No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

DFW Nursing & Rehab

900 W Leuda St, Fort Worth, TX 76104 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (817) 332-7003 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)10 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$317,302 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (17% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Nov 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 10 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $317,302 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-01)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
906 W Cannon St · (817) 321-0951 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
906 Pennsylvania Ave · (817) 769-2600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1424 Pennsylvania Ave · (817) 332-3663 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Watts Park, 704 St Louis Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.3%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%3.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.2%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.5%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.1%13.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.0%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication11.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.0%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.7%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.302.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.752.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.0–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.4–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.331.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
17.4%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 66.7 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-01)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

62 citations, most serious first. The 23 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and or exploitation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from repeated resident-to-resident abuse by Resident #3, which occurred on 05/24/2025, 08/17/2025, and 10/03/2025. A past Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was found on 08/17/25 and the immediacy was removed on 10/05/25. While the IJ was removed on 10/025/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity of actual harm due to the facility's need to monitor the effectiveness of their corrective systems. These failures could place residents at risk for continued abuse, decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increased anxiety.Findings included:Record review of an undated admission Record revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had the admitting diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility to protect the resident's right to be free of sexual abuse by a resident for one (Resident #2) of twelve residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from sexual abuse by another resident when Resident #1 led Resident #2 into his room on 09/07/2025 and sexually assaulted her. An IJ was identified on 09/08/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:54 PM. While the IJ was removed on 09/10/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of Isolated and a severity level potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility's need to implement corrective systems. This failure placed residents at risk of subsequent abuse resulting in potential mental anguish, emotional distress, and physical harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/08/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of paraplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for4 (Res#1, Res#2, Res#3 and Res#4) of 5 residents reviewed for updated care plans. The facility failed to provide Resident#1,2,3,4 with updated care plans to reflected concerns for health and safety when leaving the facility unsupervised. An IJ was identified on 08/21/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:53 pm While the IJ was removed on 08/22/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy and a severity level of pattern because all staff had not been trained on 08/22/25. This failure can affect residents health, safety and possible death.Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident#1) out of 4 received adequate supervision when reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to provide Resident#1 with adequate supervision on 08/01/25 when Resident#1 left the unsupervised for 3 day's The facility was not made aware until 08/04/25 that Resident#1 had been admitted the hospital. An IJ was identified on 08/21/15. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:45 pm. While the IJ was removed on 08/22/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy and a severity level of isolated because all staff had not been trained on 08/22/25. Thia failure could affect all resident's health, safety and possible death. Findings included:Record review of Resident#1's face sheet, dated 08/30/25 reflected, he was a [AGE] year old male who was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] and diagnosed with Paraplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for one of eleven residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from deprivation of services and goods abuse when the facility failed to have effective interventions and services in place to address the resident's inappropriate sexual behaviors and prevent him from sexually abusing others, which could lead to harm to himself and others. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 5/19/25. While the IJ was removed on 5/20/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems . This failure could place residents at risk for abuse or neglect that could lead to serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for one of eleven residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. -The facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure Resident #1 was free from deprivation of goods and services abuse when the facility failed to have effective interventions and services in place to address the resident's inappropriate sexual behaviors and in-service staff on measures to properly handle the behaviors to prevent Resident #1 from sexually abusing others. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 5/19/25. While the IJ was removed on 5/20/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern with the potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of five residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was provided with adequate supervision to prevent the resident from using nonprescription drugs at the facility. On 2/15/25 Resident #2 was found exhibiting signs of an overdose and was transported to the local hospital where he tested positive for marijuana. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 5/19/25. While the IJ was removed on 5/20/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk for accidents that could lead to serious injury or harm. Findings include: Record review of Resident 2's face sheet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be from abuse for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Residents #1 from a physical and verbal altercation on 01/22/25 with the Administrator. The Administrator pushed Resident#1, causing Resident#1 to fall. The incident was not reported or documented until after surveyor intervention on 01/23/25.The Administrator was not suspended until 01/23/25 at approximately 11:30 AM. An IJ was identified on 01/23/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:15 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/25/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of Isolated and a severity level potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility's need to implement corrective systems . This failure placed residents at risk of subsequent abuse, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident#3) of 4 residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. The facility failed to provide Resident#3 with adequate supervision on 01/20/25 when he eloped from the facility. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The IJ began on 01/20/25 and ended on 01/20/25. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the state's investigation began. These failures could affect all residents at risk of elopement. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 01/23/25 reflected Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male and was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 was diagnosed with Hyperlipidemia (high levels of lipoproteins in the blood), Schizophrenia (Serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave) -unspecified, Depression (mood disorder that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's condition or need to alter treatment significantly for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for change of condition. -The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician and responsible party when the resident had a fall on 3/27/24 and when the resident showed signs of increased lethargy and altered mental status as the week progressed. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 04/22/24. An IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:28 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 04/23/24 at 02:02 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to adequately supervise Resident #1 and to ensure the back door by the kitchen was secured or monitored while getting groceries delivered. Resident #1, who had dementia and a history of wandering, eloped from the facility through the propped open door at unknown time on 10/10/23. The facility was unaware of Resident #1's elopement until another facility notified them Resident was at their facility. The facility failed to ensure adequate interventions were implemented to prevent residents with a high risk of wandering/elopement from eloping through the same door. An IJ was identified on 11/09/2023. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:45pm. While the IJ was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse for two (Resident #1 and #2) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, in that: On 11/01/25 the facility failed to ensure that Resident #2 was not hit by Resident #1 causing Resident #2 to defend himself with his cane resulting in a laceration to Resident #1's left eyebrow. This failure could affect residents and result in abuse and injuries. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #1's Face sheet reflected she is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected in part diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental condition marked by alternating periods of elation and depression), anxiety disorder, dementia, and mood affective disorder (affects your emotional state). A BIMS score of 11 indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Record Review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 11/13/25 reflected Resident #1 was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-10-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received a psychology consultation or assessment after three incidents (5/24/2025, 08/17/2025, 10/03/2025) of resident-to-resident abuse where Resident #2 was the victim. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving behavioral health services and a decline in quality of life. Findings included:Record review of an undated admission Record revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had the admitting diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Unspecified (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications (chronic condition where persistently high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-04 · tag F0627 — pattern
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the transfer or discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs could not be met in the facility; the safety of individuals in the facility was endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident; the health of individuals in the facility would otherwise be endangered; and failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for transfers and discharges. 1) The facility failed to ensure when Resident #1 was issued a 30-day discharge notice, on 12/12/25, citing behavioral issues, the clinical documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated, prevent further potential abuse and mistreatment while the investigation was in process, and report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken for 1 (Resident #4) of 3 reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to immediately investigate, protect the residents, and report allegations of abuse on 08/29/25 when Resident #4 reported a nurse hit her while in the shower, and the facility did not investigate or implement measures to protect the residents from further abuse. This failure could place residents residing in the facility at risk of abuse. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 11/21/25 reflected [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized for 1 (Resident #3) for accuracy of records. The facility failed to accurately transcribe the admitting diagnoses for Resident #3. This failure can affect residents by putting them at risk for inaccurate and incomplete records. Findings include:Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 11/19/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old man admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of HIV (a virus that attacks cells that help the body fight infection), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein and calories), seizures, hypertension (pressure in your blood vessels is too high), atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), congestive heart failure (heart can't pump enough blood),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the QA committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. The facility failed to provide the plan of correction (POC) for a deficiency of F610 cited at D and F842 cited at D on 11/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse and not having abuse allegations investigated and inaccurate [NAME] records. Findings included:Record review of the 2567 Provider's POC exit date 11/20/2025 for F610 revealed the following: Resident #4 was sent to hospital on 8/9/2025 and returned with no injury. Resident was assessed for injury on 12/10/2025 no injury. DON/designee attempted an investigation incident on 12/10/2025 resident does not remember episode and gives incoherent rambling answers.All residents have the potential to be affected. Education with all staff was completed by DON/designee on 12/11/2025 for reporting abuse/neglect timely. The Director of Nursing Services, or designee,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-14 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of the transfer or discharge before transferring or discharging the resident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for Discharge Rights.The facility failed to notify the ombudsman in writing of the transfer/ discharge of Resident #1 to a behavioral hospital, the reason for the transfer/discharge, and the right to appeal. This failure could affect the residents at the facility by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and appeal processes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/14/2025 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 was discharged to hospital for a behavioral evaluation on 09/28/2025. Resident's diagnosis included Schizophrenia, Unspecified (a mental health condition that is marked by a mix of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished in order attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for five (Residents #1, #8, #9, #11, and #12) of eight residents reviewed for care plans related to sexual activity with other residents. The facility failed to create care plans addressing known sexual relationships between residents for Residents #1, #8, #9, #11, and #12. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/08/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of paraplegia (loss of voluntary movement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse to Health and Human Services for one (Resident #3) of twelve residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report an allegation by Resident #3 (a discharged resident) that Resident #1 put drugs in a beer he gave her on 08/31/25 or 09/01/25. This failure could place residents at risk of being abused and lack of oversight by a state agency. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/08/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of paraplegia (loss of voluntary movement and sensation in the lower half of the body), depression, anxiety, cerebral infarction (stroke), and traumatic brain injury (sudden injury to the brain usually caused by a blow or jolt to the head.) Resident #1 was his own responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-01 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's only registered dietitian carried out the functions of food and nutrition services dietitian, according to the facility's Consultant Dietitian: Retainer Agreement. The facility failed to ensure that the registered dietitian worked a minimum of 16 hours a month and/or adjusted hours based on the facility's census. This failure could result in residents not maintaining or achieving optimal nutrition status. Findings included: An interview on 08/01/2025 at 9:19AM with the registered dietitian revealed that she had been working at the facility for 22 years and worked 12 hours a month. She explained it always had been 12 hours a month; if the census was around 60 residents, she would be expected to work at least 8 hours, if the census is 61-90 residents, she'd work 12 hours. She further stated she usually does more than 12 hours a month. Record review of the Consultant Dietitian: Retainer Agreement, dated 1/1/2026 reflected: This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen.The facility failed to ensure the stand-by refrigerator were dated and labeled.The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator food items were dated, labeled and securely stored.The facility failed to ensure the dry storage food items were dated and labeled.The facility failed to ensure that the steam tray table was cleaned daily.The facility failed to ensure that canned good food items were free of dents.The facility failed to ensure that dishwashing protocol was followed.The facility failed to ensure pureed food temperatures were logged.The facility failed to ensure dietary staff had an adequate amount of safe and functional essential kitchen equipment, including cutting boards, stock pots, and metal sheet pans. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness and foodborne intoxication.Findings included: Observation on 07/29/2025 beginning at 8:43AM of 1 of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections in this facility (one of one) reviewed for water management. The facility failed to implement a water management program/plan including: 1.) An assessment to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread; and2.) to implement measures to prevent the growth of opportunistic waterborne pathogens (control measures), and how to monitor them. This failure could place all residents at risk of water borne illness.Findings included: In an interview on 7/31/25 at 12:00 pm, RN C stated that the facility had a legionella policy and plan, but that there was no documentation of the implementation of the water management program. She stated a water management binder had been started but that the plan was never designed or implemented . She stated she had spoken with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and functional essential kitchen equipment in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure the gas stove top oven had all turn knobs, did not leak grease, and was safe to touch when operating.The facility failed to assure the wall plug sockets were free of food and grease particles, and in safe operating condition. The facility failed to ensure the toaster oven was in safe operating condition. These failures could place residents at a risk for facility essential equipment not being maintained in working order. Findings included: An observation on 07/29/2025 at 8:52AM of the gas stove top oven revealed a small pile of white cloth towels with grease on them under the left front corner of the oven.An observation on 07/30/2025 beginning at 11:50AM of the facility's kitchen revealed:- A toaster over with electrical tape around its power cord- 2 wall sockets with black burn-like appearance- 2 wall sockets covered with food particles and grease- Food particles and grease build up on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, and functional environment for 6 of 10 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to repair the window in room [ROOM NUMBER].2. The facility failed to have baseboards, holes in the wall, and tile repaired in shared resident restrooms. 3. The facility failed to have soap and paper towels available in resident shared restrooms.4. The facility failed to repair the window, and repair holes in the wall and baseboards in room [ROOM NUMBER]. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsanitary, unsafe environment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 07/29/2025 at 10:22 am, revealed dirt, grime and peeling paint on the windowsill in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A disposable under pad was stuffed between a small gap between the window and window seal. Observation on 07/29/2025 at 10:33 am, revealed all baseboards loose in the restroom, 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, prepare, and periodically update menu items to meet residents needs and preferences. The facility failed to utilize and follow dietitian approved recipes for pureed food items.The facility failed to prepare an alternate menu in advance. The facility failed to ensure alternate menus were reviewed and approved to ensure it met the residents nutritional needs by the facility's dietitian.The facility failed to make reasonable efforts to develop a menu based on resident complaints about the lack of variety in food options. These failures could result in an adverse effect to resident's physical and psychosocial well-being.Findings included: During an observation on 07/29/2025 at 9:30AM, this surveyor asked the dietary assistant for a regular and alternate menu for the next 3 days. The dietary assistant was able to provide a regular menu of the meal being served that day, but not an alternate menu. She explained the alternate menu item was chosen the day of and there was not an official alternate menu. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for two of the three hallways reviewed for pest control and the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 and Resident #28's room was free of flies on 7/29/25 and 7/30/25.The facility failed to ensure Resident #56 and Resident #28's room was free of flies on 7/30/25. This failure could lead to pest infestation and place residents at risk of insect transmitted diseases.Findings included: Review of Resident #36's face sheet reflected he is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #28s face sheet reflected he is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #56's face sheet reflected he is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #29's face sheet reflected he is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #36's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMs score was not done as resident was rarely/never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #65) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, in that: On 7/27/25 the facility failed to ensure that Resident #65 was not slapped in the face by Resident #21 resulting in a bruise to the area of the right eye. This failure could result in resident abuse and injuries.Findings include: Review of Resident #65's Face Sheet reflected he is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #65's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected in part diagnoses including seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury, depression, and bipolar disorder (mental health condition causing extreme mood swings). A BIMS score of 11 indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #65's Care Plan dated 7/12/25 reflected Resident #65 was at risk for bleeding and bruising due to taking aspirin. Review of Resident #21's Face Sheet reflected he is a [AGE] year-old male…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported immediately to Health and Human Services for one (Resident #30) of three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect reporting. The facility failed to make a timely report of Resident #30's allegation that a staff member kicked a shoe at her, hurting her leg, on 07/19/25. This failure could place residents at risk of being abuse and lack of oversight by a state agency. Findings included: Review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated 07/31/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], and having diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other disease (dementia associated with another health condition) with behavioral disturbance, bipolar II (a less severe form of bi-polar than bi-polar I), major depressive disorder, and an anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #30's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/05/25, reflected Resident #30 had adequate hearing and clear speech, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence that all an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for three residents (Resident #30, Resident #15, and Resident #81) of three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect reporting. 1. The facility administrator failed to provide evidence of a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse by Resident #30 on 07/19/25, in which she alleged a staff member kicked a shoe at her and hurt her foot.2. The facility administrator failed to provide evidence of a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse between Resident #15 and Resident #81 where there was a physical altercation between the both of them. This failure could place residents at risk of being abused and lack of oversight by a state agency. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated 07/31/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], and having diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other disease (dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs in order attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident #30) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to create a care plan addressing Resident #30's trauma history on 05/07/25, when her trauma screening assessment reflected her history of trauma. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.Findings included: Review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated 07/31/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], and having diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other disease (dementia associated with another health condition) with behavioral disturbance, bipolar II (a less severe form of bi-polar than bi-polar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0773 — pattern
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services only when ordered by the physician; physician assistant; nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with State Law, including scope of practice laws and promptly notify the ordering physician of the results for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for labs. 1. Nursing staff did not ensure that labs (CBC, CMP, lipid, Valproic acid) were drawn every six months for Resident #1. 2. Nursing staff did not ensure that labs (Hgb and A1C) were drawn every three months for Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk of a delay in receiving the necessary interventions to treat their medical condition. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/18/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 12/15/2023. Diagnoses included: metabolic encephalopathy (condition when brain dysfunction occurs), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (condition of inadequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of six residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to identify Resident #1 had physical and/or verbal behaviors on his admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] or develop a care plan to address the behavior. 2. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #2's substance abuse . This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and services. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/20/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: dementia (brain disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures, for two of eleven residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, neglect and exploitation . 1. The facility failed to report to the state agency when Resident #1 exhibited sexually inappropriate behaviors to prevent further abuse or neglect towards Resident #1 and others. 2. The facility failed to report to a law enforcement entity and the state agency when Resident #2 obtained and used nonprescription drugs at the facility, was found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for two of eleven residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, neglect and exploitation. 1. The facility failed to investigate an alleged violation when Resident #1 exhibited sexually inappropriate behaviors to prevent further abuse or neglect towards Resident #1 and others. 2. The facility failed to investigate when Resident #2 obtained and used nonprescription drugs at the facility, was found exhibiting signs of an overdose, and was transported to the local hospital where he tested positive for marijuana . This failure could place all residents at an increased risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the facility did not use verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and or exploitation. for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #1 and Resident #2) 1. The facility failed ensure Resident #1 and #2's were free from resident-to-resident abuse, which occurred on 04/05/25. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increase anxiety. Findings included: Record review of an undated admission Record revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Encephalopathy (broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure), Bipolar Disorder and Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, with Agitation. Record review of Optional State Assessment Minimum Data Set, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure food items were kept away from potential airborne contaminants (leaking sinks, dust particle and grease). This failure could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation on 04/08/25 at 8:00 AM, revealed behind the air fryer area had white and brown grease on the wall. Observation of the floor revealed brown grease behind the equipment that ran from the air fryer to the stove. Observation on 04/08/25 at 8:30 AM, revealed one white towel that had turned brown was wrapped around a pipe. Under the towel was a hole that the piping did not fit into, and water was running to the hole. Observation on 04/08/25 at 8:35 AM, revealed another white towel that had turned brown underneath the pots and pans sink. Interview on 04/08/25 at 9:00 AM, CK stated the pipes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents in one of one kitchen reviewed for a clean environment. The facility failed to keep a safe and sanitary kitchen environment (leaking sinks, dirt towels and open hole outside the kitchen that was not covered to control kitchen contamination). This failure could place the residents at risk of exposure to infectious material. Findings included: Observation and interview on 04/09/25 at 8:30 AM, the MD and AMD went outside behind the kitchen to view the hole the plumber dug two weeks ago to start repairs on the pipes for the kitchen. The MD stated the plumber will need to do the tunnel from outside to follow the piping under the building and will need to replace the PVC piping. Surveyor observed a large, uncovered hole behind the kitchen wall. Attempted to interview plumber on 04/09/25 at 9:00 AM, he stated to contact the MD at the facility, and he will be able to go over the details of the repair. Interview on 04/09/25 at 2:11 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's representative and ombudsman of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understood for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for Discharge Rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's resident representative in writing of the transfer/ discharge of the resident to a behavioral hospital, the reason for the transfer/discharge, and the right to appeal. This failure could affect the residents at the facility by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and appeal processes. Findings included: Resident #1's face sheet (undated) reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with an initial admission on [DATE]. Resident #1 discharged to hospital for a behavioral evaluation on 02/10/2025. Resident#1 was transferred to the Behavioral hospital on [DATE] for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately report failed to report abuse, neglect, exploitation, or critical incidents for 1 of 4 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to report an incident of resident to staff physical aggression/assault to HHSC. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect and incidents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/23/25, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizophrenia (serious mental condition that affects how people think, feel and behave. It may result in a mix of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking and behavior) Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic, Unspecified Psychosis not due to substance or known major depressive disorder. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/28/24, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS of 12, which indicated cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate incident/accident report for 1 (Resident#1) of 4 residents reviewed for incident reports. The facility failed to ensure Resident#1's incident report was completed on 01/22/25, which involved a verbal and physical altercation between Resident#1 and Administrator by LVN C. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate or incomplete information, resulting in the risk of abuse or neglect by staff. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/23/25, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizophrenia (serious mental condition that affects how people think, feel and behave. It may result in a mix of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking and behavior) Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic, Unspecified Psychosis not due to substance or known major depressive disorder. Record review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5) reviewed for Accuracy of Assessments. 1. Resident #1's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] did not accurately reflect his current and MD order for Hemodialysis treatment in Section O. 2. Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] did not accurately reflect his current MD order for continuous oxygen treatment in Section O. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/28/24 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old-male, admitted on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE]. Resident #1's DX included: Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 convulsions dependent on dialysis (kidney failure). Record review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen . The facility failed to ensure items found in the reach-in refrigerator, were labeled with the name of container contents and the use by date, expired by date in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure items found in the reach-in refrigerator was covered, tabled and dated. This failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and food contamination. Findings include: Observation on 06/23/2024 at 9:01 AM revealed in the facility's only reach-in refrigerator the following items were not labeled or dated: Metal pot with shredded cheese covered with a ceramic plate. Styrofoam plate which contained potato chips and two sandwiches. Block of cheese covered in plastic wrap. Metal pan which contained meat pies covered with plastic wrap. Metal pan which contained sliced ham had no covering. Interview on 06/25/2024 at 03:42 PM with the Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of ten residents (Residents #19) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA A performed hand hygiene and wore gloves when administering eye medication to Resident #19. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA A did not use his bare finger to remove Coreg 6.25 MG tablet out of Resident #19's. medication cup before administering her medications. These failures could place residents at risk of infectious diseases and cross contamination. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 06/25/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included generalized anxiety disorder a condition of severe, ongoing anxiety that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 1 smoking areas reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure smoking residents were free of fire hazards, when a propane grill was stored on the smoker's court. The facility failed to ensure the smoking area was free of fire hazards. Findings include: Observation on 06/23/2024 at 1:00 PM of the resident smoking courtyard revealed residents sitting in patio chairs through the courtyard. Through the conference room window reflected a grill on the smoking court near the building . Observation on 06/23/24 at 1:13 PM, on the smoking courtyard, revealed a grill with 2 gas tanks outside in the courtyard one propane tank was attached to the grill and one was positioned behind the grill . Interview on 06/23/24 at 1:23 PM with the Activity Director revealed the residents sat all the way in the chairs in the courtyard. He said he did not do any cooking on the grill. He stated the maintenance man did the grilling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident#19) of five residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to specify blood pressure (BP) perimeters for Resident #19's order for Nifedipine 30 mg ER and Carvedilol 6.25 mg [both medications used to treat high blood pressure] when Resident #19's blood pressure reading was 105/72. MA A administered Nifedipine 30 mg and held Carvedilol 6.25 mg. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 06/25/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included generalized anxiety disorder a condition of severe, ongoing anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with professional standards, including expiration dates and with appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions for one (Resident #38) of five residents reviewed for storage of drugs and Biologicals. The facility failed to ensure MA B administered Amiodarone 200 mg (a medication used to regulate and lower heat rate) without checking vital signs or heart rate for Resident # 38 even with warning reflected on the medication bubble card to hold if heart rate was less than 60 BPM. These failure could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. Record review of Resident #38's face sheet, dated 06/24/24, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition of brain confusion due to chemical imbalance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs in that: The facility failed for provide Resident #1 with timely incontinent care. This failure could put residents at risk of impaired skin integrity, and decreased feelings of self-worth and dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 05/30/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Insomnia (Disorder can make it hard to fall asleep and hard to stay asleep), major depressive disorder (mental disorder characterized by a persistent depressed mood-causing significant impairment in daily living), recurrent, Pseudobulbar affect (inappropriate involuntary laughing and crying due to a nervous system disorder), mild…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide services to residents with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents by not providing a call light system within reach for 1 of 25 (Resident #2) observed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had a call light within reach so Resident #2 could communicate to staff he needed assistance. This failure affected residents by placing them at risk for not getting their needs met and diminishing their quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident's #2s Face Sheet dated 3-5-2024 indicated a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a primary diagnosis of Hemiplegia (paralysis) and Hemiparesis (loss of strength in limbs) following a cerebrovascular disease (condition affecting blood flow to the brain) affecting the right dominant side, unspecified visual loss, seizures,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for comprehensive resident centered care plans. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive resident centered care plan for Resident #2 was implemented by not putting a fall mat in Resident #2's room. This failure could place residents, that are at risk for falls, to be injured by not putting interventions listed in resident's care plan. Findings include: Record review of Resident's #2s Face Sheet dated 3-5-2024 indicated a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a primary diagnosis of Hemiplegia (paralysis) and Hemiparesis (loss of strength in limbs) following a cerebrovascular disease (condition affecting blood flow to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide residents who were unable to carry out ADLs the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for showers. The facility failed to ensure Resent #1 received showers/baths on scheduled shower/bath days. This failure affected residents by putting them at risk for a diminished quality of life, hygiene, and self-esteem. Findings include: Record review of Resident's #1 Face Sheet dated 3-5-2024, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a primary diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity due to excess calories, cerebral infarction (stroke), and osteoarthritis. Record review of Resident's #1 care plan dated 6-21-2023, revealed he required extensive/total assist with ADL's due to morbid obesity and late effect CVA (an interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain) with hemiplegia (Muscle weakness or partial paralysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to must ensure that the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 25 (Resident #2) observed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had a call light within reach so Resident #2 could communicate to staff he needed assistance. The facility failed to enure Resident #2 had a fall mat next to the bed as indicated in Resident #2's care plan. This failure affected residents by placing them at risk for not getting their needs met and diminishing their quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident's #2's Face Sheet dated 3-5-2024 indicated a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a primary diagnosis of Hemiplegia (paralysis) and Hemiparesis (loss of strength in limbs) following a cerebrovascular disease (condition affecting blood flow to the brain)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided in accordance with appropriate treatment and service practices to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for three (Residents #1, #2, and #3) of six residents reviewed for incontinent care and catheter care, in that: Residents #1, #2, and #3 had an indwelling urinary catheter (a catheter which is inserted into the bladder, via the urethra and remains in to drain urine) without a physician's order, regarding a valid rationale for the placement of an indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practice. The findings included: Record Review of resident #1's face sheet, printed on 02/29/24, indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnosis of tracheostomy status (a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, for daily living for four of six residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) review for environmental concerns. The facility failed to clean restrooms in Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4's room. This failure could affect residents by exposing them to an unsanitary and unsafe environment. Findings included: In an observation and interview on 01/11/2024 at 12:36 p.m., revealed the door to shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was ajar, an attempt to open the door revealed the door and bathroom floor made contact requiring door to be opened with force. Observation reflected drag marks on the floor reflecting contact with the door and floor. The shower was clean. Observation reflected there was not an out of order sign on the door. Interview with the DON on 01/11/2024 at 12:37 p.m., reflected the shower is not working because of the door. We have someone coming out to repair the bathroom. The DON said all residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and interventions for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, and Resident #5) reviewed for supervision and interventions. 1.The facility failed to use a Hoyer sling that was in good condition for Resident #1. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's wheelchair was in good condition. 3. The facility failed to safely supervise and transport Resident #5 to the facility at admission. These failures could place residents at risk for accidents and injury. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 01/12/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), vascular dementia, mixed receptive-expressive language disorder (difficulty understanding and using language) and hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one sided weakness)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for 1 of 2 shower rooms reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to ensure shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was functional. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving showers and living in an unsafe and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: Observation and interview on 01/11/2024 at 10:45 a.m., of shower room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the metal threshold of the shower room was loose and appeared dirty. The door did not open fully, and no signage was posted on the door. RN C stated residents did get showers in the room and RN C had to force open the door. Interview on 01/11/2023 at 12:39 p.m., CNA A stated the door to shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was hard to open. Interview on 01/11/2024 at 1:42 p.m., the Administrator stated residents do not use the tubs in their rooms, they go to the shower room. He stated the shower room on B Hall (shower room [ROOM NUMBER])…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests for 1 of 2 resident rooms (Resident #3's room) reviewed for pests. The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was implemented to prevent gnats in resident rooms. This could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and/or disease spread by pests. Findings included: Observation and interview on 