Williamsburg Village Healthcare Campus
941 Scotland Dr, Desoto, TX 75115 · For profit - Corporation · 242 certified beds · (972) 572-6200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 5 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (79) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $150,370 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-27)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.5% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.4% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.1% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.3% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.1% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.3% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.23 | 2.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.18 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 33.0–63.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.4–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.4–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.49 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 242 beds and averages 212.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.81 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.96 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
79 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for one (Resident #1) of eleven residents reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who resided on the facility's secured unit, received adequate supervision to prevent him from eloping on two separate occasions. On 04/20/26, Resident #1 eloped from the facility at 2:00 a.m. and was found 2.5 hours later by law enforcement approximately 2 miles away from the facility. On 04/24/26, Resident #1 eloped from the facility at 1:30 a.m. and was found on 04/27/26 at a local hospital where he was being treated for chest pain. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 04/24/26 at 12:02 p.m. and an IJ Template was provided to the Interim Administrator at 12:45 PM. While the IJ was removed on 04/27/26, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was an accident involving the resident which resulted in injury and had the potential for requiring physician intervention for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for change in condition. LVN L failed to immediately consult with Resident #1's physician and failed to notify the resident's family when Resident #1 fell hard against a rail in the hallway hitting his face/head and torso, which resulted in immediate bleeding to the resident's cheek on 03/22/26 at 7:30 AM. The resident's family noticed a change in the resident's mental status at 5:00 PM and noted a bloody bandage on the resident's face. The family had the resident transported to the hospital where he found to have sustained a right adrenal hematoma, a Grade 3 laceration of the liver through segments 5 and 6, and two rib fractures. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. LVN L failed to complete an immediate, comprehensive post-fall assessment to include neurological checks after Resident #1 had a fall when the resident swung hard towards LVN L in an attempt to hit him on 03/22/2026 at 7:30 AM, which resulted in the resident losing his balance and hitting his face/head and torso against a rail in the hallway. The resident had bleeding on his cheek which LVN L put a bandage on; however, LVN L did not notify the physician of the fall nor did he notify the resident's family. The family noticed a change in the resident's mental status on 03/22/2026 and saw the bloody bandage on the resident's cheek. The family had the resident transported to the hospital where he was found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of accident hazards as possible for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to provide Resident #1, who had dementia, with adequate supervision on 01/29/26 when the resident was left unattended and unsupervised on the facility's van from approximately 4:30 PM until 9:00 PM when temperatures were in the 30 degree Fahrenheit range.The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 01/29/26 and ended on 02/02/26. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of death, related to cold or heat exposure, discomfort, pain, and anxiety. Findings Include:Record review Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/29/26, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included kidney failure requiring dialysis, dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was used to transfer Resident #1 from her bed to the wheelchair on 12/23/25 when they were getting the resident up to go to the dialysis center. During the transfer, the resident reported that her leg got twisted which caused her severe pain. The resident was then sent to the dialysis center where she complained of severe pain and was transferred to the hospital where she was diagnosed with a comminuted fracture (a severe injury where a bone breaks into three or more fragments, typically caused by high-impact trauma), which required surgery. An IJ was identified on 02/12/26. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:22 PM. While the IJ was removed on 02/13/26, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #8) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 had the right to be free from abuse on 03/01/25 when Resident #9 hit him with a ruler 2-3 times, as the argument escalated further, Resident #9 then stabbed Resident #8 with a pen which resulted in scratches on his abdomen and the back of his neck. Resident #8 was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had the right to be free from abuse when Resident #7 pushed her on 03/09/25 while on the secure unit, causing Resident #6 to fall which resulted in a right hip fracture that required a hospital stay and surgery to repair the injury. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 03/01/25 and ended on 03/09/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation visit began. This failure placed residents at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 who had a history of wandering and exit-seeking, was provided with adequate supervision to prevent her from eloping on 06/09/25. Resident #1 was found 5 minutes away from the facility by police and was transported to the hospital for evaluation due to the resident experiencing hallucinations and delusions. The noncompliance was identified as a past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 06/09/25 and ended on 06/10/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents at risk of harm and/or serious injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/18/25, reflected the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one of six residents (Resident #6) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had the right to be free from abuse when Resident #7 punched and then pushed her on 02/05/25 located on a secure unit, causing Resident #6 to fall which resulted in a right hip fracture that required a hospital stay and surgery to repair the injury. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 02/05/25 and ended on 02/05/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 02/26/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #6's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/12/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 01, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her diagnoses included hip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse for 1 (Resident #11) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to supervise and protect Resident #11 from Resident #12, who had a diagnosis of dementia with a behavioral disturbance and was acting out on auditory hallucinations to hit other residents. On 04/02/24, Resident #11 was found on the floor, crying with bloody nostrils, while Resident #12 was standing over her yelling in an aggressive manner. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 03/27/24 and ended on 04/03/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Finding included: Review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 04/18/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (a condition characterized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care.The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with incontinence care every two hours and as neededThis failure could place residents at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/18/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis which included cerebrovascular accident, (commonly known as a stroke, which occurs when blood flow to a part of the brain is interrupted or reduced, depriving brain tissue of oxygen and nutrients). Resident #1 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14, and she was always incontinent of bowel and bladder.Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control.CNA A and CNA B failed to perform hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #1.This failure could place residents her at risk for cross-contamination. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/18/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis which included cerebrovascular accident, (commonly known as a stroke, which occurs when blood flow to a part of the brain is interrupted or reduced, depriving brain tissue of oxygen and nutrients). The resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 14, and she was incontinent of bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the discharge summary included an accurate and current description of the clinical status of the resident and sufficiently detailed individualized care instructions to ensure that care was coordinated and the resident transitioned safely from one setting to another for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for discharge process. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2's discharge summary included appropriate clinical information to ensure that the resident received continuous and coordinated care after she discharged to the community AMA (against medical advice) on 04/06/26. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving ongoing person-centered care, which could lead to worsening of condition or serious harm.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's Discharge MDS Assessment, dated 04/06/26, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 04/06/26.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for reportable incidents of abuse and neglect.LVN-L failed to report an allegation of abuse and neglect immediately to the Administrator, physician, and family for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence allegations of neglect were thoroughly investigated and documented for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. The Administrator failed to conduct a thorough investigation after being notified by the hospital on [DATE] that Resident #1 had sustained serious bodily injury after a fall on 03/22/2026 at the facility which LVN L had failed to report to the Administrator and had failed to notify the physician and the resident's family member. These failures could place residents as risk for abuse and neglect by not investigating allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admissions MDS assessment, dated 01/07/2026, revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male, was admitted on [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 00, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview (severely impaired cognition). Section GG-Functional Abilities, reflected Resident #1 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #169 and #195) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to provide privacy covers for the urinary collection bags for Residents #169 and #195.This failure could place residents at risk of a lessened sense of self-worth.Findings included: 1.Review of Resident #169's admission MDS assessment, dated 01/11/26, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, unspecified (a diagnosis of the progressive brain disorder where the onset, early or late, is not specified); Heart failure, unspecified (indicates a diagnosis of heart failure where the specific type, systolic, diastolic, acute, or chronic has not been detailed); and Adult failure to thrive (a syndrome…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 33 of 35 and resident's admission Records and 2 of 10 (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for personal privacy. The facility administration failed to protect the residents' privacy by having private information of residents in a binder in the front lobby of the facility.The facility failed to ensure resident rooms had full visual privacy, Rooms #114 did not have a privacy curtain and room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have window blinds. This failure could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity and decreased quality of life due to lack of privacy during care.Findings include:In an observation on 03/08/2026 at 9:15 a.m. revealed a red notebook on a table located in the south building facility labeled, Elopement Binder South Building. Included in the book revealed the policy and procedure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a residents who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of 35 residents (Residents #15 and #69) reviewed for ADLs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's fingernails were routinely trimmed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #69's fingernails were trimmed routinely, and her facial hair was shaved regularly. These failures could place residents at risk for a decreased sense of self-worth, as well as potential skin injury. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/14/16, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15 had with diagnoses which included a stroke affecting the left side of his body, dementia , and legal blindness. His BIMS score was not calculated due to his medical condition. His Functional Ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in 2 of 2 kitchens (North Kitchen and South Kitchen) reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure freezers in the North and South Kitchen were functioning to prevent thawing and to keep food solid. Food items that had been thawed and were soft to touch, and kept between 40 and 50 degrees Fahrenheit, were not discarded.2. The facility failed to correctly thaw beef patty fritters served for lunch on 03/09/26 from the South Kitchen.3. The facility failed to label, date, and discard items in the reach in refrigerator, and label and date items in the dry storage in the South Kitchen.4. The facility failed to ensure the dishwasher's chemical concentration and water temperatures were logged for 4 of 9 days of March 2026 in the South Kitchen.These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness.North Kitchen Observation on 03/08/26 at 9:12 AM, in the North kitchen, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition by failing to maintain freezers in two of two kitchens (North and South Kitchen) and failed to maintain 1 of 13 (Resident #147) bed in safe operating condition.1.The facility failed to ensure freezers in the North and South Kitchens were functioning to prevent thawing and to keep food solid. Food items that had been thawed and were soft to touch and kept between 40- and 50-degrees Fahrenheit, were not discarded.2. The facility failed ensure the Resident #147's bed was in proper working condition. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and at risk for injury and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: North Kitchen Observation on 03/08/26 at 9:12 AM, in the North Kitchen, revealed the following in one of the reach in freezers: - on the top shelf, unlabeled, undated, thawed and soft to touch chicken cubes, beef in a sauce, crumbled pork sausage, breaded chicken patties. In the middle of the freezer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 60 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure rooms were equipped to assure full visual privacy for each resident for 3 (Rooms # 115, #116, #119) of 18 rooms reviewed for visual privacy.The facility failed to ensure resident rooms had full visual privacy, Rooms # 115, #116, and #119, did not have a privacy curtain. This failure could place residents at risk of being exposed during cares or when changing clothes.Findings included:Observation on 03/08/26 at 11:24 AM, of room [ROOM NUMBER] there was no privacy curtain for the resident in the bed closest to the door. There was a track mounted to the ceiling for a curtain, as well as the hanger clips, but no curtain. Observation on 03/08/26 at 11:31 AM, of room [ROOM NUMBER] there was no privacy curtain at the foot of the bed closest to the window. There was a track mounted to the ceiling for a curtain, as well as the hanger clips, but no curtain.Observation on 03/08/26 at 11:38 AM, of room [ROOM NUMBER] there was no privacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free of pest for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #232), 1 of 2 kitchens (North Kitchen), and 1 of 2 halls reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of gnats in Resident #232 room, North kitchen and 700 Hall.This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, food-borne illness, and decreased quality of life.Findings included: Observation and interview on 03/08/26 at 9:14 AM, revealed there were gnats in the kitchen, in the dishwasher area. According to [NAME] K, she was aware of gnats in the dishwashing area. [NAME] K stated dishwashers were responsible for reporting the gnats to the Dietary Manager and the Maintenance Supervisor . She stated the Maintenance staff were aware of the problem. Observation and interview on 03/08/26 at 4:00 PM, Resident #232 revealed about 8-10 gnats at his bedside table, in his orange juice and on his sandwich.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team determined that this practice was clinically appropriate for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #102 and Resident #232) reviewed for resident rights.1.The facility's interdisciplinary team failed to ensure Resident #102 was clinically appropriate to self-administer Atrovent 17mcg hfa inhaler that was with the resident in the TV room.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #232's eye drops and arthritis pain cream, located at his bedside, was clinically appropriate to self-administer medications.These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medication or an adverse drug reaction.Findings include:1. Record review of Resident #102's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #102 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #102 had a BIMS score of 07, which indicated his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 1 of 35 residents (Residents #147) reviewed for environmental conditions.The facility failed to ensure Resident #147's ceiling plaster was not hanging from the ceiling.This failure could place residents at risk for injury and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Observation and interview on 03/08/26 at 12:50 PM, revealed Resident #147 room ceiling plaster was peeling and hanging from the ceiling and able to see the drywall. Resident #147 stated a couple of days ago it rained, it started to peel off, and it was getting bigger. Resident #147 stated she was not sure if anyone was going to fix it. Resident #147 stated she could not recall if she notified anyone about it. Interview on 03/10/26 at 10:59 AM, CNA PP revealed she was not aware of Resident #147's ceiling. She stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #54, #36) reviewed for care plans.1.The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #54's use of a feeding tube for nutrition or his noncompliance with physician orders which indicated Resident #54 to have nothing to eat or drink by mouth.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36's care plan addressed antibiotic treatment via CVC line (used to deliver medications and other treatments directly to the large central veins near heart). These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their individual needs.1. Record review of Resident #54's admission MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for 2 of 13 residents (Resident #54 and #229) reviewed for feeding tubes .1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's formula and water bag was properly labeled with the resident name, name of formula, feeding rate, date, time his formula and water was administered along with the nurse's initials.2. The facility failed to follow physician's orders of providing Resident #229 with his 22-hours of feeding intake and failed to ensure the formula bag was changed on 03/08/26. These failures could place residents at risk for a decline in health or adverse effects due to inappropriate management of G-tube care.Finding include:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #36 and Resident #227) reviewed for intravenous medication. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36, and Resident #227's intravenous medication bag and tubing were labeled with the date, time, and initials.2. The facility failed to change and maintain the integrity of Resident #36's CVC line (used to deliver medications and other treatments directly to the large central veins near heart) dressing per professional standards.3. The facility failed to follow physician orders for administering medications to Resident #227 when LVN Q administered Cefazolin 2gm intravenous medication used to treat infection.These failures could place residents at risk for medication error, delay in medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 medication carts (Halls 600 B nurse medication cart), 1 of 2 medication rooms (600 Hall medication room), and 1 of 5 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for labeling of drugs and biologicals.1. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the Hall 600 B medication cart and Hall 600 medication room.2. The facility failed to ensure LVN Q administered all morning medication to Resident #54. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medication or an adverse drug reaction. Findings included: 1.Observation on 03/09/2026 at 3:30 PM, of the Hall 600 B nurse medication cart with LVN M revealed one bubble pack of ibuprofen 400mg (used to treat pain) with an expiry date of January…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for medications. The facility failed to ensure LVN Q administered Resident #54 with his morning medications resulting in significant medication errors. These failures placed residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician, which could result in exacerbation of conditions. Findings included:Review of Resident #54's MDS assessment, dated 02/23/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #54 had a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #54's diagnoses included anemia (iron deficiency), cancer (complex group of diseases) and malnutrition (when the body lacks a variety of needed nutrients), Multidrug-Resistant Organism (a germ that is resistant to many antibiotics), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #107 and #125) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure MA NN disinfected the blood pressure cuff between blood pressure checks for Residents #107 and #125 during medication administration.These failures placed residents at risk of cross contamination and the spread of infection.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #107's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's cognition was severely impaired with a BIMs of 6, and she had a diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure).Record review of Resident #107's care plan dated 09/29/25 reflected: Problem:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 3 (Residents #2, #3, and #4) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.1. The facility failed to provide wound care to Resident#2's Unstageable wound of the left heel, on 01/17/2026 and 01/18/2026.1a. The facility failed to provide wound care to Resident #2's stage 4 pressure wound of the left medial first toe and the left fourth toe on 01/17/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/24/2026, 01/30/2025 and 01/31/2026. 1b. The facility failed to provide wound care to Resident #2's stage 4 pressure wound of the left fourth toe, the left distal medial foot and the left medial first toe on 02/01/2026, 02/07/2026, 02/08/2026 and 02/10/2026.1c. The facility failed to provide wound care to Resident # 2's stageable 4 pressure wounds of the left medial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for neglect.The facility failed to notify HHSC when Resident #1 was discovered to have been left in a transport van for several hours in the cold. This failure could place residents at risk of neglectful behavior not being investigated.Findings Include:Record review Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/29/26, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included kidney failure requiring dialysis, dementia, and paranoid schizophrenia. Resident #1's BIMS score was 6, indicating he had severe cognitive impairment. His Behaviors assessment did not indicate he did not wander. Resident #1's Functional Ability assessment indicated he used a wheelchair for mobility and required assistance with his ADLs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency for one of two incidents reviewed for reporting.The facility failed to report an allegation of neglect when Resident #1 alleged that her leg had been broken during a transfer from her bed to the wheelchair on 12/23/25 due to the facility staff not using a mechanical lift.This failure could affect residents by resulting in a delay of identification of abuse or neglect and lack of timely follow-up on recommended interventions to prevent harm, or impairment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female resident whose most recent admission entry was on 04/10/25. Resident #1 had a BIMS of 10 which indicated she had moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation, and mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were thoroughly investigated for one (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for neglect.The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect when Resident #1 alleged that she sustained a fractured left femur (the bone of the thigh) during a transfer in which staff did not use a mechanical lift as care planned.This failure could place residents at risk of abuse and neglect.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female resident whose most recent admission entry was on 04/10/25. Resident #1 had a BIMS of 10 which indicated she had moderately impaired cognition. The residents' diagnoses included stroke, end stage renal disease, and there was no diagnosis of dementia or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #5 and #6) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Residents #5 and #6 were provided with timely incontinence care.This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included:Record review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure when blood vessels are consistently too high) and hemiplegia/hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body/partial weakness on one side). The resident had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 7. The resident required substantial to maximal assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #5 and #6) observed for infection control. CNA D failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves while providing Residents #5 and #6 with incontinence care. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for worsening conditions and cross-contamination. Findings included:Record review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hypertension (high blood pressure when blood vessels is consistently too high) Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis (hemiplegia paralysis on one side of the body while hemiparesis indicates partial weakness on one side). BIMS score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her Functional Status revealed she required substantial/maximal assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a discharge summary that included, but not limited to a recapitulation of the resident's stay, that included but was not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology and consultant results and a final summery of the resident's status to include items, at the time of the discharge that was available to release to authorized persons and agencies, with the consent of the resident or resident's representative for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge summary. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not having complete records after permanent discharge from the facility. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's Discharge MDS assessment, dated 09/11/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 09/11/25 to Nursing Home.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #3 and #4) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide incontinence care to Residents #3 and #4 every 2 hours and as needed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/22/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #3 had a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of brain, unspecified (cancerous brain tumors where the specific location within the brain has not been determined). He had a BIMS score of 00, which indicated his cognition was severely impaired. The MDS reflected the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for pressure ulcer treatment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received wound care according to physician orders. This failure could place the resident at risk of worsening wounds. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 06/18/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 04/02/25. Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment, dated 02/23/25, reflected her diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (brain disorder), Pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, Unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, Osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region (a bone infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #100) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to follow Resident #100's physician orders for enteral feeding. These failures could affect residents receiving enteral nutrition/hydration and place them at risk of health complications and decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #100's face sheet dated 06/19/25 reflected the resident was [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #100's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 00. Resident #100 required supervision or touching assistance with eating. The assessment reflected Resident #100's diagnosis included Anemia (lack of healthy red blood cells), Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar), Alzheimer's Disease (gradual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #3 and #4) observed for infection control. 1. CNA I, CNA JJ and CNA KK failed to perform hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #3 and #4. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN X performed hand hygiene and changed gloves during wound care for Resident #4. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for worsening conditions and cross contamination. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/22/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to facility the on 02/18/25 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #3 had a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of brain, unspecified (cancerous brain tumors where the specific location within the brain has not been determined). He had a BIMS score of 00, which indicated his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 days thereafter or alternate between personal visits by the physician and visits by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist for four (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) of four residents reviewed for physician services. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4 were seen by their attending physician at least once every 60 days. The attending physician's extender was completing all visits for the residents, not alternating visits with the physician. The failure could place residents at an increased risk of not receiving appropriate and adequate medical care and a lack of oversight by the physician, which could place the residents at risk of harm and health decline. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/26/25 reflected the resident was a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #3) of four residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to administer Resident #3, who had a diagnosis of dementia, with her morning medications on 03/26/25 and 03/27/25. Both the medication aide and nurse acknowledged they were busy and did not attempt to give them to her again after one refusal. As a result, Resident #3 missed eight different medications both days, including blood pressure readings related to blood pressure medication, as well as two supplements. The failure could place residents at risk for exacerbation of health conditions, worsening of conditions, and physical/emotional discomfort. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 03/26/25 reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs, without adequate indications for its use for two (Residents #1 and #2) of four residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 and #2 were not prescribed Austedo (a prescription medicine used to treat involuntary movements in adults with tardive dyskinesia (movement disorder characterized by involuntary movements) or Huntington's disease (an illness that causes nerve cells in the brain to decay over time and affects a person's movement, thinking ability, mental health) without adequate indications for its use. The failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for possible adverse side effects, a decreased quality of life and continued use of possible unnecessary medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/26/25 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for one (Resident #1) five reviewed for resident call system, in that: Resident #1's call lights was on the floor and not within reach on 03/24/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet printed on 03/08/2025 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Alzheimer's (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills) and esophagitis (inflammation or irritation of esophagus, the pipe that carries food from mouth to stomach. This can cause pain, difficulty in swallowing or chest pain.) Record review of the annual MDS dated [DATE] did not indicate a BIMS score. Section GG…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident has a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his or her preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to follow Resident #1's care plan intervention of lowering the bed and the use of half bedrails due to fall risk. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving delayed treatment and not obtaining/maintaining their highest practicable wellbeing. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet printed on 03/08/2025 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills) and esophagitis (inflammation or irritation of esophagus, the pipe that carries food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with feeding assistance. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in nutritional needs not being met and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet printed 03/08/2025 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills) and esophagitis (inflammation or irritation of esophagus, the pipe that carries food from mouth to stomach. This can cause pain, difficulty in swallowing or chest pain.)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to prevent the ADON from taking two morphine pills prescribed for Resident #1 on 02/24/25. This failure could place residents at risk of pain and failure to achieve therapeutic effects intended by the physician. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance that began on 02/24/25 and ended on 02/24/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the surveyor entered. No Plan of Correction required. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated Face Sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included lung cancer, brain cancer, and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one of six residents (Resident #2) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to administer Resident #2's cancer medication, Ibrance, as prescribed, which resulted in the resident missing four doses between 08/26/24 and 08/29/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not achieving the therapeutic effects intended by the physician. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's undated Face Sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure, swelling of the legs, and breast cancer in 2019. Record review of resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated 01/24//25, reflected a BIMS score of 8 indicating she mildly cognitively impaired. Her Functional Status indicated she required staff assistance with her ADLs. Record review of Resident #2's care plan, dated 02/18/25, reflected she had anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #23, #55 and #81) reviewed for ADL care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #23 and #55 received grooming assistance to remove unwanted facial hair. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff provided consistent showers/baths for Resident #81. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving hygiene care which could cause skin breakdown, a loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/09/24, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old-female who initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses of anemia (condition in which the blood doesn't have enough health red blood cells and hemoglobin to carry oxygen through the body), heart failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 kitchens (North kitchen and South kitchen) reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated with name of product, date opened, and use by date. 2. Nutrition Aide M failed to wear a beard guard while prepping drinks for the lunch meal on 12/10/24. 3. Nutrition Aide L failed to wear a beard guard while putting away clean dishes on 12/10/24. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: 1. Observation on 12/08/24 at 9:16 AM of the facility's North Building kitchen revealed the following: -cooked chicken and rice soup in a plastic container was not labeled and did not have a prepared date or use by date. -cheese in a plastic container was not labeled and did not have a prepared date or use by date. -sautéed mushrooms in a plastic container was not labeled and did not have a prepared date or use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #189) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #189's catheter urine collection bag had a privacy cover. This failure could place residents with catheters at risk for a loss of dignity, decreased self-worth and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: Record review of Resident #189's face Sheet, dated 12/11/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #189's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a BIMS score of 07. Active diagnosis included Indwelling catheter (including suprapubic catheter and nephrostomy tube), ostomy, cancer, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, renal insufficiency, obstructive uropathy, diabetes mellitus, fractures, and stroke. Section GG reflected resident required partial/moderate assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for call light access. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 had access to her call light. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #55's undated Face Sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included legal blindness, muscle wasting, and difficulty swallowing. Record review of Resident #55's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/06/24, reflected a BIMS score was not completed due to her medical conditions. Her Functional Status assessment reflected she required substantial assistance with all of her ADLs. Record review of Resident #55's care plan, dated 09/24/24, reflected she had a self-care deficit and required assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practices, the comprehensive care plan, and the residents' choices and based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #133) reviewed for wound care. The facility failed to ensure the diabetic wound on Resident #133's left upper side second toe was covered with a dressing. This failure could place residents at risk of pain and lead to systemic infections causing harm for residents. Findings included: Review of Resident #133's face sheet dated 12/10/24 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #133's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected Resident #133 had diagnoses which included diabetes (high blood sugar). Had a BIMS score of 03, reflecting the resident's cognition was severely impaired. He was at risk of diabetic foot ulcers. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections based on the resident's comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #189) reviewed for urine incontinence/catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #189's catheter urine collection bag was kept off the floor. This failure placed residents at risk of urinary tract infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #189's face Sheet, dated 12/11/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #189's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a BIMS score of 07. Active diagnosis included Indwelling catheter (including suprapubic catheter and nephrostomy tube), ostomy, cancer, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, renal insufficiency, obstructive uropathy, diabetes mellitus, fractures, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of five resident (Resident #81) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #81 maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status and provide timely interventions as demonstrated by Resident #81 experiencing a 15.51% weight loss in 30 days from October to November. Resident #81 had not continued to lose weight from November to December, however. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased nutritional status, decline in health, serious illness, or hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #81's face sheet, dated 12/10/24, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #81's admission MDS Assessment, dated 10/03/24, reflected she did not have a BIMS score calculated (a term used to screen and identify a resident's cognition) Her active diagnoses included stroke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for 2 (Resident #177 and Resident #189) of 18 residents and for 1 (100 Back Hall cart) of 8 carts reviewed for secure medication storage. 1. RN-F failed to secure his medication cart. 2. Resident #177 had 1 new box of arthritis pain cream stored at the resident's bedside table not locked in a lock box or secured in the medication cart or medication room. 3. Resident #189 had a tube of arthritis pain cream, zinc oxide cream, and eye drops inside his nightstand table not locked in a lock box or secured in the mediation cart or mediation room. These failures could place residents at risk of accessing medications not prescribed for them, and at risk of overmedicating or adverse drug reactions. Findings included: 1.Observation and interview on 12/08/24 at 11:15 AM revealed the nurse medication cart for the 100 Hall was unsecured, the locking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the resident's assessment, plan of care, and in a form designed to meet the resident's needs for 1 (lunch on 12/10/24) of 3 meals reviewed for resident's needs. The facility failed to follow Resident #29's physician's order for pureed consistency food and nectar thickened liquids for the lunch meal on 12/10/24. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, weight loss and an increased risk of aspiration. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's face sheet, dated 12/11/24, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #29's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 10/31/24, reflected he had a BIMS score of 05, indicating severe cognitive impairment. His diagnoses included pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Transient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a centralized staff work area and to ensure call light cord was accessible for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #130) reviewed for call light access. The facility did not adequately equip Resident #130's room with a call light cord to allow the resident to call for assistance. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings included: Review of Resident #130's Face sheet, dated 12/10/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #130's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/27/24, reflected he had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure) and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-side muscle weakness). His brief interview for mental status assessment was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's bed was made in a timely manner after being sanitized, which prevent the resident from being able to lie in bed. These failures could place residents at risk of an unsafe or uncomfortable environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/18/24 reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (general decline in cognitive ability), history of falling, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was usually understood and understood others. The MDS indicated a BIMS score of 05 indicating Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one (Medication Cart #1) of three medication carts reviewed. MA B failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 was locked when unattended on 08/27/24. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. Findings included: In an observation on 08/27/24 at 10:23 AM, Medication Cart #1 was observed unlocked and unattended near the one of the main entrances of the facility. There were two staff members at the nurses' station but walked away after a couple of minutes. There were four residents in wheelchairs in the immediate area. Another resident wheeled himself into the building from outside while the cart was unlocked and unattended. LVN A was observed coming from an office area behind the nurses' station. The office did not have any windows. LVN A stated Medication Cart #1 belonged to MA B. He stated she was down the hall, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for six (Residents #2, #3, #4 #5 #6 and #7) of six residents reviewed for safe clean homelike environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #2, and #3 did not have soiled briefs in the trash cans in their rooms. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #2, #4, and #5 had clean privacy curtains in their rooms. 3. The facility failed to ensure the ceiling vents Resident #5, #6 and #7's rooms were clean. These failures could affect residents and place them at risk for not having a safe and sanitary homelike environment. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 04/18/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included cerebral ischemia (common mechanism of acute brain injury that results from impaired blood flow to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 6 (Residents #1, #2, #8, #9, #10, #13 ) of 6 residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide incontinence care to Residents #1, #2, #8, #9, #10, #13 every 2 hours and as needed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 04/18/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included cerebral ischemic (common mechanism of acute brain injury that results from impaired blood flow to the brain). Record review of Resident #2's Care Plan dated 02/16 /24, reflected the following: Goal: Resident will be assisted with incontinence to ensure social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 (Resident #2 and #5) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer treatment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and #5 received wound care according to physician orders. This failure could place the resident at risk of worsening wounds. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 04/18/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5's diagnoses included bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration) and chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should). Review of Resident #5's MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 received showers as scheduled for the month of December 2023, January 2024, and February 2024. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, decreased quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/23/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (paralysis of partial or total body function on one side of the body), muscle wasting and atrophy, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, other lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident #3) reviewed for oxygen. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's oxygen concentrator and nasal cannula was dated, labeled, and changed on a weekly basis. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's oxygen delivered as ordered by physician at 2 liters per minute. This failure placed residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for inadequate or inappropriate amounts of oxygen delivery and possible infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 02/23/24 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included low back pain, Hypoxemia (an abnormally low level of oxygen in the blood), chronic pain due to trauma, elevated blood-pressure reading with diagnosis of high blood pressure, anemia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative was notified when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. The RP/family was not notified when of Resident #1 who was not capable of making decisions was discovered with a new wound on 09/22/23 denying the RP/family the opportunity to participate in the resident's treatment options. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the RP/family aware, informed of and/or participating in treatment options. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's closed clinical records revealed a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]. The MDS assessment reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 07/05/23. Diagnoses included dementia (general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for wound assessments. Resident #1's wound to the right finger was not assessed until four days after discovery on 10/26/23. This failure placed residents at risk for delays in treatment, developing infections and unidentified deterioration of their wounds. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's closed clinical records revealed a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]. The MDS assessment reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 07/05/23. Diagnoses included dementia (general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), hypertensive heart disease heart problems that occur because of high blood pressure), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to self-determination for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #55, and #173) reviewed for self-determination in that: 1. CNAs failed to change Resident #55's bed linen, leaving her with no bed sheets. 2. Dietary staff were rude in their interactions with Resident #173 when discussing her food choices. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Review of Resident #55's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, speech impairment, seizures, and obesity. Review of Resident # 55's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/21/23, revealed a BIMS score of 8, indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired. Her Functional Status indicated she required extensive assistance with most of her ADLs. Review of Resident #55's care plan, dated 10/25/23, revealed she had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #503, #161, and #60) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #503's bed curtain was free from a dried brown substance. 2. The facility failed to ensure the large hole in Resident #161's and #60's bedroom wall was repaired. These failures could affect any resident and place them at risk for not having a safe and sanitary homelike environment. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #503's undated admission Record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, acute congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #503's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment and assist the resident in making appointments for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #116) whose records were reviewed for vision services in that: Nursing staff failed to ensure that Resident #116 was scheduled for an ophthalmologist appointment since July 2023. This failure could affect residents and contribute to a decline in vision. Findings included: Review of Resident #116's face sheet, dated 11/08/23, revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #116's Consolidated Order dated 10/21/23 revealed Resident #116 had a diagnosis of Unspecified Glaucoma. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 6. Review of Resident #1's nurse's note, dated 07/19/23, reflected in part: Called [name of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health for 1 of 36 residents (Resident #146) reviewed for foot care. The facility did not ensure Resident #146 received toenail care. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving foot care which is consistent with professional standards of practice. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 11/08/23, revealed Resident #146 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of secondary hypertension (high blood pressure), cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), central pain syndrome. Record review of Resident #146's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed resident BIMS score was 00, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #146 had no behaviors or rejection of care. The MDS revealed Resident #146 required substantial/maximal assistance when putting on/taking off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease of ROM for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #113) reviewed with limited range of motion. The facility failed to ensure Resident #113 was receiving contracture management to treat their contracted hands. This failure could place residents at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion, and contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings included: Review of Resident #113's face sheet, dated 11/08/23, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included acute kidney failure, severe sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when an infection triggers a massive inflammatory response in the body, damaging vital organs), and diabetes. Review of Resident #113's physician's orders, dated 11/08/23, reflected the following: Frequent visual checks every shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 (Resident #153 and #250) of 11 residents reviewed for accidents. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #153, who resided in the secure unit, did not have access to a razor. 2. The facility failed to have a fall mat in place, while in bed, for Resident #250. These failures could place residents at risk for decline in health, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #153's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia and bipolar disorder . The MDS further reflected Resident #153 had a BIMS score of 6 (cognition severely impaired). The resident also required extensive assistance of two staff for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #153's care plan updated on 11/06/23 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents to include providing pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #300) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to administer medication, Xtandi, to Resident #300 from 10/27/23- 11/08/23. This failure placed resident at risk of preventable pain and worsening of their medical conditions. Findings included: Review of Resident #300's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to facility on 10/27/23 with a history of malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate cancer). Review of Resident #300's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 12, indicating resident had moderate cognitive impairment. His functional status indicated he required the assistance of one person for all ADLs. Review of Resident #300's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #300) of 6 residents reviewed for medication errors was free of significant medication errors. The facility failed to obtain Xtandi (medication used in treatment of cancer) and administer medication per Physician Order. This failure placed the resident at risk of complications due to possible cancer spread. Findings included: Review of Resident #300's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to facility on 10/27/23 with a history of malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate cancer). Review of Resident #300's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 12, indicating resident had moderate cognitive impairment. His functional status indicated he required the assistance of one person for all ADLs. Review of Resident #300's Physician Order dated 10/27/2023-11/07/2023 revealed an order dated 10/27/2023 for Xtandi (Enzalutamide, sold under the brand name Xtandi, is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #113) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented on Resident #113's MAR on 11/07/23. This failure could affect residents that received medications and place them at risk of inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. Findings included: Review of Resident #113's face sheet, dated 11/08/23, revealed th resident was an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included acute kidney failure, severe sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when an infection triggers a massive inflammatory response in the body, damaging vital organs), and diabetes. Review of Resident #113's physician's orders, dated 11/08/23, reflected the following: Frequent visual checks every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse reporting. The facility failed to ensure LVN A reported an allegation of sexual abuse involving Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for not having allegations of abuse reported. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/07/23, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female. Her diagnoses included a sexually transmitted disease and dementia. Review of Resident #1's MDS assessment, dated 09/07/23, reflected she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's cognitive status was moderately impaired. She had no behaviors. Her diagnoses included traumatic brain dysfunction and depression. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, dated 10/25/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide B treated Resident #1 with respect and dignity in her interaction with him on 09/15/23 to which Resident #2 was a witness to. This failure led to the residents having feelings of being worried or scared. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/12/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/03/23. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a persistent respiratory symptoms like progressive breathlessness and cough) and morbid obesity. Review of Resident #1's significant change in status MDS Assessment, dated 08/28/23, reflected he had a BIMS of 07, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 10/12/23, reflected the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for one of five residents (Resident #3) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received timely incontinent care. This failure could put residents at risk of impaired skin integrity and decreased feelings of self-worth and dignity. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 10/12/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included generalized anxiety disorder and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 09/13/23, reflected she had a BIMS of 08 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed she required assistance with personal hygiene and toilet use as extensive assistance with one person physical assistance.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$150,370 in federal fines across 9 penalties.
- $17,004 — penalty dated 2026-04-27
- $17,004 — penalty dated 2026-04-27
- $10,361 — penalty dated 2026-03-03
- $23,371 — penalty dated 2026-03-03
- $16,149 — penalty dated 2026-02-13
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-06-19
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-06-19
- $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-02-26
- $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-05-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/27/2015 |
| UMB BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| CASTANEDA, EDMUNDO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/10/2022 |
| CERISE, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/24/2014 |
| PF WILLIAMSBURG SNF OPS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING, LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/22/2022 |
| VERNON, GIBSON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/08/2012 |
| CAMPBELL, SCOTT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| CHANCE, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| FISHER, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| LANGDON, THOMAS | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| MCGEHEE, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| TAYLOR, JOHN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| LIFETIME WELLNESS, LTD. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| MARTUS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2023 |
| PHARMERICA DRUG SYSTEMS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2017 |
| PRESERVATION FREEHOLD COMPANY | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| REHAB PRO LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| SANCTUARY LTC, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| BAILEY, CECIL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/15/2015 |
| BOYD, ALBERT | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2014 |
| HOFFART, TAMMIE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/06/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675756. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.