No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Capstone Healthcare of Daingerfield

507 E W M Watson Blvd, Daingerfield, TX 75638 · For profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (903) 645-3915 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)5 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$321,040 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0610) — most recent May 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $321,040 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-26)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1402 Linda Dr Ste A · (903) 577-2273 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
609 Linda Dr · (903) 645-4552 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
609 Linda Dr · (903) 645-4540 · Call to confirm hours
Park
455 Park Road 17 · (903) 645-2921 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
202 E W M Watson Blvd · (903) 645-2269

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.9%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%0.8%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.4%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.0%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.6%14.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.6%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.1%9.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.7%88.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.8%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.1%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.832.171.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.172.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.4–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.0–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.66
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
33.9%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 64.8 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-03)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse from a visitor for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from sexual abuse on 05/17/26 when Visitor A was found with his hand down Resident #1's pants. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 05/17/26 and ended on 05/17/26. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of serious adverse psychosocial outcome such as fear, anxiety, shame or guilt, depression, withdrawal from activities, helplessness, low self-worth, and post-traumatic responses such as flashbacks, nightmares, or increased startle responses.The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 05/26/26, reflected Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia (decline in thinking and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right of the residents to be free from abuse for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect other residents from being kicked by Resident #1, when Resident #1 kicked Resident #3's feet when he walked by him on 1/12/25 at 5:20 am. The facility failed to recognize and put measures in place for Resident #1's increased behaviors from 01/09/2025 through 01/12/2025, which resulted in Resident #1 choking Resident #2. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/27/2025 at 1:40 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:06 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 02/28/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures could place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to increase supervision and implement interventions when Resident #1 displayed increased behaviors beginning on 1/9/25 to prevent resident to resident altercations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision to prevent escalating behaviors towards other residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision after displaying increased behaviors beginning on 1/9/25 which resulted in Resident #1 choking Resident #2. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 1:40 PM on 02/27/2025. While the IJ was removed on 02/28/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse or neglect for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #1, Resident #3, and Resident #4) The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was not verbally abused mentally abused, and harassed for the remainder of the night on 5/28/23 by LVN D The facility failed to educate staff on the de-escalation of an agitated or aggressive resident. The facility failed to identify harassment and intimidation as abuse for Resident #1 and Resident #3 when they complained about the care CNA A was providing. The facility failed to identify abuse when Resident #3 said CNA A intentionally caused her pain. CNA A was allowed to continue to intimidate and harass Resident #1 by going into her room and the shower room when she was receiving a shower. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 12/27/23 at 3:00 p.m. while the IJ was removed on 12/28/23 at 8:18 p.m., the facility remained out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-12-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure they implemented their abuse policy to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse or neglect for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) The facility failed to follow their policy and ensure Resident #4 was not verbally abuse by LVN D and mental abused and harassed for the remainder of the night on 5/28/23. The facility failed to follow their policy and identify harassment, and intimidation for Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3 when they reported CNA A had intentionally tried to intimidate them. The facility failed to follow their policy when Resident #3 said CNA A intentionally caused her pain. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 12/27/23 at 3:00 p.m. while the IJ was removed on 12/28/23 at 8:18 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a potential for actual harm with a scope of pattern with a potential for more than minimal harm, due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-12-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have evidence violations were thoroughly investigated to prevent further abuse for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) The facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation when Resident #4 was not verbally abuse by LVN D and mental abused and harassed for the remainder of the night on 5/28/23. The facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted when residents complained of harassment, and intimidation for Resident #1, and Resident #3 when they reported CNA A had intentionally tried to intimidate them. The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation on abuse when Resident #3 said CNA A intentionally caused her pain. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 12/27/23 at 3:00 p.m. while the IJ was removed on 12/28/23 at 8:18 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a potential for actual harm with a scope of pattern with a potential for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary treatment and services, based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote the healing of pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident # 37) The facility did not follow wound care ordered by the wound care specialist (NP) from 01/08/2024 to 02/20/2024 by dressing the wound with medical honey instead of the calcium alginate ordered by the wound care nurse practioner. The facility did not ensure Resident #37's alternating pressure mattress (LAL) was working properly to promote healing to her Stage III pressure ulcer and prevent the worsening of the wound. Resident #37 did not have the MD ordered alternating pressure mattress on the bed for 2 of 3 days observed. The facility failed to ensure off loading of the pressure ulcer occured by failing to ensure medical equipment of alternating pressure mattress (LAL) was plugged in, resulting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's environment remained free of accidents and hazards for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B performed a safe transfer for Resident #1 on 6/24/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B, LVN A and CMA C performed a safe transfer on Resident #1 while assisting her from the floor to the bed and assisting her from the bed to the wheelchair on 6/24/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of injury.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 6/30/26 indicated she was a [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia (forgetfulness), metabolic encephalopathy (a general term for brain dysfunction caused by an underlying chemical imbalance in the body), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that accounts for 60% to 80% of dementia cases),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 5 of 6 residents AR2, AR3, AR4, AR5, and AR6 had a right to organize and participate in resident groups. The facility failed to provide regular resident council meetings without staff interference. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the freedom to voice their concerns in a resident meeting setting. Findings included: During an interview on 6/1/2026 at 2:02 PM, the ADM brought in 3 meeting notes from past meetings and stated the Activity Director quit and the facility was working on getting a good Resident council group going. During a confidential interview at an undisclosed date and time, AR 2, AR3, AR4, AR5, and AR6 said resident council meetings were with staff in Town hall meetings. AR4 said the facility held their first meeting in the hallway and staff were in the hallway and they shut the door. During a confidential interview at an undisclosed date and time, AR3 said the facility was without an Activity Director for a couple of months and the residents just had their first resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 4 of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #63, Resident #45, Resident #5, Resident #28) 1. The facility failed to develop the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #63 by not documenting their use of a psychotropic (Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 100 MG) medication. 2. The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for Resident #5's psychotropic medication Seroquel 150 mg every evening prescribed on 4/2/2026. 3.The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for Resident #28's psychotropic medication Zyprexa 5 mg every day and Zyprexa 7.5 mg every evening prescribed on 11/26/2025. 4.The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for Resident #45's admission to Hospice Care on 5/15/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 16 residents (Resident #2, Resident #26 and Resident #13) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN D donned a gown when prior to administering medications via G-tube (gastrostomy tube) (a medical device inserted through the abdomen directly into the stomach) for Resident #2 on enhanced barrier precautions on 6/2/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN D donned a gown prior to administering Resident #26's Daptomycin (a powerful, intravenous, cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic) intravenously via PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter) (a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded to a large vein near the heart). 3.The facility failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 3 of 21 residents reviewed for assessments. (Resident #1, #10, and #65) 1.The facility failed to ensure the MDS was appropriately coded for bed rails/restraints for Resident #1. She did not have bed rails. 2.The facility failed to ensure the MDS was appropriately coded for insulin for Resident #10. She did not take insulin. 3.The facility to ensure Resident #65's MDS assessment accurately reflected he was discharged with return anticipated. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of care due to inaccuracy of assessments. 1.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 6/2/26, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, with an original admission date ofadmitted [DATE]. She had diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's Disease with early onset (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder destroying memory, cognitive abilities and the ability to carry out daily tasks), Dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 21 residents reviewed for ADLs (Residents #20.) The facility did not clean or trim Resident #20's fingernails. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health.Findings included: Record review of Resident #20s face sheet, dated 01/20/2026, revealed Resident #20 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction (A cerebral infarction, commonly known as an ischemic stroke, occurs when a blood vessel in the brain is blocked or narrowed), Seizures (A seizure is a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain), and Urticaria (a skin reaction characterized by raised, itchy, red or skin-colored welts). Record review of Resident #20's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to act upon the recommendations of the pharmacist report of irregularities and to ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it in response to the pharmacist report for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for (MRR) Medication Regimen Review. 1. The facility failed to act on signed GDR orders to decrease Seroquel (Quetiapine) (an atypical antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depressive disorder) from 150 mg to 125 mg for Resident #5 on 3/31/2026. These failures could place residents at risk from maintaining their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and could place them at risk for adverse consequences related to medication therapy.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #5's Face sheet dated 6/2/2026 indicated an [AGE] year-old female…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 2 of 16 residents reviewed for storage of drugs and biologicals (Resident #2 and Resident #30). 1.The facility failed to securely store wound care chemicals for Resident #2. 2. The facility failed to ensure Hydrocortisone 1% anti-itch liquid was properly stored and locked in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for Resident #30. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse reactions, reduced therapeutic effects of medications and supplies, risk of having access to unauthorized medication and/or lead to harm. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 6/3/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included: diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of 30 minutes or less (widespread damage caused when rapid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents could call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for resident call system. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 had a call light button attached to the call light system. Resident #40 did not have a call light available on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity.Findings include: Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated [DATE], reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included: vascular dementia (a decline in thinking and memory skills caused by restricted blood flow and oxygen to the brain), encounter for palliative care and chronic kidney disease (the progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing information with the current date, resident census, and numbers of staff actual hours worked at the beginning of each shift for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nurse staffing. The facility failed to update and post the daily nurse staffing information from 04/20/2025-04/24/2025. This failure could affect residents, their families, and facility visitors by placing them at risk of not having access to information regarding the numbers of staff caring for the residents each shift and the facility census. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 04/24/2025 at 11:32 AM, the daily staffing posting was hanging at the nurse's station, and it was dated 04/19/2025. LVN D said the daily staffing was completed by the night shift nurse. LVN D said the daily staffing posting should be completed daily so that everyone knew how much staff was supposed to be in the facility to care for the residents. During an interview on 04/24/2025 at 11:42 AM, the DON said the night shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for facility assessment. The facility failed to ensure the daily staffing needs were followed according to the facility assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate care or treatment and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: During a confidential group meeting on 04/22/2025 at 10:30 AM, the group reported getting bed baths instead of showers, call lights not being answered timely, and the CNAs telling them they were short staffed so if they did not respond to a call light timely or were taking too long to assist them that was the reason why they were taking so long. The group reported it made them feel like they should not request assistance from the CNAs. During an interview Anonymous Staff Member #1 said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of medical records for 4 of 21 residents (Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #51, and Resident #11) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. 1.LVN C failed to ensure she closed the EMR of Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #51 before entering residents' room to obtain a blood sugar check and administer medications on 04/21/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA G closed Resident #11's EMR before entering her room to administer her pain medication on 04/21/25. These failures could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity, and decreased quality of life due to medication administration record being accessible to others. Findings included: 1.Record review of a face sheet dated 04/23/2025, revealed Resident # 8 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 21 (Resident #2, Resident #6, and Resident #9) residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a plan of care for Resident #2's smoking and use of a vape (an electronic cigarette). 2. The facility failed to develop a plan of care specific to Resident #6's use of clozapine (antipsychotic medication used to treat mental/mood disorders) The facility failed to develop a plan of care to indicate Resident #6 was considered by the PASRR process to have serious mental illness and an intellectual disability. 3. The facility failed to care plan Resident #9 was in the memory care unit. These failures could place the residents at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #41) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #41's physician's order for her enteral feedings (a form of nutrition that is delivered into the digestive system as a liquid form via the feeding tube) indicated the type of feeding she was supposed to have been receiving. This failure could affect residents receiving enteral nutrition and hydration by placing them at risk of health complications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #41's face sheet dated 04/23/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), epilepsy (seizures), hypertension (high blood pressure), and gastrostomy status (surgical opening in stomach to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff were able to demonstrate the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs for 3 of 3 staff (MA G, MA F, and LVN C) reviewed for competencies. The facility failed to ensure MA G, MA F, and LVN C were competent in medication administration. This failure could potentially affect residents by placing them at an increased and unnecessary risk of exposure to staff who lack the appropriate skills and competencies to provide safe care and minimize infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #41's face sheet dated 04/23/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), epilepsy (seizures), hypertension (high blood pressure), and gastrostomy status (surgical opening in stomach to provide nutrition and medications). Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 3 of 10 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident #'s 23, 31 and 41) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #41's metoprolol (blood pressure medication) was not administered when her blood pressure was outside of the ordered parameters on 04/13/2025, 04/16/2025, and 04/21/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA G and MA F did not administer Resident #23's metoprolol (blood pressure medication) on 04/07/2025 and 04/20/2025, when her blood pressure was not within the required parameters per the physician's order. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA F did not administer Resident #31's metoprolol (blood pressure medication) on 04/02/2025, 04/08/2025, and 04/20/2025, when his blood pressure was not within the required parameters per the physician's order. These failures could place the resident at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 21 residents (Resident #'s 55 and 10), 1 of 5 medication carts (200 hall medication cart), and 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed for drugs and biologicals. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #55's Rexall (pain/ fever relief), Purzee (sleep supplement), and Melatonin (sleep aid) were properly safe and secured on 04/23/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure a lock box in the Medication Room refrigerator with 2 bottles of Lorazepam (controlled medication for anxiety) was permanently affixed. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's clobetasol cream (used to reduce swelling, redness, itching, and rashes caused by skin conditions) was properly secured and not left on his nightstand on 04/21/25 and 04/22/25. 