Columbus Oaks Healthcare Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 69.0 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.03 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-07-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #20) whose records were reviewed for pain management. LVN H/Treatment Nurse, failed to ensure Resident #20 received a PRN pain medication prior to wound care. LVN H/Treatment Nurse failed to stop wound treatment when Resident #20 was grimacing and quizzing in pain on 7/8/25. This failure could affect any resident with DTR's, surgical wounds and pressure ulcer experiencing pain and mental distress.[SP1] .Review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 7/7/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses cellulitis of right toe,) inflammation in your airways chronic obstructive pulmonary Disease cause breathing ( lung conditions that cause breathing difficulties), unspecified,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. - The facility failed to promptly identify skin redness to the peri area and buttocks, which had tiny openings on Resident #1, and failed to ensure interventions were implemented to treat and prevent skin deterioration. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay of care or treatment, pain, and suffering. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a 58 year - old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were non- pressure chronic ulcer buttock with unspecified severity, Cellulitis of buttock, dementia, and diabetes mellitus Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 00 revealed severely impaired cognitively. It further revealed the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 (Resident #5) reviewed for pharmaceutical services.-The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's medications on 01/13/2026 were documented as given during the night shift. -Resident #5 did not receive pain medication on 03/05/2026 at 8:00p.m. per physician orders.This failure could cause residents to have unnecessary and avoidable pain. Record review of Resident #5's medical records revealed, she was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar, dementia (declining brain function related to thinking and judgement that is severe enough to impact daily life), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement.-The facility failed to ensure residents' lunch was served at a safe temperature on 3/31/2026. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness and disease. In confidential interviews with residents in the facility, residents stated food was always cold when it arrived and they would prefer food to be warmer. Observation and interview with the Dietary Manager on 3/31/2026 at 12:30pm revealed, she took the temperature of the mixed vegetables consisting of peas and carrots which was 114.6F. The Dietary Manager brought a second bowl of mixed vegetables which she measured at 105.8F. The Dietary Manager said the temperature was not in range to be served to residents, the most the food temperature should have gone down to 135F holding temperature from the steam table to when it got to residents. The Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) observed for infection control.-The facility failed to ensure CNA GG washed her hands or used hand sanitizer after doffing gloves during incontinent care observation on 3/31/26.These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 04/01/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old female was admitted on [DATE] and diagnoses include Alzheimer's disease (is a progressive neuro degenerative disorder that causes disorientation and behavioral changes, and obstructs memory, thinking and judgment), shortness of breath, hypotension (low blood pressure) and muscle wasting and atrophyRecord Review of Resident's #4's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #20 and Resident #74) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure TX Nurse used the required PPE for Resident #20, who was on enhanced barrier precautions on 7/8/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA RS used the required PPE for Resident #74, who was on enhanced barrier precautions. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection.1.Record review of Resident #74's face sheet reflected an admission date of 01/17/25. Resident #74's diagnoses included essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure) , hypothyroidism,( low thyroid hormones to meet the needs of the body), dementia ( problem with memory, thinking and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to encode a resident's assessment within 7 days and complete and electronically transmit a resident's completed discharge MDS within 14 days for 2 ((Residents #36 and #67) of 2 residents reviewed for MDS transmittal.-Resident #36 passed away 3/8/2025 and Resident #67 passed away 4/11/2025 and their discharge MDS' were not encoded within 7 days after death and were not transmitted within 14 days after death. This failure could cause a resident's significant change such as their MDS to not be accurately reflected in their medical records. Record review of Resident #36's face sheet last updated 07/092025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including gout ( a form of arthritis affecting the joints), hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia (decline in cognitive function with symptoms including forgetfulness and limited social skills), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory , thinking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one (Resident #6) out of eight residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide skin care to Resident #6 which resulted in patches and dry flaky skin from below the knee to her feet. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of skin breakdown and reduced feelings of self-worth.Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 07/08/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included, hypertension (when the pressure in the blood vessels is too high), heart failure (heart is not pumping blood as effective as it should) and dementia (decline in mental ability, severe enough to interfere with daily life, affecting thinking, and reasoning)Record review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA G cleaned Resident #11 properly during incontinent care on 7/8/25. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection and hospitalization. Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 7/7/25 reflected date of admission was 4/8/22 and re admitted on [DATE]. Resident #11's diagnoses included history of transient ischemic attack (tia)mild stroke) cerebral infarction ( stroke), unspecified, unspecified atrial fibrillation ( heart beating too fast), essential (primary) hypertension( high blood pressure), hypothyroidism ( thyroid gland isn't producing enough thyroid hormones), unspecified, edema, unspecified, hemiplegia and hemiparesis( weakness to one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and must provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #41) of 5 residents reviewed for accurate documentation and pharmaceutical services. -Resident #41 was documented as receiving his Invega suspension prefilled syringe for his bipolar disorder on 7/4/2025 when he did not receive the medication. The medication was not in the building. This failure could put residents at risk of not receiving the needed treatments they need to promote their mental and physical well-being. Record review of Resident #41's face sheet last captured 7/9/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater for. There were 2 errors out of 29 opportunities, which resulted in a 6 percent error rate involving Resident #28 and Resident #39 observed for medication pass in that: -Medication Aide FF did not administer Resident #28 Tylenol ES as ordered by the Physician.-Medication Aide RR did not check Resident #39's blood pressure prior to administering blood pressure medication hydralazine 10 mg 2 tablets by mouth.These failures placed residents at risk for increase pain and decrease in quality of life. Resident #28Record review of Resident #28's face sheet dated 07/07/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using for energy) with diabetic chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in which narrow blood vessels…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that its residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1(Resident #39) 7 residents reviewed for significant medication errors.-Medication Aide RR did not check Resident #39's blood pressure prior to administering blood pressure medication hydralazine 10 mg 2 tablets by mouth.This failure placed residents at risk for dangerous drop in blood pressure, organ damage, increase risk of falls, and hospitalization.Record review of Resident #39's face sheet dated 07/07/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 07/03/25. Resident's diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure) and urinary retention (difficulty urinating and completely emptying the bladder).Record review of Resident #39's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 indicating that resident cognition was intact. Further review section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) reflected that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,412 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,412 — penalty dated 2025-07-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX