Tuskegee Airmen Texas State Veterans Home
2200 Joe B Rushing Road, Fort Worth, TX 76119 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (512) 981-9025 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- the CMS record shows $14,280 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-10)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Staffing
CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision to prevent the resident from eloping from the facility through an ancillary door on the service hallway on 03/21/26 at approximately 3:30 PM. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 03/31/26. While the IJ was removed on 04/01/26 the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate effectiveness of their corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of serious injury, harm or death. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's active diagnoses included mild…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one of six residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had the right to be free from abuse on 11/27/25, while on the memory care unit, Resident #1 punched Resident #2 in the face causing him to fall against the wall and then to the ground resulting in facial bleeding and a fractured hip. The noncompliance was identified as a past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 11/27/25 and ended on 12/02/25 the facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure placed residents at risk of harm and/or severe injury. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 09/25/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had BIMS of 06 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (neurodegenerative disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a physical altercation when Resident #1, who was sitting at the dining room table eating and talking with LVN A, got up from the table. LVN A asked him where he was going and to have a seat, Resident #1 stated, I will be right back with you. He then walked up to Resident #2 and punched him in the face causing Resident #2 to fall against the wall and then to the ground, which resulted in Resident #2 sustaining facial bleeding and a fractured hip on 11/27/25. The noncompliance was identified as a past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 11/27/25 and ended on 12/02/25 the facility had corrected the noncompliance before the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care .The facility failed to provide incontinence care to Residents #1 as needed.This failure could place residents at risk for loss of dignity, infections and a decreased quality of life.Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/27/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinsonism (any disorder manifesting symptoms of Parkinson's disease or any such symptom complex occurring secondarily to another disorder), chronic ischemic heart disease (heart damage caused by poor blood flow to the heart), respiratory failure (not enough oxygen travels from the lungs into the blood), anxiety disorder (excessive worry and feelings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable and to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for infection control.1. CNA B and CNA D failed to perform hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Residents #1 and #2.2. RN C failed to perform hand hygiene and change her gloves when she performed a skin assessment on Resident #2. These failures could place residents at risk for worsening conditions and cross-contamination. Findings include:1. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 3/27/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinsonism (any disorder manifesting symptoms of Parkinson's disease or any such symptom complex occurring secondarily to another disorder), chronic ischemic heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systemically organized in accordance with accepted professional standards for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's medical record included documentation reflecting the resident had received showers/baths in February and March of 2026.The failure placed residents at risk of not having continuity of care.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinsonism (any disorder manifesting symptoms of Parkinson's disease or any such symptom complex occurring secondarily to another disorder), chronic ischemic heart disease (heart damage caused by poor blood flow to the heart), chronic respiratory failure (not enough oxygen travels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to immediately report allegations that involved injuries of unknown source to HHSC for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reportable incidents of abuse and neglect.The facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to HHSC when Resident #1's sustained a bruise of unknown origin to his right eye area on 02/05/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle or old age that affects memory, thinking, and behavior); obstructive sleep apnea (a condition in which breathing stops involuntarily for brief periods of time during sleep), depression (mood disorder); and vertigo (a sensation that the environment is spinning in circles). Section C. cognitive patterns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's CPAP treatments were coded in his MDS dated [DATE]. This failure could result in Resident missing essential treatment treatments and interventions for care. Findings included: During an observation and interview with Resident # 1 on 02/10/2026 at 1:10 PM his CPAP mask was on his nightstand. Resident #1 was observed in the main resident area of memory care attending activities. Resident # was not interviewed about CPAP treatments and care tasks, due to severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/10/2026 reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. DX: Alzheimer's (severe cognitive decline.) Sleep Apnea (serious sleep disorder), Depression (mood disorder), Obstructive sleep apnea (serious sleep disorder causing changes in blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included describing the services to be furnished to attain or maintain measurable objectives to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans.Resident #1's, care plan dated 02/03/2026 did not address his CPAP treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle or old age that affects memory, thinking, and behavior); obstructive sleep apnea (a condition in which breathing stops involuntarily for brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that at resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for physician orders.The facility failed to ensure there were physician orders for Resident #1's use of a CPAP machine, which is non-invasive ventilation machine that involved the administration of air usually through the nose by an external device at a predetermined level of pressure, that was provided by the nursing staff daily. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate respiratory care. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle or old age that affects memory, thinking, and behavior); obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to remove previously applied Rivastigmine Patches for Resident #1 as ordered by the physician.This failure could place residents at risk for medication duplication, adverse drug reactions, and potential side effects. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 02/05/26, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 01/23/26, reflected the resident had diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (progressive brain disorder that causes memory loss and confusion), PTSD (mental health condition caused by experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event), and Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,280 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,280 — penalty dated 2025-12-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 745057. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.