01/11/2024 at 12:56 pm in Resident #3's bathroom and bedroom revealed about 3-4 gnats flying around. Resident #3 stated he noticed the gnats and does swat at them. Interview on 01/11/2024 at 1:29 pm, the Maintenance Director stated he only goes into the resident bathrooms if the staff put something on the log that needs to be fixed. He stated if they put gnats, he logs that in the pest control book. Interview on 01/11/2024 at 1:50 pm, the Administrator stated he had been there since November and in the time here has no complaints about pest issues. He stated he had not actually seen with his own eyes any issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the allegation is made for one (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for reporting of allegations. The facility failed to report Resident #1's unwitnessed falls timely as required. This failure could place residents at risk of not having incidents reported as/when required. Findings included: Record review of Face Sheet for Resident # 1 revealed the resident initially admitted to facility on 04/10/2009 for long term care and enrolled with hospice on 01/06/2023 with admitting diagnosis of CVA (cerebrovascular accident; stroke). Resident #1 has an advanced directive on file with DNR. Resident #1 admission diagnoses information included essential (primary) hypertension; other encephalopathy (any disease that affects the whole brain and alters its structure or how it works, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were accurately documented for one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for accurate medical records, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's medical chart reflected nursing documentation of Resident #5 signing out of the facility and being pushed back into the facility by the local police because Resident #5's electronic wheelchair battery died. This deficient practice could result in errors in care and treatment. Findings included: A review of Resident #5's electronic face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Major depressive disorder (mental disorder[9] characterized by at least two weeks of pervasive low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure in normally enjoyable activities), Cerebral Infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), and Morbid obesity(…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents in 24 of 51 (1, 2, 5, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17,18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 45, and 49 and four of four (North, South, East and West) corridors reviewed for environment. The facility failed to maintain all displaced, cracked, broken, and missing wall, floor, and ceiling tiles. The facility failed to repair rusted, worn, scraped, peeling and gouged paint on doors and door frames of the room bathrooms and corridors. The facility failed to maintain the buckled flooring in the therapy room in a safe manner. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to an unsafe and unmaintained environment. The findings were: Observations and interview with the Maintenance Assistant on 03/29/2023 between 1:18PM and 3:07PM revealed the ceramic tile walls of residents' bathrooms in bedrooms 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, the failed to provide a private meeting space for residents' monthly Resident Council Meeting for 7 of 10 confidential residents reviewed Resident Council. The facility failed to provide a private space area for the monthly Resident Council Meetings. This failure could place residents who attend the monthly Resident Council Meetings at risk of not being able to voice their concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings included: In an interview on 03/29/2023 at 12:06 PM, the Activity Director revealed the monthly Resident Council Meetings were always held in the Dining Hall. The Activity Director revealed the Dining Hall was not closed for privacy and was open on one side. In an Interview on 03/29/23 at 1:57 PM, the Activities Director revealed the Resident Council Meeting on 03/29/203 would be held in a private area with a door. In an interview on 03/29/2023 at 2:00 PM during a confidential Resident Council Group Meeting with 7 residents present, each resident revealed in the meeting that their monthly Resident Council Meetings were held in the Dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #54) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the MAR and TAR for Resident #54 was initialed immediately after administering their narcotic medication. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their MARs/TARs signed after receiving their medication which could lead to overdose of the medication. Findings included: Review of Resident #54's Face sheet, not dated, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of low back pain. Record Review of Resident #54's Order Summary Report, dated March 2023, reflected: Norco 5/325mg every 6 hours as needed for pain. Record review of Resident #54's narcotic count sheet, dated March 2023, reflected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$317,302 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $173,025 — penalty dated 2025-08-01
  • $51,598 — penalty dated 2025-04-10
  • $16,859 — penalty dated 2025-02-14
  • $30,485 — penalty dated 2025-02-14
  • $36,020 — penalty dated 2024-02-29
  • $9,315 — penalty dated 2023-11-10
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-24 for 111 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-14 for 18 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BAKKER, JEFFIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
COCANOUGHER, CHARLESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/24/2010
COOK, WILLIAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2014
DUNCUM, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2010
FORBIS, CHRISTOPHERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/03/1994
MANOUSHAGIAN, DANAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2014
SANDFORD, WILLIAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 12/10/2007
WAGGONER, DEBRA SUEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 12/10/2007
CHARLESTON DFW OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2015
BENENATE, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/13/2022
BROUSSARD, KENDALLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2015
RUSSELL, WINSTONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2025
SCROGGINS, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/03/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 6%Medicare 6%Other / private 88%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$255per resident / day
operating cost
$7,754per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$228per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455881. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next