Knopp Healthcare And Rehab Center INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 59.4 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed.The facility failed to employ a qualified dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional either full-time, part-time, or on a consultant basis. A qualified nutrition professional last employed with the facility was in October 2025.The facility failed to employ a qualified dietician who designates a person to serve as a full-time director of food and nutrition services for the facility. The person designated to serve as a director of food and nutrition services was employed for less than 25 hours per week.These failures could place residents at risk of not having their nutritional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedure. In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse and neglect. The facility DON failed to identify bruising to left eyebrow and right arm as an alleged violation of injury of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to have evidence all allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated and documented for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for an injury of unknown origin.The facility failed to have evidence that a thorough investigation was conducted following the allegation Resident #1 had bruising to her left side of her face and right arm and origin was unknown on 12/29/2025.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect by not investigating injuries of unknown origin.The findings included:Review of Resident #1's admission record dated 1/07/2026 reflected that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior) with late onset, major depressive disorder (serious mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all individuals with mental health disorders were provided with accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Screenings for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #7 had an accurate PASRR Level 1 Screening which indicated a diagnosis of mental illness (Bipolar Disorder) and refer Resident #7 to the state designated authority. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed assessments (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs.The findings included: Record review of Resident #7 face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #7 had diagnosis which included Bipolar Disorder (serious mental illness causing extreme mood swings, from manic highs to depressive lows), Senile Degeneration of the Brain (age related cognitive decline), Seizures (temporary disruption of brain activity from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remains was free from accidents and hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #48) and 1 facility reviewed for a wander guard system (a wander management system used in healthcare facilities to prevent residents at risk of wandering, such as those with dementia, from leaving safe areas, offering them freedom while ensuring safety through wearable devices and automated alerts. The system uses radio frequency identification technology with wristbands and door sensors that trigger alarms and notifications to staff when a resident approaches an exit, often locking doors automatically.) The wander guard system for the facility had an exit door without a functioning wander guard system. The facility failed on 01-06-206 when the door that gave access through wing-4 hallway. The door gave a person access to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for safe and functioning equipment in the laundry department. The facility had 3 commercial clothes washers with one of the three inoperable. The facility had 4 commercial clothes dryers with one of the four in-operable. This failure could place residents at risk for neglect by not having laundry services. The findings included: A record review of the facility's Resident census report dated 1/6/2026 revealed a census of 56 residents. A record review of the facility's Facility Assessment dated 8/12/2025 revealed, The purpose of this assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for our residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. Scope: this assessment addresses the following elements: the facility's Resident population, including but not limited to: the number of residents and the facility's Resident capacity.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. The facility failed to recognize and dispose of food which had pests, including maggots on the food items. This failure could place residents who receive food and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation by a Life Safety Code inspector on 10/16/2024 at approximately 2:30 PM revealed an opened box of vanilla pudding cups in the dry storage area of the kitchen. Upon further inspection, the box was revealed to have a foul odor and bugs flew out of the box. Observation on 10/16/2024 at 3:55 PM revealed an opened box of vanilla pudding cups with an opened pudding container inside of the box. Inside the box and on the open pudding container were maggots and what appeared to be insect eggs on and around the pudding cups. Interview and observation on 10/16/2024 at 3:58 PM, [NAME] A stated she was not the person who put away the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for physical environment. The facility was observed to have numerous crickets scattered throughout the floor of the facility both alive and dead. This failure could place residents at risk for not having a home free of pests, and a comfortable environment in which to live. The findings included: Observation on 10/16/2024 at 2:30 PM, more than 10 crickets were observed down a hallway in the facility as well as in a common sitting area of the facility. All crickets were in various stages of life, including some dead and some alive crickets. Interview on 10/16/2024 at 4:45 PM, the Administrator stated she believed the contracted pest control company would be at the facility the following day. The Administrator stated they have pest control for the crickets and that they come monthly to spray for general pests to include crickets. Record review of the facility pest control record, undated, reflected that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure its medication error rates were not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 24%, based on 6 errors out of 25 opportunities which involved 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for medication administration and medication errors. 1. RN B crushed pills and capsules, 3 medications; bisacodyl 5mg delayed release, duloxetine 60mg delayed release, and divalproex 125mg delayed release, which should not be crushed per professional standards, and administered the crushed medications to Resident #7. 2. RN B administered acetaminophen 650mg, whole pill, to Resident #7 who was ordered by her physician to have crushed medications due to her swallowing difficulties. 3. RN B administered medication Carvedilol 6.25mg on 10/03/2024 at 10:01 AM, 1 hour late. 4. RN B administered medication acetaminophen 650mg on 10/03/2024 at 10:01 AM, 1 hour late. These failures could place residents at risk for not having the intended…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 of the facility's laundry department reviewed for patient care equipment in safe operating condition. The facility presented 4 installed dryers of which 2 were inoperable and the facility presented with 3 washers of which 2 were inoperable. These failures could place residents at risk for harm by the facility's inability to provide clean sanitary linens. The findings included: A record review of the facility's census Resident List Report dated 10/01/2024 revealed a census of 50 residents. During an observation on 10/01/24 at 09:59 AM, the facility's laundry department revealed 3 commercial washers of which 1 of the 3 was operational. Further review revealed 4 commercial dryers of which 2 were operational. During an interview on 10/03/2024 at 10:10 AM, laundry Aide D stated she had been the laundry attendant for the past year and of the 3 washers only 1 worked and of the 4 dryers only 2 worked. Laundry Aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX