Mitchell County Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 45.9 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 53% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of 7 of 20 confidential residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure staff were not on their personal cell phones while providing care, which included assisting residents with their showers. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth.Findings include: Interview at an undisclosed date and time revealed seven confidential residents stated the use of cell phones by CNAs while performing care made them feel ignored, not a priority, embarrassed, concerned the CNA could make a mistake due to distraction by the cell phone conversation, and, most of all, their privacy was violated. The seven confidential residents stated the use of cell phones by CNAs occurred on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care for 13 of 13 residents (Residents #1, #2, #20 and 10 confidential residents) reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The facility failed to record any documentation inviting Resident #1 or their representative to the care plan meetings. The facility failed to record any documentation inviting Resident #2 or their representative to the care plan meetings. The facility failed to record any documentation inviting Resident #20 or their representative to the care plan meetings. The facility failed to ensure 10 confidential residents of the facility were provided with prior notice to participate in their care plan meetings. These failures could place residents at risk of not being involved in their plan of care and having their needs met. The findings include:1. Record review of Resident #1's facesheet dated 2/5/2026 revealed a [AGE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the residents for 9 of 10 confidential residents reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to ensure 9 of 10 residents were provided, through postings in prominent locations, the Grievance Procedure, were provided information who the facility grievance official was, their contact information, how to file an anonymous grievance, and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. This failure could place residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings include: In Interviews and Record Review at an undisclosed date and time, 9 of 10 confidential residents stated they did not know they could file a Grievance anonymously, the Grievance procedure had never been discussed in Resident Council, and they had not observed a posting of the Grievance procedure in prominent locations. The residents stated they did not know where to acquire a grievance form, who to turn the form into, and what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of one kitchen. A. Resident #8, #11, #13, #32 voiced concerned of cold food, flavor and/or texture.B. Five of the 9 foods sampled on the meal tray were cold.C. One of the 9 foods sampled on the meal tray was mushy.D. One of the 9 foods sampled on the meal tray was sticky. E. One of the 9 foods sampled on the meal tray was chunky. These failures could affect the forms of food provided in the facility (regular, mechanical chopped and pureed) and could result in a decline in residents' consumption of food and residents to have unwanted weight loss. The findings included: On 04/26/2026 during initial tour of facility, four Residents (#8, #11, #13, #32) voiced concerns about the food. During an interview on 04/26/2026 at 1:22 PM, Resident #32 was asked how the food was and she responded by saying It is bad, I mean greasy, no seasoning, no taste, is cold, never hot. She stated the kitchen is horrible, they can't…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in facility 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1) The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator (x1), and freezer (x1), were labeled and stored in accordance with the professional standards for food service. 2) The facility failed to ensure the garbage can used for food waste was covered unless in use. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination.The findings included: During kitchen tour observations on 04/26/2026 that began at 10:39 a.m. and concluded at 11:09 a.m., revealed the following: Garbage can, next to food prepping table, was uncovered and not in use. Walk-in refrigerator revealed the following: -What resembled hamburger burns, and lettuce in different clear plastic bags, all with no use by date. Walk-in Freezer revealed the following: -What resembled chicken breast patty, mixed vegetable, and grilled chicken meat burgers in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #20) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 who was listed as DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), had an Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate form that did not have missed required information. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes honored and incomplete records.Findings include: Resident #20 Record review of Resident #20's, undated, face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #20 had diagnoses which included Dementia (irreversible that causes mental deterioration), Acute Kidney Failure (rapid loss of kidney function), and Type 2 Diabetes (high blood sugar). The face sheet indicated under the advance directive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a PRN order unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record; and PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days for 2 of 20 (Resident #21 and #40) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 was free from unnecessary anxiolytic medication (prescription drugs that treat anxiety disorder symptoms, such as fear, dread, and physical tension, by balancing brain chemicals or calming the nervous system ) and failed to ensure a PRN order for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety disorders) dated 9/19/2025 had a stop date and did not extend beyond 14 days. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 was free from unnecessary anxiolytic medication and failed to ensure a PRN order for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety disorders) dated 10/01/2024 had a stop date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 2 out of 4 residents (Resident #20 and Resident #1) observed for perineal care. 1. CNA A failed to change gloves or utilize hand hygiene prior to putting a clean brief under Resident #20. 2. CNA B failed to utilize hand hygiene prior to putting on a clean pair of gloves before assisting Resident #1 to stand to pull up her brief and pants. This failure could result in residents contracting infections or spreading infections to others by direct contact with contaminated surfaces. Findings include: Resident #20: Record review of Resident #20's facesheet dated 1/19/2024 revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Dementia (progressive decline in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to utilize the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week for 4 days out of 33 days (1/25/25, 1/26/25, 2/8/25 and 2/9/25) reviewed for nursing services. The facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was scheduled for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week on the following dates: 1/25/25, 1/26/25, 2/8/25 and 2/9/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care. Findings included: During an interview on 02/19/25 at 9:48 AM, RN B stated she was an RN. She said she worked every other weekend. As an RN, she had the ability to pronounce death. She stated they were also in the facility if the LVN needs guidance. She said there were times when an LVN may not be able to get a catheter in but will ask for assistance. During an interview on 02/19/25 at 10:27 AM, RN C stated occasionally, she worked the weekends. She stated she had not in a while, but if she did, she clocked in. She stated as an RN, she could pronounce death.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility must store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions, as required by the Texas Department of State Health Services food service sanitation requirements. in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure canned foods were not expired and dented. 2. The kitchen staff member failed to use proper hand washing while preparing eating utensils. 3. The facility failed to label and properly date foods. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: The following observations were made on 02/18/25 beginning at 09:07 AM during initial observation of the kitchen: Observed the following in the storage panty: 1. 1 can Sweetened Condensed milk (14 oz) with a dent. 2. 2 cans Velvet Evaporated milk; vitamin added (12 oz) dented 3. 4 boxes of Ritz crackers (3.4 oz.) with an expiration of 1/17/2025. 4. 3 bags (1 lbs.) of Fritos (chips) with an expiration date 1/14/2025. 5. 2 boxes of white chocolate pudding with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX