No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Knopp Nursing & Rehab Center INC

202 Billie Dr, Fredericksburg, TX 78624 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (830) 997-8840 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$32,094 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $32,094 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-18)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
205 W Windcrest St · (830) 307-9201 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
205 W Windcrest St · (830) 997-2163 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
H-E-B1.1 mi
407 S Adams St · (830) 997-9950 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Enchanted Rock Fredricksburg Tx · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.6%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.6%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.9%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.4%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.1%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.1%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.4%13.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.4%9.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.3%88.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit24.2%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.632.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.162.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.60U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.9%CMS range 43.6–65.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.6–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
1.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
62.5%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 36.3 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-21)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #140) reviewed for neglect with serious injuries and lack of supervision, in that: On 09/01/2024 CNA A assisted Resident #140 with a mechanical lift transfer by herself. Resident #140 fell during the transfer, suffered a broken right leg, and was hospitalized with a need for surgical repair. Prior to the fall Resident #140 was assessed with a need for more than 1 staff for assistance with transfers . An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 10/17/2024. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 04:30 PM. While the IJ was removed on 10/18/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with risk for harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility personnel failed to provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for code status. Facility staff failed to follow emergency protocol and did not obtain an AED or call emergency services for 25 minutes after Resident #1, who had a Full Code in place, was found unresponsive with no pulse or respirations, according to professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff had current CPR certification. On 09/05/2024 at 5:01 p.m., and Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 09/9/2024 at 6:49 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the residents' status for 2 of 7 (Resident #10 and Resident #20) whose MDS assessments were reviewed in that: Resident #10 had a diagnosis of anxiety and depression that was not coded on the MDS assessment.Resident #10 had orders for psychotropic medications that were not coded on the MDS assessment.Resident #20 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and depression that was not coded on the MDS assessment. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for inadequate care and services to meet their needs based on inaccurate MDS assessments.Findings included: Resident #10Review of Resident #10's admission Record dated 1/20/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included other specified viral disease (encompass a range of viral infections that do not fit neatly into established categories), weakness, and repeated falls. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than 4 months, on a full-time basis, unless that individual is competent to provide nursing and nursing related services; and that individual has completed a training and competency evaluation program, for 2 of 6 NAs (NA C and NA F) reviewed for competent staffing. The facility failed to ensure NA C and NA F completed the required training and competency evaluation program for nursing assistants within four months of full-time employment. This failure could result in incompetent care provided for residents and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the facility document titled Employee List 01.08.2026 revealed 6 total NAs employed by the facility. The job titles of NA C and NA F were documented as N.A. (nursing assistant), and the job titles for the remaining 4 NAs were documented as C.N.A. (certified nursing assistant). NA C's hire date was listed as 3/24/2024, and NA F's hire date was listed as 9/20/2025. In an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and to provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for 3 of 6 NAs (NA C, NA D, and NAD E) reviewed for competent staffing. The facility failed to complete a performance review and outcome based in-service education for NA C since hire on 3/24/2024, NA E since hire on 5/20/2024, and NA D since hire on 10/16/2024. These failures could lead to incompetent care provided for residents and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the facility document titled Employee List 01.08.2026 revealed 5 total NAs employed by the facility. Three of these NAs had been employed by the facility for longer a period greater than 12 months as of 1/19/2026:NA C's hire date was 3/04/2024NA D's hire date was 5/20/2024NA E's hire date was 10/16/2024 In an interview on 1/20/2025 at 9:15 AM with the BOM, she said NA D was incorrectly listed as LVN on the employee roster, and she was actually NA. The BOM said she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the prescription medication MediHoney gel (a topical medication used for wound care) was not stored in a resident's room. This failure could result in residents having unintended access to medications or accidental administration of medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's admission Record dated 1/18/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included weakness. Record review of Resident #45's MDS submissions did not reveal an admission MDS submission. Record review of Resident #45's Order Summary Report dated 1/18/2026 revealed the following physician's orders: May apply barrier cream topically with incontinence care as needed (order date 1/16/2026)Further record review of Resident #45's Order Summary Report did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required for 1 of 1 dietician and 1 of 1 director of food and nutrition services reviewed. The facility failed to employ a qualified dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional from October 2025 to January 2026.The facility failed to employ a full-time director of food and nutrition services. FSS works less than 25 hours per week at the facility. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their nutritional needs met.Findings included: In an interview on 1/21/2026 at 11:00 AM, the FSS said she has been employed with the facility for nearly 21 years. She said a new dietician was hired on to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 laundry area and 1 of 5 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure clean laundry was stored to prevent contamination in the laundry room. The facility failed to ensure laundry staff utilized PPE during handling of linen identified as potentially infectious. The facility failed to ensure appropriate level of TBP was initiated for Resident #45. The facility failed to ensure soiled linens from Resident #45 were properly secured and identified for cleaning. These failures could result in the spread of infection and illness, or the unnecessary seclusion and isolation of a resident. Findings included: 1. In an observation and interview on 1/21/2026 at 11:36 AM, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of the resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility or to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response for 1 of 1 Resident Council group reviewed. The facility failed to follow up on concerns and requests expressed in Resident Council meetings from July 2025 through December 2025.The facility failed to provide the Resident Council group with a response, actions, and rationale taken regarding their concerns. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their grievances followed up and addressed.Findings included: Review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes from July 2025 through December 2025 reflected there was no documentation of the facility's responses to Resident Council grievances identified during Resident Council group meetings:* Resident Council Meeting dated December 27, 2025, reflected: Resident Council group members communicated concerns with dietary items,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for care planning. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45's baseline care plan included TBP and planning for urinary catheter care. This failure could result in residents not receiving necessary care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's admission Record dated 1/18/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included weakness. Record review of Resident #45's MDS submissions did not reveal an admission MDS submission. Record review of Resident #45's Order Summary Report dated 1/18/2026 revealed the following physician's orders:[Urinary [sic] Catheter 14f 10 cc balloon every night shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure NA E performed proper catheter care for Resident #45 when she did not protect the catheter tubing from unnecessary tension while cleansing. This failure could result in the unintentional dislodgement of the urinary catheter or pain and injury to a resident's urinary tract. Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's admission Record dated 1/18/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included weakness. Record review of Resident #45's MDS submissions did not reveal an admission MDS submission. Record review of Resident #45's Order Summary Report dated 1/18/2026 revealed the following physician's orders:[Urinary [sic] Catheter 14f 10 cc balloon every night…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered professional nurse at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 2 of 141 days reviewed for sufficient staffing. Additionally, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis for 1 of 1 DON reviewed for staffing. The facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for 8 consecutive hours on 9/24/2025 and 10/19/2025.The facility designated an LVN to serve as the director of nursing effective 3/1/2024. These failures could lead to residents not receiving necessary care or oversight of their care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of the facility document titled Employee Timesheet [RN A] dated 9/16/2025- 9/30/2025 reflected RN A utilized 8 hours of paid time off on Wednesday, 9/24/2025. Record review of the facility document titled Employee Timesheet [RN A] dated 10/1/2025 - 10/15/2025 reflected RN A utilized 8 hours of paid time off on Thursday, 10/9/2025. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater for 2 of 4 Residents (Residents #36 and #37), and 2 of 25 medication administration observations, resulting in an error rate of 8%. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 received medication Donepezil at 7:00 AM on 1/19/2026, as ordered by the physician.The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 received medication Pantoprazole at 8:00 AM on 1/19/2026, as ordered by the physician. This failure could result in residents not receiving correct and timely medications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #36's medication administration record for January 2026, dated 1/19/2026, reflected the following order:Donepezil HCl Oral Tablet 5mg (Donepezil Hydrochloride) Give 1 tablet my mouth one time a day related to Alzheimer's disease [a progressive neurological condition causing deterioration of memory, thinking, and daily function] with late onset . start date 11/08/2025 07:00 [AM]A check mark symbol and initials of LVN G were documented on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective se rvices where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #5, #17, and #140) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 1. The administrator failed to report an allegation of neglect, with serious injury, when Resident #140…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevented further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress and reported the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action were taken, for 3 of 8 residents (rResidents #5, #17, and #140) reviewed for allegations of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 1. The administrator failed to investigate and report an allegation of neglect, with serious injury, when Resident #140 was assisted with a mechanical lift transfer by 1 staff member, CNA A. Resident #140 fell during the transfer, suffered a broken right leg, and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure its medication error rates were not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7.69%, based on 2 errors out of 26 opportunities which involved 2 of 6 residents (Resident #8 and #24) reviewed for crushed medication administration and medication errors. 1. RN G administered Resident #8's medications: a. ranolazine 500mg extended-release tablet by crushing the tablet. Ranolazine is used to treat heart related chest pain. 2. RN G administered Resident #24's medications: a. duloxetine 30mg delayed-release capsule by opening the capsule. Duloxetine is used to treat depression and anxiety. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: 1. A record review of Resident #8's admission record dated 10/17/2024 revealed an admission date of 10/01/2024 with diagnoses which included dysphagia oropharyngeal and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or the residents' representatives the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to invite and include the input of Resident #28 and/or residents' representative as members of the interdisciplinary team in Care Plan Conference meetings. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the interventions, treatments, and care necessary for the resident to reach their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being by not involving the resident and/or the residents' representative in Care Plan Conference meetings. The findings included: Record review of Resident #28's face sheet, dated 10/18/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male resident initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan with interventions that addressed Resident #18's diagnoses of mental illness including depression. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their needs and preferences met. The findings included: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet, dated 10/18/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident, initially admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonia (a lung infection that causes the air sacs in the lungs to fill with fluid or pus, making it difficult to breathe), depression, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for personal hygiene. The facility failed to provide Resident #28, 18 of 30 scheduled showers between 7/2/2024 and 10/15/2024. This failure could place residents who require assistance from staff for personal hygiene at risk of not receiving care and services contributing to overall poor hygiene, risk of experiencing a diminished quality of life, and possible skin infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #28's face sheet, dated 10/18/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male resident initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (a condition that affects one side of the body after a stroke causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who had not used psychotropic drugs were not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was taking a psychotropic medication (Mirtazapine (an antidepressant)), to treat a specific diagnosed condition. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for receiving medications that were not necessary for their care. The findings include: Record review of the admission Record reflected Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old resident who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included essential hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure), and a pressure ulcer of the sacral region, stage 4. A diagnosis of depression was not documented. Record review of the comprehensive MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and follow a policy to provide pharmacy services in accordance with State and Federal laws or rules of the Drug Enforcement Administration for 4 of 6 residents (Residents #10, 11, 12, and 13) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to dispense the correct number of pills for Resident #10 per physician orders for diazepam (controlled medication used to treat anxiety, muscle spasms, and alcohol withdrawal). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 blister pack (packaging used for pharmaceuticals) of 5-325 mg of hydrocodone acetaminophen (medicine used to relieve moderate to severe pain.) was not tampered with and replaced with a 10-235 mg hydrocodone acetaminophen by RN K. 3. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff who documented they dispensed 10-235 mg hydrocodone acetaminophen in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-09 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had orders and followed physician's orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 13 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for admission orders. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's admission orders for insulin administration and blood sugar checks were entered on admission. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving necessary care and services upon admission that could result in a deterioration of their condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated [DATE], reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, Resident #1's face sheet did not list his code status. Record review of Resident #1's nursing notes revealed was admitted to the facility after dinner service on [DATE] and expired on [DATE] around midnight. Record review of Resident #1'admission assessment dated [DATE] reflected he had intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (RN K) of 13 nurses reviewed for competent nursing care. RN K failed to administer Resident #12's 10-235 mg hydrocodone acetaminophen one hour before or after the scheduled time according to the facility's policy. These deficient practices could places residents at risk of not receiving medications timely . The findings included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 9/7/24, revealed an [AGE] year-old female was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis that included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia with fluctuations (is a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and causes tremors, stiffness and slow movement.), migraine without aura (genetically-influenced complex…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' pharmacist medication regimen review recommendations were reviewed by the resident's attending physician and what, if any, action has been taken to address them, for 34 of 38 residents (Residents #1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 33, 36, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49) whose records were reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to present the pharmacist's recommendations to the residents' physician for medication regimen review This failure could place residents at risk for significant health status declines. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1 Face Sheet dated 9/15/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: paraplegia, unspecified (paralysis of the legs and lower body), epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus (disorder characterized by recurrent seizures), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner than enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for 34 of 34 residents (Residents #1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 33, 36, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49) reviewed for pharmacy, nursing, and physician cooperation with Administration oversight, in that: The facility failed to present the pharmacist's recommendations to the residents' physician for medication regimen reviews for 3 reviewed monthly pharmacist recommendations (June, July, and August 2023). This failure placed residents at risk for significant health status declines. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1 Face Sheet dated 9/15/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: paraplegia, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility assessment must address or include: All personnel, including managers, staff as well as their education and/or training and any competencies related to resident care, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for the facility assessment, in that; The facility assessment was developed without complete assessment data and solely by the MDS nurse without training to complete the facility assessment. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their needs met. The findings included: A record review of the facility's CMS 802 Resident Matrix dated 09/11/2023 revealed the facility census to be 38 residents. A record review of the facility's facility assessment tool dated 08/01/2023, revealed Persons involved in completing assessment; Administrator: [The Administrator]; DON: [The DON]; Governing Body Rep [The Administrator]; Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have the interdisciplinary team, review, and revise the comprehensive care plan after each assessment and quarterly, for 2 of 18 residents (Residents #23 and #138) reviewed for care plans, in that. 1. The facility failed to revise Resident #23's refusal to wear a right foot boot while in bed. 2. The facility failed to have a quarterly care plan meeting for Resident #138. These failures could have placed residents at risk for not having their needs met. The findings included: 1. A record review of Resident #23's admission record, dated [DATE] revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses which included type II diabetes [a condition where the body does not make enough insulin, or it does not respond to it effectively. Insulin is a hormone that helps the cells use glucose (sugar) for energy. Symptoms include feeling tired, hungry, or thirsty, and passing more urine] and atherosclerosis of native arteries of right leg ulceration of ankle [a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 19 of 38 residents (Residents #2, #6, #10, #12, #15, #16, #17, #19, #21, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #35, #39, #40, and #138) reviewed for pharmacy services, in that; 1. Resident #2 was administered a diabetic medication 24 minutes late by RN E on 09/13/2023. 2. Resident #6 was administered injectable insulin 1 hour and 23 minutes late by LVN D on 09/13/2023. 3. Resident #10 was administered 3 drugs, a blood thinner medication, a probiotic, and breathing treatment medication, 32 minutes late, by RN E on 09/13/2023. 4. Resident #12 was administered a stool softener medication 47 minutes late, by LVN D on 09/13/2023. 5. Resident #15 was administered 6 medications, a gastro-esophageal reflux medication, a vitamin, 2 pain relief medications,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5%, for 32 medication administration opportunities with 7 errors resulting in a 21.88% medication error rate, for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #10 and #26) and 2 of 2 staff Nurses (LVN D and RN E) reviewed for medication pharmacy services, in that: 1. LVN D administered 4 late medications to Resident #26. 2. RN E administered 3 late medications to Resident #10. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings include: 1. A record review of Resident #26's admission record dated 09/15/2023 revealed an admission date of 07/20/2023 with diagnoses which included hypertension [high blood pressure], constipation, glaucoma [a serious eye disease that can damage the optic nerve and cause vision loss or blindness], and polyneuropathy [a condition in which multiple peripheral nerves are damaged]. A record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for 1 of 1 medication rooms and 1 of 38 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for medication storage, in that: 1. LVN F failed to store unadministered medications for Resident #40. 2. The facility failed to secure the medication storage room. These failures could place residents at risk for misappropriation of property and harm by not receiving the therapeutic effects of the medications prescribed by the physician. The findings included: 1. During an observation on 09/11/2023 at 09:03 AM revealed the facility sole medication storage room door was ajar and unsecured. Further observations revealed the room to be unsupervised and unattended. During an observation and interview on 09/11/2023 at 09:15 AM LVN D stated she and LVN F were the nurses on duty and the only staff with keys to the medication storage room. LVN D stated the room was unlocked and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to take actions aimed at performance improvement and, after implementing those actions, measure its success, and track performance to ensure that improvements are realized and sustained for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for QAPI performance improvements, in that; The facility failed to develop quality improvement measures and or interventions after recognizing a failure to have the resident's physician address the pharmacists monthly drug regiment review recommendations. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by not receiving the benefits of the physician and the pharmacist's review. The findings included: Record review of documents titled Consultant Pharmacist's Monthly Report for [The Facility], dated June 18 & 19, 2023; July 23 & 24, 2023; and August 20 & 21, 2023 reflected the pharmacist had made medication regimen review recommendations for the residents' physician to review. The record review revealed 33 residents of the 33 sampled had no interventions to support the pharmacist recommendations. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the event, if the events result in serious bodily injury, or no later than 24 hours if the events and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with state law through established procedures for 1 of 8 (Resident #20) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that: The facility failed to report an allegation of neglect to the State Survey Agency within 24 hours of being made by Resident #20. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of allegations not fully being investigated, and abuse, neglect, misappropriation, or exploitation. The findings included: Record review of Resident #20's Face Sheet dated 9/15/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old resident admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for care plans, in that. The facility failed to develop a care plan to support Resident #3's need for a spinal cord stimulator. These failures could have placed residents at risk for not having their needs met. The findings included: A record review of Resident #3's admission record, dated 05/15/2023, revealed an admission date of 08/18/2023, with diagnoses which included post-laminectomy status [after a surgery to fuse some spinal vertebrae], chronic pain, and the presence of neurostimulator [a device which stimulates nerves]. A record review of Resident #3's admission MDS assessment, dated 08/24/2023, revealed Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old female…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 1 day (08/20/2023) of 90 days reviewed for nursing services, in that: The facility failed to have a registered nurse working on Sunday 08/20/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by denying residents the advanced nursing skill level a registered nurse is supposed to provide. The findings included: A record review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool dated 08/08/2023 revealed the facility's average daily census was projected to be 30-50, with an average of residents who have specialized care needs: 14 who need oxygen therapy, 1-3 residents who need a BiPaP / CPaP [BiPAP and CPAP machines have a lot in common. They both deliver positive air pressure (PAP) via a tabletop device connected to a tube and a mask], 1-7 residents who have behavioral health needs, 2-5 residents who need injectable medications, and an average of 7 residents who have hospice care needs. A record review of the facility census…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$32,094 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $16,448 — penalty dated 2024-10-18
  • $15,646 — penalty dated 2024-09-09
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-21 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LUCHENBACH, JAYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR50%since 05/01/2023
MONKHOUSE, MARYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR9%since 05/01/2023
PERRY, CHASEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL9%since 01/01/2013
PERRY, JANEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF33%since 01/01/2013
KOTHMANN, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/27/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 43%Medicare 8%Other / private 49%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,172per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675740. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next