the dishwashing sink middle compartment used to rinse dishes was leaking water from the bottom onto the floor. The sink had a soft, yellowish substance, along the inside of the bottom of the right side of the sink. The sink could not hold water for longer than 5 minutes. During an interview on 11/14/24 at 5:00 p.m. the DS stated she was not sure what to call the yellowish substance in the sink, but it was used to repair a leak in the sink. The DS stated that they did not know if the sealant used was food safe. The DS stated she had discussed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse and neglect. 1. LVN B and the Administrator heard an allegation of physical and sexual abuse on behalf of Resident #2 and failed to report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for 2 person staff assistance with mechanical lift transfers. CNA C transferred Resident #1 by herself, with a mechanical lift, and caused Resident #1 transient head pain. Resident #1 was assessed as needing more than 1 staff assistance with all transfers. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The noncompliance began on 12/8/23 and ended on 12/11/23. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by neglecting to provide more than 1 staff assistance with mechanical lift transfers. The findings included: A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 10/10/2024 revealed an admission date of 03/10/2017 with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (a chronic brain disorder that causes movement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure LVN A used a sterile technique when flushing Resident #3's urinary catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for infection. The findings included: A record review of Resident #3's admission record revealed an admission date of 08/22/2023 with diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition when urine can't drain through the urinary tract, causing it to back up into the kidneys) and retention of urine. A record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Further review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with state and federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 4 medication carts (Medication cart #1) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the Medication cart in the public area was locked. This failure could place residents at risk of medication misuse and drug diversion. Findings include: During observation and interview on 9/21/24 at 11:42 am, Medication cart #1 was observed to be unlocked and unattended by the state investigator and RN A. There were no staff at the nurses' station and there were six residents sitting in the public area where the unlocked medication cart was located. RN A said the medication cart was not supposed to be unlocked. RN A further stated it was important the medication carts were locked because otherwise both residents and visitors had access to medications. During an interview on 9/21/24 at 4:26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or serious bodily injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to report an allegation of resident neglect regarding Resident #1's unwitnessed fall with major injury to the State Agency within the allotted time frame of 2 hours. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential neglect due to unreported allegations of neglect. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 07/26/2024, revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (damage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect resident's clinical records for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #1 & #5) reviewed for clinical records, in that: MA A failed to lock and disable access to Resident #1's electronic health record while he walked away from his medication cart. LVN B failed to lock and disable access to Resident #5's electronic health record while she walked away from her medication cart. This failure could affect residents by having their records viewed and accessed by unauthorized personnel and violate the HIPAA. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/15/2023, reflected an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 11/04/2023 and an admitting diagnosis of OTHER FORMS OF ACUTE ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (inadequate blood supply (circulation) to a local area due to blockage of the blood vessels supplying the area.) Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 11/15/2023, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #61, #82 and #40) observed for physical restraints in that: 1. The facility failed to obtain a consent for Resident #61 to wear a wander guard. 2. The facility failed to obtain a consent for Resident #82 to wear a wander guard. 3. The facility failed to obtain a consent for Resident #40 to wear a wander guard. This failure placed residents at risk of unnecessary restriction of their freedom of movement and diminished quality of life. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #61's face sheet, dated 09/21/23 documented a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure proper dating was used on dry and refrigerated items. 2. The facility failed to ensure dry food was stored in a proper container. 3. The facility failed to ensure there was paper towels at the hand washing sink. 4. The facility failed to ensure raw meat was thawed properly. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: 1. During an observation on 09/21/23 at 9:32 a.m. a bag of chocolate pudding was in inside of a plastic container with a label butterscotch pudding, Dated: 7/24-8/24. A box next to the plastic container of pudding read CHO PUDDING 06/08/23. No date was on the bag of chocolate pudding. A box of vanilla pudding read VAN PD 06/07/2023. A sticker label on the front of the box of vanilla pudding contained a bar code, item number, item name,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #76 and #43) reviewed for infection control practices, in that: 1. CNA C and RN D did not utilize appropriate hand hygiene during incontinent/peri care to Resident #76 2. LVN A placed a medication into the palm of her ungloved hand intended for Resident #43 These failures could place residents at risk of infection or a decline in health. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #76's face sheet, dated 9/22/23 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, lack of coordination and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible, for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #76) reviewed for perineal/incontinent care, in that: CNA C failed to clean between Resident #76's vaginal folds during incontinent/peri care This deficient practice could place residents at risk of increased urinary tract infections due to improper care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #76's face sheet, dated 9/22/23 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, lack of coordination and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should). Record review of Resident #76's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 6/23/23 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, and described in the plan of care for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #19, #80, #24, and #20) reviewed for nursing competencies, in that: LVN A failed to administer 7 medications outside of acceptable parameters for safe medication administration for Residents #19, #80, #24 and #20 and stored 2 medication cups with loose pills inside the medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving their medications, not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications and could contribute to possible adverse reactions. The findings included: Record review of the nursing competency dated 7/25/23 for LVN E revealed she had satisfied the requirements for medication administration that included executing the 5 rights of medication administration (right patient, right medication, right dose, right time, right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 32% based on 8 out of 25 opportunities, which involved 5 of 7 Residents (Residents #43, #19, #80, #24, and #20) reviewed for medication administration, in that: LVN A allowed Resident #43 to self-administer his inhaler without a physician's order or assessment and failed to administer 7 medications outside of acceptable parameters for safe medication administration for Residents #19, #80, #24 and #20. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications and could contribute to possible adverse reactions. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #43's face sheet, dated 9/21/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #19 and #24) observed during medication administration in that: LVN A failed to administer Resident #19's insulin and Resident #24's insulin and seizure medication as prescribed by the physician. These deficient practices placed residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 9/21/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] and 3/24/23 with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) with agitation, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and type 2 diabetes (a chronic, long-lasting health condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly, for 1 of 2 dumpsters in that: Dumpster #1 had the side door open with garbage items visible and garbage on the ground outside the dumpster. This deficient practice could place residents who reside at the facility at risk of unsanitary conditions that could result in the attraction of vermin and rodents and expose them to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents. The findings were: Observation on 09/22/23 at 9:50 a.m. revealed Dumpster #1 had a side door and a glove and mask behind the dumpster on the ground. During an Interview with the DM on 09/22/23 at 9:50 a.m. the DM stated the dumpster side door should be closed after use. The DM stated the entire facility staff has access to this dumpster and she normally makes sure it is closed. The DM stated it should be closed to keep rodents out of the dumpsters. During an Interview with Administrator on 09/22/23 at 5:17 p.m., the Administrator stated the dumpsters should not be open, all staff have access to them,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-02-27 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess each resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #42) of 8 residents reviewed for timely assessment, in that: The facility failed to complete Resident #42's quarterly MDS assessment by 2/6/26 This failure could lead to residents not receiving necessary, complete, or correct care due to lack of current information. The findings were: Record review of the admission Record, dated 2/26/26, reflected Resident #42 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (a condition in which plaque builds up in the coronary arteries that supply blood to the heart muscle, causing narrowing of the arteries without current chest pain symptoms), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (a disorder in which nerve damage or neurological impairment affects the bladder's ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 of 2 Dumpsters (Dumpster #1 and Dumpster #2) reviewed for disposal of garbage. The facility failed to ensure the waste in Dumpster #1 and Dumpster #2 was not leaking and staining the ground around the dumpsters. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents. The findings were: Observation on 11/13/24 at 12:56 p.m. revealed liquid was leaking from the bottom corner of Dumpster #1. There were large brown and reddish stains in front of either dumpster running down the drive way. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 1:00 p.m. the DS stated she had not noticed the stains from the dumpsters before but Dumpster #1 was leaking liquids on to the driveway. The DS stated she would let the MS know so he could power wash the driveway. During an interview on 11/15/24 at 4:53 p.m. the MS stated he had been power washing the driveway that was stained by the leaking dumpsters for an unknown amount of time. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MEDINA COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2014
BELL, BILLIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/03/2023
CASCADE HEALTH SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2014
CASCADE MEDINA HEALTH SERVICES, LTDOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2014
HANEY, RONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2014
DORROW, MARJORIEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2025
CASTROVILLE CARE CENTER, LTDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2014
GREGORY, PATRICEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/30/2020
HANEY, MAXIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2014
JAAFAR, SALEHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
KUBIK, DARLENEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 6%Other / private 34%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$225per resident / day
operating cost
$6,853per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$227per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675974. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next