4. The facility failed to ensure MA G secured the 200 hall Medication Cart when she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 3 meals reviewed for palatability, attractiveness, and appetizing. The dietary staff failed to provide food that was palatable for 1 of 3 meals observed on 4/22/2025 (lunch) meal. The failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: Record review of the menu indicated the lunch meal items on 4/22/2025 included chicken enchiladas, Spanish rice, refried beans, and churro bites. During an interview on 04/21/2025 beginning at 09:39 a.m., Resident # 29 stated sometimes the food was good and sometimes the food was bad. Resident #29 stated the food was a hit and miss. During an interview on 04/21/25 at 12:05 p.m., Resident #26 stated the food was not good. Resident #26 stated the food was not good because of the taste and sometimes she received the food cold. During an interview on 04/21/25 at 09:46 a.m., Resident #56 stated his eggs were cold most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in (1 of 1) kitchen and 1 of 4 halls (Hall 400) reviewed for dietary services, in that: 1) The dietary staff failed to label and date all food items. 2) The dietary staff failed to discard expired food items. 3)CNA A did not sanitize her hands in between passing meal trays on the 400 hall. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: During an observation of Freezer #1 with the Dietary Manager on 4/21/25 at 9:02 a.m., the following was observed: -(1) container of cranberry juice had no prep date and had a use by date of 4/20/25. -(1) 5-pound container of sour cream had an open date of 4/11/25 and expiration date of 4/18/25. - (1) 1/2-quart container of orange juice was not labeled and had no preparation date or expiration date. - (1) container of Kool aide had a no preparation date and had an expiration date of 4/20/25. - (1) container…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for existing staff, consistent with their expected roles for 5 of 21 employees (Administrator, DON, ADON, LVN D, and LVN O) reviewed for required trainings. The facility failed to ensure the Administrator, DON, ADON, LVN D, and LVN O received HIV training upon hire on 10/01/2024. The facility failed to ensure the Administrator, DON, ADON, LVN D, and LVN O received Restraint training upon hire on 10/01/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for the inappropriate use of restraints and exposure to HIV. Findings included: Record review of the employee files revealed there was no HIV training completed upon hire for the following staff: *Administrator (hire date 10/01/2024), *DON (hire date 10/01/2024), *ADON (hire date 10/01/2024), *LVN D (hire date 10/01/2024), *LVN O (hire date 10/01/2024), Record review of the employee files revealed there was no resistant training completed upon hire for the following staff: *Administrator (hire date 10/01/2024),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed ensure Resident #3's foley catheter drainage bag had a privacy cover on 04/21/25 and 04/22/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for loss of dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 04/23/25 indicated an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses of diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), protein calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of food), and urine retention. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated she was usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's call light was within reach while in bed on 04/21/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/23/2025 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side (weakness and paralysis of left side of the body), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (insulin resistance, with or without insulin deficiency that induces organ dysfunction) progressive death of nerve fibers, which leads to loss of nerves, increased sensitivity,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for self-determination. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was provided showers instead of bed baths per her request. This failure could place residents at risk for being denied the opportunity to exercise his or her autonomy regarding things that were important in their life and decrease their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 04/23/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), cerebral infarction (stroke), irritable bowel syndrome (an intestinal disorder causing pain in the belly, gas, diarrhea, and constipation), and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 21 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident #41) The facility did not ensure Resident #41's code status was updated when the OOHDNR was signed by the physician on [DATE]. These failures placed the residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes honored. Findings included: Record review of Resident #41's face sheet dated [DATE], indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), epilepsy (seizures), hypertension (high blood pressure), and gastrostomy status (surgical opening in stomach to provide nutrition and medications). The face sheet indicated under the advance directive section Code Status: FULL CODE. Record review of Resident #41's comprehensive care plan dated [DATE], indicated Resident #41's guardian had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for 2 of 21 residents (Resident #'s 8 and #26) reviewed for grievances. 1. The facility did not ensure a grievance was filed for Resident #8's missing black pants and green shirt. 2. The facility did not ensure a grievance was filed for Resident #26's missing black pants. These failures could place residents at risk for grievances not being addressed or resolved promptly. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 04/23/25, indicated an [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), and heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Record review of Resident #8's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident #11 and 26) The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 and #26 received their showers as scheduled. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services/care, decreased quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #26's face sheet dated 04/23/25, indicated an [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #26 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #26's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #26 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion/and or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident #10) The facility to ensure Resident #10's splint for his right-hand contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen) was being applied as ordered. This failure could place residents who had limited range of motion at risk of not attaining/or maintaining their highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 04/23/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke), hypertension (high blood pressure), right upper arm muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #2) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not keep a vape (electronic cigarette) on her over bed table. The facility failed to have documentation that Resident #2 was evaluated for use of electronic cigarette use. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for injury. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/23/2025 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side (weakness and paralysis of left side of the body), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (insulin resistance, with or without insulin deficiency that induces organ dysfunction) progressive death of nerve fibers, which leads to loss of nerves, increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for treatment and services related to indwelling catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's foley catheter was secured on 04/22/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections, catheter dislodgement and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 04/23/25 indicated an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses of diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), protein calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of food), and urine retention. Record review of Resident #3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #43 and Resident #23) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #43's oxygen was administered between 2-3 liters per minute via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's nasal cannula was stored properly. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 04/23/25, revealed Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses dementia without behavioral disturbance (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life), Hyperlipidemia (blood has too many lipids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 1 resident's (Resident #'s 50) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility did not ensure Resident #50 had a trauma screening that identified possible triggers when Resident #50 had a history of trauma. These failures could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 04/23/2025, indicated Resident #50 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Wernicke's encephalopathy (a serious neurological condition caused by a deficiency of thiamine (vitamin B1), often due to chronic alcohol use or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure MA F accurately reconciled Resident #8's narcotic medication log when she administered Resident #8's acetaminophen-codeine (controlled medication used for pain) tablet on 04/22/25. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, resident's safety, and drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 04/23/25, indicated an [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for the 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for smoking policies. The facility failed to follow the smoking policy and ensure Resident #2 had a safe smoking evaluation completed. This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe smoking environment and an increased risk of injury related to smoking. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/23/2025 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side (blood flow to the brain affected with weakness and paralysis of left side of the body), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (insulin resistance, with or without insulin deficiency that induces organ dysfunction) progressive death of nerve fibers, which leads to loss of nerves, increased sensitivity, and the development of foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, to the administrator of the facility and toother officials for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the administrator and HHSC when Resident #1 kicked Resident #3's feet when he walked by him on 1/12/25 at 5:20 am. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 02/27/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including depression, hypercholesterolemia (high blood cholesterol that limits blood flow), hypertension (high blood pressure), delusional disorders (mental illness that causes people to have false beliefs), and dementia (degenerative brain disease - loss of memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: 1. Dietary Aide L was not wearing appropriate facial covering restraint while preparing and serving lunch. 2. Hamburger meat was thawing improperly in the dish room sink without running water. 3. Ice maker buildup with brown residue on interior panel. 4. Grease buildup on the vent hood switch in the kitchen area. These deficient practices could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: 1. During an observation on 2/25/2024 between 9:00 a.m. and 9:20 a.m., Dietary Aide L was not wearing a facial hair restraint for his goatee and had hair protruding from hair restraint while cleaning the kitchen surfaces. During an observation on 2/25/2024 at 11:52 a.m., Dietary Aide L was serving trays wearing a hair restraint,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-27 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS for 1 of 4 quarters reviewed for payroll data information. (Quarter 4 2023). The facility failed to submit staffing information to CMS for the 4th quarter of the fiscal year 2023. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feeling of well-being within their living environment. Findings included: Record review of the facility's Civil Rights form (3761) dated 02/26/24 indicated the following: 5 RNs 8 LVNs 33 Direct Care Staff 8 Dietary 7 Housekeeping and Laundry 5 All Others During an interview on 02/27/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each Minimum Data Set was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 4 of 18 (Resident #59, #62, #63, and #61) residents reviewed for MDS transmittal in that: Resident #59's, discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not submitted as of 02/26/2024. Resident # 62's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not submitted as of 02/26/2024. Resident # 63's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not submitted as of 02/26/2024. Resident # 61's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not submitted as of 02/26/2024. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their assessments transmitted timely. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #59's face sheet dated 02/27/2024 indicated Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 09/11/2023. Resident #59 had diagnoses including acute embolism of right femoral vein…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities in accordance with the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for activities. (Residents #27) The facility failed to provide Residents #27 with consistent, scheduled activities. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 02/26/24 revealed Resident #27 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, dementia, and aphasia (a disorder that affects how you communicate). Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 was rarely/never understood and sometimes understood others. The MDS revealed a BIMS had not been conducted due to the resident being rarely/never understood. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies, skills set and accreditations to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service department for 3 of 4 reviewed for qualified dietary staff. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager H, Assistant Dietary Supervisor J and Dietary Aid K met the requirements for a food handling This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and placing them at risk for food born illnesses. Findings: During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 9:27 AM, Dietary Aid K said she had been employed as the dishwasher and dessert preparer for 3 years. She said that she was currently in the process of obtaining her food handler certification. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 9:41 AM, Assistant Dietary Supervisor J said his Food Handler Certification was not current and could not say when it expired. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 9:50 AM, Dietary Manager H said she had been employed at the facility for over 1 year. She said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #56) reviewed for foley catheters and for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #8 and Resident #37). 1 .The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and Resident #56's foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) tubing and drainage bag/privacy bags were not dragging/touching the floor under their wheelchairs. 2.The facility failed to perform appropriate hand washing while wound care was performed for Resident #8 and Resident #37. These failures could place residents at risk for cross-contamination, increased risk of infection and the spread of infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 2/25/24 indicated Resident #3 was an [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview , the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #45) The facility failed to ensure Resident #45 was served lunch on 02/25/24 at the same time as others at his table. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increase anxiety. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 02/26/24 indicated Resident #45 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), vitamin deficiency, and pain in left shoulder. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 was sometimes understood and sometimes understood others. The MDS indicated a BIMS score of 7 which indicated severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the notice to residents when changes in coverage are made to items and services covered by Medicare as soon as is reasonably possible provided to 2 of 3 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #42) reviewed for skilled Medicare services in that: Resident #3 and Resident #42 was not given a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) when discharged from skilled services prior to covered days being exhausted. This failure could place residents at risk of not being aware of changes to provided services not covered by Medicare and their financial responsibilities. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 09/19/2023, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anxiety (Intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations. Fast heart rate, rapid breathing, sweating, and feeling tired may occur), Anemia (a problem of not having enough healthy red blood cells…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop, and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 of 20 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #37, Resident #66). 1. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #37's wound care orders. 2.The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #66's right upper elbow contracture. These failures could place residents in the facility at an increased risk of a decline in physical or functional well-being, of not receiving necessary care or services, and having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings included: 1. Review of a face sheet dated 2/27/2024 indicated Resident #37 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good nurtrition, grooming, and personal and hygiene to residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living for 1 of 18 resident (Resident #16) reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to removal facial hair from Resident #16 on his request 02/26/2024. This failure could result in a decrease in resident self-esteem, decrease social interaction and cause depression. Findings included: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 02/26/2024 indicated Resident #16 was an 61- year- old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of nerves) [Primary, Admission], Moderate intellectual disabilities, Unspecified osteoarthritis (a progressive, degenerative joint disease), unspecified site, Essential [primary] hypertension, Other recurrent depressive disorders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine dental services and assist the resident with making appointment for 1 of 61 (Resident #13) residents reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to assist in providing routine dental services for Residents #13. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of oral complications with their gums and teeth, causing pain, infections, and weight loss, resulting in a decreased physical and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 2/25/2024 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with blood vessels that supply it ) , Cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain) , Rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption for 1 of 12 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety. (Resident #4). The facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents. Resident #4's personal refrigerator contained decomposing orange and apple slices. This failure could place residents at risk for not understanding safe food storage practices related to food borne illnesses. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 01/23/2024 indicated Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Interstitial pulmonary disease (group of diseases that cause scarring (fibrosis) of the lungs), Heart failure (occurs when the heart muscle does not pump blood as well as it should), and Sequelae of cerebral infarction (occurs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$321,040 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

  • $19,615 — penalty dated 2026-05-26
  • $85,885 — penalty dated 2025-02-28
  • $151,284 — penalty dated 2024-02-27
  • $3,387 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $7,903 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $52,966 — penalty dated 2023-12-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SANDERSON, CLARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2024
CAPSTONE-DAINGERFIELD OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2024
MOMAN, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2024
KERSEY, TROYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
SINGAPERUMAL, MANAVALANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$630K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 4%Other / private 39%

This home reported $630K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$235per resident / day
operating cost
$7,142per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$196per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675755. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next