No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at The Meadow

8383 Meadow Road, Dallas, TX 75231 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 184 certified beds · (214) 239-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$35,731 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $35,731 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-06)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8355 Walnut Hill Ln · (214) 369-7661 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7560 Greenville Ave · (214) 421-2210 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10455 N Central Expy · (214) 954-0600 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Sopac Trail · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
Congreso0.2 mi
7557 Rambler Rd · (214) 828-5119

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.5%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.7%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.4%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.2%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.7%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.6%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.7%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.3%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.332.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.902.061.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.6–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.24
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
58.1%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 184 beds and averages 77.4 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 107 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.96 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-12-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 received her scheduled pain medication every six hours as ordered when her supply ran out. Resident #36 received no scheduled or PRN pain medication for more than two days until surveyor inquiry causing her to experience severe pain. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/30/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:12 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/1/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm because all staff had not been trained on the corrective systems. This failure placed residents who require pain management at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to obtain the routine scheduled pain medication for Resident #36, who was to receive it every 6 hours, for more than two days after her supply ran out. Resident #36 missed 10 doses of her scheduled pain medication causing her to experience severe pain. The medications were received after surveyor inquiry. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/30/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:12 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/1/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm because all staff had not been trained on the corrective systems. This failure could place residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-12-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services . The facility failed to administer the routine scheduled pain medication for Resident #36, who was to receive it every 6 hours, for more than two days after her supply ran out. Resident #36 missed 10 doses of her scheduled pain medication. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/30/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:12 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/1/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm because all staff had not been trained on the corrective systems. This failure could result in residents experiencing severe pain, not receiving medications prescribed by their physician and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #36's Face Sheet dated 11/30/23 revealed she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-12-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for privacy. 1. Facility staff allowed a visitor to sign in as a volunteer, but was not an approved volunteer. Visitor recorded Resident #1, while at the faciity and posted the recording to social media. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/06/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Mood Disorder (mental illness that affects a person's emotional state), Insomnia (have trouble falling asleep or staying asleep), Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Restlessness and Agitation. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS Assessment, dated 10/16/24, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 05, which indicated Resident #1 was severely impaired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. 1. Resident #1 was referred to as a pig and spoken to in a rude manner on a recorded video. 2. Facility staff allowed a visitor to sign in as a volunteer, but was not an approved volunteer. Visitor recorded Resident #1, while at the faciity and posted the recording to social media. This deficient practice could cause psychosocial harm due to feelings of embarrassment and loss of dignity. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/06/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Mood Disorder (mental illness that affects a person's emotional state), Insomnia (have trouble falling asleep or staying asleep), Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Restlessness and Agitation. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment by ensuring that 2 residents (Resident #2, and Resident #3) bedroom received the housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 2 (Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 8 residents reviewed for physical environment.The facility failed on 06/12/26 to remove the food on the floor from the dinner meal served on 06/11/26 in 2 residents room.This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to unsafe, unclean, unhealthy, and unhomelike living conditionsFindings included:During an observation on 06/12/26 at 10:42 A.M., there were chicken strips and dried green peas on the floor underneath Resident #2's bed. There were also chicken strips and dried green peas on the floor between Resident #2's and Resident #3's beds. During an observation on 06/12/26 at 11:48 A.M., there were chicken strips and dried green peas on the floor underneath Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames that met the residents clinical and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 (Resident #5, Resident #21 and Resident #35) out of 6 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #5's Comprehensive Care Plan included his physician's order for G-Tube, Advanced Directives, and active diagnoses.2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #21's Comprehensive Care Plan included her active diagnoses of dementia, diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, anxiety and she was a Smoker.3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #35's Comprehensive Care Plan included her active diagnoses of dementia, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and dialysis services. These failures could place residents at risk of having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #85 and Resident#9) reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #85 and Resident #9's catheters were not secured with a Stat Lock (used to secure catheters to patients inner thigh) or leg strap. This failure could place residents at risk of urethral tears or dislodging the catheter.Record review of Resident #85's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/30/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-entry of 01/24/2026. Her BIMs score was 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Her diagnosis included neurogenic bladder (a condition that affects the bladder's ability to function properly due to damage or dysfunction in the nerves that control it). Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable, for 5 residents (Resident# 71, Resident# 13, Resident#34's, Resident# 75, Resident# 42 ) on 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (200 hall and 100 (secure unit) hall Medication cart) The facility failed to ensure Resident# 71's expired Nitroglycerin (a fast-acting medication used to treat or prevent angina (chest pain) by relaxing blood vessels, which increases oxygen-rich blood flow to the heart) was removed from the 100 Hall nurses' medication cart and disposed of. The facility failed to ensure Resident#34's expired morphine (a potent, fast-acting opioid used for severe acute or chronic pain management and sometimes for severe shortness of breath) was removed from the 200 hall nurses' medication cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide foods which were palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal observed for food preparation. (lunch 03/04/26). 1.The facility failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature for the lunch meal on 03/04/26 for the regular, mechanical soft and pureed meals. This failure could place residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen at risk for reduced meal satisfaction, diminished nutritional intake, weight loss and a decreased quality of life.Findings included: In confidential resident interviews on at an undisclosed date and time, the residents stated that their food for all 3 of their daily meals was often cold. In an observation on 03/04/26 at 12:30 PM, the State Survey Team participated in the sampling of the Lunch Meal which included 3 Test Trays (regular, mechanical, and puree). The 3 lunch trays were served with covered tops. The 3 Test Trays consisted of roasted pork loin, baked sweet potato, seasoned cauliflower, and dinner roll. The food on all 3 Test Trays were cold.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's dry storage, refrigerator, and freezer areas were labeled and dated according to guidelines. 2. The facility failed to seal open items in plastic bags in the dry storage pantry, refrigerator, and freezer areas. 3. The facility failed to ensure that expired items in the dry storage pantry and freezer areas were removed. 4. The facility failed to ensure that dented cans were removed in the dry pantry area were separated from the other canned food. These deficient practices could affect residents who received meals and/or snacks from the main kitchen and place them at risk for cross contamination and other food-borne illnesses.Findings Included: Observation of the kitchen during the brief initial tour of the kitchen on 03/03/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident#9) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's MDS accurately reflected the resident's clinical status for indwelling catheter and pressure ulcers. This failure could place residents at risk inaccurate resident assessments, inappropriate care planning, and misrepresentation of the residents' condition. Record review of Resident #9's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/09/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her BIMs score was 08, which indicated his cognitive status was moderately impaired. Her diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure). Section H-Bowel and Bladder H0100 reflected the resident was not coded to have an indwelling catheter. Section M -M0300 skin Conditions Resident #9 was not coded to have current pressure ulcer. Record review of Resident #9 's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 (200 Hallway) out of 2 hallways reviewed for accidents and hazards. 1.The facility failed to ensure that the mechanical lift on the 200 Hallway was locked and secured when not in use. 2.The facility failed to ensure that the mechanical lift on the 200 Hallway in the entry of the Dining/Activity Room area was locked and secured when not in use. These failures could place residents at risk of falls and/or injury.Findings Include:Observation of the facility's 200 Hallway on 03/04/26 at 10:15 AM revealed an unlocked and unsecured mechanical lift parked in front of a resident's room.Observation of the facility's 200 Hallway on 03/04/26 at 12:11 AM revealed an unlocked and unsecured mechanical lift parked in front of a resident's room.Observation on 3/04/2025 at 12:11 PM revealed an unlocked Mechanical Lift on the 200 Hallway near the 2nd floor elevator in front of the entry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (Resident#13) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's nebulizer mask was changed weekly, which was consistent with facility's policy. This failure could place residents at increased risk of infections. Record review of Resident #13's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 01/28/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had a BIMs score of 04, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses which included respiratory failure (when the respiratory system cannot adequately provide oxygen to the body), heart failure (a chronic, progressive condition where the heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 2 medications on 1 of 3 medication carts, reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure proper disposal of Resident#38's Tramadol 50 mg (controlled medication) and Resident#35's Tramadol 50 mg (controlled medication) by taping narcotic medication. This failure could place residents at risk of drug diversion and risk of pills contamination due to broken seals. Record review of Resident #38's admission MDS Assessment, dated 01/22/26, reflected the Resident #38 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a BIMs score of 08, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had a diagnosis which included Pain Disorder with related psychological factors. Record review of Resident #38's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident#85) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #85's foley catheter was not on the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of urethral tears or dislodging catheter and urinary tract infections.Record review of Resident #85's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/30/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-entry of 01/24/2026. Her BIMs score was 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Her diagnosis included neurogenic bladder (a condition that affects the bladder's ability to function properly due to damage or dysfunction in the nerves that control it). Section H-Bowel and Bladder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe environment for the secure unit residents, staff and the public in two (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) of four resident rooms on the secure unit observed for safety. The facility failed to ensure no portable heaters or space heaters were used in residents' rooms on the secure unit. This failure could place residents at risk for injury or accidents and hazards. Findings included: Observation and interview on 01/29/26 at approximately 10:00 AM with CNA A revealed resident room [ROOM NUMBER] with a portable space heater plugged into the wall on Resident #1's nightstand. The portable space heater was in the on position with a digital temperature on the display of 85 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident #1, nor the roommate, were in the room. Observation of the resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a portable space heater plugged into the wall on Resident #2's nightstand. The portable space heater was not on. Resident #2 was in bed. Resident #2 did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but no less than two hours after the allegation was made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation did not involve abuse or did not result in bodily injury, to the facility administrator and to other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse towards Resident #1 when reported by a staff member. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed investigation, intervention and abuse.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/07/26, reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident's rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for Resident #1 that was individualized to his care needs, which included psychotropic medications, dementia and related behaviors, and acute use of PRN antipsychotic medication after a behavioral incident. This failure could place residents at risk for inappropriate responses to behavioral symptoms and inappropriate use of psychotropic medications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/07/26, reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for one (Resident #1) of four residents who were reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who had a diagnosis of dementia, was administered PRN Haldol (antipsychotic) with adequate indications for its use. The facility nurse administered PRN Haldol intramuscularly when Resident #1 refused ADL care and was combative. This failure could place residents at risk for being administered unnecessary antipsychotic medication to control behaviors and could have adverse side effects including over-sedation, confusion and decreased quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/07/26, reflected he was an [AGE] year old male, admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by systemic metabolic disturbances, leading to symptoms like confusion,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately equipped to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from-four of six residents (Resident #2, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for Resident Call System. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #2, #3, #4, and #5's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents on 12/30/25. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 12/30/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included reduced mobility and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/09/25, reflected a severe cognitive impairment. For ADL care, it reflected the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's BPAP mask and nasal canula were properly stored in a bag when not in use on 12/30/25. This failure could place the resident at risk for respiratory infection and not having his respiratory needs met.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 12/30/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnosis included COPD (shortness of breath). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/16/25, reflected he had an intact cognitive response. The resident had an active diagnosis of COPD. Record Review of Resident #1's physician orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The MDS did not address Resident #1 and Resident #8's oxygen use. This failure could place residents at risk of missed services, treatments, and overall decline in health. Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/04/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with other specified cough and obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 10/29/2025, reflected the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 12, indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition Section O Special treatments, procedures, and programs did not address resident oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #1's NC was not replaced when dirty.Resident #8's 02 concentrator humidification bottle was not dated. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings:Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/04/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with other specified cough and obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 10/29/2025, reflected the resident was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for two (Residents #3 and #12) of seven residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline of Resident #3's and Resident #12's contracture to her left hand upon discharge from therapy services. These failures could place residents at risk for decline in range of motion, decreased mobility, and worsening of contractures. Findings included: Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's Face sheet dated 1/15/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 5/3/17. Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/12/24, reflected she was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMs of 00. The resident had upper and lower extremity impairment on one side. Resident #3 was started on OT on 9/25/24. Active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 2 (Med Aid cart 2 west front and Nurses cart 2 Central ) of 3 carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure: 1. LVN P, responsible for Med Aid cart 2 west front, counted controlled drugs every shift change. 2. The Nurses cart 2 Central had 1 insulin pen for Resident #24 with an expired opened date. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to possible drug diversion. Findings Included: 1. Record review and observation on [DATE] at 12:06 PM of Med Aid cart 2 west front, with MA M revealed missing signatures for Off duty and On duty for [DATE], [DATE] of the narcotic count sheet. Interview on [DATE] at 12:08 PM, MA M stated nurses and medication aides should have signed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents obtained needed dental services, including routine dental services for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #23) reviewed for dental services. The facility did not obtain routine dental services for Resident #8 and #23. This failure could place the residents at risk by contributing to mouth pain, difficulty eating and weight loss. Findings included: 1.Review of Resident #8 Face sheet dated 1/15/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 3/11/23. Review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/11/24, reflected she was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMs of 12. The resident had no impairment to upper or lower extremities. Resident #8's active diagnoses included Anemia (a condition in which the blood does not have enough healthy red blood cells and hemoglobin), and Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure with no identifiable cause). Resident #8 was on a regular diet. Her funding source was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility kitchen were covered. 