Clarendon Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 58.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.50 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.52 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Resident #1 was left alone in the shower, fell, and was injured on 10/13/23. Resident #1 was coded as needing assistance by one staff person for bathing in his MDS completed 08/08/23. This failure could place residents requiring assistance with ADLs in danger of injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11-13-23 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes (insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), chronic congestive heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects the pumping action of the heart muscles resulting in shortness of breath and fatigue), personal history of cerebral infarction (stroke), major depressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical service to include accurate dispensing and administering of biologicals for 1 of 3 medication storage areas reviewed to meet the needs of each resident. The facility had 8 inulin medications expired according to the date documented on the bottle/pen of when it was opened. This failure could result in ineffective treatment resulting in exacerbation of residents' disease processes.Findings included: During an observation on [DATE] at 11:08 AM (with LVN A present) of the facility's medication room noted there were 8 insulins that revealed the following:2-Humulog insulin bottles marked with an open/accessed date of [DATE]. (opened 29 days prior to today's date)1-Novolog insulin bottle marked with an open/accessed date of [DATE]. (opened 46 days prior to today's date)1-Lantus insulin bottle marked with an open/accessed date of [DATE]. (opened 33 days prior to today's date)1-Novolog insulin bottle marked with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment requirement for 1 of 1 kitchen staff (Dietary Manager) reviewed for qualifications. The Dietary Manager failed to have the appropriate license, certification, or qualifications to function as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services since her start date in August 2025. This failure could place residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at increased risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition.Findings included: Record review of a current facility employee roster including hire date, indicated the DM's date of hire was 08/01/2025. During an interview on 01/13/26 at 9:05 AM, the ADS stated she had been employed at the facility since August 2025 and was hired as the DM and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated, freezer, and pantry items were properly stored, labeled, and dated.This failure could place residents at risk of food-borne illnesses. Findings included:Observation of the pantry on 01/13/26 at 9:10 AM revealed the following:1. (1) clear container that contained what looked like rice, no label or date.2. (1) clear container that contained what looked like flour, no label.3. (3) cans of vegetable soup - cans were dented.During an interview on 01/13/26 at 9:11 AM, the ADS stated that she puts dented cans in a separate area away from food storage. When shown the 3 cans of dented food on the pantry shelves, she immediately removed them from pantry. Observation of the freezer on 01/13/26 at 9:15 AM revealed the following:1. (1) can of lemonade, no label or date.2. (1) box of what looked to be frozen rolls,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #36) of 15 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36's MDS was accurately coded to reflect he received insulin. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #36's admission record dated 01/14/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, mild, with other behavioral disturbance (breakdown of thought process causing disruptive behavior), type 2 diabetes mellitus (inability to process sugar), Anxiety disorder (a group of mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry), major depressive disorder (mental illness causing sadness due to lack of chemicals in the brain that cause happiness) or (Persistent depressed mood), and cognitive communication deficit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 1 (Resident #34) of 15 residents reviewed for behavioral health services.The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's comprehensive care plan included goals and interventions addressing his documented diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of treatment and prevention to maintain resident safety.Findings included:Record review of Resident #34's face sheet dated 01/13/2026 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breath),anxiety disorder(feeling panic), bipolar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff; individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement; and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles for 4 out of 5 employees (LVN A, CNA B, CNA C and PTA) reviewed for required training. The facility failed to ensure staff were properly trained in Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Fall Prevention, HIV, Restraints, Emergency Procedures and Dementia for 4 of 5 employees (LVN A, CNA B, CNA C, and the PTA) reviewed for training at hire and annually. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care from individuals who did not have the knowledge and skills to properly provide safety from adverse events or other resident life and health complications. Findings included: Record review of employee records for LVN A reflected LVN A was hired at the facility on 03/18/2022 and had not received annual training through the facility on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Fall Prevention, HIV, Restraints, Emergency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0839 — isolated
  Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws for 1 of 2 CNAs (CNA C) reviewed for CNA certification. The facility failed to ensure CNA C's certification was current before allowing her to care for residents. CNA C worked in the facility providing resident care, on a full-time basis, with an expired certification for the months of February and [DATE]. This failure could place residents who received care from CNA C in medical jeopardy, which could lead to the decreased physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Findings included: On [DATE] record review of employee records revealed CNA C's certification expired on [DATE]. An interview with the BOM/HR on [DATE] at 3:27PM revealed she was not aware CNA C's certification had expired. She stated she thought it was the responsibility of CNA C, not herself, to ensure the certification was up to date. CNA C had been on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. The facility failed to label and date food in the refrigerator, freezer, and pantry. The facility failed to keep food in the refrigerator and freezer sealed. The facility failed to maintain cleanliness in the pantry. The facility failed to store all food at least 6 inches off the floor in the pantry. These failures could put residents at risk of food and pest borne illnesses. Findings Included: An observation of refrigerator 1 on 10/28/24 at 09:12 AM revealed the following: 1 clear plastic bag open to air containing what appeared to be lunch meat with no label or date. 1 square, opaque, plastic tub with a green lid containing what appeared to be jelly with no label or date. 1 box containing 6 sealed plastic bags of what appeared to be guacamole with brown spots throughout and a date printed on the plastic of 02/03/24. 1 square, opaque, plastic tub with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 (Resident #2, Resident #26, and Resident #39) of 15 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to perform quarterly safe smoking assessments on Resident #2, Resident #26, and Resident #39. These failures could place residents at risk of burns and/or injury. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #2's admission record dated 10/29/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration (a severe type of traumatic brain injury that occurs when the brain rapidly shifts inside the skull), lack of coordination, unspecified convulsions (a sudden, violent, irregular movement of a limb or of the body caused by involuntary contraction of the muscles and associated especially with brain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests for one of one facility reviewed for environment for 3 out of 3 days. -The facility failed to prevent an infestation of flies and gnats based on observations at varied times over a 3-day period from 10-28-2024 to 10-30-2024. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings include: During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/28/24 at 09:45 AM with no resident present, observed was a partially eaten tray of food in the room on a bedside table with a meal ticket dated Supper: Sunday 10-27-2024 with Salisbury steak, garlic mash potatoes, and green beans listed on the meal ticket with the noted corresponding food partially eaten on the tray. Also noted were multiple flies and gnats on the tray, curtain, wall, and bed. During an observation and interview on 10/28/24 at 10:00 AM revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,551 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $7,551 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-14 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $414K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX