San Rafael Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
3050 Sunnybrook Rd., Corpus Christi, TX 78415 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 168 certified beds · (361) 853-9981 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $43,802 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-27)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.1% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.5% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.7% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.3% | 98.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.4% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 45.2% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.0% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.3% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.96 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.84 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 38.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.2–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 38.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 4.3–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.38 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 168 beds and averages 113.0 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.13 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure menus met the needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines for 1 (R#1) of 4 residents reviewed for pureed diets.The facility provided R#1 with a whole hot dog when R#1 required a puree diet, leading to a choking incident on 10/16/25 that required the use of the Heimlich maneuver and resulted in anoxic brain injury. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 10/16/25 and ended on 10/17/25. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began.This failure could place residents that require specialized diets at risk of choking, hospitalization, and death.Record review of the Resident #1's admission Record dated 10/22/25 revealed Resident #1 was a 66year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 was admitted with multiple diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia with agitation (a cognitive disorder that causes a gradual decline in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and/or hazards as possible for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision, accidents, and hazards. The facility failed to keep Resident #1 free from accident and/or hazards when she fell on [DATE] which caused her to sustain a left hip fracture by not providing the necessary monitoring and supervision for Resident #1 with known history of behaviors of wandering into other resident rooms. The three staff assigned to supervise the secure unit were at the nurse's station distracted and engaged in personal conversation when Resident #1 wandered out of her room and into another resident's room. An IJ was identified on 08/20/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:22 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/21/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision while Resident #1 eloped from the facility at night. This failure could place residents requiring supervision at risk for injury and accidents with potential for more than minimal harm. The noncompliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The IJ began on 12/18/23 and ended on 12/18/2023. Verifcation of corrections ended on 12/22/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (brain condition that causes a progressive decline in memory, thinking, learning, and organizing skills), Dementia (cognitive decline in a person's ability to perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to enforce the post-fall assessment policy leading to Resident #1 being moved from the floor to her wheelchair, and from her wheelchair to her bed after a fall while having severe pain and an obvious hip and leg deformity. The failure could affect residents currently residing in the facility, resulting in them not receiving the needed care to maintain optimal health and placing them at risk for injury or deterioration in their condition. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/31/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 01/12/23 and a current admission date of 06/05/25. Pertinent diagnoses included Displaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of Left Femur (a common hip fracture which occurs in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for four of 27 residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #47, and Resident #123) reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to hold Resident #1's midodrine (blood pressure medication) when Resident #1's blood pressure was outside of physician's parameters on May 6th, 13th, 14th, and 21st of 2026.The facility failed to hold Resident #3's Midodrine when Resident #3's blood pressure was outside of the physician's parameters on May 5th, May 6th, May 7th, May 8th, May 10th, May 13th, May 18th, May 20th, May 21st, May 22nd, May 23rd, May 24th, May 26th, May 27th, and May 28th.The facility failed to hold Resident #123's midodrine when Resident #123's blood pressure was outside of physician's parameters on May 23rd, 25th, 26th and 28th of 2026.The facility failed to hold Resident #47's midodrine when Resident #47's blood pressure was outside of physician's parameters on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 8 medication carts (Nurse Cart 1 and Nurse Cart 2) and 2 of 2 supply rooms (nurses' supply room and general supply room) reviewed for storage. The facility failed to keep medication carts free from expired supplies and unnecessary food/drink items. Nurse Cart 2 contained LVN C's personal items, drinks, and snacks at 3:25 PM on 05/27/26. Nurse Cart 1 contained expired COVID tests at 3:53 PM on 05/27/26.The facility failed to keep the nurses' supply room and the general supply room free from expired supplies. The failure could place residents in the facility at risk of receiving treatment from expired supplies and contamination of medications.Findings included:1. During an observation at 3:25 PM on 05/27/26, a bottle of soda was found in the drawer of Nurse Cart 2. Further observation revealed one small bag full of pens and another larger bag with an unopened granola bar snack inside in another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed and 1 of 1 nutrition rooms for storage, preparation, and sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen followed their cleaning schedules and the floor was slick. 2. The facility failed to ensure the ice cream freezer was clean and defrosted. 3. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean and the door closed properly. 4. The facility failed to ensure the oven doors and the area behind the oven were clean. 5. The facility failed to ensure there were no personal items in refrigerator B. 6. The facility failed to ensure the handwashing sink and paper towels functioned properly. 7. The facility failed to ensure the steam table wells were clean. 8. The facility failed to ensure boxes of product were at least 18 inches from the ceiling in the walk-in freezer. 9. The facility failed to ensure food items in the walk-in freezer were sealed properly. 10. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for documentation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47's blood pressures were documented on 13 separate occasions for May 2026. This failure could place residents at risk for errors in care and treatment and not receiving the services needed to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #47's face sheet dated 05/28/26 indicated a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Disease (condition affecting blood flow and blood vessels in the brain), Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), Hypotension (low blood pressure). Record review of Resident #47's May 2026 physician order summary report indicated Midodrine (used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 dining rooms reviewed, and 1 of 5 residents (Resident #127) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure CNA-F performed proper or adequate hand hygiene while assisting with dining on 05/26/2026.The facility failed to ensure CNA-F did not wipe her nose on her hand while assisting with dining on 05/26/2026.The facility failed to ensure CNA-F correctly passed cups while assisting with dining on 05/26/2026. The facility failed to ensure the CNA-G performed proper or adequate hand hygiene during wound care on 05/27/2026.The facility failed to ensure CNA-G did not place a dirty heel protector over Resident #127's CDI wound dressing during wound care on 05/27/2026. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so the facility is free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 kitchen, 1 of 3 medication storage rooms (100 hall), and 2 of 20 resident rooms (Resident #4 and Resident #92) reviewed for pests.The facility failed to have pest control effectively treat the kitchen for roaches.The facility failed to ensure effective pest control for the medication room on the 100-hallThe facility failed to ensure pest control effectively treated the rooms of Resident #4 and #92 from roaches.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of exposure to pests, diseases, infections, and diminished quality of life.Findings included: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so the facility is free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 kitchen, 1 of 3 medication storage rooms (100 hall), and two resident rooms (Resident #4 and Resident #92)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for each resident consistent with resident rights to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #75) out of 5 residents reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to review or revise Resident #2's care plan to include all smoking related privileges, restrictions, and concerns.The facility failed to review or revise Resident #75's care plan to include all smoking related privileges, restrictions, and concerns.These failures could place residents at risk for receiving inadequate care and services.The findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 05/28/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 02/22/2022 and a current admission date of 092025. Diagnoses included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (paralysis or weakness to one side of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented within a timely manner for each resident consistent with resident rights to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 residents (Resident #17 and Resident #9) of 5 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented after starting anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication on 05/29/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's care plan was revised to accurately reflect the most current anti-anxiety medication status. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services, and the implementation of a personalized plan of care to address their specific needs. Findings included:1.Record review of Resident #9's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the director of nursing did not serve as a charge nurse when the facility had an average daily occupancy of 60 or higher for 4 days (08/03/25, 08/11/25, 09/08/25, and 09/14/25) reviewed for DON staffing in the last 2 months. The facility failed to ensure the DON did not work as a charge nurse for 4 different shifts in August and September 2025 while the average census was above 60. This failure could lead to dividing the DON's attention, preventing them from performing duties assigned to the DON leading to possible harm to a resident. The findings included:Record review of the daily clinical staff schedules revealed the DON was scheduled to work as charge nurse from 2:00 PM - 6:00 PM on 08/03/25 in the 100 hall, 6:00 AM - 6:00 PM on 08/11/25 in the 300 hall, 6:00 AM - 6:00 PM on 09/08/25 in the 100 hall, and 6:00 AM - 6:00 PM on 09/14/25 in the 300 hall. Record review of the resident census data from the facility revealed the daily census for 08/03/25 was 118, 08/11/25 was 121, 09/08/2025 was 116, and 09/14/25 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #16) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to administer Resident #2's Clonidine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) per the prescribed order and blood pressure parameters in June of 2025. 2. The facility failed to administer Resident #16's Clonidine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) per the prescribed order and blood pressure parameters in September of 2025. These failures could place residents at risk for complications and jeopardize their health and safety. Findings Included: 1.Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 09/25/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 04/22/2025, and a current admission date of 09/05/2025. Pertinent diagnosis included Essential Primary Hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were accurately documented for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2,and Resident #16) of 5 residents reviewed for medical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's vital signs were accurately documented in the MAR on 08/15/25.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's blood pressure was accurately documented in the MAR during the month of September 2025.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's blood pressure was accurately documented for the month of September 2025. These failures could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings included:1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/25/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 11/03/23. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease (when the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), hypertension (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for one resident (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for skin irregularities. When Resident #5 was readmitted into the facility on [DATE], LVN E failed to complete a thorough and accurate head-to-toe assessment that included assessing what was under Resident #5's right arm dressing/bandage. This failure could compromise a resident's skin integrity, which could increase the risk for progressive skin complications. Record review of the Resident #5's admission Record dated 10/24/2025 revealed Resident # 5 was a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #5 was admitted with multiple diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle wasting and atrophy, intellectual disabilities, hemiplegia (paralysis of a limb) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access for 1 of 2 wound treatment carts on hall 100 reviewed for storage.The 100 hall wound care treatment cart was found unlocked.This failure could place residents at risk of access and ingestion of medications or supplies not intended for them and/or misappropriation. Findings were:Observation on 10/21/2025, at 11:24 a.m., a wound care treatment cart was found unlocked in front of the 100 hall nursing station. The observation of items inside the wound care cart included: betadine solution, hydrogen peroxide, triple antibiotic ointment, nystatin cream, diclofenac sodium gel, iodoform packing strips, lidocaine cream, and a variety of bandages used for wound care treatment.During an interview on 10/21/2025 at 11:30 a.m., LVN A verbalized the treatment cart was an extra cart and was not assigned to any staff member. LVN A verbalized she was unsure who used the cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice, that were complete and accurately documented, for one resident (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for total body skin assessment documentation. 1. When Resident #5 was readmitted into the facility on [DATE], LVN E failed to document a bandage on Resident #5's forearm/elbow area. 2. When Resident #5's skin irregularity was assessed on 09/25/2025, LVN F failed to document and detail the right arm skin impairment. These failures could affect residents who require care and monitoring and place them at risk of not receiving the care and services to meet their needs. Record review of the Resident #5's admission Record dated 10/24/2025 revealed Resident # 5 was a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #5 was admitted with multiple diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle wasting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately to the appropriate State Agency, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #1's fall with a major injury on 06/01/25 in which Resident #1 sustained a left hip fracture. State Agency was not notified of the fall with injury. This failure could result in placing residents at increased risk for not receiving a proper or thorough investigation. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/31/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 01/12/23 and a current admission date of 06/05/25. Pertinent diagnoses included Displaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of Left Femur (a common hip fracture which occurs in the upper part of the femur which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and measures were taken to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment in accordance with State law, and if the alleged violation was verified appropriate, corrective action must have been taken for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and/or misappropriation. The facility failed to do a thorough investigation to include interviewing Resident #1, as well as other residents or staff which may have been involved in or witnessed the incident. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their allegations investigated thoroughly or timely. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/31/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 01/12/23 and a current admission date of 06/05/25. Pertinent diagnoses included Displaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of Left Femur (a common hip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed and 2 of 2 nutrition rooms for storage, preparation, and sanitation. The facility failed to use internal thermometers in 2 freezers. The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of shelves, the ice machine, coffee cups, and microwave oven throughout the kitchen. The facility failed to follow a proper cleaning schedule. The facility failed to ensure kitchen utensils were in good working order. The facility failed to ensure dented holding pans were not in use and on the clean rack. The facility failed to ensure the dumpster side doors were kept closed. The facility failed to ensure all containers of food in the refrigerator was labeled. The facility failed to ensure boxes of food were not stacked too close to the ceiling in the walk-in refrigerator. The facility failed to ensure personal items were not on the shelves with dry storage items and canned goods. The facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for pests. The facility failed to have pest control effectively treat the kitchen for roaches. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of exposure to pests, diseases, infections, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation and initial tour of the kitchen with the DM on 03/04/25 at 8:35 am revealed there were roaches in the upper mechanical part of the ice machine. She opened the upper part of the ice machine, and a roach ran across the opening, then several more roaches emerged from under the front edging. She said the roaches could carry diseases and could make the residents sick. In an interview with the DM on 03/04/25 at 8:45 am, she said the process for reporting equipment that needed to be repaired or replaced was for her to place the request in the facility's electronic reporting system, the MS received a text, and all requests were discussed in the daily morning meetings. Observation and re-visit to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 8 (Resident #75 and Resident #110) residents reviewed for accurate procedures for medication administration. 1a. The facility failed to ensure LVN C checked and/or documented an accurate blood pressure for Resident #75 before administering Resident #75's blood pressure decreasing medication that had physician ordered hold parameters on 5 of 12 opportunities from 02/01/25 to 03/04/25. 1b. The facility failed to ensure LVN I checked and/or documented an accurate blood pressure for Resident #75 before administering Resident #75's blood pressure decreasing medication that had physician ordered hold parameters on 10 of 11 opportunities from 02/01/25 to 03/04/25. 2a. The facility failed to ensure LVN E checked and/or documented an accurate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 (Resident #16, Resident #34, Resident #75, Resident #83, Resident #88) of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN C sanitized the blood pressure cuff between use on Resident #83, Resident #88, Resident #34, Resident #75, and Resident #16 on 03/06/25. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development or spread of infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #83's admission record reflected a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an original admission date of 01/19/23. Resident #83's diagnoses included unspecified meningitis (inflammation of the tissues surrounding the brain and spinal cord usually caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge, and the reasons for the transfer or discharge, in writing to the resident, resident representative, or the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman as soon as practicable before transfer or discharge when an immediate transfer or discharge was required for urgent medical needs for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #24 and Resident #66) reviewed for transfer and/or discharge. The facility failed to send written notice of transfer or discharge of Resident #24 ' s transfer on 01/28/25, and Resident #66 ' s transfer on 01/25/25. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available resources, advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and the appeal processes. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #24 ' s face sheet dated 03/06/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 02/15/19, and a current admission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and describes the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #43) of 5 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #43 ' s care plan to include oxygen therapy. This failure could affect the resident by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: In an observation on 03/04/2025 at 11:00 AM of Resident #43, revealed he did not have any oxygen on, and there was no oxygen concentrator, tubing or other equipment in his room. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of five residents (Resident #103) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure floor mats were in place beside Resident #103 ' s right side of the bed. This failure could place residents at risk for an injury or a major injury. The findings include: Record review of Resident #103 face sheet, dated 03/05/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #103 had a diagnosis which included Benign Paroxysmal Vertigo (a feeling of spinning), Unspecified Ear. Record review of Resident #103's Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated she had Cerebrovascular accident (stroke), muscle wasting and other lack of coordination. The assessment indicated Resident #103's brief interview of mental status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, physicians orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 3 (Resident #7) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's oxygen concentrator administered oxygen at the correct setting of 2 liters per minute. Resident #7's oxygen concentrator was set at 3 liters per minute on 03/04/2025 at 8:33 AM and at 4:55 PM. This failure places residents who receive respiratory care at an increased risk of developing respiratory complications, and a decreased quality of care. The findings included: Resident #7's face sheet dated 03/04/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #7 had a diagnosis which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (a common lung disease causing restrictive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to dispose of expired biologicals in 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for storage. The facility failed to discard 19 expired swab kits in the 100-hall medication room. The facility failed to discard an expired enteral feeding tube de-clogger device in the 200-hall medication room. These failures could place residents at risk of infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation of the 100 hall medication room on [DATE] at 8:32 AM revealed expired medication and specimen swabs: 1 glucagon pen (emergency use for low blood sugar) expired [DATE]. 1 urine-vaginal-STI (sexual transmitted infection) expired [DATE]. 1 wound swab kit expired [DATE]. 4 buccal (mouth) swab kits expired [DATE]. 2 vaginal swab kits expired [DATE]. 3 vaginal swab kits expired [DATE]. 7 wound/tissue swab kits expired [DATE]. Observation of the 200 hall medication room on [DATE] at 8:37 AM revealed 1 enteral feeding tube de-clogger expired [DATE]. In an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility must employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment for 1 of 5 (RD) qualified dietary staff reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the registered dietician (RD) attended weekly weight meetings. This failure could affect residents who ate food from the kitchen and could result in the dietary needs of residents not being met. The findings included: In an interview with the ADON F on 03/06/25 at 1:52 pm, she said the RD was supposed to visit the facility weekly for weekly weight meetings but came in primarily for monthly meetings. She said the monthly meetings included the RD, ADONs, DM, wound care nurse, the DOR, and the DON. She said the RD did not call in to attend the weekly meetings. She said the RD would often miss meetings. She said dietary was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 8 residents (R #75) reviewed for accuracy of records. -The facility failed to ensure LVN C checked and/or documented an accurate blood pressure for Resident #75 before administering Resident #75's blood pressure decreasing medication that had physician ordered hold parameters on 5 of 12 opportunities from 02/01/25 to 03/04/25. -The facility failed to ensure LVN I checked and/or documented an accurate blood pressure for Resident #75 before administering Resident #75's blood pressure decreasing medication that had physician ordered hold parameters on 10 of 11 opportunities from 02/01/25 to 03/04/25. -The facility failed to ensure LVN I did not document a blood pressure reading for Resident #75 when he was not given his blood pressure medication due to being out of the facility on 2 of 2 opportunities from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and sanitary environment for 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to maintain an electrical outlet, lighting fixture, and two AC ducts from dripping water and water damage in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for exposure to an unclean, unsanitary environment, risk of falls and other injuries due to an unsafe environment. The findings included: Observation and initial tour of the kitchen on 03/04/25 at 8:35 am revealed there was an electrical conduit box and a lighting fixture in the ceiling above the stove that were dripping water. The nearby AC return was dripping water. Observation and re-visit to the kitchen on 03/05/25 at 9:15 am revealed the AC return on the ceiling of the DM's office appeared to have water damage to the sheetrock around the frame, which was swollen and gaping open. In an interview and observation with the MS on 03/04/25 at 8:55 am, he said the leak around the electrical conduit, AC return, and lighting fixture had been dripping condensation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure administration of narcotic medication was accurately documented in the electronic medication administration record when Resident #3 received Lorazepam (a controlled medication [benzodiazepine] used to relieve symptoms of anxiety) 9 times between 01/10/25 and 01/13/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure administration of narcotic medication was accurately documented in the electronic medication administration record when Resident #3 received Tramadol (a schedule IV controlled opioid medication used to treat pain) 2 times between 01/10/25 and 01/11/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure administration of narcotic medication was accurately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for two of five residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse. On 09/28/24, Resident #2 pushed Resident #1 backward. Resident #1 tripped, then fell and hit the back of her head on the floor which resulted in a hematoma (swelling) to the back of her head. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and physical, mental, and psychosocial harm. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (several diseases that affect memory, thinking, and the ability to perform daily activities, Alzheimer's (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), blindness left eye, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of Resident #3's lorazepam (a controlled medication [benzodiazepine] used to relieve symptoms of anxiety) and Tramadol (a schedule IV controlled opioid medication used to treat pain) tablets. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving prescribed medications which could lead to physical, mental, or psychosocial harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission record reflected an [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnosed which included dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, fear, or nervousness that are strong enough to interfere with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 resident's (Residents #1) reviewed for accidents/supervision in that: CNA B failed to have a second staff assist her with care for Resident #1 and Resident was left unattended and rolled off her bed during incontinent care on 06/12/24. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries related to falls. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 06/16/21 documented a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including Cerebral Palsy (abnormal brain development that affect's a person's ability to control their muscles), muscle wasting, Parkinson's (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), seizures, Alzheimer's, heart failure, and mild intellectual disabilities. She was her own self representative. Record review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored behind a closed and locked door in a secured unit (Hall 300) in one of 3 medication rooms. The medication door was left open on hall 300.This failure could place residents at risk of access and ingestion of medication in the medication room. Findings were: Observation on 1/8/2025, at 4:23 p.m., revealed the medication room door was open and unlocked. The medication door was unlocked for 5 minutes until LVN A exited a room and returned to the nurses station (medication room door located inside of nurses ' station). The refrigerator door was locked, and the discontinued tub of medications were locked. No medication was immediately accessible including over the counter medications without a key to the refrigerator and the tub of medications. During an interview on 1/8/2025 at 4:28 p.m., LVN A verbalized she was in a room helping a resident with sit to stand equipment. She verbalized she thought she shut and locked the door of the medication room before leaving the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one of one residents reviewed for call lights. The facility did not ensure Resident #1's call light was with in reach. This failure could place residents at risk for illness due to cross contamination in the kitchen and left a resident without access to staff and at risk for falling. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 9/4/2024 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and hemiparesis of the left side following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side (a stroke causing weakness or total paralysis of the left side of the body), Vascular Dementia (a progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking), lack of coordination, and abnormalities of gait and ambulation (walking). Review of a quarterly MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for one of one kitchens reviewed for safety. The kitchen vent was drpiping condensation from the ceiling to the surface beneath the area creating slipping hazards and possible contamination during food prepartation. This failure could place residents at risk for illness due to cross contamination in the kitchen and left a resident without access to staff and at risk for falling. Findings included: Observation and interview on 9/4/2024 at 11:51 am, revealed the kitchen area the ceiling ventilation was dripping onto the floor space very near a table. During the interview of the Kitchen Manager, she stated I didn't notice it was dripping, but there is no cross contamination due to the water not being directly over the food preparation area. The Kitchen Manager also stated, all residents are served out of the kitchen except one resident that has a feeding tube. During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 9/5/2024 at 3:00 pm, he stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records accuracy, in that: Resident #1's clinical record was incomplete. Staff did not document Residents #1's fall that occurred on 06/21/24 in the shower room. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care, and treatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/30/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of body) and hemiparesis (weakness to one side of body) following cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke -occurs when the blood flow to brain is disrupted) affecting left dominant side. Record review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for one of one facility reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure resident rooms were safe and in good repair 2. The facility failed to ensure the smoking area had self-closing lids for discarded cigarette butts 3. The facility failed to ensure the maintenance log work orders were fulfilled before signing off 4. The facility failed to ensure resident closet ceilings and hallways were safe and in good repair These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings included: Observations of the facility and hall 300 (locked unit) beginning on 06/04/24 at 10:00 am revealed the side lobby, employee restroom, and the 300 Hall including the activity area, rooms 304-316 revealed what appeared to be water damage in almost every resident's closet near the baseboards, as the sheetrock was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, within two hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury for 1 residents (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility did not report the allegation of resident neglect to the State Survey Agency within the allotted time frame for Resident #1 who had eloped from the facility on 12/18/2023. This failure could place all residents at risk for injuries, abuse, and/or neglect due to not reporting or completing investigations of elopements. Findings included : Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (brain condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure dishes were clean and sanitized 2. The facility failed to ensure equipment was clean and sanitized 3. The facility failed to ensure food in the freezer was properly contained 4. The facility failed to ensure dry storage items and spices were sealed properly 5. The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of the floor in the kitchen 6. The facility failed to properly label and date items in the refrigerator These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen beginning 12/11/23 at 10:20 a.m. revealed 17 of 36 plastic bowls, 14 of 25 plastic coffee cups, and 10 of 10 plastic drinking glasses had a whitish residue in them, some heavier than others. The ice machine had a removable dark…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain all equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safe operating equipment: 1. Bowls, cups, and glasses had whitish residue in them 2. The vent hood manifolds were rusted 3. Two freezers were inoperable These failures could place residents and staff at risk of foodborne illnesses and injury. Findings included: Observation of the kitchen beginning 12/11/23 at 10:20 a.m. revealed 17 of 36 plastic bowls, 14 of 25 plastic coffee cups, and 10 of 10 plastic drinking glasses with a whitish residue in them, some heavier than others. The vent hood manifolds were badly rusted. Two large freezers were unplugged and not operating. Both of the freezers were warm inside and had an odor. Interview with the CFM on 12/11/23 at 10:25 a.m. during the initial tour of the kitchen stated parts had been ordered for the freezers and she had invoices for them. The CFM stated one of the freezers went out a month ago and the other one, 2 weeks later, and she took them both out of service, leaving two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, for 4 residents Resident # 83 (R#83), Resident #35 (R#35), Resident #414 (R#414 ), Resident #49 (R#49) of 10 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility staff did not provide R#83, R#35, R#414, R#49 with a call light that was within reach. This failure could place residents who utilized call lights at risk for not having their needs met. Findings included: R #83: Review of R #83's Face Sheet dated 12/14/23 documented a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Cerebral Palsy, Unspecified and Chronic Kidney Disease, Unspecified. Review of R #83's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed R #83: -required extensive assistance with two-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene -had impairment on both sides of lower extremity (hip, knee,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 33 residents (Residents 57 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 109 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 24 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 88 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 15 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 64 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 103 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 6 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 19 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 26 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 16 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 25 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 106(room [ROOM NUMBER]), 56 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 41 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 27 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 52 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 21 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 230 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 40 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 60 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 73 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 82 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 37 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 34 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 8 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 32 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 55 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 39 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 51 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 99 (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 107(room [ROOM NUMBER]) and 102(room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 41 residents residing in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was as free of accident hazards as is possible, on the 100 hall, for 1 of 3 shower rooms observed for hazards. The facility failed to secure the shower room door and securely store chemicals to keep out of reach from any resident that resided within the first-floor unit. These failures could place residents at risk for accidental poisonous hazards. The finding include: During an observation on 12/12/2023 at 8:34AM, Observed a 100 hall shower room and door slightly opened, and upon further inspection on the left side of the slightly opened door, observed a sign that stated shower room. Through the door opening a visible red/white tubing was observed. To proceed with further inspection, this surveyor retrieved ADON and inquired if the door was opened, to which he responded by physically pushing the entry shower room door. On a shelf to the left of the room, was a red/white tube with a label of All-purpose Caulk: Use on tubs, sinks, windows, trim and more. Warning! May cause eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were 2 errors out of 25 opportunities which resulted in an 8 percent error rate involving Resident #1. 1. LVN A administered another resident's IV Vancomycin 1gram/250mL normal saline to Resident #1. The name on the Vancomycin IV medication bulb label had another person's name the label which was not Resident #1's name. 2. CMA A did not follow the physician's order to hold medication if the blood pressure was less than 110/60 mmHg. Resident #1's blood pressure was 107/77 mmHg, and CMA A administered Resident #1's Metoprolol Tartrate 25mg tablet. These failures could affect residents that are sensitive to cardiac medication which could lower blood pressure which could lead to life-threatening outcomes, as well as affect residents who are not on Vancomycin by damaging their kidney function. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/11/2023, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for significant medication errors, was administered his medication as per his physician's order. The facility did not carry out Physician's Orders to hold Resident#1's Metoprolol Tartrate 25mg tablet for blood pressure less than 110/60mmHg. This failure could affect multiple residents who reside in the facility who are taking blood pressure medication by causing a decline in their quality of care and quality of life due to not only the lack of competent blood pressure monitoring but also the lack of adherence to physician's orders. The findings were : Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/11/2023, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (bone infection), sepsis (infection), and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection. Record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #1: -had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the wound care nurse (LVN B) had the specific competencies and skills sets necessary to care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #101) that required wound care. 1.LVN B did not provide wound care for Resident #101 for 2 days but documented wound was provided.Resident #101's physician orders stated wound care be performed every day and as needed. This deficient practice could place residents requiring wound care at risk for adverse effects and have the potential to result in the development of infection, sepsis, and pain. The Findings: Review of the clinical record for Resident #101 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission original date of 6/28/2023 and a readmission dated of 11/8/2023. Diagnoses included, type 2 diabetes (insufficient production of insulin in the body), end stage renal (kidney) disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue, skin graft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for one Resident (R #1) of six residents reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to update R #1's care plan to include history of fabricating stories, as well as failed to update R#1's care plan to reflect actual event that transpired on 11/12/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their needs met and psychosocial complications. The findings included: Record review of R #1's Face Sheet dated 11/26/2023 documented an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with the diagnoses of: cerebral infarction, dementia, encephalopathy, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record review of R #1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented R #1: -BIMS score 07 out of 15 revealing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters, in that: CNA A did not ensure Resident #1's indwelling catheter tubing was allowed to flow freely via gravity drainage. Resident #1's catheter bag was incorrectly positioned on top of the resident's bed, which was situated above the resident's bladder for an undetermined amount of time, during the entire duration of cleaning care. These failures could place residents with indwelling urinary catheters at risk of infection. The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 10/06/2023, documented a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted [DATE], with readmission date 09/22/2023, with the diagnoses of: Cerebral palsy (disorder that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture), Neurocognitive disorder (damage of the brain),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and services were provided to prevent accident hazards for 1 of 5 resident reviewed for accidents, Resident #1 (R #1) in that: The facility failed to recognize a trapeze bar hanging above resident's bed installed by a family member without consent from facility. The device was attached to the resident's bed overnight from 6/23/23 until morning of 6/24/23. The trapeze equipment fell onto R #1 when he was adjusting himself in bed which resulted in R #1 sustaining a serious injury of a left tibia and fibula fracture and concussion. This failure of identifying and preventing the installment and use of unapproved medical equipment could lead serious injury. The findings included: Record review of R#1 clinical file revealed a [AGE] year-old male, with an original admission date of 1/17/2023. Diagnosis included Paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body, typically caused by spinal injury or disease), Fracture of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all essential equipment is maintained in safe operating condition for 1 (Resident #1/R #1) of 5 residents reviewed for maintenance of medical equipment, in that: The facility failed to recognize a trapeze bar hanging above resident's bed installed by family member without consent from facility. The device was attached to the resident's bed overnight from 6/23/23 until morning of 6/24/23. The trapeze equipment fell onto R #1 when he was adjusting himself in bed which resulted in R #1 sustaining a serious injury of a left tibia and fibula fracture and concussion. This failure of identifying and preventing the installment and maintenance of unapproved medical equipment could lead serious injury for residents requiring medical equipment. The findings included: Record review of R#1 clinical file revealed a [AGE] year-old male, with an original admission date of 1/17/2023. Diagnosis included Paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$43,802 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-10-27
- $16,421 — penalty dated 2025-08-21
- $10,036 — penalty dated 2023-12-14
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOOKER HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2021 |
| HOOVER, SHAWN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| SAN RAFAEL OPERATIONS INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| SCHINDELE, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| BILLY SCHINDELE 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| SAN RAFAEL LEASING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| SHERRY SCHINDELE IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| TRIDENT LTC, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| TRIDENT ONE LEASING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| BYERS, RONALD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/31/2023 |
| NOWOTNY, STEVEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675717. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.