2. The facility failed to ensure hot holding temperature were above 135 F for three menu items on the lunch service. This failure could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included: Observation on 1/13/2025 at 9:09 AM of the walk-in freezer revealed food items such as cut zucchini, cut carrots, cinnamon rolls, cooked sausages were left open in a plastic bag inside their individual cardboard boxes. Observation on 01/13/25 at 11:56 AM of the tray line temperatures for the lunch service revealed [NAME] A was measuring Holding Temperatures before serving the residents. [NAME] A used cleaned thermometer and sanitized the thermometer between each use. [NAME] A took the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 resident (Resident #53) of 8 residents observed for infection control and for 2 of 2 clean linen closets observed for sanitary environment. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Clean linen closets were kept sanitary. 2. CNA N failed to performed hand hygiene and changed gloves during incontinent care for Resident #53. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination resulting in infections. Findings included: 1- An observation of the Clean Linen Closet in the Secured Unit, on 1/13/25 at 10:58 AM revealed an additional cart with a broken bottom most shelf apart from the clean linen cart. The cart had the following items on it: The top shelf contained 2 sets of bagged clothes without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #30 and Resident #48) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: - Resident #30 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. - Resident #48 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #48 Record review of Resident #48's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #48 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included cerebral infarction (a condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked. The blockage can lead to brain tissue death), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Resident #48's BIMS score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment as free of accident hazards as is possible for one of two shower rooms (shower room [ROOM NUMBER]) in the facility's secured unit, reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was locked. These failures could place residents at risk of accidents, injury, or consuming hazardous personal care products. Findings included: An observation of the secured unit on 01/13/25 10:55 AM revealed Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was unlocked when not in use. An observation of the secured unit on 01/13/25 03:07 PM revealed Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was unlocked. A cabinet in the shower room was unlocked with the unpadlocked hanging on the door. The cabinet contained multiple bottles of Shampoo, body cleanser, body lotion, and an opened twin [NAME] razor box. The shower area of the shower room had a cleanser that was kept by itself on a table. In an interview on 1/13/25 at 3:20 PM, CNA F…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for one of one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report when the Activities Assistant spoke rudely to Resident #1 and called her names on Thanksgiving Day, 11/28/24. This failure could place residents at risk of continued abuse or mistreatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/06/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Mood Disorder (mental illness that affects a person's emotional state), Insomnia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a comfortable, homelike environment, with safe temperature levels within a range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit for 5 of 11 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #204 #208, #210, and #213) reviewed for environmental concerns. On 01/25/24, the facility failed to ensure the temperatures in room [ROOM NUMBER], #204 #208, #210, and #213 were maintained at a safe and comfortable range, even after the facility's boiler had been adjusted. This failure could place residents at risk of an uncomfortable environment and diminish their quality of life. Findings included: An observation on 01/25/24 at 9:10 AM revealed, when entering the facility, the entrance lobby area, the hallways near the entrance, and the conference room all felt cold. The conference room's HVAC unit was blowing cool air. An observation of the thermostat on the wall in the front hallway was observed to be set at 73 degrees Fahrenheit but reflected an inside temperature of 64 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a private space for residents' monthly council meetings for 08 of 08 residents (Residents #14, #17, #18, #24, #25, #41, #42 and #50) reviewed for resident council. The facility did not provide a private space for resident council meetings for Residents #14, #17, #18, #24, #25, #41, #42 and #50 This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings included: In an interview and observation on11/29/23 at 11:00 AM, the Activity Director stated resident council was held in the downstairs dining area monthly. The Activity Director said there was not a private area in the facility for the Resident Council to meet. The Activity Director placed three wet floor signs in the entrance way to dining hall. The Activity Director stated the signs were placed to prevent staff and visitors from walking into the meeting. In an observation on 11/29/23 at 11:03 AM, a Resident Council Meeting was conducted with Residents #14, #17, #18,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #68) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure clean linen closets were kept sanitary. 2. ADON D failed to complete hand hygiene while providing wound care to Resident #68 These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination resulting in infections. Findings included: 1. An observation of the Clean Linen Closet in the Secured Unit, on 11/28/23 at 11:48 AM revealed a pair of white running shoes on the bottom shelf, resting on top of clean linen. In an interview on 11/28/23 at 12:23 PM, CNA B said the clean linen closet should only contain clean linen. She stated she did not know why running shoes were in the closet. She said the laundry staff stocked the closet and all staff were responsible to ensure the closet was kept…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for drug diversion. The facility failed to prevent an employee with access to controlled medications from diverting an unknown number of Tylenol #3 tablets (a Schedule III narcotic drug used to treat pain) tablets belonging to Resident #57 from a medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk for unrelieved pain due to his medication not being readily available. Findings included: Record review of Resident #57's Face Sheet dated 11/29/23 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, unspecified open wound of the right lessor toe, non-pressure chronic wound of the right foot, pressure ulcer of other site Stage 2, pain in unspecified joint, and pain unspecified. Record review of Resident #57's Physician's orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the transfer or discharge in writing for one (Resident #228) of one resident reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility failed to send a transfer or discharge notice in writing to the facility's Ombudsman as soon as practicable when Resident #228 was discharged on 04/10/23. This failure could affect residents at the facility by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and the appeal processes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #228's electronic face sheet, dated 11/30/23 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dermatitis, contact with COVID, muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of Resident #228's progress notes dated 04/10/23 11:59 PM, indicated Resident #228 discharged via stretcher/…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for one (Residents #15) of two residents reviewed for personal care. The facility failed to provide personal care and skin care for Resident #15 by not trimming his fingernails. This failure could place residents who require staff assistance at risk of dermatitis, infections, and low self-esteem. Findings included: Record review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 05/18/21, reflected Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15 had diagnoses of Other cerebrovascular disease ( group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of strength leading to paralysis on one side of the body ), unspecified affecting unspecified side, muscle wasting and atrophy( body tissue or an organ waste away),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement measures to prevent further decrease in ROM for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #15 and #21) reviewed for contractures. The facility did not apply a splint on Resident #15's and Resident#21's hands to prevent a decline in ROM. This failure could place residents at risk for further decline in ROM and development of contractures. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment dated , 10/20/23, reflected Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15 had diagnoses of Other cerebrovascular disease ( group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of strength leading to paralysis on one side of the body ), unspecified affecting unspecified side, muscle wasting and atrophy( body tissue or an organ) waste away,), neuromuscular dysfunction(a wide-range of diseases affecting the peripheral nervous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment as free of accident hazards as is possible for two of two rooms (storage room and shower room) in the facility's secured unit, reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure the storage room and shower room doors, in the secured unit were locked. These failures could place residents at risk of accidents, injury, or consuming hazardous personal care products. Findings included: Observation on 11/28/23 at 11:34 AM in the secured unit revealed the storage room door in the secured unit was unlocked. The door had two locks, a dead bold and a regular lock on the doorknob. Both were unlocked. The storage room contained oxygen condensers and bottles,, deodorants and wound care supplies including wound spray labeled, Keep out of reach of children. Shampoo and conditioner, shoes, a fan, fall mats, hand sanitizer, and alcohol pads were also in the room. The room was observed to be clustered with these items which made it difficult to move in the room. Observation on 11/28/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to perform routine bi-pap (bilevel positive airway pressure is a machine that helps you breathe) maintenance. This failure has the potential to affect residents who use bi-pap machines in the facility. Findings included: Resident #40 Face Sheet Record Review revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. Resident#40 face sheet revealed a BIMS score of 14 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #40's MDS revealed a diagnosis of Arthritis and Alzheimer's disease. Observation of resident in resident's room on 11/28/23 at 12:04 PM revealed a yellow sediment in the bottom of the water reserve of the ci-pap/bi-pap…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-03-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify residents or their representatives on how to file a grievance or complaint in an anonymous manner.The facility failed to notify residents or their representatives either individually or through prominent postings throughout the facility on how to file a grievance or complaint in an anonymous manner.These failures could affect resident's ability to file a grievance without the fear of discrimination, reprisal, retribution, and their right to anonymously file their grievance.Findings included:Observation on 03/04/26 at 2:45 PM the State Surveyor observed there were no grievance forms available in any common areas nor indications of places where grievance forms were normally kept. Interview on an undisclosed date and undisclosed date and time with six confidential residents revealed the residents were unaware where grievance forms were located. The residents stated that they did not know how to anonymously file a grievance. Residents expressed wanting to have the option to file an anonymous grievance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-01 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption for 1 of 1 facility, in that: The facility did not have a policy regarding use and storage of food brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. This failure could place residents at the facility who received food from outside sources at risk for foodborne illnesses. The findings were: Record review of an email received on 11/29/2023 at 1:24 PM from the ADM stated, The facility does not have a policy on foods brought in by visitors. Interview on 11/29/2023 at 2:20 PM with the Dietary Manager, requested the facility's policy for foods brought into the facility by visitors. The Dietary Manager was advised that the ADM stated that the facility did not have a policy. The Dietary Manager stated that that he has been at the facility for 2 months and he was unsure if the facility had the requested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$35,731 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $6,325 — penalty dated 2024-12-06
  • $29,406 — penalty dated 2023-12-01
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-30 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/31/2017
SANDERSON, CLARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/29/2012
8383 MEADOWS RD OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
JAMAL, SYEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/13/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/13/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/13/2025
8383 MEADOWS RD PROPERTY OWNER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2026
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
WHITFIELD, DALEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 8%Other / private 13%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$249per resident / day
operating cost
$7,555per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$242per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455463. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next