Lakewest Rehabilitation and Skilled Care
2450 Bickers St, Dallas, TX 75212 · Government - Hospital district · 118 certified beds · (214) 879-0888 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,799 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.9% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.8% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.5% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.8% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.2% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.8% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.20 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.96 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.9%CMS range 29.1–56.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.9–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.0–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 89.9 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 9 (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10) of 14 reviewed for Abuse.The facility failed to protect Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10 from physical and verbal abuse by another resident.An IJ was identified on 4-16-2026. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 4-16-2026 at 3:40 PM. While the IJ was removed on 4-17-2026, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility's need to implement corrective measures. This failure placed residents at risk of subsequent abuse resulting in potential mental anguish, emotional distress, and physical harm. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 4-15-2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 4-26-2021 and a readmission date of 11-4-2025. Resident #1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from abuse on 05/14/25, when Resident #1 hit Resident #2 in the back of his head with his walking cane which caused 2 hematomas (localized collection of blood outside of blood vessels, often due to injury). An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 06/10/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:31 PM and signed by the ADM. While the IJ was removed on 06/11/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity level of no actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures placed residents at risk of physical harm from abuse. Findings included: Record review of Provider Investigation Report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 3 of 8 Residents (Residents #6, #7, #8 ) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission alleged abuse that occurred when Resident #1 physically and verbally abused Resident #6 on 10-7-2025, physically abuse Resident #7 on 10-8-2026, and physically and verbally abused Resident #8 on 1-21-2026. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for four of six residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #5) reviewed for the resident rights.The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #1, #2, #3, and #5's room was in a position that was accessible to the residents on 03/05/26. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed, and help in the event of an emergency.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 03/05/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses of a need for assistance with personal care and muscle weakness.Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/10/26, reflected the Resident's BIMS (11) indicated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #4 ) reviewed for care plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's care plan reflected a plan of care for the resident's use of a BiPAP device. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services.Findings included:Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 had a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure.Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/21/26, reflected Resident #4's BIMS (15) indicated an intact cognitive response. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of six residents (Resident #4) reviewed for respiratory care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's breathing treatment masks were properly stored in a bag when not in use on 03/05/26. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 had a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure.Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/21/26, reflected Resident #4's BIMS (15) indicated an intact cognitive response. The Quarterly MDS Assessment reflected the resident had an active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 5 residents of 25 residents (Resident #17, Resident #89, Resident #57, Resident# 66, Resident #63) reviewed for ADLs.The facility failed to ensure:1. Residents #17, #57, and #63's fingernails were trimmed.2. Residents #89 and #66's fingernails were cleaned and trimmedThese failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at a loss of dignity and a decreased quality of life.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/11/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 09/19/22. Resident #17 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. He required substantial to maximum assistance for personal hygiene, toileting, bathing and dressing and had not refused care. He had functional limitation in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for four of seven Residents (Resident #17, Resident #8, Resident #89, and Resident #3) reviewed for quality of care.1. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline of Resident #17's contracture to his left wrist.2. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline of Resident #8's contracture to his left hand.3. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline of Resident #89's contracture to his left hand, right hand and shoulder. 4. The facility failed to implement interventions to increase range of motion for Resident #3's upper and lower extremities. This failure could place residents at risk for decline in range of motion, decreased mobility, and worsening of contractures. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 24 residents (Resident #98, Resident #68, Resident #12, and Resident #17) and 1 of 4 linen closets (Linen Closet for Hall 100) and the facility's only laundry room observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D and LVN E utilized Enhanced Barrier Precautions during incontinence care for Resident # 98 on 01/11/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN E utilized Enhanced Barrier Precautions, performed hand hygiene after glove changes during wound care, and prevent cross contamination of the treatment cart after completion of wound care for Resident # 98 on 01/11/26. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA C and CNA B changed their gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, packages and other materials delivered to the facility or the resident through a means other than a postal service, including the right to privacy of such communications for 1 (Resident #65) of 7 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure staff distributed unopened mail packages to Resident #65. This deficient practice could result in residents not receiving their mail in a timely manner and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #65's face sheet dated 1/14/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 2/25/21 and re-admission date of 9/12/25. Resident #65 had the following diagnoses: Major Depressive Disorder (a serious mood disorder, marked by persistent sadness) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (a condition marked by excessive, persistent and hard to control worry). Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two of 25 (Residents #17 and #89) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to include, in the care plan for Resident #17, his left wrist contracture and interventions to prevent further decline.2. The facility failed include, in the care plan for Resident #89, his contracture to his left hand, right hand and shoulder and interventions to prevent further decline of Resident #89'sThese failures could place residents at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life and care and did not represent a person-centered coordination of care.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/11/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 2 (Resident #39 and Resident #48) of 4 residents reviewed for wound treatment.1. The facility failed to provide care for Resident #39's wounds as identified on the resident's physician's orders on 1/9/2025.2. The facility failed to provide care for Resident #48's wound and obtain physician order for another wound that had reopened on 1/8/2025.These failures could place residents at risk for delayed wound healing or worsening of the exiting wound.Findings included:1.Record review of Resident 39's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected, Resident # 39 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her pertinent diagnoses included: Stroke (Decreased blood flow to the brain), Anemia (low blood count), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Hyperlipidemia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities for 1 (Resident #55) of 2 residents reviewed for prescription eyeglasses. The facility failed to follow up in a timely manner on prescription eyeglasses for Resident #55 after his eye exam was completed on 7/17/25. This deficient practice and failure could place residents at risk for worsening vision and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #55's face sheet, dated 1/15/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 3/7/22. Pertinent diagnoses included Chronic Kidney Disease, Unspecified Dementia (cognitive decline that severely impairs daily life), Major Depressive Disorder (a mood condition causing persistent sadness, loss of interest and affecting how you feel) and Adult Failure to Thrive (a syndrome of decline, marked by weight loss, poor appetite, inactivity and social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for two of four residents (Resident #17 and Resident #98) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA C provided appropriate perineal care for Resident #17 when she failed to clean the resident's penis downward and the pubic area on 01/12/26. 2.The facility failed to ensure CNA B provided appropriate catheter and perineal care for Resident #98, when she failed to separate the labia and wipe the catheter tubing from the insertion site downward while providing care on 01/12/26. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care to address their incontinence and could increase the risk of urinary tract infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/11/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services such as but not limited to physical therapy, speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility failed to provide physical therapy for Resident #3 after her PT evaluation, recommending therapy, was completed on 8/15/25. This failure could place residents at risk for decline in range of motion, decreased mobility, development of contractures, and a decline in quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's Face sheet dated 1/13/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 3/25/23 and a readmission date of 10/22/25. Review of Resident #3's Significant Change MDS assessment, dated 10/28/25, reflected her cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 13. The resident had upper and lower extremity impairment on one side and used a walker. Resident #3 was dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation report into a resident assessment, care planning, and transition of care for one (Resident # 22) of one resident reviewed for PASRR services. The facility did not initiate the application process for the Durable Medical Equipment / Customized Wheelchair for Resident #22 within twenty days, per PASRR recommendations made during the PASRR Care plan meeting held on 05/08/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized PASRR services which would enhance their highest level of functioning and could contribute to residents decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included:Record review of Resident #22's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 04/26/2021, diagnoses included unspecified intellectual disabilities (significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]) of three resident rooms reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 swallowed and consumed all of her pills and supplements prior to leaving Resident #1 alone in her room on 06/13/25 with the medications. During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering the medications. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 06/13/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, with an initial admission date of 08/09/23 and a re-admission date of 06/10/24. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Paraplegia (paralysis of lower legs and body), Type 2 Diabetes (body does not produce enough insulin or cannot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to move Resident #2 to a temporary room on the nights of 5/12/2025 and 5/13/2025 when Resident #2 complained that the room was too hot. This failure could place residents at risk for living in an uncomfortable and unhomelike environment which could cause a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2 face sheet, dated 06/09/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses of Vascular Dementia (progressive cognitive disorder that damages brain tissue due to reduced blood flow), Encephalopathy (broad range of brain disorders that affect the brain's function and/or structure) and Major Depressive Disorder (persistent feelings of sadness, emptiness, and a loss of interest or pleasure in activities). Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #24) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to correctly transcribe Resident #1's medication changes when he returned to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization. The incorrectly transcribed medication was administered from 03/2025 to 05/13/25. These failures could place residents at risk for medication errors, ineffective relief from pain medication, and drug diversion of controlled substances. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 05/13/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission of 08/31/24 and readmission of 03/20/25. His primary diagnosis was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (a lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed ensure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers from developing for 4 (Resident #2, Resident#3, Resident#4 and Resident#5) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident#2's pressure relieving mattress functioned properly on 03/20/25. The facility failed to have pressure relieving mattress set to the correct weight settings for Resident #3's, Resident#4, and Resident#5 to prevent pressure ulcers or skin breakdown on 03/20/2025 and 03/21/25. These failures could affect residents at risk for pressure ulcers of developing new or worsening existing pressure ulcers. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 03/21/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, with an initial admission date of 10/31/23, and a re-admission date of 01/24/24. Resident #2 had diagnoses of disorder of the skin and subcutaneous tissue unspecified, local…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed f1or infection control. On 03/20/25 and 03/21/25 CMA E, CNA F and HK G failed to put on PPE before entering Resident#1 room. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination of infections from other residents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/20/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, with an admission date of 03/04/25. Resident#1 had diagnoses of amputation of limbs as the cause of abnormal reaction of the patient, or of later complication, without misadventure at the time of the procedure and tobacco use. Record review of Resident #1s annual MDS Assessment, dated 03/10/25, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 11, which meant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals, and preferences for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility failed to ensure Resident#1's oxygen concentrator was functioning properly on 03/20/25 and 03/21/25. This failure could place residents at risk of serious injury or hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 03/20/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, with an admission date of 03/04/25. Resident#1 had diagnoses of amputation of limbs as the cause of abnormal reaction of the patient, or of later complication, without misadventure at the time of the procedure and tobacco use. Record review of Resident #1s annual MDS Assessment , dated 03/10/25, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 11, which meant Resident #1 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was implemented so the facility was free of pests and rodents for the facility's one of four halls (Hall 100) reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to keep an effective pest control program to ensure the residents' rooms of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and 115 including bathrooms were free of roaches and water bugs. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life and poor sanitary environment. Findings included: Interview on 02/24/25 at 2:42 PM with Resident #5 (room [ROOM NUMBER] ) revealed she had roaches in her room in her bathroom at night constantly. She stated it bothered her to have the roaches in her room. Interview on 02/24/25 at 2:44 PM with Housekeeper I revealed she had seen roaches and water bugs in resident rooms including bathrooms and closets. Housekeeper I stated she had seen roaches in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s closet before and needed to clean room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical and verbal abuse by CMA C. On 09/18/24 at 7:30 PM, CMA C threw a pitcher of water at Resident #1 which caused him to get wet. CMA C also used profanity at Resident #1. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 09/18/24 at 7:30 PM and ended on 09/30/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the Incident investigation began on 02/24/25. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury or harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/24/25, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, with original admission date of 09/06/2024 with diagnoses that included: Aphasia , Dysarthria (difficult or unclear articulation of speech), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), Bipolar disorder, Major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items in walk-in refrigerator were sealed and produce did not show signs of expiration. 2. The facility failed to ensure food temperatures of hamburger patties, chicken nuggets, fries, ice cream and gelatin dessert were obtained prior to serving lunch on 11/06/24. 3. Dietary Aide N, LVN J and Dishwasher O wore effective hair restraints during lunch meal service on 11/06/24. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: 1. Observation in the facility's kitchen walk-in refrigerator on 11/05/24 at 9:32 AM revealed a stainless-steel square container labeled Burger Toppings. The container was not sealed properly, and the lettuce was turning brown. Observation in the facility's kitchen walk-in refrigerator on 11/05/24 at 9:35 AM revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 4 (Resident #69, Resident #86, Resident #47, and Resident #33) of 14 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1- Resident #69 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. 2- Resident #86 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. 3- Resident #47 received shower on his scheduled day. 4- Resident #33 had his fingernails cleaned. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1-Record review of Resident #69's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #69 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included degenerative disease of nervous system (a condition where the cells of the brain and spinal cord…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 3 medication carts (Nurses cart hall 300, Med Aide cart hall 300/400, and Nurses cart hall 400) of 3 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure: 1- LVN D, responsible for Nurses Cart Hall 300, removed medications in unsecure blister packs from the Nurses Cart. 2- MA E, responsible for Med Aide Cart Hall 300/400, removed medications in unsecure blister packs from the Med Aide Cart. 3- LVN F, responsible for Nurses Cart Hall 400, removed medications in unsecure blister packs from the Nurses Cart. These failures could place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to possible drug diversion and at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medication. Findings Included: 1- Record review and observation on 11/05/24 at 12:40 PM of Nurses Cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 residents (Resident #3 and Resident#83) of 4 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure: 1- CNA A performed hand hygiene between change of gloves during incontinent care for Resident #3. 2- LVN C and CNA B donned the appropriate PPE during wound care for Resident #83 who was on enhanced barriers precautions. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination of pathogens and illness. Findings included: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included need for assistance with personal care, dementia, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 3, which indicated Resident #3's cognition was severely impaired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health for 1 (Resident #40) of 8 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 received foot care and treatment for her dry, flaky skin on her feet. These failures placed all residents at risk for not receiving foot care which is consistent with professional standards of practice. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected she was a [AGE] year-old-female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her BIMS score was 15 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact, required extensive, one-person assistance for ADLs. Her diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugar), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident is offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration for one (Resident #5) of six residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was provided adequate hydration on 11/05/24. This failure could place residents at risk of dehydration and decline in nutritional status. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses of Hemiplegia (partial or complete paralysis or weakness) on left side, hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes, wound infection, Respiratory Failure and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident #5 had a BIMS score of 10 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #5 required set-up assistance with eating. Resident #5 was on hospice services. Resident #5 had a mechanically altered diet and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food that was at an appetizing temperature and palatable for one (11/06/24) of one meal reviewed for food palatability and temperature. The facility failed to serve hamburger at an appetizing temperature and vegetables at a palatable texture during the lunch meal on 11/06/24. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: In a confidential group interview on 11/06/24 at 10:00 AM revealed residents complained about the food not being cooked properly it can be overcooked. Observation on 11/06/24 at 1:02 PM revealed nurse was walking down 400 hall to give last meal tray down to resident on end of 400 hall. 400 hall trays were the last to be served. Observation at 11/06/24 at 1:05 PM revealed lunch test tray of vegetable medley including cauliflower and green beans were harder and undercooked. The Hamburger was cold. Interview on 11/06/24 at 12:48 PM with Dietary [NAME] Q revealed he should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a Resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 (Resident #1) reviewed for respiratory care The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 Oxygen humidity bottle and nasal cannula were labeled or dated. These failures could place the resident at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. The findings were: Review of Resident # 1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included, Anemia, Cirrhosis (a condition in which the liver is scarred and permanently damaged), hepatic failure without Coma and Septicemia ( a condition of liver failure without changes in mental status and without infection). Resident had BIMS Score of 14 which signifies Resident #1 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 9/4/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents, establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations for two (Residents #1 and #2) of eleven residents reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to implement and follow their abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy to ensure Resident #1 was safe from abuse when CNA A reported that Resident #3 was observed touching Resident #1's shoulder area of her body on 08/22/2024. 2. The facility failed to implement and follow their abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy to ensure Resident #2 was safe from abuse when CNA B reported that Resident #4 was observed using his cane to hit Resident #2 over the head on 08/19/24 or 08/20/2024. These failures could place all residents at risk for abuse and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress for two (Residents #1 and #2) of eleven residents reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to investigate the alleged or suspected abuse of Resident #1 to ensure all resident's safety, when CNA A reported that Resident #3 was observed touching Resident #1's shoulder area of her body. 2. The facility failed to investigate the alleged or suspected abuse of Resident #2 to ensure all resident's safety, when CNA B reported that Resident #4 was observed using his cane to hit Resident #2 over the head. These failures could place all residents at risk for abuse and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised 01/08/2023, reflected, All reports of resident abuse . are reported to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and/or accurate for three (Residents #1, #2, #4) of seven residents reviewed for clinical records. 1. Resident #1's Foley catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder) volume was not recorded per physician's orders on 10/13/23 and 10/14/23. 2. Resident #1's wound care to her stage four pressure wound to her coccyx (a small triangular bone at the base of the spinal column) was not documented as being completed per physician's orders on 10/06/23 and 10/09/23. 3. Resident #2's treatment administration record reflected he was not administered insulin per physician's orders on 10/02/23, 10/03/23 and 10/09/23. 4. Resident #4's treatment administration record did not reflect wound care was completed per physician's orders to her amputated toe on 10/13/23, 10/16/23 and 10/18/23. These failures placed residents at risk of not having accurate clinical records completed to indicate if a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (Resident #2 and Resident #4) of seven residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's comprehensive care plan addressed his newly acquired infection of sepsis and pneumonia, his use of antibiotics, and related interventions. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's comprehensive care plan addressed her wound care on her amputated toe, her blood infection and use of antibiotic via a PICC line. The failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate interventions not individualized to their health care needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 10/18/23 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included but is not limited to, (i) A recapitulation of the resident's stay that includes, but is not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results; (ii) A final summary of the resident's status; (iii) Reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over-the-counter) for two (Residents #3 and #5) of two residents reviewed for discharge planning. 1. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident #3 when he had a planned discharge home. 2. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary, discharge plan of care and a reconciliation of medications for Resident #5 when he had a planned discharge home. This failure could place residents at risk of a recapitulation of the stay being unavailable to help ensure continuity of care once they went back home. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for residents, staff, and the public for four (Halls 100, 200, 300, and 400) of four hallways reviewed for housekeeping services. The facility failed to ensure the floors in resident rooms on Halls 100, 200, 300, 400 and the dining hall, were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 10/03/23 at 9:35 AM of all four halls in the facility revealed resident room floors were sticky, with food crumbs and trash. The floors in the dining area were also sticky and with food crumbs on the floor. At the time of this observation, residents were in the dining area participating in activities. Observation on 10/03/23 at 11:20 AM revealed rooms on Hall 300 with floors that were sticky, with trash, and food crumbs. Observation on 10:04/23 at 9:35 AM revealed rooms on Hall 400 with floors that were sticky, with trash and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all irregularities identified by the Pharmacist Consultant were reported to the attending physician and acted upon to minimize or prevent adverse consequences to the extent possible for 1 (Resident #55) of 24 resident reviewed for drug regimen reviews. The facility failed to have in writing the Pharmacist Consultant's recommendation for a gradual dose reduction for Resident #55's antianxiety medication, in return there was no documentation in the pharmacy review book that the medical director agreed or disagreed. These failures could place residents who require monthly drug regimen reviews and placed them at risk of receiving unnecessary medications and adverse drug consequences. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #55's Face Sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #55 had diagnoses that included: Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety, Major Depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and assure only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 (Resident #42) of 7 residents reviewed for pharmacy services, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42 eye drops were stored in a secured place. 2. The facility failed to ensure the Nurse Medication Cart for Hall 300/400 was locked when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapy needed. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #42's face sheet, dated 10/05/23, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dry eye syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands (is a condition that affects your tear film, the three layers of tears that cover and protect the surface of your eyes)and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 4 (Resident #26, Resident #65, Resident #31, and Resident #25) of 7 residents reviewed for infection control during medication administration. 1. MA D failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Resident #26, Resident #65, and Resident #31. 2. The facility failed to ensure that its infection control policy was followed in Resident #25's room. These failures could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #26's MDS assessment, dated 09/22/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #26 had diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for dignity. CNA A failed to use privacy curtain or close the door when providing incontinent care for Resident #96. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for psychosocial harm due to a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #96's face sheet, dated 10/05/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (brain disease), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure and pain. Record review of Resident #96's admission MDS assessment, dated 09/06/23, revealed Resident #96's BIMS score was 14, which indicated her cognition was intact. MDS assessment revealed Resident #96 needed extensive assistance of two or more persons physical assist with bed mobility, transfer, dressing and toilet use. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, disposition, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #27) of 7 residents and one cart for hall 300 reviewed for pharmacy services. 1.MA D did not check Resident #27's blood pressure or pulse rate before administering Lisinopril 10mgs 1 tablet (blood pressure medication), as ordered by Resident #27's physician. 2.The facility failed to dispose of one expired bottle of docusate 100mgs tablets from hall 300 cart. This failure could place residents who take blood pressure medications at risk for hypotension (low blood pressure) and resident on hall 300 at risk of receiving expired medications. Findings included: Review of Resident #27's MDS assessment, dated 07/16/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #27 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and thawed in accordance with professional standards. These failures could place residents, who receive food from the kitchen, at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation of the kitchen refrigerator on 10/03/23 at 9:26 AM revealed the following: - Chicken thighs and chicken legs, packaged, uncooked, completely thawed (not frozen) undated and unlabeled. - Bacon pulled from the freezer and dated with the date it was removed from the freezer of 9/25/2023. Interview on 10/04/23 at 10:35 AM with the [NAME] E revealed he had worked at the facility since February 2019. He stated that there was no Dietary Manager currently employed with the facility. He stated he had been trained in the past on how to properly store and thaw food items. [NAME] E revealed all stored foods had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,799 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $11,730 — penalty dated 2026-04-17
- $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-06-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MOMENTUM SKILLED SERVICES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/31/2017 |
| CARETRUST REIT INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2019 |
| CTR PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2019 |
| BRADLEY, SHANNAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/11/2023 |
| CASTANEDA, EDMUNDO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/10/2022 |
| CERISE, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/31/2017 |
| NEXT GEN P, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2019 |
| THREADGILL, SHARLYN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2019 |
| MARTEL, TYLER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/28/2025 |
| THREADGILL, FORREST | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/28/2025 |
| THREADGILL, MORGAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/28/2025 |
| DOTI, ANTHONY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2019 |
| SHOULDERS, MARQUITA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676276. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.