Avir at Granbury

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 49.1 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. When Resident #1 obtained a skin tear on 05/17/24 that reopened on 05/25/24, the facility failed to obtain treatment orders and provide wound care treatment. After the wound reopened on 5/25/24, the facility did not provide wound care until 5/30/34 when a family member changed the dressing. On 06/01/24 maggots were found in the wound and dressing. The facility did not obtain treatment orders until 06/02/24. An IJ was identified on 06/07/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:13 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 06/08/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures could place residents at risk of pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, diminished quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. When Resident #1 obtained a skin tear on 05/17/24 that reopened on 05/25/24, the facility failed to obtain treatment orders and provide wound care treatment. After the wound reopened on 5/25/24, the facility did not provide wound care until 5/30/24 when a family member changed the dressing. On 06/01/24 maggots were found in the wound and dressing. The facility did not obtain treatment orders until 06/02/24. An IJ was identified on 06/07/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:13 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 06/08/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 6 of 6 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. For Resident #1, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs with measurable objectives in the focus areas of decreased functional abilities r/t impaired cognition and impaired mobility, resistive to care at times r/t new to nursing facility and adjustment to nursing facility, impaired daily decisions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability was performed prior to admission for 1 of 4 (Resident #3) reviewed for PASRR, in that: The facility admitted Resident #3, whose admission was a Pre-admission category and who had a suspicion of mental illness, prior to receiving the required PASRR II evaluation assessment and PASRR determination. This failure could affect all new residents admitted into the facility as a Preadmission with a mental condition at risk for inappropriate admissions and the inability to be evaluated and receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs.Findings included:Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 04/21/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, with an original admission date into the facility of 02/27/2026. Resident #3 was most recent admission date was 04/10/2026. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the use of the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 1 of 1((11/01/2025,11/02/2025,11/08/2025,11/29/2025, and 11/30/2025) month reviewed for RN coverage.The facility failed to provide evidence that a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 5 of 30 days (11/01/2025,11/02/2025,11/08/2025,11/29/2025, and 11/30/2025).This failure could place residents at risk of not having decisions made, that would have required an RN to make in the management of the residents' healthcare needs and in managing and monitoring the direct care staff. Findings include:Record review of the facility's RN nursing schedule for the month of November 2025 revealed there was no evidence of 8 hour RN coverage on 11/01/2025,11/02/2025,11/08/2025,11/29/2025, and 11/30/2025. During an interview on 12/05/2025 at 2:15 PM, the DON stated she started working as the interim DON on 9/18/2025. The DON stated she could not cover every shift with RN coverage. The DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 (Resident #32, Resident #25, Resident #21, and Resident #39) of 18 Residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure MDS dated [DATE] reflected the use of oxygen for Resident #32. The facility failed to ensure MDS dated [DATE] reflected hospice services for Resident #25. The facility failed to ensure MDS dated [DATE] reflected hospice services for Resident #21. The facility failed to ensure MDS dated [DATE], reflected the use of anti-anxiety medications for Resident #39. This failure could residents at risk of inaccurate assessments and not receiving appropriate care according to their status. Findings include: Resident #32 Review of Resident #32's electronic face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: fusion of spine (surgery to fuse spine),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and to permit only authorized personnel to have access to 2 (West Hall medication cart and East Hall medication cart) of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the [NAME] Hall and East Hall medication carts, with prescription medications and biologicals, were secured while unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to lack of potency of supplies, medications/biologicals or misappropriation of medications, or drug diversions. The findings included: During an observation on 06.02.2025 at 10:01 AM, the [NAME] Hall Medication cart had prescription heart medications (amiodarone, amlodipine, metoprolol), prescription depression medications (trazodone), prescription diuretics (metolazone), prescription antinausea (meclizine, ondansetron), prescription diabetes medications (glucagon, insulin), prescription inhalation medications (albuterol, ipratropium bromide, budesonide),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure that spoiled food items were disposed of properly. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods were labeled properly. 3. The facility failed to ensure that food items were disposed of properly. 4. The facility failed to ensure cans that were dented were removed from food storage. 5. The facility failed to ensure staff wore beard and hair coverings, that secured all hair. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 06/02/2025 between 9:30 AM and 9:50 AM of the kitchen revealed Dietary Aide was wearing a hair net that failed to have all hair covered, and dietary aide was not wearing a beard covering over his beard. The Dietary Aide stated he was new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0849 — pattern
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician and others participating in the provision of care for 3 (Resident #8, Resident #25, and Resident #40) of 18 residents reviewed for hospice services. 1. The facility failed to maintain required hospice forms and documentation, that included certificate of terminal illness to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hours per day to ensure Resident #8, Resident #25, and Resident #40 received adequate end-of-life care. 2. The facility failed to have a communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hours per day and to have a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free from chemical restraints not required to treat the residents' medical symptoms for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #39) of 18 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's PRN Lorazepam (medicine used to treat the symptoms of anxiety) was discontinued after 14 days or document a rationale for the continued provision of the medication. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's PRN Hydroxyzine (medicine used to treat the symptoms of anxiety) was discontinued after 14 days or document a rationale for the continued provision of the medication. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse reactions and negative side effects from the administration of medication and dependence on unnecessary medications. Findings included: Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided respiratory care received care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #32) and 1 of 1 oxygen storage room reviewed for oxygen administration. 1. The facility failed to post No Smoking sign in resident doorway for Resident #32 on 06/02/2025 & 06/03/2025 who used oxygen. 2. The facility failed to post No Smoking sign on doorway for room that oxygen was stored on 06/02/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of people not being notified of no smoking in oxygen storage or oxygen in use and prohibit smoking in any room, ward, or compartment where oxygen was in use or stored. Findings included: Resident #32 Record review of Resident #32's electronic face sheet dated 06/03/2025 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: fusion of spine (surgery to fuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 (Resident #5) of 110 residents tested for nutritive value, flavor, and appearance: The facility failed to provide palatable food served that was palatable and attractive to Residents #5, during lunch on 06/02/2025. Resident #5 received gravy on his hamburger patty. This failure could affect the residents who ate food from the facility kitchen by placing them at risk of poor food intake and/or dissatisfaction of the meals served. The findings included: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 06/04/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Heart failure, high blood pressure, renal failure and type 2 diabetes. Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, Section C- Cognitive Patterns revealed Resident #5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$66,367 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $66,367 — penalty dated 2024-05-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX